Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 53 references

TITAN mass measurements of neutron-rich Cs, Ba and r-process lanthanide abundances

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read New masses of five neutron-rich isotopes smooth predicted r-process abundance patterns near A=150.

desk verdict Solid new masses, but the odd-even smoothing claim is confounded with simultaneous Pn model changes until a control calc separates them. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05476 v1 pith:DSB5DCKF submitted 2026-08-05 nucl-th nucl-ex

T.-H. Yeh , J.D. Cardona , Y. Wang , J. Ash , B. Ashrafkhani , I. Belosovic , J. Bergmann , E. Dunling
show 21 more authors
L. Egoriti G. Gelinas G. Gwinner Z. Hockenbery C. Izzo A. Jacobs S. Kakkar B. Kootte E. M. Lykiardopoulou T. Murbock A. Mollaebrahimi A. Ridley S. F. Paul W. S. Porter M. P. Reiter J. Ringuette R. Simpson C. Walls M. R. Mumpower N. Vassh A.A. Kwiatkowski
This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thnucl-ex
keywords r-processnucleosynthesisneutronstarmergersatomicmassmeasurementstime-of-flightspectrometryneutron-richcesiumisotopesbariumlanthanideabundancesfissioncycling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports first-time mass measurements of $^{149-151}$Cs and $^{151,152}$Ba, five neutron-rich isotopes whose masses were previously only extrapolated. The authors trace these masses through two-neutron separation energies, neutron-capture rates, and $\beta$-delayed neutron emission probabilities into r-process nucleosynthesis calculations for neutron star merger ejecta. They find that the new masses change predicted abundances near mass number $A=148$--$152$ by up to about 40%, with the largest effects on the lanthanides Nd, Sm, and Eu. In both a fission-cycling trajectory and a trajectory without fission, the updated masses smooth out the odd-even staggering in isotopic abundances near $A\sim150$. The goal is to show that experimental masses in this unexplored neutron-rich region directly shape interpretations of stellar and Solar lanthanide abundances.

What carries the argument

The central object is a set of five atomic mass values obtained with a multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer, converted into one- and two-neutron separation energies $S_n$ and $S_{2n}$. These separation energies enter r-process simulations in two ways: they set the path of $(n,\gamma)\leftrightarrow(\gamma,n)$ equilibrium through contours of constant $S_n$, and they feed the neutron-capture rates and $\beta$-delayed neutron emission probabilities used by the reaction network. The paper compares a baseline using FRDM2012 and AME2020 masses against a version updated with the new measurements, across one accretion-disk trajectory without fission cycling and one dynamical-ejecta trajectory with robust fission cycling.

What would settle it

Re-run the same reaction network with the five new masses removed but with the identical two trajectories and Solar rescaling: if the odd-even smoothing and the large abundance shifts persist without the new masses, the central conclusion fails. Alternatively, compute the same two cases without rescaling to Solar abundances, or add a set of trajectories with different electron fractions, and check whether the smoothing near $A\sim150$ remains.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that the measured masses of $^{149-151}$Cs and $^{151,152}$Ba, determined with uncertainties below 50 keV, are the first experimental anchors in a neutron-rich region of the nuclear chart that had previously been reached only by model extrapolation. Propagating these masses into reaction and decay inputs moves the predicted r-process abundance pattern near $A\sim148$--$152$ by up to 40%, and in both astrophysical scenarios considered the updated pattern shows a smoother, less odd-even-staggered isotopic distribution than the baseline. The authors interpret this as evidence that neutron-rich nuclear structure in the lanthanide region contributes to the smoothing of rare-earth abundances, and they show that the affected ratios $[\mathrm{Sm}/\mathrm{Eu}]$ and $[\mathrm{Nd}/\mathrm{Eu}]$ shift relative to stellar data while the flat $[\mathrm{Ag}/\mathrm{Eu}]$ trend is preserved.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two chosen neutron star merger trajectories, and the rescaling of predicted abundances to Solar values between $A=150$ and $A=180$, are representative enough that the smoothing and the up-to-40% abundance changes are caused by the new masses rather than by the choice of astrophysical conditions or normalization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The five new masses change predicted r-process abundances near $A=148$--$152$ by up to about 40%, with the dominant elemental effects on Nd, Sm, and Eu.
  • The updated masses smooth out the odd-even staggering in isotopic abundances near $A\sim150$ in both fission-cycling and non-fissioning neutron star merger conditions.
  • The masses alter how fission fragments settle into the final lanthanide abundance pattern when actinides are produced and fission cycling operates.
  • Predicted stellar ratios $[\mathrm{Sm}/\mathrm{Eu}]$ and $[\mathrm{Nd}/\mathrm{Eu}]$ shift when the new masses are included, while the flat $[\mathrm{Ag}/\mathrm{Eu}]$ co-production trend remains.
  • Along the Cs and Ba chains, the measured separation energies lie closer to FRDM2012 predictions than the previous AME2020 extrapolations do.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the smoothing is real, it implies that the local mass surface, not only long-timescale $\beta$-decay and $\beta$-delayed neutron emission, helps produce the observed smoothness of rare-earth r-process abundances; measuring neighboring odd-$Z$ chains would test whether the effect persists.
  • The abundance comparison rescales both predicted and Solar patterns between $A=150$ and $180$, so the odd-even smoothing should be checked on un-rescaled abundances to separate the mass effect from the normalization choice.
  • Because only two hot trajectories are shown, the 40% abundance shifts and smoothing may be trajectory-dependent; the natural extension is to run an ensemble of merger ejecta conditions with varying electron fraction and entropy.
  • The new mass uncertainties of roughly 20 to 40 keV are still larger than the few-keV scale of the most precise mass measurements, so future measurements with smaller uncertainties could tighten or revise the direction of the abundance shifts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper reports first-time mass measurements of 149-151Cs and 151,152Ba using the TITAN MR-TOF-MS with mass-selective re-trapping, calibrants, and hyper-EMG fits, yielding uncertainties below 50 keV. The authors propagate these masses to two-neutron and one-neutron separation energies, TALYS neutron-capture rates, and BeOH beta-delayed neutron emission probabilities, then feed the updated nuclear data into PRISM r-process network calculations for two neutron-star-merger trajectories: a disk wind without fission cycling and a dynamical ejecta with fission cycling. They report abundance changes up to 40% near A~148-152, claim that the new masses smooth out the odd-even effect in isotopic abundances near A~150 in both classes of conditions, and examine the impact on stellar abundance ratios such as [Ag/Eu], [Sm/Eu], and [Nd/Eu].

Significance. The mass measurements are a solid experimental contribution: they extend the known mass surface into a neutron-rich region below Z=58 with N>95, use standard TITAN analysis procedures, and are independent of any abundance-fitting target, so circularity is not a concern. If the abundance conclusions withstand scrutiny, the paper would provide a concrete demonstration that nuclear masses in the lanthanide region shape final r-process abundances and fission-fragment settling, with implications for interpreting stellar lanthanide ratios and kilonova observations. However, the central astrophysical claim is currently entangled with an unvalidated theoretical Pn update, and the abundance predictions carry no propagated uncertainties from the mass errors; these issues need to be addressed before the claim that the masses smooth the odd-even effect can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Pn paragraph; Sec. IV, Fig. 5] The r-process comparison labelled '+ TITAN masses' does not isolate the mass effect. In Sec. III the authors replace the baseline Moller Pn values with BeOH predictions that use TITAN masses; for 150Cs this changes P0n from 0.56 to 0.10 and P1n from 0.44 to 0.89, more than doubling the probability of one-neutron emission. Because beta-delayed neutron emission directly shifts the final mass-number distribution and can smooth odd-even staggering, the up-to-40% abundance changes shown in Fig. 5 cannot be attributed to the measured masses alone. The authors should add a calculation that uses the TITAN masses in S_n and TALYS capture rates while keeping the baseline Pn values, so that the mass signal and the Pn model change are disentangled.
  2. [Sec. IV, Figs. 5 and 7] No uncertainties are propagated from the measured mass errors (21-42 keV in Table I) to the abundance predictions or to the [Ag/Eu], [Sm/Eu], and [Nd/Eu] ratios. Without a sensitivity study that shifts each measured mass within its uncertainty, it is unclear whether the reported 40% abundance changes and the shifts in the stellar ratios are significant compared to the measurement precision. The authors should provide uncertainty bands or a perturbation analysis around the measured masses.
  3. [Abstract; Sec. IV, Fig. 5 caption] The abstract's claim that the new masses 'smooth out the odd-even effect ... in both fission cycling astrophysical conditions and conditions that do not reach actinides' is supported by only two trajectories, and the plotted abundances are rescaled to Solar values between A=150 and A=180. That rescaling can itself reduce apparent odd-even staggering, so the claim should be either restricted to the two shown examples or accompanied by additional trajectories and a discussion of the sensitivity to the normalization window.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV, paragraph after Fig. 6] There is a typo in the sentence 'the r-process abundances have yet to be finalized are are just beginning to encounter the TITAN Cs, Ba measurement region'; 'are are' should be 'and are'.
  2. [Sec. II, Table I] The authors state that statistical and systematic uncertainties combine to δm<50 keV, but they do not state whether the two components are added in quadrature or linearly; please specify the combination rule.
  3. [Section II, references [33-35]] The emgfit package is cited as a code reference; providing a permanent repository or DOI for the exact version used would improve reproducibility.
  4. [Sec. IV, Fig. 7] The caption for Fig. 7 should clarify that the red curves include both TITAN masses and the BeOH Pn updates, not masses alone, to avoid the same confounding noted in the major comments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the TITAN masses are independently measured, and the r-process abundance changes are forward-model outputs, not fitted inputs or self-referential predictions.

full rationale

The derivation chain begins with time-of-flight mass measurements calibrated against known species (Table I), with systematic uncertainties from the TITAN analysis procedures of Refs. [33,34]. These five mass values are not fitted to any abundance target, and the paper makes no use of solar or stellar r-process abundances in determining them. The propagation to S2n, Sn, TALYS neutron-capture rates, and BeOH beta-delayed neutron emission probabilities is a forward application of measured masses as inputs to published nuclear-model and network codes; none of those outputs are fed back into the mass values themselves. The PRISM r-process abundances in Fig. 5 compare a baseline dataset to an updated dataset in which TITAN masses replace FRDM/AME values, with TALYS and BeOH quantities recalculated consistently from those masses. The absence of a control run with baseline Moller Pn values is a real scientific limitation: the mass update and the Pn model choice are confounded, so the specific attribution of the odd-even smoothing to the masses alone is not fully isolated. However, confounding is not circularity under the requested criteria. No equation in the paper defines the abundance prediction in terms of the abundance result, and no parameter is fitted to the plotted abundances. The self-citations to Mumpower's BeOH work, PRISM, and fission-yield studies are published forward-model tools used in a standard sensitivity-study mode, not unverified uniqueness theorems or answers smuggled in through citation. The mass data are benchmarked against AME2020, providing independent external context. The paper is therefore self-contained in its derivation: the central abundance conclusion is a model output conditional on independently measured nuclear masses, not an input recycled as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim of this paper rests on the experimental mass measurements, which are new and not fitted. The abundance propagation relies on established but model-dependent nuclear data tools, plus a deliberate choice of theoretical Pn values over a recent RIKEN measurement. No invented entities or fitted free parameters are introduced by the authors.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption TALYS-2.0 with FRDM2012 and AME2020 masses provides reliable neutron capture rates for the r-process region.
    Used as baseline in Sec. III and IV to compute rates and abundances; model errors are not propagated.
  • domain assumption PRISM-1.6.0 with FRDM2012 masses, FRLDM barriers, and GEF yields is suitable for r-process simulations.
    The network choices are stated in Sec. IV and are not independently validated in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The two astrophysical trajectories (Just et al. disk wind, Rosswog et al. dynamical ejecta) are representative of r-process conditions with and without fission cycling.
    One trajectory per condition is chosen to support the general smoothing claim in the abstract and conclusions.
  • domain assumption The BeOH code gives trustworthy beta-delayed neutron emission probabilities when given TITAN masses.
    Used in Sec. III to update Pn values for 150,151Cs and 151Ba.
  • domain assumption NUBASE2020 decay data are complete for the measured isotopes.
    The paper relies on NUBASE2020 half-lives and branching ratios, except for Pn values.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of TITAN mass measurements of neutron-rich Cs, Ba and r-process lanthanide abundances." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DSB5DCKF

@misc{pith2026260805476,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: TITAN mass measurements of neutron-rich Cs, Ba and r-process lanthanide abundances},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DSB5DCKF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05476}
}
abstract

We present measurements for the masses of five neutron-rich isotopes, $^{149-151}$Cs and $^{151, 152}$Ba, probed for the first time by TITAN at TRIUMF with time-of-flight measurement techniques. We propagate these masses to the nuclear reaction and decay data required for the simulation of the rapid neutron capture process (r-process) nucleosynthesis in neutron star mergers. We show that these neutron-rich masses affect the abundance predictions near mass number $A\sim148-152$ corresponding to lanthanide element abundances at $Z=60,\,62$ and $63$. We demonstrate that these new TITAN masses smooth out the odd-even effect in isotopic abundance predictions near $A\sim150$ in both fission cycling astrophysical conditions and conditions that do not reach actinides. We further show that these new masses adjust how fission fragments settle into place when forming the final abundances, and consider the effect on comparisons with stellar abundance ratios such as [Ag/Eu], [Sm/Eu], and [Nd/Eu].

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05476 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. TOF spectrum for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Trends in the two-neutron separation energies ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Contours of constant one-neutron separation en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Abundance predictions for (a) neutron star merger ejecta that does not undergo fission cycling (top) [45], as compared [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Fission fragment deposition shown via fission yield [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Predicted abundance ratios for (a) [Ag/Eu], (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    E. M. Burbidge, G. R. Burbidge, W. A. Fowler, and F. Hoyle, Synthesis of the elements in stars, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 547 (1957)

    1957

  2. [2]

    Arcones et al

    A. Arcones et al. , White paper on nuclear astrophysics and low energy nuclear physics Part 1: Nuclear astro- physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 94, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Schatz et al

    H. Schatz et al. , Horizons: nuclear astrophysics in the 2020s and beyond, J. Phys. G 49, 110502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    C. J. Horowitz et al. , r-Process Nucleosynthesis: Con- necting Rare-Isotope Beam Facilities with the Cosmos, J. Phys. G 46, 083001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Kajino, W

    T. Kajino, W. Aoki, A. B. Balantekin, R. Diehl, M. A. Famiano, and G. J. Mathews, Current status of r -process nucleosynthesis, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 109 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    J. J. Cowan, C. Sneden, J. E. Lawler, A. Aprahamian, M. Wiescher, K. Langanke, G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, and F.- K. Thielemann, Origin of the heaviest elements: The rapid neutron-capture process, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 15002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    J. Beun, G. C. McLaughlin, R. Surman, and W. R. Hix, Fission cycling in a supernova r process, Phys. Rev. C 77, 035804 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Sneden, J

    C. Sneden, J. J. Cowan, and R. Gallino, Neutron-capture elements in the early galaxy, Annual Review of Astron- omy and Astrophysics 46, 241 (2008)

    work page 2008

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Goriely, A

    S. Goriely, A. Bauswein, and H. T. Janka, R-Process Nu- cleosynthesis in Dynamically Ejected Matter of Neutron Star Mergers, Astrophys. J. Lett. 738, L32 (2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    Korobkin, S

    O. Korobkin, S. Rosswog, A. Arcones, and C. Winteler, On the astrophysical robustness of neutron star merger r-process, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426, 1940 (2012)

    2012

  3. [11]

    de Jes´ us Mendoza-Temis, M.-R

    J. de Jes´ us Mendoza-Temis, M.-R. Wu, G. Mart ´ ınez- Pinedo, K. Langanke, A. Bauswein, and H.-T. Janka, Nu- clear robustness of the r process in neutron-star mergers, Phys. Rev. C 92, 055805 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Goriely, The fundamental role of fission during r- process nucleosynthesis in neutron star mergers, Eur

    S. Goriely, The fundamental role of fission during r- process nucleosynthesis in neutron star mergers, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 22 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Vassh, M

    N. Vassh, M. R. Mumpower, G. C. McLaughlin, T. M. Sprouse, and R. Surman, Coproduction of Light and Heavy r-process Elements via Fission Deposition, Astro- phys. J. 896, 28 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    I. U. Roederer et al., Element abundance patterns in stars indicate fission of nuclei heavier than uranium, Science 382, adf1341 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    B. D. Metzger, Kilonovae, Living Rev. Rel. 23, 1 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Radice, S

    D. Radice, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Perego, The Dynamics of Binary Neutron Star Mergers and GW170817, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 95 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Margutti and R

    R. Margutti and R. Chornock, First Multimessenger Ob- servations of a Neutron Star Merger, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59, 155 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Y. L. Zhu, K. Lund, J. Barnes, T. M. Sprouse, N. Vassh, G. C. McLaughlin, M. R. Mumpower, and R. Surman, Modeling Kilonova Light Curves: Dependence on Nu- clear Inputs, Astrophys. J. 906, 94 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Barnes, Y

    J. Barnes, Y. L. Zhu, K. A. Lund, T. M. Sprouse, N. Vassh, G. C. McLaughlin, M. R. Mumpower, and R. Surman, Kilonovae Across the Nuclear Physics Land- scape: The Impact of Nuclear Physics Uncertainties on r- process-powered Emission, Astrophys. J. 918, 44 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Dilling, R

    J. Dilling, R. Kr¨ ucken, and L. Merminga, ISAC and ARIEL: The TRIUMF radioactive beam facilities and the scientific program (Springer Dordrecht, 2014) pp. 1–284

    2014

  13. [21]

    Egoriti, Transport phenomena in radioisotope beam production targets , Ph.D

    L. Egoriti, Transport phenomena in radioisotope beam production targets , Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Brunner et al., Nucl

    T. Brunner et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A676, 32 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    M. P. Reiter et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1018, 165823 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Jesch, T

    C. Jesch, T. Dickel, W. R. Plaß, D. Short, S. Ayet San Andres, J. Dilling, H. Geissel, F. Greiner, J. Lang, K. G. Leach, W. Lippert, C. Scheidenberger, and M. I. Yavor, Hyperfine Interact. 235, 97 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Dickel, W

    T. Dickel, W. R. Plaß, W. Lippert, J. Lang, M. I. Ya- vor, H. Geissel, and C. Scheidenberger, Isobar separation in a multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer by mass-selective re-trapping, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 28, 1079 (2017), pMID:...

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    Jacobs, Collision induced dissociation and mass spec- trometry with the TITAN Multiple-Reflection Time-of- Flight Mass-Spectrometer , Ph.D

    A. Jacobs, Collision induced dissociation and mass spec- trometry with the TITAN Multiple-Reflection Time-of- Flight Mass-Spectrometer , Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Beck et al

    S. Beck et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 112501 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Mukul, C

    I. Mukul, C. Andreoiu, J. Bergmann, M. Brodeur, T. Brunner, K. A. Dietrich, T. Dickel, I. Dillmann, E. Dunling, D. Fusco, G. Gwinner, C. Izzo, A. Jacobs, B. Kootte, Y. Lan, E. Leistenschneider, E. M. Lykiar- dopoulou, S. F. Paul, M. P. Reiter, J. L. Tracy, J. Dilling, and A. A...

    2021

  21. [29]

    C. Izzo, J. Bergmann, K. A. Dietrich, E. Dunling, D. Fusco, A. Jacobs, B. Kootte, G. Kripk´ o-Koncz, Y. Lan, E. Leistenschneider, E. M. Lykiardopoulou, I. Mukul, S. F. Paul, M. P. Reiter, J. L. Tracy, C. An- dreoiu, T. Brunner, T. Dickel, J. Dilling, I. Dillmann, G. Gwinner, D...

    2021

  22. [30]

    W. S. Porter, B. Ashrafkhani, J. Bergmann, C. Brown, T. Brunner, J. D. Cardona, D. Curien, I. Dedes, T. Dickel, J. Dudek, E. Dunling, G. Gwinner, Z. Hock- enbery, J. D. Holt, C. Hornung, C. Izzo, A. Jacobs, A. Javaji, B. Kootte, G. Kripk´ o-Koncz, E. M. Lykiar- dopoulou, T. Mi...

    2022

  23. [31]

    Purushothaman, S

    S. Purushothaman, S. Ayet San Andr´ es, J. Bergmann, T. Dickel, J. Ebert, H. Geissel, C. Hornung, W. Plaß, C. Rappold, C. Scheidenberger, Y. Tanaka, and M. Ya- vor, Hyper-emg: A new probability distribution func- tion composed of exponentially modified gaussian dis- tributions...

    2017

  24. [32]

    M. Wang, W. Huang, F. Kondev, G. Audi, and S. Naimi, The ame 2020 atomic mass evaluation (ii). tables, graphs and references*, Chinese Physics C 45, 030003 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Ayet San Andr´ es, C

    S. Ayet San Andr´ es, C. Hornung, J. Ebert, W. R. Plaß, T. Dickel, H. Geissel, C. Scheidenberger, J. Bergmann, F. Greiner, E. Haettner, C. Jesch, W. Lippert, I. Mar- dor, I. Miskun, Z. Patyk, S. Pietri, A. Pihktelev, S. Pu- rushothaman, M. P. Reiter, A.-K. Rink, H. Weick, M. I...

    2019

  26. [34]

    S. F. Paul, J. Bergmann, J. D. Cardona, K. A. Diet- rich, E. Dunling, Z. Hockenbery, C. Hornung, C. Izzo, A. Jacobs, A. Javaji, B. Kootte, Y. Lan, E. Leistenschnei- der, E. M. Lykiardopoulou, I. Mukul, T. Murb¨ ock, W. S. Porter, R. Silwal, M. B. Smith, J. Ringuette, T. Brun- ...

    2021

  27. [35]

    S. F. Paul, emgfit - fitting of time-of-flight mass spectra with hyper-emg models (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    M¨ oller, A

    P. M¨ oller, A. Sierk, T. Ichikawa, and H. Sagawa, Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations: Frdm(2012), Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 109-110, 1 (2016)

    2012

  29. [37]

    Koning, Arjan, Hilaire, Stephane, and Goriely, Stephane, Talys: modeling of nuclear reactions, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 131 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Kondev, M

    F. Kondev, M. Wang, W. Huang, S. Naimi, and G. Audi, The nubase2020 evaluation of nuclear physics properties *, Chinese Physics C 45, 030001 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    M. R. Mumpower, T. Kawano, and P. M¨ oller, Neutron-γ competition for β-delayed neutron emission, Phys. Rev. C 94, 064317 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    J. Wu, S. Nishimura, P. M¨ oller, M. R. Mumpower, R. Lozeva, C. B. Moon, A. Odahara, H. Baba, F. Browne, R. Daido, P. Doornenbal, Y. F. Fang, M. Haroon, T. Isobe, H. S. Jung, G. Lorusso, B. Moon, Z. Pa- tel, S. Rice, H. Sakurai, Y. Shimizu, L. Sinclair, P.- A. S¨ oderstr¨ om, ...

    2020

  33. [41]

    M¨ oller, B

    P. M¨ oller, B. Pfeiffer, and K.-L. Kratz, New calculations of gross β-decay properties for astrophysical applications: Speeding-up the classical r process, Phys. Rev. C 67, 055802 (2003)

    2003

  34. [42]

    T. M. Sprouse, M. R. Mumpower, and R. Surman, Following nuclei through nucleosynthesis: A novel tracing technique, Phys. Rev. C 104, 015803 (2021), arXiv:2008.06075 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Vassh et al

    N. Vassh et al. , Using excitation-energy dependent fis- sion yields to identify key fissioning nuclei in r-process nucleosynthesis, J. Phys. G 46, 065202 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    M. R. Mumpower, T. Kawano, T. M. Sprouse, N. Vassh, E. M. Holmbeck, R. Surman, and P. Moller, β-delayed Fission in r-process Nucleosynthesis, Astrophys. J. 869, 14 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    O. Just, A. Bauswein, R. A. Pulpillo, S. Goriely, and H.-T. Janka, Comprehensive nucleosynthesis analysis for ejecta of compact binary mergers, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 448, 541 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    Rosswog, O

    S. Rosswog, O. Korobkin, A. Arcones, F.-K. Thielemann, and T. Piran, The long-term evolution of neutron star merger remnants – I. The impact of r-process nucleosyn- thesis, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety 439, 744 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    S. P. Shah, R. Ezzeddine, I. U. Roederer, T. T. Hansen, V. M. Placco, T. C. Beers, A. Frebel, A. P. Ji, E. M. Holmbeck, J. Marshall, and C. M. Sakari, The R- Process Alliance: detailed chemical composition of an r-process enhanced star with UV and optical spec- troscopy, Mon. ...

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Xylakis-Dornbusch, T

    T. Xylakis-Dornbusch, T. T. Hansen, T. C. Beers, N. Christlieb, R. Ezzeddine, A. Frebel, E. Holmbeck, V. M. Placco, I. U. Roederer, C. M. Sakari, and C. Sne- den, The R-Process Alliance: Analysis of limited-r stars, A&A 688, A123 (2024), arXiv:2404.03379 [astro-ph.SR]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    are considered as these are the cases which are more solidly connected to r-process enrichment. The flat trend of these ratios points to universality (that is, the ratio of the two is robust across stellar data), and this is visible for both [Ag/Eu] and [Sm/Eu] indicating co-p...

  42. [50]

    Abohalima and A

    A. Abohalima and A. Frebel, Jinabase—a database for chemical abundances of metal-poor stars, The Astrophys- ical Journal Supplement Series 238, 36 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    C. M. Sakari, V. M. Placco, E. M. Farrell, I. U. Roederer, G. Wallerstein, T. C. Beers, R. Ezzeddine, A. Frebel, T. Hansen, E. M. Holmbeck, C. Sneden, J. J. Cowan, K. A. Venn, C. E. Davis, G. Matijeviˇ c, R. F. G. Wyse, J. Bland-Hawthorn, C. Chiappini, K. C. Freeman, B. K. Gib...

    2018

  44. [52]

    Ezzeddine, K

    R. Ezzeddine, K. Rasmussen, A. Frebel, A. Chiti, K. Hi- nojisa, V. M. Placco, A. P. Ji, T. C. Beers, T. T. Hansen, I. U. Roederer, C. M. Sakari, and J. Melendez, The R- Process Alliance: First Magellan/MIKE Release from the Southern Search for R-process-enhanced Stars, As- tro...

    2020

  45. [53]

    E. M. Holmbeck, T. T. Hansen, T. C. Beers, V. M. Placco, D. D. Whitten, K. C. Rasmussen, I. U. Roed- erer, R. Ezzeddine, C. M. Sakari, A. Frebel, M. R. Drout, J. D. Simon, I. B. Thompson, J. Bland-Hawthorn, B. K. Gibson, E. K. Grebel, G. Kordopatis, A. Kunder, J. Mel´ endez, J...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.