Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 44 references

Exceptional field theory yields gauge-invariant Kaluza-Klein fluctuation equations and complete mass matrices via homotopy transfer.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 05:56 UTC pith:DSNO4C2P

load-bearing objection Solid ExFT linearization plus the first projector-complete mass matrices via homotopy; Hodge package is assumed by analogy and the black-hole cut is partial, but the core algebra holds. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.24914 v1 pith:DSNO4C2P submitted 2026-07-27 hep-th

Kaluza-Klein Perturbation Theory from Exceptional Field Theory

Camille Eloy , Olaf Hohm , Camilla Lavino , Henning Samtleben , Yehudi Simon This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 04.65.+e11.25.Mj04.50.-h
keywords exceptional field theoryKaluza-Klein spectrumhomotopy transfergeneralized Scherk-SchwarzHiggs mechanismAdS black holesE6(6)
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs the linear fluctuation equations of ten- and eleven-dimensional supergravity around a broad family of Kaluza-Klein backgrounds that arise from five-dimensional gauged supergravity by a generalized Scherk-Schwarz uplift. Those equations are written so that they remain invariant under the linearized generalized diffeomorphisms of exceptional field theory whenever the background itself solves the five-dimensional equations. For the large subclass in which higher-form background fields vanish and the internal metric is constant, the authors use homotopy transfer on the gauge complex to isolate the physical, gauge-invariant massive modes (including spin-2) and to discard pure-gauge directions systematically. The same machinery supplies explicit mass matrices whose eigenvalues recover known AdS5×S5 spectra at low levels. As a first application with a non-vanishing background vector, they extract part of the ten-dimensional spectrum around the near-horizon geometry of an extremal Kerr-Newman AdS5 black hole and map the regions of the two-parameter family that violate the charged Breitenlohner-Freedman bound.

Core claim

Around any generalized Scherk-Schwarz background in E6(6) exceptional field theory the linearized fluctuation equations are gauge-invariant under linearized generalized diffeomorphisms once the five-dimensional background equations hold; when higher-form fields vanish and the internal metric is constant, homotopy transfer produces the complete projectors and mass matrices for the physical spin-0,1,2 Kaluza-Klein modes.

What carries the argument

Homotopy transfer on the chain complex of gauge parameters, fields and equations of motion: projection, inclusion and homotopy maps that convert the gauge-redundant upstairs complex into a downstairs complex of gauge-invariant fields, automatically inserting the projectors that remove pure-gauge directions from the mass operators.

Load-bearing premise

The detailed Higgs analysis and mass matrices require vanishing background field strengths and currents together with a constant internal metric, and the black-hole stability plots further restrict to non-mixing “simple” modes.

What would settle it

Compute the low-lying eigenvalues of the projected mass matrices (4.97), (4.103), (4.111) on AdS5×S5 and check whether they reproduce the known Kaluza-Klein spectrum of type-IIB supergravity; any mismatch falsifies the claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Mass matrices for physical modes become available for any Einstein external geometry with vanishing higher-form backgrounds, not only AdS.
  • Homotopy-transfer data already constructed at linear order give an algorithmic route to gauge-invariant n-point couplings of the physical Kaluza-Klein fields.
  • Near-horizon Kerr-Newman AdS5 stability can be tested mode-by-mode once the remaining mixed-spin sectors are included.
  • The same ExFT-plus-homotopy pipeline extends in principle to E7(7) and E8(8) theories and their AdS4 and AdS3 vacua.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Once the homotopy data are known, Witten-diagram computations of boundary correlators for massive Kaluza-Klein modes become systematic rather than case-by-case.
  • The residual “stability dents” below the BPS locus at finite Kaluza-Klein level suggest that full ten-dimensional stability may still leave isolated open regions in the black-hole parameter space.
  • Backgrounds with non-vanishing p-form fluxes can be treated by a controlled deformation of the present vanishing-flux homotopy data rather than a complete restart.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops linearized Kaluza-Klein perturbation theory for E6(6) exceptional field theory around generalized Scherk-Schwarz (GSS) backgrounds. Section 3 derives the fluctuation equations (3.22)–(3.28) for the full field set (h, m, a, b) around arbitrary 5D gauged-supergravity backgrounds and verifies gauge invariance under linearized generalized and external diffeomorphisms modulo the 5D background equations (3.23), (3.25), (3.27), (3.30). Section 4 restricts to backgrounds with vanishing higher-form fields and constant internal metric and works out the Higgs mechanism via homotopy transfer: an explicit upstairs/downstairs chain-complex pair with projection, inclusion, and homotopy maps is constructed through degree 3 (summarized in Fig. 4 and Table 1), yielding physical mass matrices (4.97), (4.103), (4.111) with projectors that remove pure-gauge directions, and the massive spin-2 equation (4.123) on a general Einstein background. Section 5 applies the framework to the near-horizon AdS2 × squashed-S3 geometry of extremal Kerr-Newman-AdS5 black holes, deriving AdS2 mass and charge formulas for "simple" U(2)-singlet modes (5.32), (5.39), (5.47) and mapping BF-stability regions in the (r+, a) plane.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a substantial and useful contribution. The linearized fluctuation equations of §3 generalize the ExFT KK spectrometry of [6,7] from AdS to arbitrary GSS backgrounds, with explicit gauge-variation checks that reduce to the full set of 5D background equations — a non-trivial algebraic consistency test. The homotopy-transfer treatment of the Higgs mechanism replaces the previous ad hoc procedure of discarding eigenvalues by hand with a systematic, algorithmic construction: the homotopy data are written out completely, chain-map and homotopy relations are verified in the text, and Table 1/Fig. 4 make the construction auditable and reproducible. The resulting mass matrices are checked against the known AdS5×S5 spectra of [39,40]. The black-hole analysis extends [23] from the 5D sector to full 10D KK towers, and the tangency of the BPS locus to the instability boundary at the computable points (5.49) is a non-trivial, falsifiable consistency check. The formalism is explicitly designed to extend to higher orders in perturbation theory, which is where its main long-term value lies.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2, eqs. (4.21)–(4.27)] The Hodge-theory package that underlies all of §4 is asserted without specifying the internal measure. The inner products (4.21) use the plain measure ∫dy, and the adjointness relations (4.24) — derived explicitly in (4.25) by "integrating by parts" — require ∫dy f (d_M g) = −∫dy (d_M f) g. But d_M = ρ^{−1}(U^{−1})_M^N ∂_N is a flattened derivative with [d_M, d_N] = X_{MN}^K d_K (eq. 2.36), not a coordinate derivative; its divergence is controlled by the no-trombone condition (2.34), Γ^P_{MP} = −4ρ^{−1} d_M ρ, which is precisely the kind of relation that determines a non-trivial compatible density (a power of ρ). With the measure as written, (4.24)–(4.27) are not justified off the round-sphere example, and the load-bearing chain adjoints (4.26)–(4.27) → self-adjointness of ∆V, ∆T (4.28) → zero-mode characterization (4.33)–(4.35) → projectors (4.47)–(4.48) → mass matrices (4.97), (4.103),
  2. [§4.2, eqs. (4.30)–(4.35); §4.5] The existence of the Green's operators K, K_V, K_T inverting the Laplacians on non-zero-mode complements requires a discrete spectrum with a gap, and the zero-mode characterization ker ∆ = ker d ∩ ker d† (4.33)–(4.35) requires positive-definiteness plus compactness, as the de Rham review itself states ("compact Riemannian manifold"). However, the class of restricted backgrounds of §4.1 — generalized Leibniz-parallelizable spaces with constant M_MN and vanishing forms — includes non-compact internal spaces (e.g. those underlying non-compact/CSO gaugings), for which the KK spectrum is continuous and the Hodge decomposition (4.29)–(4.32) fails. The manuscript should state compactness (or the precise spectral hypotheses) as a standing assumption of §4 and qualify the phrase "complete mass matrices" accordingly. Relatedly, the only numerical corroboration of the mass matrices is the sentence
minor comments (6)
  1. [§4.2, §4.4] The chain complex is truncated at degree −2 ("There will almost certainly be further spaces of gauge-for-gauge-for-gauge parameters... we truncate here"), and the homotopy relation in degree 3 cannot be checked because ∂_3 is unknown (end of §4.4). This is sufficient for the linearized Higgs analysis as argued, but the abstract and §6 advertise an all-orders algorithm; please state explicitly what additional data (higher gauge-for-gauge spaces, ∂_3, ...) are required for that extension.
  2. [§4.3, eqs. (4.46)–(4.50)] Terminology: the hatted fields (4.46) are called "gauge invariant" but â_µM and ĥ_µν still transform under the zero-mode parameters (4.50). The authors acknowledge the "abuse of language", but since §4.5's identification of the physical spectrum relies on the constraints (4.49) rather than strict invariance, a more precise term (e.g. "partially gauge-fixed" or "gauge covariant") used consistently would avoid confusion.
  3. [§5.1, eq. (5.15)] Eq. (5.15) lists the eigenvalues of C^M d_{MKL} with multiplicities, but these do not appear to be used anywhere in §5; please indicate where they enter (presumably in the charge/mass diagonalization) or drop the equation.
  4. [§4.4, eq. (4.74)] In (4.74) the external measure is written as d^5x without √|g|; since the Noether identities (4.76)–(4.77) are derived by integrating by parts with ∇_µ, the measure convention should be stated to avoid sign/factor ambiguities.
  5. [§4.5, eqs. (4.119)–(4.123)] The remark after (4.119)–(4.120) about possible partially massless points is interesting; a sentence on whether such degenerate points of (∆ + V/4) are known to occur within the restricted GSS class (beyond AdS) would strengthen the spin-2 discussion.
  6. [§4.4–§5.4] Typos: "estbalished" (above 4.112), "approppriste" (below 4.83), "exlicit" (above 4.95), "defintion" (below 4.80 and 4.81). In Figs. 5–6 the color coding (teal/dark blue) is defined only in the main text; please add it to the captions together with the BF-bound equation number (5.22).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: mass matrices and black-hole reductions are new algebraic computations inside ExFT; self-citations supply framework, not the target results.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 4 intro; Sec. 4.3–4.5; citation [16]]
    "We use a recently established machinery based on homotopy transfer that allows one to separate the fields into gauge invariant physical modes and pure gauge unphysical modes to all orders in perturbation theory. ... following the recent treatment of the torus toy model [16], we give a completely systematic analysis of the Higgs mechanism"

    The organizational language of homotopy transfer (chain complex, projection/inclusion/homotopy maps, downstairs complex) is taken from the authors’ own prior torus paper [16]. This is framework reuse, not a circular derivation of the mass matrices: the explicit differentials, adjoints, projectors P and P, and the resulting (M_sm), (M_V), (M_T) for the E6(6) restricted backgrounds are newly computed here and checked against external AdS5×S5 spectra. Load-bearing content does not reduce to the citation alone.

full rationale

The paper’s central outputs—the linearized fluctuation equations (3.22)–(3.28), the full homotopy-transfer data and projected mass matrices (4.97), (4.103), (4.111), (4.123) for restricted GSS backgrounds, and the AdS2 mass/charge formulae for simple modes on the Kerr–Newman near-horizon geometry—are derived by direct expansion of the E6(6) ExFT Lagrangian/EOMs under the generalized Scherk–Schwarz ansatz and by explicit construction of chain maps, projectors and homotopy operators. There is no fit to external data, no parameter tuned on a subset and then “predicted,” and no uniqueness theorem imported solely to force the answer. Recovery of the known AdS5×S5 low-level spectra is presented as a Mathematica consistency check, not as the derivation itself. Self-citations ([16] for the torus homotopy toy model, prior ExFT/GSS papers, [7] for earlier AdS mass operators, [23] for the 5D black-hole sector) supply the ambient formalism and benchmarks; the load-bearing algebra (adjoints, projectors inside the mass matrices, reduction of simple-mode EOMs to charged AdS2 Klein–Gordon equations) is recomputed in the present text. The skeptic’s concerns about the internal measure for adjointness and spectral gaps are assumptions/correctness issues, not circular reductions of outputs to inputs. Minor residual self-citation of the homotopy package does not make the mass matrices tautological. Score 1.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 7 axioms · 2 invented entities

The paper sits inside established maximal supergravity/ExFT and generalized geometry. Load-bearing inputs are the E6(6) ExFT Lagrangian and section constraint, consistency of generalized Scherk-Schwarz truncations, the homotopy transfer theorem for L∞/chain complexes, and Hodge-theory positivity on the internal space. No empirical free parameters are fitted; black-hole parameters (a,r+) label a known solution family. Invented structure is organizational (hatted gauge-invariant fields, downstairs complex) rather than new physical entities.

axioms (7)
  • domain assumption E6(6) exceptional field theory with section constraint is equivalent on-shell to 10D IIB or 11D supergravity in the appropriate section.
    Invoked throughout Sec. 2; dictionary cited to Hohm–Samtleben 2014.
  • domain assumption Generalized Scherk-Schwarz data (U,ρ) satisfying the Leibniz parallelizability / constant embedding-tensor condition yield consistent truncations to 5D gauged supergravity without trombone gauging (ΓPMP=−4ρ−1 dMρ).
    Sec. 2.3–2.4; restricts the background class.
  • standard math Homotopy transfer theorem: chain maps and homotopies induce a homotopy-equivalent complex whose degree-0 cohomology are physical modes, transferable order by order.
    Sec. 4; cited to L∞/homotopy-transfer literature and prior torus/cosmology papers.
  • domain assumption Internal operators d, Π, Z admit adjoints w.r.t. positive-definite background-metric inner products, so Laplacian zero modes are exactly closed and co-closed (Hodge package).
    Sec. 4.2; needed to define projectors K, KV, KT and discard pure-gauge eigenvalues.
  • ad hoc to paper Restricted Higgs analysis: background FμνM=JμMN=B=0 and constant MMN, with external geometry Einstein from the 5D equations.
    Sec. 4.1; stated limitation of the complete mass-matrix derivation.
  • domain assumption Black-hole embedding: minimal 5D supergravity sits as U(3) singlets inside SO(6) maximal gauged supergravity with CM normalized by (5.13).
    Sec. 5.1; follows Chong et al. / Ezroura–Larsen embedding conventions.
  • domain assumption Stability of charged AdS2 scalars is governed by the modified BF bound 1+4m²ℓ²−4q²ℓ⁴≥0.
    Sec. 5.2; standard in AdS2/CFT1 literature cited.
invented entities (2)
  • Hatted gauge-invariant field combinations (ĥ, m̂, â, b̂) and downstairs chain complex with projectors P, P no independent evidence
    purpose: Separate physical KK modes from Stückelberg/pure-gauge directions via homotopy transfer.
    Defined in (4.46)–(4.51); organizational field redefinitions, not new particles.
  • Additional T-zero-mode gauge parameter ωμνM (and implied constrained 3-form) for incomplete bμν transformations independent evidence
    purpose: Account for residual redundancy of two-forms under Z-projection at linear level.
    Sec. 4.2 eq. (4.39); expected from known ExFT (n−2)-form structure.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 49028 in / 3848 out tokens · 81354 ms · 2026-07-31T05:56:51.422321+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop the perturbation theory of ten and eleven-dimensional supergravities on a large class of Kaluza-Klein backgrounds including familiar AdS examples such as AdS$_5\times S^5$, but also more general manifolds such as black hole geometries. Employing ${\rm E}_{6(6)}$ exceptional field theory with the backgrounds characterized by a generalized Scherk-Schwarz ansatz, we determine the first order field equations for the fluctuations that are gauge invariant under linearized generalized diffeomorphisms. We then present the details of the Higgs mechanism for all fields including spin-2 for the subset of backgrounds in which higher-form gauge fields vanish. We use a recently established machinery based on homotopy transfer that allows one to separate the fields into gauge invariant physical modes and pure gauge unphysical modes to all orders in perturbation theory. Finally, as a first application for backgrounds with higher-form gauge fields switched on, we analyze part of the spectrum of ten-dimensional Kaluza-Klein modes of type IIB supergravity around a Kerr-Newman AdS$_5$ black hole that in the near horizon limit becomes a fibered product of AdS$_2$ and a squashed three-sphere.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24914 by Camilla Lavino, Camille Eloy, Henning Samtleben, Olaf Hohm, Yehudi Simon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: de Rham chain complex. and also obeys (d† ) 2 = 0. Harmonic forms are now defined as the zero modes of the Laplace operator ∆ := dd† + d †d . (4.17) The core statement we will need is that a p-form a is harmonic if and only if it is closed and co-closed, i.e, if and only if da = d † a = 0. One direction is obvious: a closed and co-closed form is harmonic by definition (4.17). Conversely, suppose that the f… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Bi-complex underlying gauge algebra. Introducing then the operators D : one-forms −→ vectors , (Dω) M := Z MN ωN , D : vectors −→ scalar metrics , (Da)MN := ΠMN,Ka K , d : vectors −→ scalars , (da) := dMa M , (4.22) and the adjoint ones in the other direction, (d † f) M := d Mf , (D†m) M := Π†M,KLmKL , (D† a)M := Z † MN a N , (4.23) we indeed have3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Truncated chain complex. 25 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Homotopy transfer. The definitions of the different objects are given in table 1. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Instability regions for the scalars t + at Kaluza-Klein levels (a) n = 0, (b) n = 1, (c) n = 5 and (d) n = 10 in the (r+, a) plane. The five-dimensional masses M and charges Q of these modes can be found in table 3. The BPS line r+ = p a(2 + a), in red, is tangent to the BF instability region at the points (5.49), depicted by yellow crosses. The purple line corresponds to the saturation of the left equatio… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Instability region for the whole Kaluza-Klein tower of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,Exceptional form ofD= 11supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 231601 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.231601, arXiv:1308.1673

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  2. [2]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,Exceptional field theory I: E6(6) covariant form of M-theory and type IIB, Phys. Rev.D89, 066016 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.066016, arXiv:1312.0614

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    K. Lee, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram,Spheres, generalised parallelisability and consistent truncations, Fortsch. Phys.65(10-11), 1700048 (2017), doi:10.1002/prop.201700048, arXiv:1401.3360

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,Consistent Kaluza-Klein truncations via exceptional field theory, JHEP1501, 131 (2015), doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2015)131, arXiv:1410.8145

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Baguet, O

    A. Baguet, O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,E6(6) exceptional field theory: Review and embedding of type IIB, PoSCORFU2014, 133 (2015), doi:10.22323/1.231.0133, arXiv:1506.01065

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Malek and H

    E. Malek and H. Samtleben,Kaluza-Klein spectrometry for supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 101601 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.101601, arXiv:1911.12640

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Malek and H

    E. Malek and H. Samtleben,Kaluza-Klein spectrometry from exceptional field theory, Phys. Rev. D102, 106016 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.106016, arXiv:2009.03347

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Guarino, E

    A. Guarino, E. Malek and H. Samtleben,Stable non-supersymmetric Anti-de Sitter vacua of massive IIA supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(6), 061601 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 126.061601, arXiv:2011.06600

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Eloy,Kaluza-Klein spectrometry forAdS 3 vacua, SciPost Phys.10(6), 131 (2021), doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.6.131, arXiv:2011.11658

    C. Eloy,Kaluza-Klein spectrometry forAdS 3 vacua, SciPost Phys.10(6), 131 (2021), doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.6.131, arXiv:2011.11658

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Cesàro and O

    M. Cesàro and O. Varela,Kaluza-Klein fermion mass matrices from exceptional field theory andN= 1spectra, JHEP03, 138 (2021), doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)138, arXiv:2012.05249

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Bobev, E

    N. Bobev, E. Malek, B. Robinson, H. Samtleben and J. van Muiden,Kaluza-Klein spectroscopy for the Leigh-Strassler SCFT, JHEP04, 208 (2021), doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)208, arXiv: 2012.07089

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Cesàro, G

    M. Cesàro, G. Larios and O. Varela,The spectrum of marginally-deformedN= 2 CFTs with AdS4 S-fold duals of type IIB, JHEP12, 214 (2021), doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2021)214, arXiv:2109.11608

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    C. Eloy, G. Larios and H. Samtleben,Triality and the consistent reductions on AdS3×S 3, JHEP01, 055 (2022), doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)055, arXiv:2111.01167

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    C.EloyandG.Larios,Nonsupersymmetric stable marginal deformations in AdS3/CFT2, Phys. Rev. D108(12), L121901 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L121901, arXiv:2309.03261

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Eloy and G

    C. Eloy and G. Larios,Charting the conformal manifold of holographic CFT2’s, SciPost Phys. 17(4), 123 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.4.123, arXiv:2405.17542. 54

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    C. Eloy, O. Hohm, C. Lavino, H. Samtleben and Y. Simon,Homotopy transfer for massive Kaluza-Klein modes, JHEP05, 098 (2026), doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2026)098, arXiv:2512.03146

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    Zwiebach,Closed string field theory: Quantum action and the B-V master equation, Nucl

    B. Zwiebach,Closed string field theory: Quantum action and the B-V master equation, Nucl. Phys. B390, 33 (1993), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90388-6, arXiv:hep-th/9206084

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  18. [18]

    A. M. Zeitlin,Homotopy Lie Superalgebra in Yang-Mills Theory, JHEP09, 068 (2007), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/068, arXiv:0708.1773

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    Hohm and B

    O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach,L∞ algebras and field theory, Fortsch. Phys.65(3-4), 1700014 (2017), doi:10.1002/prop.201700014, arXiv:1701.08824

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    A. S. Arvanitakis, O. Hohm, C. Hull and V. Lekeu,Homotopy transfer and effective field theory I: Tree-level, Fortsch. Phys.70(2-3), 2200003 (2022), doi:10.1002/prop.202200003, arXiv:2007.07942

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Chiaffrino, O

    C. Chiaffrino, O. Hohm and A. F. Pinto,Gauge invariant perturbation theory via homotopy transfer, JHEP05, 236 (2021), doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)236, arXiv:2012.12249

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Hohm and A

    O. Hohm and A. F. Pinto,Cosmological Perturbations in Double Field Theory, JHEP04, 073 (2023), doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2023)073, arXiv:2207.14788

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Ezroura and F

    N. Ezroura and F. Larsen,Supergravity spectrum of AdS5 black holes, JHEP12, 020 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)020, arXiv:2408.11529

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    D. S. Berman, C. D. A. Blair and R. Otsuki,Non-Riemannian geometry of M-theory, JHEP 07, 175 (2019), doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)175, arXiv:1902.01867

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    D. S. Berman and C. D. A. Blair,The geometry, branes and applications of exceptional field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35(30), 2030014 (2020), doi:10.1142/S0217751X20300148, arXiv: 2006.09777

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    de Wit, H

    B. de Wit, H. Samtleben and M. Trigiante,The maximalD= 5supergravities, Nucl. Phys. B716, 215 (2005), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.03.032, arXiv:hep-th/0412173

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  27. [27]

    Le Diffon and H

    A. Le Diffon and H. Samtleben,Supergravities without an action: Gauging the trombone, Nucl. Phys.B811, 1 (2009), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.11.010, arXiv:0809.5180

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  28. [28]

    Günaydin, L

    M. Günaydin, L. J. Romans and N. P. Warner,Compact and noncompact gauged supergravity theories in five dimensions, Nucl. Phys.B272, 598 (1986), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90237-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90237-3 1986

  29. [29]

    Baguet, O

    A. Baguet, O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,Consistent type IIB reductions to maximal 5D super- gravity, Phys. Rev.D92, 065004 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.065004, arXiv:1506.01385

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    A. S. Arvanitakis, O. Hohm, C. Hull and V. Lekeu,Homotopy transfer and effective field theory II: Strings and double field theory, Fortsch. Phys.70(2-3), 2200004 (2022), doi:10. 1002/prop.202200004, arXiv:2106.08343

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,Exceptional field theory III: E 8(8), Phys. Rev.D90, 066002 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.066002, arXiv:1406.3348. 55

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  32. [32]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,Higher gauge structures in double and exceptional field theory, InDurham Symposium, Higher Structures in M-Theory Durham, UK, August 12-18, 2018 (2019), arXiv:1903.02821

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Deser and R

    S. Deser and R. I. Nepomechie,Gauge Invariance Versus Masslessness in De Sitter Space, Annals Phys.154, 396 (1984), doi:10.1016/0003-4916(84)90156-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(84)90156-8 1984

  34. [34]

    Z. W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C. N. Pope,General non-extremal rotating black holes in minimal five-dimensional gauged supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 161301 (2005), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.161301, arXiv:hep-th/0506029

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  35. [35]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu, C. Pope, A. Sadrzadeh and T. A. Tran,ConsistentSO(6)reduction of type IIB supergravity onS 5, Nucl.Phys.B586, 275 (2000), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00372-2, arXiv:hep-th/0003103

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  36. [36]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman,Stability in gauged extended supergravity, Annals Phys. 144, 249 (1982), doi:10.1016/0003-4916(82)90116-6

    doi:10.1016/0003-4916(82)90116-6 1982

  37. [37]

    Faulkner, N

    T. Faulkner, N. Iqbal, H. Liu, J. McGreevy and D. Vegh,Holographic non-Fermi liquid fixed points, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc.A 369, 1640 (2011), doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0354, arXiv: 1101.0597

    arXiv 2011

  38. [38]

    Faulkner, H

    T. Faulkner, H. Liu, J. McGreevy and D. Vegh,Emergent quantum criticality, Fermi surfaces, and AdS(2), Phys. Rev. D83, 125002 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.125002, arXiv: 0907.2694

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    H. J. Kim, L. J. Romans and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,The mass spectrum of chiral ten- dimensionalN= 2supergravity onS 5, Phys. Rev.D32, 389 (1985), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 32.389

    doi:10.1103/physrevd 1985

  40. [40]

    Günaydin and N

    M. Günaydin and N. Marcus,The spectrum of theS 5 compactification of the chiralN= 2,D= 10supergravity and the unitary supermultiplets ofU(2,2/4), Class. Quant. Grav.2, L11 (1985), doi:10.1088/0264-9381/2/2/001

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/2/2/001 1985

  41. [41]

    N. S. Deger, C. A. Deral, A. Saha and O. Sarıoğlu,Rotating AdS3×S 3 and dyonic strings from 3 dimensions, JHEP10, 185 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)185, arXiv:2408.03197

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Maurelli, R

    S. Maurelli, R. Noris, M. Oyarzo, H. Samtleben and M. Trigiante,Supersymmetric warped so- lutions from Type IIB orientifold reduction, JHEP08, 013 (2025), doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2025) 013, arXiv:2504.16822

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    B.Duboeuf, E.MalekandH.Samtleben,Cubic and higher-order supergravity couplings for AdS vacua using Exceptional Field Theory, JHEP05, 214 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)214, arXiv:2311.00742

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Chiaffrino, T

    C. Chiaffrino, T. Ersoy and O. Hohm,Holography as homotopy, JHEP09, 161 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)161, arXiv:2307.08094. 56

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024