Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Human-AI Safety: A Descendant of Generative AI and Control Systems Safety

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.09794 v2 pith:DULYXDVT submitted 2024-05-16 cs.AI cs.CYcs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.AIcs.CYcs.SYeess.SY
keywords safetyoutputsbehaviorcontrolfeedbackgenerativehumanhuman--ai
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is interacting with people at an unprecedented scale, offering new avenues for immense positive impact, but also raising widespread concerns around the potential for individual and societal harm. Today, the predominant paradigm for human--AI safety focuses on fine-tuning the generative model's outputs to better agree with human-provided examples or feedback. In reality, however, the consequences of an AI model's outputs cannot be determined in isolation: they are tightly entangled with the responses and behavior of human users over time. In this paper, we distill key complementary lessons from AI safety and control systems safety, highlighting open challenges as well as key synergies between both fields. We then argue that meaningful safety assurances for advanced AI technologies require reasoning about how the feedback loop formed by AI outputs and human behavior may drive the interaction towards different outcomes. To this end, we introduce a unifying formalism to capture dynamic, safety-critical human--AI interactions and propose a concrete technical roadmap towards next-generation human-centered AI safety.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reliability, Resilience and Human Factors Engineering for Trustworthy AI Systems

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A framework applying classical reliability, resilience, and human-factors engineering to AI systems, with a small subjective case study of OpenAI status incidents.

Pith tools