Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Reinforcement Learning Models Predict Visual Responses in the Brain: A Preliminary Result

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.10112 v1 pith:DW7PJFEU submitted 2021-06-18 cs.LG q-bio.NC

classification cs.LGq-bio.NC
keywords modelsvisuallearningneuralreinforcementsupervisedbetterdeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Supervised deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) are currently one of the best computational models that can explain how the primate ventral visual stream solves object recognition. However, embodied cognition has not been considered in the existing visual processing models. From the ecological standpoint, humans learn to recognize objects by interacting with them, allowing better classification, specialization, and generalization. Here, we ask if computational models under the embodied learning framework can explain mechanisms underlying object recognition in the primate visual system better than the existing supervised models? To address this question, we use reinforcement learning to train neural network models to play a 3D computer game and we find that these reinforcement learning models achieve neural response prediction accuracy scores in the early visual areas (e.g., V1 and V2) in the levels that are comparable to those accomplished by the supervised neural network model. In contrast, the supervised neural network models yield better neural response predictions in the higher visual areas, compared to the reinforcement learning models. Our preliminary results suggest the future direction of visual neuroscience in which deep reinforcement learning should be included to fill the missing embodiment concept.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comprehensive Guide to Explainable AI: From Classical Models to LLMs

    cs.LG 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A survey-style XAI book with code examples, covering standard interpretability methods and models, but no new scientific contributions.

Pith tools