Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

An Introduction to Collective Intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cs/9908014 v1 pith:DUINY2QJ submitted 1999-08-17 cs.LG adap-orgcond-matcs.DCcs.MAnlin.AO

classification cs.LGadap-orgcond-matcs.DCcs.MAnlin.AO
keywords coindesignproblemagentsothersystemwillalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper surveys the emerging science of how to design a ``COllective INtelligence'' (COIN). A COIN is a large multi-agent system where: (i) There is little to no centralized communication or control; and (ii) There is a provided world utility function that rates the possible histories of the full system. In particular, we are interested in COINs in which each agent runs a reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm. Rather than use a conventional modeling approach (e.g., model the system dynamics, and hand-tune agents to cooperate), we aim to solve the COIN design problem implicitly, via the ``adaptive'' character of the RL algorithms of each of the agents. This approach introduces an entirely new, profound design problem: Assuming the RL algorithms are able to achieve high rewards, what reward functions for the individual agents will, when pursued by those agents, result in high world utility? In other words, what reward functions will best ensure that we do not have phenomena like the tragedy of the commons, Braess's paradox, or the liquidity trap? Although still very young, research specifically concentrating on the COIN design problem has already resulted in successes in artificial domains, in particular in packet-routing, the leader-follower problem, and in variants of Arthur's El Farol bar problem. It is expected that as it matures and draws upon other disciplines related to COINs, this research will greatly expand the range of tasks addressable by human engineers. Moreover, in addition to drawing on them, such a fully developed scie nce of COIN design may provide much insight into other already established scientific fields, such as economics, game theory, and population biology.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Signaling and Social Learning in Swarms of Robots

    cs.RO 2024-11 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    A review proposing that decentralized learning and execution is a common paradigm across robot swarms and that signaling methods can be classified by information selection and physical abstraction.

  2. Artificial Theory of Mind and Self-Guided Social Organisation

    cs.MA 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper proposing that AI coordination should be built on Theory of Mind, language, and causal social cognition, modeled on ecological niche dynamics and human social networks.

Pith tools