Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Family of Unconventional Superconductivities in Crystalline Graphene

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In clean rhombohedral graphene, the authors identify superconducting states that are enhanced or induced by magnetic fields and survive in-plane fields far beyond the BCS Pauli limit.

desk verdict Genuinely new field-enhanced and field-induced superconducting states in clean rhombohedral graphene, with SC2 and SC4 convincing and SC3's intrinsic out-of-plane boost still an open question. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03295 v1 pith:DT664H4W submitted 2025-09-03 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.supr-con

Junseok Seo , Armel A. Cotten , Mingchi Xu , Omid Sharifi Sedeh , Henok Weldeyesus , Tonghang Han , Zhengguang Lu , Zhenghan Wu
show 12 more authors
Shenyong Ye Wei Xu Jixiang Yang Emily Aitken Prayoga P. Liong Zach Hadjri Rasul Gazizulin Kenji Watanabe Takashi Taniguchi Mingda Li Dominik M. Zumbühl Long Ju
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.supr-con
keywords rhombohedralmultilayergrapheneunconventionalsuperconductivityPaulilimitviolationfield-enhancedfield-inducedShubnikov-deHaasoscillationshalf-metalparentstatespin-orbitproximityeffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports electrical transport measurements on hole-doped rhombohedral tetralayer and pentalayer graphene and argues that these clean carbon crystals host a family of superconducting states, several of which behave in ways ordinary Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer superconductors cannot. In pentalayer graphene, one superconducting state (SC2) is strengthened by an in-plane magnetic field, another (SC3) is strengthened by a small out-of-plane field, and a third (SC4) appears only when an in-plane field is applied; all three remain superconducting in in-plane fields up to 8.5 tesla, far beyond the nominal Pauli limit for a conventional superconductor. The paper also reports that putting a WSe2 layer next to tetralayer graphene produces several new superconducting states while keeping the graphene in the clean limit. If the interpretation is right, rhombohedral multilayer graphene is a tunable, low-disorder testbed for superconductivity with broken symmetries and a plausible platform for engineering non-Abelian quasiparticles.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the ordered parent states of the superconducting phases, identified by spin and valley structure and diagnosed with Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations. The central signatures are frequency relations among the oscillation branches: $f_1 - (f_2 + f_3) \approx 1/2$ for SC2 and $f_1 - f_2 \approx 1/2$, $f_1 - f_3 \approx 1/2$ for SC3, which the paper reads as evidence for an annular Fermi surface (a ring-shaped Fermi surface) in a half-metal (a conductor with only one spin species at the Fermi level). Superconductivity itself is established by vanishing $R_{xx}$, nonlinear current-voltage curves, critical-current peaks that respond to a small out-of-plane field, and BKT scaling with $V_{xx} \propto I^3$; the clean limit is quantified through coherence length $\xi$ and mean free path $l$ with $\xi/l \ll 1$. The Pauli-limit-violation ratio, the measured in-plane critical field divided by the Pauli limit, is what turns the survival of SC3 and SC4 up to 8.5 T into a quantitative argument for unconventional pairing.

What would settle it

A direct spin-sensitive measurement of the normal states of SC2 and SC3 would settle the parent-state claim: if no net spin polarization is found, or if a higher-resolution Shubnikov-de Haas measurement fails to reproduce the frequency relations $f_1 - (f_2 + f_3) \approx 1/2$ and $f_1 - f_2 \approx 1/2$, $f_1 - f_3 \approx 1/2$, the half-metal interpretation collapses. On the superconducting side, observing that the small out-of-plane field no longer enhances SC3 in a device with different contacts or after a different cooling procedure would point to a non-intrinsic, percolative origin.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that clean, hole-doped rhombohedral tetra- and penta-layer graphene host not one but several superconducting states, and three of them respond to magnetic fields in ways a conventional spin-singlet superconductor should not. SC2, whose normal state is identified as a valley-unpolarized (both valleys equally occupied), spin-polarized half-metal with an annular Fermi surface, has its critical current and Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition temperature increased when an in-plane field is applied. SC3, identified from Shubnikov-de Haas data as a half-metal with an annular Fermi surface, is boosted by an out-of-plane field of about 1.8 mT and is still superconducting in an in-plane field of 8.5 T, corresponding to a nominal Pauli-limit-violation ratio above 35. SC4 does not exist at zero field and is induced only by a large in-plane field, surviving to at least 8.5 T with a nominal Pauli-limit-violation ratio around 65. The paper argues that these effects come from the spin-polarized isospin structure of the parent states rather than from Ising spin-orbit coupling, because bare graphene has very weak spin-orbit coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on reading the Shubnikov-de Haas frequencies as proving that SC2 and SC3 emerge from spin-polarized, valley-unpolarized half-metals with ring-shaped Fermi surfaces; the paper itself notes that the low-frequency branch in the SC3 density range is unclear, so a misassignment would weaken the spin-polarized interpretation and the exclusion of orbital-magnetism mechanisms for the out-of-plane-field enhancement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rhombohedral multilayer graphene becomes a clean, gate-tunable platform for studying superconductivity without the twist-angle disorder that complicates moiré devices.
  • The in-plane-field robustness of SC2, SC3, and SC4, with nominal Pauli-limit-violation ratios above 35, would require pairing mechanisms beyond the conventional Pauli limit, such as spin-triplet or other broken-symmetry pairing.
  • Because the same rhombohedral stacks already host quantum anomalous Hall states, superconducting regions and topological regions could be combined in one material to pursue Majorana or parafermion quasiparticles.
  • Proximitized spin-orbit coupling from WSe2 creates additional superconducting states while preserving the high mean free path, suggesting interface engineering as a practical way to enlarge the superconducting phase diagram.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper does not pursue is a direct test of triplet pairing: measuring the angular anisotropy of the upper critical field of SC4 in the plane would distinguish a spin-triplet state from an extrinsic or multi-band effect.
  • The nearly identical optimal out-of-plane field for SC3 in two devices resembles an Aharonov-Bohm period of a small loop; testing whether the enhancement survives with different contact geometries would separate a phase-sensitive mechanism from a density-of-states effect.
  • If the spin-polarized half-metal assignments are right, rhombohedral graphene offers a rare example of possible spin-polarized superconductivity without magnetic dopants, which could clarify what kind of pairing glue is needed.
  • The low displacement fields at which several of these superconductors appear would make it practical to combine them with quantum anomalous Hall regions in split-gate devices, because gate leakage is less of a risk at low fields.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports transport measurements on rhombohedral tetralayer and pentalayer graphene, identifying several superconducting states. Three of these (SC2, SC3, SC4) are claimed to be unconventional: SC2 is strengthened by an in-plane magnetic field, SC3 is boosted by a small out-of-plane field, and SC4 is induced by an in-plane field. All three remain superconducting up to 8.5 T in-plane, with nominal Pauli-limit-violation ratios exceeding 35 for SC3 and about 65 for SC4. Shubnikov-de Haas analysis assigns the parent states of SC2 and SC3 to valley-unpolarized, spin-polarized half-metals with annular Fermi surfaces, and the absence of anomalous Hall effect is used to infer zero valley polarization. A separate R4G/WSe2 device shows that proximitized spin-orbit coupling produces additional superconducting states. The authors interpret these observations as evidence for a family of unconventional superconductors in a clean, gate-tunable material platform.

Significance. If the interpretations hold, this work would establish a clean, crystalline, gate-tunable platform for unconventional superconductivity, with field-enhanced and field-induced superconducting states that are rare in any material. The paper's strengths include the mutual consistency of several superconducting diagnostics (vanishing Rxx, nonlinear dV/dI, suppression by millitesla out-of-plane fields, BKT scaling), the reproduction of the SC3 field-enhancement in a second device, and the clean-limit context (xi/l << 1). However, two load-bearing points need additional support before the central claims can be considered secure: the intrinsic nature of the SC3 enhancement under a small perpendicular field, and the robustness of the fermiology-based assignment of parent states for SC2 and SC3. These concerns do not undermine the existence of superconductivity, but they directly affect the interpretation of the field-enhancement and the claimed half-metal parentage.

major comments (2)
  1. The paper reports Fraunhofer-like interference fringes in the critical current near the phase boundary of SC3 (Extended Data Fig. 5i), and the main text concludes this section with 'We believe further studies are needed to clarify the underlying mechanism.' This admission, together with the presence of such fringes, leaves open the possibility that the observed enhancement of Ic and TBKT under a small perpendicular field arises from a Josephson-junction network (e.g., superconducting islands with pi junctions) rather than an intrinsic property of a uniform superconductor. The authors' counterarguments—that the optimal B_perp is independent of (n, D) and comparable in two devices—are qualitative; a fixed loop area set by disorder or by device geometry would also give an (n, D)-independent optimum. To secure the central claim that SC3 is an intrinsically field-boosted superconductor, the paper should provide a quantitative analysis of the Fraunhofer period in Extended Data Fig. 5i, a direct test that rules out percolative/junction effects (e.g., multi-terminal or noise measurements), or an explicit demonstration that the enhancement persists when the normal-state resistance away from SC3 is unchanged.
  2. The parent-state identification for SC3 rests on the frequency relations f1−f2≈1/2 and f1−f3≈1/2, yet the low-frequency branch is explicitly described as 'unclear' within the density range of SC3. The branch is identified only at the two ends of the SC3 region, and the normalized frequency f_nu depends on gate capacitances calibrated from Landau fans. If the frequency assignments are not unique, the conclusion that SC3 emerges from a valley-unpolarized half-metal with an annular Fermi surface is not secured; consequently, the exclusion of an orbital-magnetism mechanism for the B_perp enhancement also loses support. A similar concern applies to SC2 (Fig. 2d), where the relation f1−(f2+f3)≈1/2 is used. Please provide a more thorough evaluation of the SdH branches, including uncertainty estimates and a comparison with band-structure calculations, so that the half-metal parentage and the spin-polarized interpretation rest on firmer ground.
minor comments (5)
  1. The equation for the coherence length is garbled in the provided manuscript; please ensure that all equations, especially the expression for ξ, are typeset correctly.
  2. The definitions of n and D appear to be missing a factor or a division by ε0; please verify that the formulas as written are consistent with the units used in the figures (V/nm).
  3. The text says 'Compared to bare R4G as shown in Fig. 1a' but Fig. 1a is the R5G map; Fig. 1b is the R4G map. Please correct the figure reference.
  4. The naming of the new states in the R4G/WSe2 device (SC3–SC7) may be confusing because SC3 in the bare R5G device is a different state; please add a clarifying note or use distinct labels.
  5. The statement that the sample could not be cooled as efficiently at 8 T as at 5 T is important for interpreting the high-field data; please include this caveat in the main text where the B|| = 8 T data are compared with B|| = 5 T.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: all central claims are direct transport observations compared against external benchmarks.

full rationale

This paper is an experimental transport study with no fitted theory and no derivation chain that reduces a prediction to an input. The superconducting states SC1–SC4 are identified by measured zero-resistance regions, nonlinear current–voltage characteristics, and critical-current responses to magnetic fields; the field-enhancement claims for SC2, SC3, and SC4 are direct comparisons of measured Rxx maps and differential-resistance traces at different fields. The Pauli-limit-violation ratios are computed by comparing the measured in-plane critical fields with the textbook Chandrasekhar limit, which is an external benchmark rather than a fitted constant. The parent-state assignments for SC2 and SC3 are inferred from Shubnikov–de Haas oscillation frequencies and the absence of anomalous Hall effect; these Fermi-surface analyses are independent observables and are not used to define the superconducting states themselves. The paper cites several prior works, including some by overlapping authors, but only for context or comparison (e.g., R2G superconductivity, chiral SC in rhombohedral graphene, QAH states) and not as the load-bearing justification for the present claims. The admitted uncertainty about the microscopic mechanism of SC3's out-of-plane-field enhancement, including the Fraunhofer-like interference fringes in Extended Data Fig. 5i and the closing statement that further studies are needed, is an interpretation or correctness risk, not a circularity: none of the measured enhancements are constructed from the same data used to explain them. No equation in the paper makes a claimed output equal to an input by definition, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The paper is therefore self-contained against direct transport evidence and receives a circularity score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims are experimental observations; no free theory parameters are fitted. The paper relies on standard analysis tools (BKT theory, Pauli limit, Shubnikov-de Haas-Onsager relation, Hall-effect interpretation) and a field-compensation trick. The main ledger concern is not a fitted constant but the choice to evaluate Pauli limits from TBKT rather than mean-field Tc.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption BKT theory: Vxx proportional to I^3 at the BKT transition, and TBKT marks the 2D superconducting transition.
    Used to extract TBKT for SC2, SC3, SC4 and the R4G/WSe2 states (Fig. 3a inset; Extended Data Figs. 2, 3, 9). If the V proportional to I^3 scaling is not the correct transition criterion, the quoted TBKT values and Pauli-limit ratios shift.
  • domain assumption Chandrasekhar-Clogston Pauli limit H_P = 1.86 Tc applies with Tc replaced by TBKT for the nominal limit.
    Paper computes Pauli-limit-violation ratios using TBKT (e.g., 130 mK for SC3, 70 mK for SC4). Since mean-field Tc is generally above TBKT, this likely overstates the violation ratio, though the qualitative robustness to 8.5 T remains.
  • standard math Onsager relation: Fourier frequencies of Rxx(1/B_perp) are proportional to Fermi-surface cross-sectional areas; normalized f_nu = f divided by (|n|h/e) distinguishes full and annular Fermi surfaces.
    Foundation of the fermiology claims for SC1, SC2, and SC3 parent states (Fig. 1e,f; Fig. 2d; Fig. 3b; Methods).
  • domain assumption Absence of anomalous Hall effect in a half-metal implies zero valley polarization.
    Used to conclude that SC2 and SC3 normal states are valley-unpolarized (Fig. 2e, Fig. 3c), and to exclude orbital-magnetic-moment coupling as the origin of the out-of-plane-field enhancement of SC3.
  • domain assumption The superconducting sample can serve as a sensitive magnetometer to compensate the perpendicular component of the in-plane field.
    Methods: the perpendicular component of the in-plane field due to sample misalignment was carefully compensated with the perpendicular magnet using the superconducting sample as an extremely sensitive magnetometer. This is required for the in-plane-field response measurements.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Family of Unconventional Superconductivities in Crystalline Graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DT664H4W

@misc{pith2026250903295,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Family of Unconventional Superconductivities in Crystalline Graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DT664H4W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03295}
}
read the original abstract

Unconventional superconductors exhibit multiple broken symmetries and exceed the range of the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory. For instance, time-reversal symmetry can be broken in addition to the gauge symmetry, resulting in superconductors that can be enhanced or induced by a magnetic field. However, such unconventional superconductivities are more vulnerable to impurities than their BCS counterparts, requiring highly ordered and clean material systems to observe them. Crystalline rhombohedral multilayer graphene is a promising platform to explore unconventional superconductivity due to its superior material quality and gate-tunable strong correlation effects. Here we report transport measurements of rhombohedral tetralayer and pentalayer graphene, where a spectrum of superconductivities in a clean limit are observed. Three of them (SC2-4) show highly unusual enhancements by magnetic fields: 1. SC2 is strengthened by an in-plane field; 2. SC3 is boosted by a small out-of-plane field; 3. SC4 is induced by an in-plane field. All these superconductors are robust against an in-plane field up to 8.5 Tesla, exceeding the Pauli limit of conventional superconductors by tens of times and suggesting their unconventional nature. Moreover, we observed that proximitized spin-orbit coupling generates a plethora of new superconductors in the phase diagram, while maintaining the high quality of bare rhombohedral graphene. Our work establishes a family of new superconductors in rhombohedral multilayer graphene, which also provides an ideal platform to engineer non-Abelian quasiparticles by proximitizing with quantum anomalous Hall states existing in the same material system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03295 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. SC in hole-doped bare RNG. a,b, Longitudinal resistance Rxx as a function of n and D/ε0 for R5G (a) and R4G (b), respectively, at zero magnetic field. Inset of a: Zoomed-in map corresponding to the black box. Several regions with vanishing Rxx are observed, including the SC1 similar to that observed in R3G and three new SC states labeled as SC2 and SC3. c,d, Rxx as a function of n at varied temperatures and fixed D/… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. SC2 and SC4 in R5G, respectively enhanced and induced by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. SC3 in R5G enhanced by B⊥. a, Rxx as a function of n at D/ε0 = 52 mV/nm and varied temperatures. Inset: Voltage Vxx versus current I at T = 8, 88, 115, 130, 138 and 156 mK for n = −1.104  1012 cm−2. The dashed line corresponds to 𝑉୶୶ ∝ 𝐼 ଷ expected from the BKT theory. Vanishing Rxx and nonlinear Vxx-I relation indicate SC3 is a superconductor. b, Fourier transform of Rxx(1/B⊥) as a function of n and fν, suggesting… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Proliferation of SC in R4G by proximitized SOC effects. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nematic Wigner crystals in rhombohedral multilayer graphene

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Projected Hartree–Fock and time-dependent Hartree–Fock calculations predict a spontaneously C3-breaking (nematic) Wigner crystal that is locally stable in a region of the rhombohedral tetralayer graphene phase diagram.

  2. Anomalous metal and superconducting phases in rhombohedral graphene

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gate-tuned rhombohedral graphene hosts adjacent zero-resistance superconducting and finite-resistance anomalous-metal pockets with similar Tc but distinct critical fields, constraining extrinsic origins of anomalous metals.

  3. Competing Orders Driven by Wigner Crystal Phase in Rhombohedral Graphene

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In pentalayer rhombohedral graphene, the insulating state beside chiral superconductivity is a Wigner crystal whose boundary continuously connects to magnetic-field-stabilized superconducting and reentrant quantum Hal...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Stewart, G. R. Unconventional superconductivity, Adv. Phys. 66, 75-196 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Magnetic field-boosted superconductivity, Phys

    de Visser, A. Magnetic field-boosted superconductivity, Phys. Today 73, 44-50 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Anderson, P. W. Theory of dirty superconductors, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 11, 26-30 (1959)

    work page 1959

  4. [4]

    Han, T. et al. Correlated insulator and Chern insulators in pentalayer rhombohedral-stacked graphene, Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 181-187 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Liu, K. et al. Spontaneous broken-symmetry insulator and metals in tetralayer rhombohedral graphene, Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 188-195 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Chandrasekhar, B. S. A note on the maximum critical field of high-field superconductors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1, 7-8 (1962)

    work page 1962

  7. [7]

    & Stern, A

    Alicea, J. & Stern, A. Designer non-Abelian anyon platforms: from Majorana to Fibonacci, Phys. Scr. T164, 014006 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Han, T. et al. Large quantum anomalous Hall effect in spin-orbit proximitized rhombohedral graphene, Science 384, 647-651 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Lian, B. et al. Topological quantum computation based on chiral Majorana fermions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 10938-10942 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Steglich, F. et al. Superconductivity in the Presence of Strong Pauli Paramagnetism: CeCu2Si2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1892-1896 (1979)

    1979

  3. [11]

    Stewart, G. R. Heavy-fermion systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 755-787 (1984)

    1984

  4. [12]

    Fisher, R. A. et al. Specific Heat of UPt3: Evidence for Unconventional Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1411-1414 (1989)

    1989

  5. [13]

    Ran, S. et al. Nearly ferromagnetic spin-triplet superconductivity, Science 365, 684-687 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Bednorz, J. G. & Müller, K. A. Possible High Tc Superconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O System, Z. Phys. B Cond. Matt. 64, 189-193 (1986)

    1986

  7. [15]

    Wu, M. K. et al. Superconductivity at 93 K in a new mixed-phase Y-Ba-Cu-O compound system at ambient pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 908-910 (1987)

    1987

  8. [16]

    Kamihara, Y. et al. Iron-Based Layered Superconductor La[O1-xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296-3297 (2008)

    2008

  9. [17]

    Chen, X. H. et al. Superconductivity at 43 K in SmFeAsO1-xFx, Nature 453, 761-762 (2008)

    2008

  10. [18]

    Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 43-50 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Yankowitz, M. et al. Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 363, 1059- 1064 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Lu, X. et al. Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature 574, 653-657 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Park, J. M. et al. Tunable strongly coupled superconductivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nature 590, 249-255 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Hao, Z. et al. Electric field-tunable superconductivity in alternating-twist-angle magic-angle trilayer graphene, Science 371, 1133-1138 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Tian, H. et al. Evidence for Dirac flat band superconductivity enabled by quantum geometry, Nature 614, 440-444 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Xia, Y. et al. Superconductivity in twisted bilayer WSe2, Nature 637, 833-838 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Guo, Y. et al. Superconductivity in 5.0˚ twisted bilayer WSe2, Nature 637, 839-845 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Uri, A. et al. Mapping the twist angle and unconventional Landau levels in magic angle graphene, Nature 581, 47-52 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Lau, C. N. et al. Reproducibility in the fabrication and physics of moiré materials, Nature 602, 41-50 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Zhang, F. et al. Band structure of ABC-stacked graphene trilayers, Phys. Rev. B 82, 035409 (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    & McCann, E

    Koshino, M. & McCann, E. Trigonal warping and Berry’s phase Nπ in ABC-stacked multilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165409 (2009)

    2009

  22. [30]

    Chatterjee, S. et al. Inter-valley coherent order and isospin fluctuation mediated superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Nat. Commun. 13, 6013 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Dong, Z. et al. Superconductivity near spin and valley orders in graphene multilayers, Phys. Rev. B 108, 134503 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Vituri, Y. et al. Incommensurate intervalley coherent states in ABC graphene: Collective modes and superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 111, 075103 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Zhou, H. et al. Isospin magnetism and spin-polarized superconductivity in Bernal bilayer graphene, Science 375, 774-778 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Zhang, Y. et al. Enhanced superconductivity in spin-orbit proximitized bilayer graphene, Nature 613, 268-273 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Li, C. et al. Tunable superconductivity in electron- and hole-doped Bernal bilayer graphene, Nature 631, 300-306 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Zhang, Y. et al. Twist-programmable superconductivity in spin-orbit coupled bilayer graphene, Nature 641, 625-631 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Zhou, H. et al. Superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Nature 598, 434-438 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Patterson, C. L. et al. Superconductivity and spin canting in spin-orbit-coupled trilayer graphene, Nature 641, 632-638 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    Yang, J. et al. Impact of spin-orbit coupling on superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene, Nat. Mater. 24, 1058-1065 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Han, T. et al. Orbital multiferroicity in pentalayer rhombohedral graphene, Nature 623, 41-47 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Lu, Z. et al. Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature 626, 759-764 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Choi, Y. et al. Superconductivity and quantized anomalous Hall effect in rhombohedral graphene, Nature 639, 342-347 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Xie, J. et al. Tunable fractional Chern insulators in rhombohedral graphene superlattices, Nat. Mater. 24, 1042-1048 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Lindner, N. H. et al. Fractionalizing Majorana Fermions: Non-Abelian Statistics on the Edges of Abelian Quantum Hall States, Phys. Rev. X 2, 041002 (2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    Clarke, D. J. et al. Exotic non-Abelian anyons from conventional fractional quantum Hall states, Nat. Commun. 4, 1348 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    Lu, J. et al. Full superconducting dome of strong Ising protection in gated monolayer WS2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 3551-3556 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    Han, T. et al. Signatures of chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene, Nature 643, 654-661 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    Lu, J. M. et al. Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS2, Science 350, 1353-1357 (2015)

    2015

  41. [49]

    Saito, Y. et al. Superconductivity protected by spin-valley locking in ion-gated MoS2, Nat. Phys. 12, 144-149 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Xi, X. et al. Ising pairing in superconducting NbSe2 atomic layers, Nat. Phys. 12, 139-143 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Sichua, J. et al. Resonance Microwave Measurements of an Intrinsic Spin-Orbit Coupling Gap in Graphene: A Possible Indication of a Topological State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 046403 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    Banszerus, L. et al. Observation of the Spin-Orbit Gap in Bilayer Graphene by One- Dimensional Ballistic Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 177701 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    Arp, T. et al. Intervalley coherence and intrinsic spin-orbit coupling in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Nat. Phys. 20, 1413-1420 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Lévy, F. et al. Magnetic Field-Induced Superconductivity in the Ferromagnet URhGe, Science 309, 1343-1346 (2005)

    2005

  47. [55]

    Ran, S. et al. Extreme magnetic-field-boosted superconductivity, Nat. Phys. 15, 1250-1254 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    Uji, S. et al. Magnetic-field-induced superconductivity in a two-dimensional organic conductor, Nature 410, 908-910 (2001)

    2001

  49. [57]

    Balicas, L. et al. Superconductivity in an Organic Insulator at Very High Magnetic Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 067002 (2001)

    2001

  50. [58]

    Meul, H. W. et al. Observation of Magnetic-Field-Induced Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 497-500 (1984)

    1984

  51. [59]

    & Peter, M

    Jaccarino, V. & Peter, M. Ultra-High-Field Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 290 (1962)

    1962

  52. [60]

    Morissette, E. et al. Superconductivity, Anomalous Hall Effect, and Stripe Order in Rhombohedral Hexalayer Graphene, arXiv:2504.05129 (2025). Methods Device fabrications Rhombohedral graphene and hBN flakes were prepared onto SiO2/Si substrates by mechanical exfoliation. The r...

    2025 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Lu, Z. et al. Extended quantum anomalous Hall states in graphene/hBN moiré superlattices, Nature 637, 1090-1095 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    Ju, L. et al. Topological valley transport at bilayer graphene domain walls, Nature 520, 650- 655 (2015)

    2015

  55. [63]

    Lui, C. H. et al. Imaging Stacking Order in Few-Layer Graphene, Nano Lett. 11, 164-169 (2011). Acknowledgements We acknowledge helpful discussions with A. V. Chubukov, C. Yoon and F. Zhang. J.S. was supported by NSF grant DMR-2414725. The device fabrication and transport measu...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.