REVIEW 2 cited by
Coverage-based Scene Fuzzing for Virtual Autonomous Driving Testing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Simulation-based virtual testing has become an essential step to ensure the safety of autonomous driving systems. Testers need to handcraft the virtual driving scenes and configure various environmental settings like surrounding traffic, weather conditions, etc. Due to the huge amount of configuration possibilities, the human efforts are subject to the inefficiency in detecting flaws in industry-class autonomous driving system. This paper proposes a coverage-driven fuzzing technique to automatically generate diverse configuration parameters to form new driving scenes. Experimental results show that our fuzzing method can significantly reduce the cost in deriving new risky scenes from the initial setup designed by testers. We expect automated fuzzing will become a common practice in virtual testing for autonomous driving systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SAFLITE: Fuzzing Autonomous Systems via Large Language Models
An LLM-based test-case relevance scorer, SaFliTe, increases the number of collision and policy-violation test cases found by several drone fuzzing tools.
-
SimADFuzz: Simulation-Feedback Fuzz Testing for Autonomous Driving Systems
SimADFuzz combines transformer-based violation-risk scoring with distance-guided mutation and reports more detected violations than three baseline fuzzers in CARLA simulations of the InterFuser agent.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.