REVIEW 7 cited by
The anti-aligned spin of GW191109: glitch mitigation and its implications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With a high total mass and an inferred effective spin anti-aligned with the orbital axis at the 99.9% level, GW191109 is one of the most promising candidates for a dynamical formation origin among gravitational wave events observed so far. However, the data containing GW191109 are afflicted with terrestrial noise transients, i.e., detector glitches, generated by the scattering of laser light in both LIGO detectors. We study the implications of the glitch(es) on the inferred properties and astrophysical interpretation of GW191109. Using time- and frequency-domain analysis methods, we isolate the critical data for spin inference to 35 - 40 Hz and 0.1 - 0.04 s before the merger in LIGO Livingston, directly coincident with the glitch. Using two models of glitch behavior, one tailored to slow scattered light and one more generic, we perform joint inference of the glitch and binary parameters. When the glitch is modeled as slow scattered light, the binary parameters favor anti-aligned spins, in agreement with existing interpretations. When more flexible glitch modeling based on sine-Gaussian wavelets is used instead, a bimodal aligned/anti-aligned solution emerges. The anti-aligned spin mode is correlated with a weaker inferred glitch and preferred by ~ 70 : 30 compared to the aligned spin mode and a stronger inferred glitch. We conclude that if we assume that the data are only impacted by slow scattering noise, then the anti-aligned spin inference is robust. However, the data alone cannot validate this assumption and resolve the anti-aligned spin and potentially dynamical formation history of GW191109.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
When (not) to trust Monte Carlo approximations for hierarchical Bayesian inference
A unified error statistic E-hat measures information lost to Monte Carlo noise in hierarchical Bayesian inference, with a recommended cutoff of 0.2 bits.
-
A comprehensive look into the accuracy of SpEC binary black hole waveforms
Simulated black-hole merger waveforms accumulate numerical error over time, but the merger stage is not intrinsically less accurate once aligned on its own, and resolution-exchanged differences show no systematic bias...
-
No Glitch in the Matrix: Robust Reconstruction of Gravitational Wave Signals Under Noise Artifacts
AWaRe, a neural network trained on clean binary black hole signals, reconstructs gravitational wave waveforms from LIGO data contaminated by glitches without any glitch-specific training.
-
Fast frequency-domain gravitational waveforms for precessing binaries with a new twist
IMRPhenomXPHM-SpinTaylor computes precession angles by numerically solving post-Newtonian spin equations in the frequency domain and improves match to numerical relativity from mean mismatch 6.3e-3 to 5.1e-3.
-
GWSkyNet-Multi II: an updated machine learning model for rapid classification of gravitational-wave events
An updated 188-parameter neural network classifies LVK gravitational-wave alerts into four source categories and matches updated LVK labels for 93% of O4 events.
-
Structure and Skewness of the Effective Inspiral Spin Distribution of Binary Black Hole Mergers
The effective inspiral spin distribution of GWTC-3 black hole binaries is skewed toward positive values, implying a modest preferentially aligned subpopulation, no strong bimodality, and at least about 20% negative-sp...
-
The first decade of gravitational-wave measurements of black hole spins
A review summarizing formation-channel predictions, waveform effects, and population-level constraints on stellar-mass black hole spins from the first decade of gravitational-wave observations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.