Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 31 references

Emergence of Double-Dome Superconductivity in the Pressurized Dirac Semimetal BaMg2Bi2

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read BaMg2Bi2, a Dirac semimetal with surface superconductivity at ambient pressure, develops two distinct superconducting domes under pressure — peaking at about 6.67 K near 4.5 GPa and about 7.22 K near 10.4 GPa — with the first dome tied to a

desk verdict Double-dome superconductivity in BaMg2Bi2 is real and reproducible; the second dome's structural origin is plausible but relies on room-temperature XRD, so it needs a careful referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02394 v1 pith:DTV36JIZ submitted 2026-08-03 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Qi Wang , Juefei Wu , Cuiying Pei , Yi Zhao , Yiyan Wang , Yanpeng Qi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 74.70.-b74.62.Fj74.25.Dw
keywords highpressuresuperconductivityDiracsemimetalLifshitztransitionstructuralphaseBaMg2Bi2double-domePnma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that pressurizing the Dirac semimetal BaMg2Bi2 produces superconductivity that rises and falls twice, like an M-shaped curve: Tc peaks at about 6.67 K around 4.5 GPa, dips, then rises again to about 7.22 K around 10.4 GPa. The authors argue the two domes have different origins. The first happens while the crystal keeps its ambient layered structure and coincides with a Lifshitz transition — the Fermi surface changes shape, and the dominant charge carriers switch from holes to electrons. The second appears exactly when the crystal transforms from the P-3m1 phase to a denser Pnma phase. If correct, this makes BaMg2Bi2 a single material in which pressure can tune superconductivity through two independent mechanisms.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the pressure-tuned Lifshitz transition — a change in the topology of the Fermi surface, defined as pockets appearing, vanishing, or disconnecting — in the P-3m1 phase, driving the first dome; and the pressure-driven structural phase transition from the P-3m1 phase to the Pnma phase, driving the second dome. The phase diagram of Tc versus pressure (Figure 7) is the central organizing object, and it is built from transport measurements, Hall-resistivity tracking of the carrier-type inversion, high-pressure X-ray diffraction identifying the structural transition, and density-functional-theory calculations including phonon stability of the predicted Pnma structure.

What would settle it

Perform low-temperature high-pressure X-ray diffraction across 8-12 GPa in the same diamond-anvil cell used for resistivity, tracking both the Tc peak and the appearance of Pnma reflections: if the Tc maximum at about 10.4 GPa appears without Pnma reflections, or Pnma appears without a Tc enhancement, the claimed structural-dome association fails. Alternatively, a direct Fermi-surface probe under pressure (such as quantum oscillations) that shows no pocket emergence or vanishing between 1.7 and 4.5 GPa would falsify the Lifshitz-transition attribution of the first dome.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that BaMg2Bi2 exhibits pressure-driven double-dome superconductivity, with Tc reaching about 6.67 K at 4.5 GPa and about 7.22 K at 10.4 GPa. The paper establishes this through high-pressure transport, Hall resistivity, synchrotron X-ray diffraction, and first-principles calculations. It argues that the first superconducting dome is induced by a pressure-modulated Lifshitz transition: the carrier type changes from hole-dominated to electron-dominated, and Fermi-surface pockets emerge and vanish while the crystal remains in the P-3m1 phase. The second dome coincides with a structural phase transition to the Pnma phase, which is predicted to be thermodynamically and dynamic

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central link between the second superconducting dome and the structural transition rests on identifying the Pnma phase at room-temperature X-ray diffraction around 10.9 GPa and assuming the same structural change drives the enhancement measured at low temperature around 10.4 GPa; if the low-temperature crystal structure differs, or the transition pressure shifts enough, the association between the structural transition and the second dome breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the double-dome picture holds, BaMg2Bi2 becomes a material in which pressure alone can induce two distinct superconducting states in one crystal, each with a different microscopic cause.
  • The first dome demonstrates that a pressure-tuned Lifshitz transition can act as a switch for superconductivity without any structural change, offering a clean testbed for Fermi-surface-driven pairing.
  • The second dome identifies a high-pressure Pnma polymorph that is dynamically stable above about 10 GPa and superconducting, giving a concrete structural target for further experimental and theoretical study.
  • The maximum Tc of about 7.22 K exceeds the ambient-pressure surface Tc of about 4.77 K, showing pressure can push superconductivity higher in this topological semimetal.
  • The change in upper critical-field behavior under pressure implies the superconducting state evolves from surface-dominated to bulk-dominated, which would affect how the material is measured and used.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the Pnma phase is genuinely the high-Tc state, chemically similar compounds in the XMg2Bi2 family may show analogous double-dome behavior under pressure, and this could guide a search for higher-Tc variants.
  • Editorial inference: The apparent crossover from surface to bulk superconductivity under pressure, inferred from the upper critical-field curvature, suggests the pairing character may change between domes; a phase-sensitive probe such as scanning tunneling spectroscopy or muon spin rotation could test this directly.
  • Editorial inference: A direct measurement of the Fermi surface as a function of pressure — for example via quantum oscillations — would test whether the first dome's enhancement is truly tied to the Lifshitz transition rather than to a more mundane pressure effect such as lattice stiffening.
  • Editorial inference: The double-dome structure implies that pressure can re-enter a superconducting phase after suppressing it, which is unusual among simple metals; checking whether the re-entrance persists under non-hydrostatic pressure conditions would clarify whether the second dome is intrinsic or pressure-medium dependent.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a pressure-driven double-dome superconducting phase diagram in the Dirac semimetal BaMg2Bi2, with Tc maxima of ~6.67 K at 4.5 GPa and ~7.22 K at 10.4 GPa. Combining high-pressure resistivity, Hall effect, room-temperature XRD, MAGUS structure search, and DFT calculations, the authors attribute the first superconducting dome to a pressure-modulated Lifshitz transition and the second dome to a structural transition from the ambient P-3m1 phase to a predicted Pnma phase. The double-dome feature is reproduced in a second pressure run, and the first-principles calculations provide thermodynamic and dynamical stability evidence for the Pnma phase.

Significance. If the two-dome structure and its proposed mechanisms are confirmed, the paper would provide a valuable example of how Fermi-surface topology and lattice symmetry can separately modulate superconductivity in a topological semimetal, of interest to the high-pressure and topological-materials communities. The study draws on independent experimental probes (transport, Hall, XRD) and theoretical structure searches, which is a strength. The double-dome observation itself is well supported by the resistivity data and its reproducibility. However, the central association of the second dome with the Pnma structural transition is not established at the measurement temperature, and the first-dome Lifshitz mechanism is not quantitatively pinned. These load-bearing points require further evidence or explicit softening.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Fig. 2, Fig. 7] The second dome's maximum Tc is measured below 10 K at 10.4 GPa, while the P-3m1→Pnma transition is identified from room-temperature XRD with new peaks at 10.9 GPa. DAC pressure is temperature-dependent (pressure-medium freezing, thermal contraction, non-hydrostaticity), so the room-temperature structural identification does not guarantee that the low-temperature phase at the dome maximum is Pnma. Moreover, the calculated enthalpy crossover for Pnma stability occurs at ~5 GPa (Fig. 3b), whereas the experimental transition is at 10.9 GPa, a ~6 GPa discrepancy that is not quantitatively reconciled. Because the structural coincidence is the basis for explaining the second dome, this is load-bearing. Please add low-temperature structural data or substantially soften the structural-origin claim.
  2. [§4.3–4.4, Figs. 4–6] The first dome is attributed to a pressure-modulated Lifshitz transition, but the precise Lifshitz transition pressure is not defined. The Hall coefficient changes sign between 1.1 and 1.7 GPa (Fig. 4d), whereas the first Tc maximum occurs at 4.5 GPa; the Fermi-surface evolution in Fig. 6a is gradual over 0–5 GPa. No quantitative marker ties a Lifshitz transition at 4.5 GPa to the Tc peak. Please identify the Lifshitz transition pressure via a band-structure or transport criterion (e.g., pocket emergence/vanishing at the dome maximum, DOS anomaly), or explicitly label the connection a hypothesis.
  3. [Fig. 7 and text] The Tc-P phase diagram lacks error bars, and the definition of Tc is ambiguous. The text mixes onset Tc (6.67 K at 4.5 GPa) with zero-resistivity Tc (4.77 K at 5.6 GPa), and the figure caption does not specify which criterion is plotted. Without error bars and a consistent Tc metric, the quantitative dome maxima and pressure positions cited in the abstract and conclusion cannot be assessed. Please specify the Tc definition and add uncertainties.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.4] Typo: 'Liftshiz' should be 'Lifshitz'.
  2. [Fig. 2(a) and Methods] The caption says 'single crystal' but the Methods section states that ground powder was loaded; please make this consistent.
  3. [Reference [20]] Title should read 'XMg2Bi2 (X = Ba and Sr)' rather than 'Mg2Bi2 (X = Ba and Sr)'.
  4. [Fig. 1(f)] Specify which fitting formula is used for each pressure and report the fitted α values and uncertainties for the positive-curvature data.
  5. [Methods] Pressure is calibrated by ruby luminescence at room temperature; clarify whether the same pressure values are assumed for the low-temperature transport measurements and whether pressure drift was monitored.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the double-dome Tc is direct transport data, and the structural/Lifshitz interpretations rest on independent XRD, Hall, and DFT calculations.

full rationale

The central claim—pressure-driven double-dome superconductivity with maxima at ~6.67 K (4.5 GPa) and ~7.22 K (10.4 GPa)—is an observed quantity from resistivity measurements (Figs. 1a,b), not the output of a fit or theory. The first-dome interpretation in terms of a Lifshitz transition is supported by an independent Hall-coefficient sign change (Fig. 4d and text: "the positive RH at 1.1 GPa changes into negative at 1.7 GPa") and by DFT Fermi-surface pocket evolution (Fig. 6a). The second-dome structural association is supported by room-temperature XRD showing new peaks at 10.9 GPa and Rietveld fitting to the independently structure-searched Pnma phase, with enthalpy and phonon calculations establishing Pnma stability above ~10 GPa. None of these steps uses the target result (the double-dome Tc) as an input. The only author-overlapping citation is Ref. [21], where Yiyan Wang is also a co-author; it is used to document ambient-pressure surface superconductivity and the crystal-growth method, and it is not load-bearing for the double-dome observation itself. A genuine but non-circular concern is that the room-temperature structural transition may not coincide with the low-temperature second dome because of DAC pressure-temperature shifts; the paper's hedged wording ("emerges concurrently") acknowledges this as an interpretation, not a derived prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central double-dome observation rests on transport measurements, which are not heavily parameterized. The interpretation of each dome, however, relies on standard DFT approximations, the completeness of the structure search, the transfer of room-temperature structural results to low temperature, and the identification of Hall sign change with a Lifshitz transition. These are domain assumptions rather than fitted free parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • Birch-Murnaghan parameters for P3m1 and Pnma phases = P3m1: V0=161.9±0.5 Å3, B0=92.9±6.7 GPa; Pnma: V0=141.6±1.7 Å3, B0=97.2±13.3 GPa
    Fitted to the volume-pressure data to characterize compressibility and the volume collapse at the structural transition. These parameters support the structural-transition claim but are not direct inputs to the double-dome superconductivity claim.
  • Upper-critical-field fitting parameters = µ0Hc2(0)=9.24 T at 1.1 GPa, 7.94 T at 7.5 GPa, 1.80 T at 19.8 GPa; exponent α differs by pressure region
    Fitted to Hc2(T) data using two different functional forms. Used to argue the superconducting character changes from surface to bulk, but this is peripheral to the central double-dome observation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption GGA-PBE DFT with PAW pseudopotentials accurately describes the electronic structure and relative enthalpies of BaMg2Bi2 under pressure.
    All band-structure, Fermi-surface, and enthalpy conclusions rely on standard DFT approximations; exchange-correlation errors could affect the predicted Lifshitz transition and Pnma stability crossover.
  • domain assumption The MAGUS structure search at 20 and 50 GPa found the relevant competing structure (Pnma) and did not miss other phases of comparable or lower enthalpy.
    The structural interpretation of the second dome depends on the completeness of the structure search; only one candidate high-pressure structure is compared with P3m1.
  • domain assumption The room-temperature XRD phases persist at low temperatures where superconductivity is measured.
    The second dome is associated with the Pnma phase based on room-temperature XRD at 10.9 GPa, while Tc is measured below 10 K. Pressure/temperature shifts could invalidate the direct correspondence.
  • domain assumption The Hall-coefficient sign change from positive to negative indicates a Lifshitz transition in the P3m1 phase.
    The interpretation of the first dome relies on combining Hall data with DFT Fermi-surface calculations. A sign change alone is not a unique signature of a Lifshitz transition.
  • domain assumption Ruby luminescence pressure calibration under the experimental DAC conditions is accurate.
    All reported pressures, including dome peak positions and the structural transition pressure, depend on this standard calibration.
invented entities (1)
  • High-pressure Pnma phase of BaMg2Bi2 independent evidence
    purpose: Proposed as the crystal structure responsible for the second superconducting dome above ~10 GPa.
    The Pnma phase was predicted by MAGUS structure search and is supported by experimental XRD peaks at 10.9 GPa and phonon calculations showing dynamical stability above 10 GPa. It is not an ad hoc entity, though the calculated enthalpy crossover (~5 GPa) and observed XRD transition (~10.9 GPa) differ.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergence of Double-Dome Superconductivity in the Pressurized Dirac Semimetal BaMg2Bi2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DTV36JIZ

@misc{pith2026260802394,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergence of Double-Dome Superconductivity in the Pressurized Dirac Semimetal BaMg2Bi2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DTV36JIZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02394}
}
read the original abstract

Dirac semimetal BaMg2Bi2 is reported to be a unique topological material that manifests surface superconductivity that coexistswith bulk band topology at ambient pressure. Here, we present a comprehensive investigation of high-pressure superconductingproperties in BaMg2Bi2 single crystal. Significantly, a pressure-driven double-dome superconducting behavior was revealed, withthe superconducting transition temperature Tc approaching the maximum values of 6.67 K at 4.5 GPa and 7.22 K at 10.4 GPafor the first and second superconducting domes, respectively. The combination of high-pressure X-ray diffraction, Hall resistivitymeasurements, and theoretical calculations demonstrates that, the first superconducting regime is closely related to the pressure-modulated Lifshitz transition, whereas the second superconducting phase emerges concurrently with a structural transition fromthe ambient-pressure P3m1 phase to a high-pressure Pnma phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02394 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) and (b) Temperature dependence of resistivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) High-pressure XRD patterns of BaMg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) The crystal structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a-c) The Hall resistivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The band structures and partial density of states (PD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The Fermi surface of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Bansil, H

    A. Bansil, H. Lin, T. Das, Colloquium: Topological band theory, Reviews of Modern Physics 88 (2016): 021004

    2016

  2. [2]

    H. Weng, X. Dai, Z. Fang, Topological semimetals predicted from first-principles calculations, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 28 (2016): 303001

    2016

  3. [3]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, A. Vishwanath, Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Reviews of Modern Physics 90 (2018): 015001

    2018

  4. [4]

    Liang, Q

    T. Liang, Q. Gibson, M. N. Ali, M. H. Liu, R. J. Cava, N. P. Ong, Ultrahigh mobility and giant magnetoresis- tance in the Dirac semimetal Cd 3As2, Nature Materials 14 (2015): 280-284

    2015

  5. [5]

    Q. Wang, P. J. Guo, S. S. Sun, C. H. Li, K. Liu, Z. Y. Lu, H. C. Lei, Extremely large magnetoresistance and high- density Dirac-like fermions in ZrB 2, Physical Review B 97 (2018): 205105

    2018

  6. [6]

    Q. Wang, Y. F. Xu, R. Lou, Z. H. Liu, M. Li, Y. B. Huang, D. W. Shen, H. M. Weng, S. C. Wang, H. C. Lei, Large intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in half-metallic ferromagnet Co3Sn2S2 with magnetic Weyl fermions, Na- ture Communications 9 (2018): 3681

    2018

  7. [7]

    E. Liu, Y. Sun, N. Kumar, L. Muechler, A. Sun, L. Jiao, S. Y. Yang, D. Liu, A. Liang, Q. Xu, J. Kroder, V. S¨uβ, H. Borrmann, C. Shekhar, Z. Wang, C. Xi, W. Wang, W. Schnelle, S. Wirth, Y. Chen, S. T. B. Goen- nenwein, C. Felser, Giant anomalous Hall effect in a fer- romagnetic kagome-lattice semimetal, Nature Physics 14 (2018): 1125-1131

    2018

  8. [8]

    M. Sato, Y. Ando, Topological superconductors: a re- view, Reports on Progress in Physics 80 (2017): 076501

    2017

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Qi, P. G. Naumov, M. N. Ali, C. R. Rajamathi, W. Schnelle, O. Barkalov, M. Hanfland, S.-C. Wu, C. Shekhar, Y. Sun, V. S¨ uβ, M. Schmidt, U. Schwarz, E. Pippel, P. Werner, R. Hillebrand, T. F¨ orster, E. Kam- pert, S. Parkin, R. J. Cava, C. Felser, B. Yan, S. A. Medvedev, Sup...

    2016

  2. [10]

    S. Zhu, J. Wu, P. Zhu, C. Pei, Q. Wang, D. Jia, X. Wang, Y. Zhao, L. Gao, C. Li, W. Cao, M. Zhang, L. Zhang, M. Li, H. Gou, W. Yang, J. Sun, Y. Chen, Z. Wang, Y. Yao, Y. Qi, Pressure-Induced Superconductivity and Topo- logical Quantum Phase Transitions in the Topological Semim...

    2023

  3. [11]

    B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, Y. Hu, J. L. Zuo, P. M. Sarte, E. C. Schueller, A. M. M. Abeykoon, M. J. Krogstad, S. Rosenkranz, R. Osborn, R. Seshadri, L. Ba- lents, J. He, S. D. Wilson, CsV 3Sb5: A Z2 Topological Kagome Metal with a Superconducting Ground State, Physical Rev...

    2020

  4. [12]

    Q. W. Yin, Z. J. Tu, C. S. Gong, Y. Fu, S. H. Yan, H. C Lei, Superconductivity and Normal-State Proper- ties of Kagome Metal RbV 3Sb5 Single Crystals, Chinese Physics Letters 38 (2021): 037403

    2021

  5. [13]

    B. R. Ortiz, P. M. Sarte, E. M. Kenney, M. J. Graf, S. M. L. Teicher, R. Seshadri, S. D. Wilson, Superconduc- tivity in the Z2 kagome metal KV 3Sb5, Physical Review Materials 5 (2021): 034801. 8

    2021

  6. [14]

    Q. Wang, P. Kong, W. Shi, C. Pei, C. Wen, L. Gao, Y. Zhao, Q. Yin, Y. Wu, G. Li, H. C. Lei, J. Li, Y. L. Chen, S. C. Yan, Y. P. Qi, Charge Density Wave Orders and Enhanced Superconductivity under Pressure in the Kagome Metal CsV 3Sb5, Advanced Materials 33 (2021): 2102813

    2021

  7. [15]

    J. Song, S. Kim, Y. Kim, H. Fu, J. Koo, Z. Wang, G. Lee, J. Lee, S. H. Oh, J. Bang, T. Matsushita, N. Wada, H. Ikegami, J. D. Denlinger, Y. H. Lee, B. Yan, Y. Kim, S. W. Kim, Coexistence of Surface Superconduct- ing and Three-Dimensional Topological Dirac States in Semimetal K...

    2021

  8. [16]

    N. Lee, C. Pei, J. Koo, Y. Qi, S. W. Kim, Pressure-Dependent Superconductivity in Topological Dirac Semimetal SrCuBi, Advanced Materials 36 (2024): 2400428

    2024

  9. [17]

    Y. Li, Q. Gu, C. Chen, J. Zhang, Q. Liu, X. Hu, J. Liu, Y. Liu, L. Ling, M. Tian, Y. Wang, N. Samarth, S. Li, T. Zhang, J. Feng, J. Wang, Nontrivial superconductivity in topological MoTe 2−xSx crystals, NAS PNAS 115 (2018): 9503-9508

    2018

  10. [18]

    Schimmel, Y

    S. Schimmel, Y. Fasano, S. Hoffmann, J. Besproswanny, L. T. Corredor Bohorquez, J. Puig, B.-C. Elshalem, B. Kalisky, G. Shipunov, D. Baumann, S. Aswartham, B. B¨uchner, C. Hess, Surface superconductivity in the topo- logical Weyl semimetal t-PtBi 2, Nature Communications 15 (20...

    2024

  11. [19]

    Deller, B

    K. Deller, B. Eisenmann, Ternary Alkaline Earth- Element(V)-Compounds AMg 2B2 with A = Ca, Sr, Ba and B = As, Sb, Bi, Zeitschrift f ¨ur Naturforschung B 32 (1977): 612-616

    1977

  12. [20]

    Takane, Y

    D. Takane, Y. Kubota, K. Nakayama, T. Kawakami, K. Yamauchi, S. Souma, T. Kato, K. Sugawara, S. Ideta, K. Tanaka, M. Kitamura, K. Horiba, H. Kumi- gashira, T. Oguchi, T. Takahashi, K. Segawa, T. Sato, Dirac semimetal phase and switching of band inversion in Mg2Bi2 (X = Ba and ...

    2021

  13. [21]

    Liu, P.-J

    Q. Liu, P.-J. Guo, X.-Y. Yue, Z.-K. Yi, Q.-X. Dong, H. Liang, D.-D. Wu, Y. Sun, Q.-J. Li, W.-L. Zhu, T.-L. Xia, X.-F. Sun, Y.-Y. Wang, Observation of Surface Su- perconductivity in a 3D Dirac Material, Advanced Func- tional Materials 32 (2022): 2208616

    2022

  14. [22]

    H. K. Mao, J. Xu, P. M. Bell, Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800 kbar under quasi-hydrostatic con- ditions, Journal of Geophysical Research 91 (1986): 4673- 4676

    1986

  15. [23]

    J. Wang, H. Gao, Y. Han, C. Ding, S. Pan, Y. Wang, Q. Jia, H.-T. Wang, D. Xing, J. Sun, MAGUS: machine learning and graph theory assisted universal structure searcher, National Science Review 10 (2023): nwad128

    2023

  16. [24]

    K. Xia, H. Gao, C. Liu, J. Yuan, J. Sun, H. T. Wang, D. Xing, A novel superhard tungsten nitride predicted by machine-learning accelerated crystal structure search , Science Bulletin 63 (2018): 817-824

    2018

  17. [25]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthm¨uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave ba- sis set, Physical Review B 54 (1996): 11169

    1996

  18. [26]

    H. J. Monkhorst, J. D. Pack, Special points for Brilloui n- zone integrations, Physical Review B 13 (1976): 5188

    1976

  19. [27]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gra- dient Approximation Made Simple, Physical Review Let- ters 77 (1996): 3865

    1996

  20. [28]

    P. E. Bl¨ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Physi- cal Review B 50 (1994): 17953

    1994

  21. [29]

    A. Togo, I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calculatio ns in materials science, Scripta Materialia 108 (2015): 1-5

    2015

  22. [30]

    M¨uller, G

    K.-H. M¨uller, G. Fuchs, A. Handstein, K. Nenkov, V. N. Narozhnyi, D. Eckert, The upper critical field in super- conducting MgB2, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 322 (2001): L10-L13

    2001

  23. [31]

    H. Cynn, J. E. Klepeis, C.-S. Yoo, D. A. Young, Osmium has the Lowest Experimentally Determined Compress- ibility, Physical Review Letters 88 (2002): 135701

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.