Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Assessing Privacy Policies with AI: Ethical, Legal, and Technical Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.08381 v1 pith:DPZJDVT3 submitted 2024-10-10 cs.CY

Assessing Privacy Policies with AI: Ethical, Legal, and Technical Challenges

classification cs.CY
keywords policiesprivacyusersassessdatapracticeschallengesenabling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The growing use of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) like OpenAI's GPT series, leads to disruptive changes across organizations. At the same time, there is a growing concern about how organizations handle personal data. Thus, privacy policies are essential for transparency in data processing practices, enabling users to assess privacy risks. However, these policies are often long and complex. This might lead to user confusion and consent fatigue, where users accept data practices against their interests, and abusive or unfair practices might go unnoticed. LLMss can be used to assess privacy policies for users automatically. In this interdisciplinary work, we explore the challenges of this approach in three pillars, namely technical feasibility, ethical implications, and legal compatibility of using LLMs to assess privacy policies. Our findings aim to identify potential for future research, and to foster a discussion on the use of LLM technologies for enabling users to fulfil their important role as decision-makers in a constantly developing AI-driven digital economy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Disclosure Divergence: Measuring Privacy Policy and Data Safety Misalignment at Scale

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Privacy policies and Google Play Data Safety labels disagree for about one in three data-category disclosures across 6,051 apps, with sharing and sensitive categories the most affected.

  2. Bridging the Disciplinary Gap in Explainable AI: From Abstract Desiderata to Concrete Tasks

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The authors introduce a taxonomy with target, functional role, and mode of justification axes plus a framework that decomposes abstract XAI desiderata into concrete benchmarkable tasks via identified dependency structures.