Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MoFE: Mixture of Frozen Experts Architecture

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.06491 v1 pith:DVQ5T4ID submitted 2025-03-09 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords mofeefficiencyarchitectureexpertsmixturemodelstrainingfrozen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose the Mixture of Frozen Experts (MoFE) architecture, which integrates Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning (PEFT) and the Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture to enhance both training efficiency and model scalability. By freezing the Feed Forward Network (FFN) layers within the MoE framework, MoFE significantly reduces the number of trainable parameters, improving training efficiency while still allowing for effective knowledge transfer from the expert models. This facilitates the creation of models proficient in multiple domains. We conduct experiments to evaluate the trade-offs between performance and efficiency, compare MoFE with other PEFT methodologies, assess the impact of domain expertise in the constituent models, and determine the optimal training strategy. The results show that, although there may be some trade-offs in performance, the efficiency gains are substantial, making MoFE a reasonable solution for real-world, resource-constrained environments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hecto: Modular Sparse Experts for Adaptive and Interpretable Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A lightweight heterogeneous MoE with a GRU and an FFNN expert trails homogeneous baselines, and its claimed reasoning-type specialization is confounded by unequal expert inputs.

Pith tools