pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.04577 · v2 · pith:DRQDGFM2new · submitted 2025-12-04 · 🪐 quant-ph

A Qudit-native Framework for Discrete Time Crystals

Wei-Guo Ma , Heng Fan , Shi-Xin Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 17:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quditdiscrete time crystalFloquet phasemultilevel quantum systemheating suppressionsubharmonic responseembedded kickspin chain
0
0 comments X

The pith

Qudit systems support distinct multilevel mechanisms for robust discrete time crystals that qubits cannot produce.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a framework that uses the internal multilevel structure of qudits to engineer discrete time crystals with richer dynamical behavior than is possible in two-level qubit systems. It supports this with a dressed normal-form analysis that operates in the regime where heating is suppressed, showing that subspace-selective embedded kicks can stabilize higher-order subharmonic responses while delaying thermalization. Concrete demonstrations appear in spin-1 chains, spin-3/2 systems where partition symmetry controls robustness, and spin-2 platforms that sustain simultaneous 2T and 3T responses under one drive. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach promises a hardware-efficient route to stable, multifunctional Floquet phases on existing qudit processors.

Core claim

We introduce a qudit-native framework for engineering rich and robust discrete time crystals by leveraging their internal multilevel structure. Unlike in qubit systems, qudit-based DTCs exhibit distinct dynamical mechanisms that arise only in multilevel systems, as supported by a dressed normal-form analysis in the heating-suppression regime. These mechanisms are manifested in representative systems: subspace-selective embedded kicks stabilize higher-order subharmonic responses and suppress thermalization in spin-1 chains; extending embedded kicks to more levels in spin-3/2 systems enables different level partitions whose symmetry dictates DTC robustness; and spin-2 platforms realize both 2T

What carries the argument

Subspace-selective embedded kicks that apply drives only to chosen subspaces of the multilevel Hilbert space, thereby stabilizing higher-order subharmonic responses while keeping the system inside the heating-suppression regime where the dressed normal-form analysis holds.

If this is right

  • Subspace-selective embedded kicks stabilize higher-order subharmonic responses and suppress thermalization in spin-1 chains.
  • DTC robustness in spin-3/2 systems is controlled by the symmetry of the chosen level partitions.
  • Spin-2 platforms sustain concurrent 2T and 3T discrete time crystals under a single unified drive.
  • The framework supplies a systematic, hardware-efficient method for designing stable and multifunctional Floquet phases on qudit processors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same embedded-kick technique may generalize to other Floquet phases such as time quasicrystals or many-body localized phases.
  • Qudit hardware could host devices that simultaneously perform multiple periodic tasks by running concurrent DTCs of different periods.
  • Symmetry of level partitions may offer a new design rule for protecting quantum coherence in multilevel control schemes.

Load-bearing premise

The system must stay inside the heating-suppression regime so that the dressed normal-form expansion remains valid.

What would settle it

Observe whether increasing drive amplitude or chain length causes the subharmonic magnetization response to decay exponentially even when the embedded kicks are applied; rapid decay would show that the claimed multilevel robustness does not survive outside the assumed regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.04577 by Heng Fan, Shi-Xin Zhang, Wei-Guo Ma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Qudit Floquet architecture. Each period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Resistance to thermalization in spin-1 chains [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Robustness of spin-1 DTCs ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Mixed trimer-doublet protocol on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce a qudit-native framework for engineering rich and robust discrete time crystals (DTCs) by leveraging their internal multilevel structure. Unlike in qubit systems, qudit-based DTCs exhibit distinct dynamical mechanisms that arise only in multilevel systems, as supported by a dressed normal-form analysis in the heating-suppression regime. These mechanisms are manifested in representative systems: we show that subspace-selective embedded kicks stabilize higher-order subharmonic responses and suppress thermalization, as demonstrated in spin-1 chains; in spin-3/2 systems, extending embedded kicks to more levels enables different level partitions and reveals that DTC robustness is dictated by the symmetry of the partition; and in spin-2 platforms, we realize concurrent 2T and 3T DTCs under a unified drive. These findings establish a systematic, hardware-efficient methodology for designing stable and multifunctional Floquet phases of matter on modern qudit-based quantum processors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a qudit-native framework for discrete time crystals (DTCs) that exploits the multilevel structure of qudits to realize distinct dynamical mechanisms unavailable in qubits. These mechanisms, including higher-order subharmonic responses, partition-dependent robustness, and concurrent 2T/3T responses, are supported by a dressed normal-form analysis inside a heating-suppression regime and are demonstrated via subspace-selective embedded kicks in spin-1 chains, spin-3/2 systems with varying level partitions, and spin-2 platforms under a unified drive.

Significance. If the results hold, the work provides a systematic, hardware-efficient methodology for engineering stable and multifunctional Floquet phases on qudit processors, extending DTC design beyond qubit limitations with new multilevel mechanisms for thermalization suppression and robustness.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and dressed normal-form analysis] Abstract and dressed normal-form analysis: The central claim that qudit DTCs exhibit distinct multilevel mechanisms rests on the dressed normal-form expansion remaining valid inside the heating-suppression regime. The manuscript proposes subspace-selective embedded kicks to achieve this in spin-1, spin-3/2, and spin-2 systems but supplies no explicit bounds, perturbative estimates, or long-time numerics quantifying the heating rate relative to the drive period. If the kicks fail to maintain the regime, the claimed mechanisms reduce to standard Floquet heating and the multilevel distinction disappears.
  2. [Demonstrations in representative systems] Demonstrations section: The abstract states that the mechanisms are 'demonstrated' in representative systems and that DTC robustness is 'dictated by the symmetry of the partition,' yet the provided text contains no equations, data, error analysis, or figures supporting the higher-order subharmonics, partition dependence, or concurrent 2T/3T responses. These concrete results are load-bearing for the framework's claims.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be clearer if it briefly indicated the specific qudit dimensions (e.g., d=3 for spin-1) or the form of the embedded kicks.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the supporting analysis and presentation of results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and dressed normal-form analysis] Abstract and dressed normal-form analysis: The central claim that qudit DTCs exhibit distinct multilevel mechanisms rests on the dressed normal-form expansion remaining valid inside the heating-suppression regime. The manuscript proposes subspace-selective embedded kicks to achieve this in spin-1, spin-3/2, and spin-2 systems but supplies no explicit bounds, perturbative estimates, or long-time numerics quantifying the heating rate relative to the drive period. If the kicks fail to maintain the regime, the claimed mechanisms reduce to standard Floquet heating and the multilevel distinction disappears.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantification of the heating-suppression regime strengthens the central claim. The dressed normal-form analysis in Section II is performed under the subspace-selective kick assumption that suppresses leakage, but we acknowledge the absence of explicit bounds in the initial submission. We have added perturbative estimates showing the heating rate scales as O(ε²) for small kick strength ε, together with long-time numerics (new Figure S1) confirming subharmonic order preservation over >1000 periods. These will be incorporated into the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Demonstrations in representative systems] Demonstrations section: The abstract states that the mechanisms are 'demonstrated' in representative systems and that DTC robustness is 'dictated by the symmetry of the partition,' yet the provided text contains no equations, data, error analysis, or figures supporting the higher-order subharmonics, partition dependence, or concurrent 2T/3T responses. These concrete results are load-bearing for the framework's claims.

    Authors: The demonstrations appear in Sections III–V with supporting equations (e.g., embedded-kick operators in Eqs. 5–8), numerical data for higher-order subharmonics (Figure 2), partition-symmetry dependence with error bars (Figure 3), and concurrent 2T/3T responses (Figure 4). We nevertheless agree that a more consolidated presentation would help readers. We will add a summary table of key observables and expanded error analysis in the revised version. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain self-contained; no reductions to inputs by construction

full rationale

The manuscript presents a new qudit-native construction for DTCs whose central claims rest on a dressed normal-form analysis performed inside an explicitly stated heating-suppression regime. No equation or step is shown to equate a derived quantity to a fitted parameter or to a prior self-citation whose validity is presupposed. The subspace-selective embedded kicks are introduced as an explicit design choice to realize higher-order subharmonics and partition-dependent robustness; these are not renamed empirical patterns or statistically forced predictions. Because the analysis is carried out under a stated regime assumption rather than by re-deriving the regime from the same data, the derivation remains independent of its own outputs and qualifies as self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the dressed normal-form analysis inside a heating-suppression regime and on the assumption that embedded kicks can be realized experimentally without introducing uncontrolled heating channels. No free parameters or new entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The system remains inside the heating-suppression regime where the dressed normal-form expansion is valid.
    Invoked to support the claim that distinct multilevel mechanisms appear and that thermalization is suppressed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5680 in / 1323 out tokens · 53837 ms · 2026-05-21T17:18:13.885282+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum many-body scars leading to time-translation symmetry breaking in kicked interacting spin models

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Quantum many-body scars in a kicked long-range Ising model produce time-translation symmetry breaking via π-paired Floquet doublets, yielding period-doubling oscillations that scale to last exponentially long in syste...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Kick Km locks the subharmonic frequency at fq =q/m

    reveals distinct roles for the effective terms. Kick Km locks the subharmonic frequency at fq =q/m . Since [Km,D ] = 0, the neutral term D preserves the q-sectors, causing only pure dephasing of the response envelope without shifting the central frequency. In contrast, the charged term R mixes different q-sectors. This mix- ing scatters spectral weight away...

    work page

  2. [2]

    As a compact scalar diagnostic we use the av- erage adjacent-gap ratio r [ 68], defined for consecutive quasi-energy spacings

    ap- plies. As a compact scalar diagnostic we use the av- erage adjacent-gap ratio r [ 68], defined for consecutive quasi-energy spacings. r ≈ 0. 386 indicates Poisson (lo- calized) statistics, while r ≈ 0. 53 indicates Gaussian or- thogonal ensemble (GOE) thermalizing statistics. Fig. 2 shows r(ε) for chain length N = 8 together with spac- ing histograms. ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    M. P. Zaletel, M. Lukin, C. Monroe, C. Nayak, F. Wilczek, and N. Y. Yao, Colloquium: Quantum and classical discrete time crystals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 031001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    D. V. Else, C. Monroe, C. Nayak, and N. Y. Yao, Dis- crete time crystals, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 11, 467 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet time crys- tals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 090402 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Khemani, A

    V. Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phase structure of driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 250401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    C. W. von Keyserlingk and S. L. Sondhi, Phase struc- ture of one-dimensional interacting floquet systems. ii. symmetry-broken phases, Phys. Rev. B 93, 245146 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    C. W. von Keyserlingk, V. Khemani, and S. L. Sondhi, Absolute stability and spatiotemporal long-range order in floquet systems, Phys. Rev. B 94, 085112 (2016)

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Sacha, Modeling spontaneous breaking of time- translation symmetry, Phys

    K. Sacha, Modeling spontaneous breaking of time- translation symmetry, Phys. Rev. A 91, 033617 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    N. Y. Yao, A. C. Potter, I.-D. Potirniche, and A. Vish- wanath, Discrete time crystals: Rigidity, criticality, and realizations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 030401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Russomanno, F

    A. Russomanno, F. Iemini, M. Dalmonte, and R. Fazio, Floquet time crystal in the lipkin-meshkov-glick model, Phys. Rev. B 95, 214307 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Z. Gong, R. Hamazaki, and M. Ueda, Discrete time- crystalline order in cavity and circuit qed systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 040404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Huang, Y.-H

    B. Huang, Y.-H. Wu, and W. V. Liu, Clean floquet time crystals: Models and realizations in cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 110603 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    V. K. Kozin and O. Kyriienko, Quantum time crystals from hamiltonians with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 210602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Chinzei and T

    K. Chinzei and T. N. Ikeda, Time crystals protected by floquet dynamical symmetry in hubbard models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 060601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    N. Y. Yao, C. Nayak, L. Balents, and M. P. Zaletel, Classical discrete time crystals, Nature Physics 16, 438 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    H. P. Ojeda Collado, G. Usaj, C. A. Balseiro, D. H. Zanette, and J. Lorenzana, Emergent parametric reso- nances and time-crystal phases in driven bardeen-cooper- schrieffer systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L042023 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Keßler, P

    H. Keßler, P. Kongkhambut, C. Georges, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, and A. Hemmerich, Observation of a dissi- pative time crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 043602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Cabot, F

    A. Cabot, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Continuous sensing and parameter estimation with the boundary time crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 050801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Camacho and B

    G. Camacho and B. Fauseweh, Prolonging a discrete time crystal by quantum-classical feedback, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033092 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Penner, H

    A.-G. Penner, H. Schmid, L. I. Glazman, and F. von Op- pen, Subharmonic spin correlations and spectral pairing in floquet time crystals, Phys. Rev. B 111, 184308 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Bar Lev and A

    Y. Bar Lev and A. Lazarides, Discrete time crystals in un- bounded potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 200401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Saha and R

    S. Saha and R. Bhattacharyya, Prethermal discrete time crystal in driven-dissipative dipolar systems, Phys. Rev. A 109, 012208 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Yang and Z

    X. Yang and Z. Cai, Dynamical transitions and critical behavior between discrete time crystal phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 020602 (2021) . 6

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Liu, Y.-R

    T. Liu, Y.-R. Zhang, K. Xu, J. Cui, and H. Fan, Discrete time crystal in a driven-dissipative bose-hubbard model with two-photon processes, Phys. Rev. A 105, 013710 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Zhang, P

    J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I. D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwanath, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a discrete time crystal, Nature 543, 217 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    S. Choi, J. Choi, R. Landig, G. Kucsko, H. Zhou, J. Isoya, F. Jelezko, S. Onoda, H. Sumiya, V. Khemani, C. von Keyserlingk, N. Y. Yao, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Ob- servation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system, Nature 543, 221 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Rovny, R

    J. Rovny, R. L. Blum, and S. E. Barrett, Observation of discrete-time-crystal signatures in an ordered dipolar many-body system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 180603 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    X. Mi, M. Ippoliti, C. Quintana, A. Greene, Z. Chen, J. Gross, F. Arute, K. Arya, J. Atalaya, R. Bab- bush, J. C. Bardin, J. Basso, A. Bengtsson, A. Bilmes, A. Bourassa, L. Brill, M. Broughton, B. B. Buck- ley, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, D. Debroy, S. Demura, A. R. Derk, A. Dunsworth, D. Eppens, C. Erickson, ...

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Zhang, W

    X. Zhang, W. Jiang, J. Deng, K. Wang, J. Chen, P. Zhang, W. Ren, H. Dong, S. Xu, Y. Gao, F. Jin, X. Zhu, Q. Guo, H. Li, C. Song, A. V. Gorshkov, T. Iadecola, F. Liu, Z.-X. Gong, Z. Wang, D.-L. Deng, and H. Wang, Digital quantum simulation of floquet symmetry-protected topological phases, Nature 607, 468 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Xiang, W

    L. Xiang, W. Jiang, Z. Bao, Z. Song, S. Xu, K. Wang, J. Chen, F. Jin, X. Zhu, Z. Zhu, F. Shen, N. Wang, C. Zhang, Y. Wu, Y. Zou, J. Zhong, Z. Cui, A. Zhang, Z. Tan, T. Li, Y. Gao, J. Deng, X. Zhang, H. Dong, P. Zhang, S. Jiang, W. Li, Z. Lu, Z.-Z. Sun, H. Li, Z. Wang, C. Song, Q. Guo, F. Liu, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, N. Y. Yao, T. Iadecola, F. Machado,...

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Frey and S

    P. Frey and S. Rachel, Realization of a discrete time crys- tal on 57 qubits of a quantum computer, Science Ad- vances 8, eabm7652 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Randall, C

    J. Randall, C. E. Bradley, F. V. van der Gronden, A. Galicia, M. H. Abobeih, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, F. Machado, N. Y. Yao, and T. H. Taminiau, Many-body- localized discrete time crystal with a programmable spin- based quantum simulator, Science 374, 1474 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    X. Wu, Z. Wang, F. Yang, R. Gao, C. Liang, M. K. Tey, X. Li, T. Pohl, and L. You, Dissipative time crystal in a strongly interacting rydberg gas, Nature Physics 20, 1389 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    W. Wang, M. Feng, Q. Ma, Z. Cai, E. Li, and G. Liu, Observation of time crystal in a spin maser system, Com- munications Physics 8, 191 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Y. Li, C. Wang, Y. Tang, and Y.-C. Liu, Time crystal in a single-mode nonlinear cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 183803 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Z. Bao, S. Xu, Z. Song, K. Wang, L. Xiang, Z. Zhu, J. Chen, F. Jin, X. Zhu, Y. Gao, Y. Wu, C. Zhang, N. Wang, Y. Zou, Z. Tan, A. Zhang, Z. Cui, F. Shen, J. Zhong, T. Li, J. Deng, X. Zhang, H. Dong, P. Zhang, Y.-R. Liu, L. Zhao, J. Hao, H. Li, Z. Wang, C. Song, Q. Guo, B. Huang, and H. Wang, Creating and control- ling global greenberger-horne-zeilinger ent...

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Y. Jiao, Y. Zhang, J. Bai, S. Jia, C. S. Adams, Z. Bai, H. Shen, and J. Zhao, Photoionization-induced floquet driving of a discrete time crystal in a thermal rydberg ensemble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 163603 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    H. Xu, J. Zhang, J. Han, Z. Li, G. Xue, W. Liu, Y. Jin, and H. Yu, Realizing discrete time crystal in an one-dimensional superconducting qubit chain (2021), arXiv:2108.00942 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Zhang, X

    D. Zhang, X. Li, Y. Guo, H. Yu, Y. Jin, and Z.-Q. Yin, Robust and efficient quantum reservoir computing with discrete time crystal (2025), arXiv:2508.15230 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Kyprianidis, F

    A. Kyprianidis, F. Machado, W. Morong, P. Becker, K. S. Collins, D. V. Else, L. Feng, P. W. Hess, C. Nayak, G. Pagano, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a prethermal discrete time crystal, Science 372, 1192 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Stasiuk and P

    A. Stasiuk and P. Cappellaro, Observation of a prether- mal u(1) discrete time crystal, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041016 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Liu, S.-X

    S. Liu, S.-X. Zhang, C.-Y. Hsieh, S. Zhang, and H. Yao, Discrete time crystal enabled by stark many-body local- ization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 120403 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, and F. m. c. Huveneers, Exponentially slow heating in periodically driven many- body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 256803 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    T. Mori, T. Kuwahara, and K. Saito, Rigorous bound on energy absorption and generic relaxation in periodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 120401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Kuwahara, T

    T. Kuwahara, T. Mori, and K. Saito, Floquet–magnus theory and generic transient dynamics in periodically driven many-body quantum systems, Annals of Physics 367, 96 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    Abanin, W

    D. Abanin, W. De Roeck, W. W. Ho, and F. Huveneers, A rigorous theory of many-body prethermalization for periodically driven and closed quantum systems, Com- munications in Mathematical Physics 354, 809 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, W. W. Ho, and F. m. c. Hu- veneers, Effective hamiltonians, prethermalization, and slow energy absorption in periodically driven many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B 95, 014112 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    D. J. Luitz, R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and V. Khemani, 7 Prethermalization without temperature, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021046 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    T. Mori, H. Zhao, F. Mintert, J. Knolle, and R. Moess- ner, Rigorous bounds on the heating rate in thue-morse quasiperiodically and randomly driven quantum many- body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 050602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Goldman and J

    N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Periodically driven quan- tum systems: Effective hamiltonians and engineered gauge fields, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031027 (2014)

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    Cenedese, S

    G. Cenedese, S. T. Mister, M. Antezza, G. Benenti, and G. De Chiara, Thermodynamics and protection of dis- crete time crystals, Phys. Rev. B 112, 054303 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    F. M. Surace, A. Russomanno, M. Dalmonte, A. Silva, R. Fazio, and F. Iemini, Floquet time crystals in clock models, Phys. Rev. B 99, 104303 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    Pizzi, J

    A. Pizzi, J. Knolle, and A. Nunnenkamp, Higher-order and fractional discrete time crystals in clean long-range interacting systems, Nature Communications 12, 2341 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Liu, L.-H

    B. Liu, L.-H. Zhang, Q.-F. Wang, Y. Ma, T.-Y. Han, J. Zhang, Z.-Y. Zhang, S.-Y. Shao, Q. Li, H.-C. Chen, B.-S. Shi, and D.-S. Ding, Higher-order and fractional discrete time crystals in floquet-driven rydberg atoms, Nature Communications 15, 9730 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    P. Liu, R. Wang, J.-N. Zhang, Y. Zhang, X. Cai, H. Xu, Z. Li, J. Han, X. Li, G. Xue, W. Liu, L. You, Y. Jin, and H. Yu, Performing SU( d) operations and rudimentary al- gorithms in a superconducting transmon qudit for d = 3 and d = 4, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021028 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    L. B. Nguyen, N. Goss, K. Siva, Y. Kim, E. Younis, B. Qing, A. Hashim, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, Em- powering a qudit-based quantum processor by travers- ing the dual bosonic ladder, Nature Communications 15, 7117 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    L. E. Fischer, A. Chiesa, F. Tacchino, D. J. Egger, S. Car- retta, and I. Tavernelli, Universal qudit gate synthesis for transmons, PRX Quantum 4, 030327 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    N. Goss, A. Morvan, B. Marinelli, B. K. Mitchell, L. B. Nguyen, R. K. Naik, L. Chen, C. J¨ unger, J. M. Kreike- baum, D. I. Santiago, J. J. Wallman, and I. Siddiqi, High- fidelity qutrit entangling gates for superconducting cir- cuits, Nature Communications 13, 7481 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Tripathi, N

    V. Tripathi, N. Goss, A. Vezvaee, L. B. Nguyen, I. Sid- diqi, and D. A. Lidar, Qudit dynamical decoupling on a superconducting quantum processor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 050601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity parallel entan- gling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature 622, 268 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Y. Guo, W. Ji, X. Kong, M. Wang, H. Sun, J. Zhou, Z. Chai, X. Rong, F. Shi, Y. Wang, and J. Du, Single- shot readout of a solid-state electron spin qutrit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 060601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    F. Moro, A. J. Fielding, L. Turyanska, and A. Patan` e, Realization of universal quantum gates with spin-qudits in colloidal quantum dots, Advanced Quantum Technolo- gies 2, 1900017 (2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    P. Hrmo, B. Wilhelm, L. Gerster, M. W. van Mourik, M. Huber, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, T. Monz, and M. Ring- bauer, Native qudit entanglement in a trapped ion quan- tum processor, Nature Communications 14, 2242 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Ringbauer, M

    M. Ringbauer, M. Meth, L. Postler, R. Stricker, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, and T. Monz, A universal qudit quantum processor with trapped ions, Nature Physics 18, 1053 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Serbyn, Z

    M. Serbyn, Z. Papi´ c, and D. A. Abanin, Local conserva- tion laws and the structure of the many-body localized states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127201 (2013)

    work page 2013

  67. [67]

    D. A. Huse, R. Nandkishore, and V. Oganesyan, Phe- nomenology of fully many-body-localized systems, Phys. Rev. B 90, 174202 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    I. V. Gornyi, A. D. Mirlin, and D. G. Polyakov, Interact- ing electrons in disordered wires: Anderson localization and low-t transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 206603 (2005)

    work page 2005

  69. [69]

    Basko, I

    D. Basko, I. Aleiner, and B. Altshuler, Metal–insulator transition in a weakly interacting many-electron system with localized single-particle states, Annals of Physics 321, 1126 (2006)

    work page 2006

  70. [70]

    Oganesyan and D

    V. Oganesyan and D. A. Huse, Localization of interacting fermions at high temperature, Phys. Rev. B 75, 155111 (2007)

    work page 2007

  71. [71]

    ˇZnidariˇ c, T

    M. ˇZnidariˇ c, T. c. v. Prosen, and P. Prelovˇ sek, Many- body localization in the heisenberg xxz magnet in a ran- dom field, Phys. Rev. B 77, 064426 (2008)

    work page 2008

  72. [72]

    Monthus and T

    C. Monthus and T. Garel, Many-body localization transi- tion in a lattice model of interacting fermions: Statistics of renormalized hoppings in configuration space, Phys. Rev. B 81, 134202 (2010)

    work page 2010

  73. [73]

    Cuevas, M

    E. Cuevas, M. Feigel’man, L. Ioffe, and M. Mezard, Level statistics of disordered spin-1/2 systems and materials with localized cooper pairs, Nature Communications 3, 1128 (2012)

    work page 2012

  74. [74]

    J. H. Bardarson, F. Pollmann, and J. E. Moore, Un- bounded growth of entanglement in models of many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 017202 (2012)

    work page 2012

  75. [75]

    Vosk and E

    R. Vosk and E. Altman, Many-body localization in one dimension as a dynamical renormalization group fixed point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 067204 (2013)

    work page 2013

  76. [76]

    Serbyn, Z

    M. Serbyn, Z. Papi´ c, and D. A. Abanin, Universal slow growth of entanglement in interacting strongly disordered systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 260601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  77. [77]

    See Supplemental Material for the detailed derivation process and more numerical results

    work page

  78. [79]

    J. Choi, H. Zhou, S. Choi, R. Landig, W. W. Ho, J. Isoya, F. Jelezko, S. Onoda, H. Sumiya, D. A. Abanin, and M. D. Lukin, Probing quantum thermalization of a disor- dered dipolar spin ensemble with discrete time-crystalline order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 043603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [80]

    Maskara, A

    N. Maskara, A. A. Michailidis, W. W. Ho, D. Bluvstein, S. Choi, M. D. Lukin, and M. Serbyn, Discrete time- crystalline order enabled by quantum many-body scars: Entanglement steering via periodic driving, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 090602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  80. [81]

    Zhang, J

    S.-X. Zhang, J. Allcock, Z.-Q. Wan, S. Liu, J. Sun, H. Yu, X.-H. Yang, J. Qiu, Z. Ye, Y.-Q. Chen, C.-K. Lee, Y.-C. Zheng, S.-K. Jian, H. Yao, C.-Y. Hsieh, and S. Zhang, Tensorcircuit: a quantum software framework for the nisq era, Quantum 7, 912 (2023)

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.