pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27870 · v1 · pith:DR5DCIMEnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · 🪐 quant-ph

Standard-quantum-limit-surpassing vector polarimetry using Rydberg atoms in an SU(1,1) interferometer

Weiqiang Guan , Yuetao Chen , Jun Zhou , Keyi Li , Yu Huang , Shaoyan Gao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 04:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords Rydberg atomsvector polarimetrySU(1,1) interferometerstandard quantum limitRF electric fieldquantum sensinghomodyne detectionpolarization measurement
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rydberg atoms in an SU(1,1) interferometer measure RF polarization angles with sensitivity surpassing the SQL.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out a theoretical framework for high-sensitivity vector polarimetry of weak RF electric fields that places a Rydberg atom inside an SU(1,1) interferometer. A static magnetic field produces unequal coupling strengths between the atom's Zeeman sublevels and the two polarization components of the RF field, so the polarization angles appear directly in the atomic absorption index recovered by homodyne detection. The authors calculate the resulting angular sensitivities and the associated standard quantum limit, then show that both dual coherent states and coherent-plus-squeezed-vacuum inputs yield sensitivities that beat the SQL over broad angular ranges. Optimal performance reaches below 10^{-6} degree while values better than 10^{-3} degree are maintained across most of the domain. The work supplies a concrete route to precision direction sensing in Rydberg-atom quantum sensors.

Core claim

Under a static magnetic field the asymmetry in Zeeman-sublevel coupling lets the Rydberg atom's absorption index encode the polarization angles of an incident RF field; when this index is read out by homodyne detection inside an SU(1,1) interferometer the angular sensitivity exceeds the standard quantum limit for either dual coherent or coherent-plus-squeezed-vacuum inputs, with the best value falling below 10^{-6} degree.

What carries the argument

The SU(1,1) interferometer that amplifies the homodyne signal from the Rydberg atom's absorption index, whose value is set by the asymmetric Zeeman coupling to RF polarization components.

Load-bearing premise

The asymmetry in coupling between the Zeeman sublevels of the Rydberg atom and the RF field's polarization components under a static magnetic field enables polarization angles to be determined from the atomic absorption index.

What would settle it

An experiment that records polarization-angle sensitivity no better than the calculated SQL for the same input states over the same angular range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27870 by Jun Zhou, Keyi Li, Shaoyan Gao, Weiqiang Guan, Yuetao Chen, Yu Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of absorptive measurement with dispersion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the RAP. The probe mode, corresponding to input mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) shows the absorption index ϵ as a func￾tion of θa and θp under the chosen parameters. For any fixed θp, ϵ varies monotonically with θa over the inter￾val [0, π/2]. Moreover, ϵ is periodic in θa with period π, and its behavior on [π/2, π] mirrors that on [0, π/2] with respect to θa = π/2. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Rotation of the polarization vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Optimal polarization angle sensitivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Optimal sensitivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Vector polarimetry is an important application frontier for Rydberg-atom-based sensing. While prior research has largely concentrated on developing novel measurement schemes, high-sensitivity vector polarimetry remains an open question. Here we propose a theoretical framework for high-sensitivity detection of radio-frequency (RF) electric field polarization direction, which is particularly suitable for weak-field detection. Under a static magnetic field, the asymmetry in coupling between the Zeeman sublevels of the Rydberg atom and the RF field's polarization components enables the polarization angles to be determined from the atomic absorption index, which is retrieved via homodyne detection by incorporating the Rydberg atom system into an SU(1,1) interferometer. We derive the sensitivity of the polarization angles along with the corresponding standard quantum limit (SQL) and quantum Cram\'{e}r--Rao bound (QCRB). Our results demonstrate a sensitivity surpassing the SQL across wide angular ranges using either dual coherent states or a coherent state combined with a squeezed vacuum state as input. Significantly, the optimal sensitivity reaches below \SI{e-6}{\degree}, with sensitivities better than \SI{e-3}{\degree} maintained over most of the angular domain. This work establishes a foundation for high-precision vector polarimetry, thereby advancing the development of Rydberg-atom-based quantum sensing and contributing to a deeper understanding of light--matter interactions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a theoretical framework for high-sensitivity vector polarimetry of weak RF electric fields using Rydberg atoms placed inside an SU(1,1) interferometer. A static magnetic field induces asymmetry in the coupling of Zeeman sublevels to the RF polarization components, allowing the two polarization angles to be recovered from the atomic absorption index, which is measured by homodyne detection. Sensitivities and the corresponding SQL and QCRB are derived for inputs consisting of dual coherent states or a coherent state plus squeezed vacuum; the results show SQL-beating over wide angular ranges, with optimal sensitivity below 10^{-6}° and values better than 10^{-3}° over most of the domain.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work provides a concrete route to sub-SQL vector polarimetry with Rydberg atoms, extending existing scalar sensing techniques to polarization direction. The explicit comparison to both SQL and QCRB, together with the use of an SU(1,1) interferometer to reach sensitivities below 10^{-6}°, constitutes a useful addition to the quantum-sensing literature.

major comments (1)
  1. [Framework and sensitivity derivation] The central claim that polarization angles can be determined from the absorption index rests on the mapping being locally invertible. The manuscript should explicitly show in the derivation of the absorption index (around the framework section following the abstract) that ∂(absorption index)/∂θ never vanishes inside the reported angular domain; without this, the local sensitivity and the SQL/QCRB comparisons become undefined at stationary points.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §2] The abstract states that sensitivities and bounds are derived, yet the main text should include at least one explicit expression for the absorption index as a function of the two angles before the sensitivity formulas are presented.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should state the precise input states (coherent amplitudes, squeezing parameter) used for each plotted curve to allow direct comparison with the analytic expressions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation and the constructive comment on ensuring local invertibility. We address the point below and will incorporate the requested verification in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Framework and sensitivity derivation] The central claim that polarization angles can be determined from the absorption index rests on the mapping being locally invertible. The manuscript should explicitly show in the derivation of the absorption index (around the framework section following the abstract) that ∂(absorption index)/∂θ never vanishes inside the reported angular domain; without this, the local sensitivity and the SQL/QCRB comparisons become undefined at stationary points.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit check is required to confirm the mapping is locally invertible everywhere in the reported domain. The absorption index is derived from the imaginary part of the atomic susceptibility under the static magnetic field, which breaks the symmetry between Zeeman sublevels and produces an angle-dependent response. In the revised manuscript we will add, immediately after the absorption-index derivation, an analytic evaluation (or numerical confirmation over a dense grid) of both partial derivatives showing they remain strictly non-zero throughout the angular ranges where sensitivities are claimed. This addition will be placed in the framework section and will also note any isolated boundary points where the derivative approaches zero (if any) and confirm they lie outside the domain of interest. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation self-contained from quantum optics principles

full rationale

The provided abstract and framework description present a theoretical derivation of polarization-angle sensitivity from the atomic absorption index via homodyne detection in an SU(1,1) interferometer, relying on the stated Zeeman-sublevel asymmetry under static B-field. No equations, self-citations, or claims are visible that reduce any 'prediction' or sensitivity result to a fitted input, self-definition, or load-bearing prior result by the same authors. The central claims (SQL surpassing, sub-10^{-6}° sensitivity) are positioned as derived quantities rather than tautological renamings or constructions, making the chain independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum-optics assumptions plus one domain-specific modeling choice; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and quantum optics govern the atom-light interaction and interferometer dynamics.
    Invoked throughout the derivation of sensitivity and QCRB.
  • domain assumption A static magnetic field produces Zeeman splitting that creates asymmetric coupling to RF polarization components.
    Stated as the enabling physical mechanism in the framework paragraph.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5791 in / 1356 out tokens · 23520 ms · 2026-06-29T04:35:54.535641+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    ˆU1 and⟨·⟩is the average value under the state ˆS(ξ1)|ψin⟩|0ν⟩. Substituting the explicit expression ofU 1 and simplifying yields the QFI in the compact form: Fj(θj) = 4T 2 1 1−T 2 1 ⟨ ˆMi⟩ × ∂ϵ ∂θj 2 ,(9) where ˆMi = ˆa† 2ˆa2 (withi=c, qdenotes different input configuration), whose expectation values are taken with respect to the states ˆS(ξ1)|ψin⟩|0ν⟩. ...

  2. [2]

    Con- sequently , the electric field can be expressed as ERF =E RF (cosθ a sinθ p ˆx+ sinθ a sinθ p ˆy+ cosθ p ˆz) =E RF +1X q=−1 αqϵq = +1X q=−1 E(q) RF , (18) 5 FIG

    In this basis, ϵ0 represents theπ-polarized unit vector driving∆m= 0 transitions, whileϵ ±1 correspond to theσ ±-circularly po- larized unit vectors driving∆m=±1transitions. Con- sequently , the electric field can be expressed as ERF =E RF (cosθ a sinθ p ˆx+ sinθ a sinθ p ˆy+ cosθ p ˆz) =E RF +1X q=−1 αqϵq = +1X q=−1 E(q) RF , (18) 5 FIG. 2. (a) Schematic...

  3. [3]

    in this case, the estimates ofθ p andθ a are decoupled, and their errors do not affect one another

    In contrast, Method (ii) re- quires two separate rotations, enabling two independent single-parameter estimations. in this case, the estimates ofθ p andθ a are decoupled, and their errors do not affect one another. Both methods require at least two measure- ments to determine the two angles. In the subsequent sensitivity analysis, we adopt Method (ii) as ...

  4. [4]

    Rydberg atoms cambridge monographs on atomic, molecular and chemical physic.Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 1994

    TF Gallaghar. Rydberg atoms cambridge monographs on atomic, molecular and chemical physic.Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 1994

    1994

  5. [5]

    Rydberg atom quantum technologies.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 53(1):012002, dec 2019

    C S Adams, J D Pritchard, and J P Shaffer. Rydberg atom quantum technologies.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 53(1):012002, dec 2019

    2019

  6. [6]

    Gordon, Christopher L

    Joshua A. Gordon, Christopher L. Holloway , Steve Jef- ferts, and Tom Heavner. Quantum-based si traceable electric-field probe. In2010 IEEE International Sympo- sium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pages 321–324, 2010

    2010

  7. [7]

    Holloway , Joshua A

    Christopher L. Holloway , Joshua A. Gordon, Steven Jefferts, Andrew Schwarzkopf, David A. Anderson, Stephanie A. Miller, Nithiwadee Thaicharoen, and Georg Raithel. Broadband rydberg atom-based electric-field probe for si-traceable, self-calibrated measurements.IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 62(12):6169– 6182, 2014

    2014

  8. [8]

    Microwave electrometry with rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances.Nature physics, 8(11):819–824, 2012

    Jonathon A Sedlacek, Arne Schwettmann, Harald K ¨ubler, Robert L¨ow, Tilman Pfau, and James P Shaffer. Microwave electrometry with rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances.Nature physics, 8(11):819–824, 2012

    2012

  9. [9]

    Simons, Abdulaziz H

    Matthew T. Simons, Abdulaziz H. Haddab, Joshua A. Gor- don, and Christopher L. Holloway . A rydberg atom-based mixer: Measuring the phase of a radio frequency wave. Applied Physics Letters, 114(11):114101, 03 2019

    2019

  10. [10]

    Anderson, R.E

    D.A. Anderson, R.E. Sapiro, L.F. Gonc ¸alves, R. Cardman, and G. Raithel. Optical radio-frequency phase measure- ment with an internal-state rydberg atom interferometer. Phys. Rev. Appl., 17:044020, Apr 2022

    2022

  11. [11]

    Transfer phase of microwave to beat amplitude in a rydberg atom-based mixer by zeeman modulation.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 54(16):165501, 2021

    Feng-Dong Jia, Huai-Yu Zhang, Xiu-Bin Liu, Jiong Mei, Yong-Hong Yu, Zhao-Qing Lin, Hai-Yue Dong, Ya Liu, Jian Zhang, Feng Xie, et al. Transfer phase of microwave to beat amplitude in a rydberg atom-based mixer by zeeman modulation.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 54(16):165501, 2021

    2021

  12. [12]

    An all-optical phase detector by amplitude modulation of the local field in a rydberg atom- based mixer.Chinese Physics B, 31(9):090703, 2022

    Xiu-Bin Liu, Feng-Dong Jia, Huai-Yu Zhang, Jiong Mei, Wei-Chen Liang, Fei Zhou, Yong-Hong Yu, Ya Liu, Jian Zhang, Feng Xie, et al. An all-optical phase detector by amplitude modulation of the local field in a rydberg atom- based mixer.Chinese Physics B, 31(9):090703, 2022

    2022

  13. [13]

    Quadrupole interaction- based detection of oam microwaves using rydberg atoms

    Zheyuan Wang and Chao Zhang. Quadrupole interaction- based detection of oam microwaves using rydberg atoms. IEEE MICROWAVE AND WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY LET - TERS, 2025

    2025

  14. [14]

    Rydberg atom-based oam-fdm integration for high-capacity microwave com- munications.IEEE Microwave and Wireless T echnology Let- ters, 2026

    Zheyuan Wang and Chao Zhang. Rydberg atom-based oam-fdm integration for high-capacity microwave com- munications.IEEE Microwave and Wireless T echnology Let- ters, 2026

    2026

  15. [15]

    Precise measurement of microwave polar- ization using a rydberg atom-based mixer.Optics Express, 31(6):10449–10457, 2023

    Yuhan Wang, Fengdong Jia, Jianhai Hao, Yue Cui, Fei Zhou, Xiubin Liu, Jiong Mei, Yonghong Yu, Ya Liu, Jian Zhang, et al. Precise measurement of microwave polar- ization using a rydberg atom-based mixer.Optics Express, 31(6):10449–10457, 2023

    2023

  16. [16]

    Measurement of microwave polarization us- ing two polarization orthogonal local microwave electric fields in a rydberg atom-based mixer.Optics Express, 32(22):38372–38383, 2024

    Weibo Yin, Jianan Zhang, Fengdong Jia, Yuhan Wang, Yuxiang Wang, Jianhai Hao, Yue Cui, Ya Liu, and Zhip- ing Zhong. Measurement of microwave polarization us- ing two polarization orthogonal local microwave electric fields in a rydberg atom-based mixer.Optics Express, 32(22):38372–38383, 2024

    2024

  17. [17]

    Complete three-dimensional vector polarimetry with a rydberg-atom rf electrometer.Physical Review Applied, 22(6):064012, 2024

    Peter K Elgee, Kevin C Cox, Joshua C Hill, Paul D Kunz, and David H Meyer. Complete three-dimensional vector polarimetry with a rydberg-atom rf electrometer.Physical Review Applied, 22(6):064012, 2024

    2024

  18. [18]

    Atom-based vector microwave electrometry using ru- bidium rydberg atoms in a vapor cell.Physical review let- ters, 111(6):063001, 2013

    JA Sedlacek, A Schwettmann, Harald K¨ubler, and JP Shaf- fer. Atom-based vector microwave electrometry using ru- bidium rydberg atoms in a vapor cell.Physical review let- ters, 111(6):063001, 2013

    2013

  19. [19]

    Atom- based radio-frequency field calibration and polarization measurement using cesium n dj floquet states.Physical Review Applied, 8(1):014028, 2017

    Yuechun Jiao, Liping Hao, Xiaoxuan Han, Suying Bai, Georg Raithel, Jianming Zhao, and Suotang Jia. Atom- based radio-frequency field calibration and polarization measurement using cesium n dj floquet states.Physical Review Applied, 8(1):014028, 2017

    2017

  20. [20]

    A vapor-cell atomic sensor for radio-frequency field detec- tion using a polarization-selective field enhancement res- onator.Applied Physics Letters, 113(7), 2018

    David A Anderson, Eric G Paradis, and Georg Raithel. A vapor-cell atomic sensor for radio-frequency field detec- tion using a polarization-selective field enhancement res- onator.Applied Physics Letters, 113(7), 2018

    2018

  21. [21]

    Polarization-Aware DoA Detection Relying on a Single Rydberg Atomic Receiver

    Yuanbin Chen, Chau Yuen, Darmindra Arumugam, Chong Meng Samson See, M´erouane Debbah, and Lajos Hanzo. Polarization-aware doa detection relying on a single ry- dberg atomic receiver.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.17179, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Ryd- berg states of alkali atoms in atomic vapour as si-traceable field probes and communications receivers.Nature Re- views Physics, 6(10):606–620, 2024

    Noah Schlossberger, Nikunjkumar Prajapati, Samuel Berweger, Andrew P Rotunno, Alexandra B Artusio- Glimpse, Matthew T Simons, Abrar A Sheikh, Eric B Nor- rgard, Stephen P Eckel, and Christopher L Holloway . Ryd- berg states of alkali atoms in atomic vapour as si-traceable field probes and communications receivers.Nature Re- views Physics, 6(10):606–620, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    Quantum sensing of microwave electric fields based on rydberg atoms.Reports on Progress in Physics, 86(10):106001, 2023

    Jinpeng Yuan, Wenguang Yang, Mingyong Jing, Hao Zhang, Yuechun Jiao, Weibin Li, Linjie Zhang, Liantuan Xiao, and Suotang Jia. Quantum sensing of microwave electric fields based on rydberg atoms.Reports on Progress in Physics, 86(10):106001, 2023

    2023

  24. [24]

    Atomic super- heterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed rydberg spectroscopy .Nature Physics, 16(9):911–915, 2020

    Mingyong Jing, Ying Hu, Jie Ma, Hao Zhang, Linjie Zhang, Liantuan Xiao, and Suotang Jia. Atomic super- heterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed rydberg spectroscopy .Nature Physics, 16(9):911–915, 2020

    2020

  25. [25]

    Enhancement of electromagnetically induced transparency based rydberg- atom electrometry through population repumping.Ap- 12 plied Physics Letters, 119(21), 2021

    Nikunjkumar Prajapati, Amy K Robinson, Samuel Berweger, Matthew T Simons, Alexandra B Artusio- Glimpse, and Christopher L Holloway . Enhancement of electromagnetically induced transparency based rydberg- atom electrometry through population repumping.Ap- 12 plied Physics Letters, 119(21), 2021

    2021

  26. [26]

    Enhanced metrology at the critical point of a many-body rydberg atomic system.Nature Physics, 18(12):1447–1452, 2022

    Dong-Sheng Ding, Zong-Kai Liu, Bao-Sen Shi, Guang-Can Guo, Klaus Mølmer, and Charles S Adams. Enhanced metrology at the critical point of a many-body rydberg atomic system.Nature Physics, 18(12):1447–1452, 2022

    2022

  27. [27]

    Nonlinearity-enhanced continuous microwave detection based on stochastic resonance.Science Advances, 10(41):eado8130, 2024

    Kang-Da Wu, Chongwu Xie, Chuan-Feng Li, Guang- Can Guo, Chang-Ling Zou, and Guo-Yong Xiang. Nonlinearity-enhanced continuous microwave detection based on stochastic resonance.Science Advances, 10(41):eado8130, 2024

    2024

  28. [28]

    Cavity-enhanced optical bistability of rydberg atoms.Optics Letters, 48(11):2865–2868, 2023

    Qinxia Wang, Zhihui Wang, Yanxin Liu, Shijun Guan, Jun He, Chang-Ling Zou, Pengfei Zhang, Gang Li, and Tian- cai Zhang. Cavity-enhanced optical bistability of rydberg atoms.Optics Letters, 48(11):2865–2868, 2023

    2023

  29. [29]

    Qinxia Wang, Yukang Liang, Zhihui Wang, Shijun Guan, Pengfei Yang, Pengfei Zhang, Gang Li, and Tiancai Zhang. High-precision measurement of microwave electric field by cavity-enhanced critical behavior in a many-body ryd- berg atomic system.Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 68(6):1–6, 2025

    2025

  30. [30]

    Approaching the standard quantum limit of a rydberg-atom microwave electrometer, 2023

    Tu Haitao, Liao Kaiyu, He Guodong, et al. Approaching the standard quantum limit of a rydberg-atom microwave electrometer, 2023

    2023

  31. [31]

    Quantum-enhanced electrometer based on microwave-dressed rydberg atoms.Phys

    Shuhe Wu, Dong Zhang, Zhengchun Li, Minwei Shi, Peiyu Yang, Jinxian Guo, Wei Du, Guzhi Bao, and Weip- ing Zhang. Quantum-enhanced electrometer based on microwave-dressed rydberg atoms.Phys. Rev. Appl., 20:064028, Dec 2023

    2023

  32. [32]

    Theo- retical analysis of an electrometer based on microwave- dressed rydberg atoms using a quantum interferometer

    Dong Zhang, Minwei Shi, Ding Huang, Yiquan Yang, Wei Du, Shuhe Wu, Guzhi Bao, and Weiping Zhang. Theo- retical analysis of an electrometer based on microwave- dressed rydberg atoms using a quantum interferometer. Optics Express, 33(3):5253–5261, 2025

    2025

  33. [33]

    Distributed quantum sensing in a continuous- variable entangled network.Nature Physics, 16(3):281– 284, 2020

    Xueshi Guo, Casper R Breum, Johannes Borregaard, Shuro Izumi, Mikkel V Larsen, Tobias Gehring, Matthias Christandl, Jonas S Neergaard-Nielsen, and Ulrik L An- dersen. Distributed quantum sensing in a continuous- variable entangled network.Nature Physics, 16(3):281– 284, 2020

    2020

  34. [34]

    Advances in quantum metrology .Nature photonics, 5(4):222–229, 2011

    Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone. Advances in quantum metrology .Nature photonics, 5(4):222–229, 2011

    2011

  35. [35]

    Quantum fisher information for density matri- ces with arbitrary ranks.Communications in Theoretical Physics, 61(1):45, 2014

    Jing Liu, Xiao-Xing Jing, Wei Zhong, and Xiao-Guang Wang. Quantum fisher information for density matri- ces with arbitrary ranks.Communications in Theoretical Physics, 61(1):45, 2014

    2014

  36. [36]

    Estima- tion of imbert-fedorov shifts based on su (1, 1) interfer- ometer breaking through the shot-noise limit.Physical Review A, 111(6):062615, 2025

    Yuetao Chen, Jing Wang, Qiang Ma, Gaiqing Chen, Meng- meng Luo, Shoukang Chang, and Shaoyan Gao. Estima- tion of imbert-fedorov shifts based on su (1, 1) interfer- ometer breaking through the shot-noise limit.Physical Review A, 111(6):062615, 2025

    2025

  37. [37]

    Multi-parameter quantum metrology .Ad- vances in Physics: X, 1(4):621–639, 2016

    Magdalena Szczykulska, Tillmann Baumgratz, and Ani- mesh Datta. Multi-parameter quantum metrology .Ad- vances in Physics: X, 1(4):621–639, 2016

    2016

  38. [38]

    Holevo cram\’{e}r-rao bound for multi-parameter estimation in nonlinear inter- ferometers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.02855, 2025

    Mengyao Zhou, Hongmei Ma, Liqing Chen, Weiping Zhang, and Chun-Hua Yuan. Holevo cram\’{e}r-rao bound for multi-parameter estimation in nonlinear inter- ferometers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.02855, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Overcoming quantum metrology singularity through sequential measurements.Physical Review Letters, 135(1):010401, 2025

    Yaoling Yang, Victor Montenegro, and Abolfazl Bayat. Overcoming quantum metrology singularity through sequential measurements.Physical Review Letters, 135(1):010401, 2025

    2025

  40. [40]

    Polarization-insensitive microwave electrometry using ry- dberg atoms.Physical review applied, 21(4):044025, 2024

    Matthew Cloutman, Matthew Chilcott, Alexander Elliott, J Susanne Otto, Amita B Deb, and Niels Kjærgaard. Polarization-insensitive microwave electrometry using ry- dberg atoms.Physical review applied, 21(4):044025, 2024

    2024

  41. [41]

    Quantum and atom optics

    Daniel A Steck. Quantum and atom optics. 2007

    2007

  42. [42]

    Cesium d line data

    Daniel A Steck. Cesium d line data. 2003

    2003

  43. [43]

    Arc 3.0: An expanded python toolbox for atomic physics calculations.Computer Physics Communications, 261:107814, 2021

    Elizabeth J Robertson, Nikola ˇSibali´c, Robert M Potvliege, and Matthew PA Jones. Arc 3.0: An expanded python toolbox for atomic physics calculations.Computer Physics Communications, 261:107814, 2021

    2021