Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 116 references

Twisted circle reduction of Argyres–Douglas theories is captured by an abelian Chern–Simons-matter theory on a lens space, with the choice of conical edge deciding whether the infrared is a non-unitary TQFT or a rank-0 3d N=4 SCFT.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 10:11 UTC pith:DWWWLWCF

load-bearing objection A strong, mostly credible construction paper: the TQFT branch is thoroughly checked, while the general SCFT branch leans on geometry plus a thinner dynamical test. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20308 v1 pith:DWWWLWCF submitted 2026-07-22 hep-th

Three-dimensional TQFTs from Argyres--Douglas theories via the 3d/3d correspondence

Cyril Closset , Adam Keyes , Sungjoon Kim This is my paper
classification hep-th MSC 81T6081T4557K16 PACS 11.25.Hf11.30.Pb
keywords Argyres-Douglas theory3d/3d correspondenceDimofte-Gaiotto-Gukov constructionlens spacerank-0 SCFTnon-unitary TQFTvertex operator algebratwisted circle reduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the twisted dimensional reduction of the (A1, A2n) Argyres–Douglas theory is exactly described by a 3d abelian Chern–Simons-matter theory constructed from a lens space L(2n+3, 2k), with the triangulation of that lens space dictated by the 4d BPS spectrum. The same DGG theory flows to two very different infrared phases depending on the superpotential: keeping all monopole terms gives a non-unitary 3d TQFT (the A-twist), while dropping exactly one term — the one associated with an internal edge isotopic to the core circle — gives the non-trivial 3d N=4 rank-0 SCFT. The geometric location of the conical singularity on the triangulation therefore predicts the infrared phase, and for k=±(n+1) the SCFT degenerates into a unitary TQFT. A sympathetic reader would care because this is a concrete, testable 3d/3d mechanism that ties the elusive rank-0 SCFTs and their boundary vertex operator algebras directly to the BPS geometry of 4d SCFTs.

Core claim

The central claim is that the twisted circle reduction of the (A1, A2n) Argyres–Douglas theory, with U(1)_r holonomy e^{πik}, produces a 3d N=4 rank-0 SCFT that is the infrared fixed point of the DGG abelian Chern–Simons-matter theory T[M_3^{(k)}] for the lens space M_3^{(k)} = L(2n+3, 2k). The triangulation of M_3^{(k)} is built from 4n|k| tetrahedra, one per BPS flip in the minimal chamber, and the same ACSM data with maximal monopole superpotential flows to the non-unitary TQFT T_A[M_3^{(k)}]. The paper's key geometric insight is that whether the unavoidable conical singularity sits at the external edge C_∞ or at an internal edge C_I — which happens precisely when the chord distance s_I ≡

What carries the argument

The central object is the DGG abelian Chern–Simons-matter (ACSM) theory T[M_3^{(k)}] associated to a triangulated lens space M_3^{(k)} = L(2n+3, 2k). The triangulation is produced by foliating the Gaiotto curve over the circle with twist k, one tetrahedron per BPS flip, and the ACSM data (CS level matrix K, chiral matter, and monopole superpotential) is read off from the Neumann–Zagier matrices of the gluing. The load-bearing identity is the isotopy condition s_I = ±2k (mod 2n+3) between an internal edge C_I of the triangulation and the core circle C_0 of the Heegaard splitting: this condition alone selects whether removing one superpotential term lands on the rank-0 SCFT or on a torus-knot-

Load-bearing premise

The whole identification of the SCFT point rests on the claim that the triangulated three-manifold built from the BPS flips is exactly the lens space L(2n+3, 2k) and that an internal edge C_I of chord distance s_I is isotopic to the core circle C_0 exactly when s_I = ±2k; if that isotopy were wrong, the one-fewer-superpotential theory would flow to a different SCFT (a torus-knot complement) and the central correspondence would collapse.

What would settle it

For a specific (n,k) not already checked (e.g. n=3, k=2), compute the Heegaard splitting of the triangulated manifold M_3^{(k)} given by the paper's explicit gluing rules: if M_3^{(k)} minus a tubular neighbourhood of the edge with s_I = ±2k is not a solid torus, or if the three-manifold itself is not isometric to L(2n+3, 2k) as a triangulated manifold, the central claim is false. A field-theoretic falsifier would be to compute the superconformal index of the ACSM theory with one superpotential term dropped for that edge and find a result inconsistent with the known index of the Gang–Yamazaki

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The 3d N=4 rank-0 SCFT arising from each (A1, A2n) theory is now explicitly realized by a UV 3d N=2 abelian gauge theory with a specific superpotential, enabling direct computation of its superconformal index, F-function, and boundary VOA data.
  • For k=1, the TQFT T_A[M_3^{(1)}] reproduces the modular data of the Virasoro minimal model M(2,2n+3) and its half-index reproduces the vacuum character, confirming the SCFT/VOA correspondence from the 3d/3d perspective.
  • For k=-1, the construction yields the affine osp(1|2n)_1 VOA on the holomorphic boundary, and for n=1, k=-2 it yields the (G2)_1 VOA, matching earlier conjectures from the quantum monodromy trace.
  • The Galois-orbits statement, that distinct k give Galois-conjugate TQFTs with the same fusion algebra, is proven for the modular data and used to determine the central charge c_{2d} mod 8 including the gravitational Chern–Simons level.
  • If an internal edge with s_I ≠ ±2k is drilled instead, the resulting DGG theory flows to a new 3d N=2 SCFT associated with a torus knot complement inside the lens space, opening a new family of SCFTs predicted by the same geometric mechanism.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's geometric criterion s_I = ±2k suggests a more general principle: the infrared phase of any class-S twisted reduction is determined by which edge of the triangulation carries the conical deficit, not merely by the topology of the three-manifold; this could extend to (A1, A2n+1) theories and to higher-rank AD theories, where a Higgs branch and flavour symmetries are present.
  • If the conjecture that F-maximisation dynamically drives ν_A to 1 at the SCFT point holds generally, then the same triangulation data would predict the exact R-charges at the fixed point for all n and k, allowing an analytic check of the k-independence of the F-function and of the unitary-TQFT cases k=±(n+1).
  • A testable extension is to compute the partition function of T[M_3^{(k)}] on a Seifert manifold with the one-fewer-superpotential theory and compare the result to the universal SCFT prediction (2.40); agreement would provide a quantitative check of the 'isotopy implies SCFT' rule beyond the low-n examples already checked.
  • The relation between the conical edge and the torus-knot complement suggests that the same BPS-spectrum-to-triangulation construction may generate a zoo of 3d N=2 SCFTs labelled by torus knots in lens spaces, which could be explored computationally using the explicit CS level matrices given in the paper.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the twisted circle compactification of the (A1, A2n) Argyres–Douglas theory via the 3d/3d correspondence. The authors construct a triangulated lens space M_3^(k) = L(2n+3, 2k) from the BPS spectrum of the 4d theory and propose that the associated Dimofte–Gaiotto–Gukov (DGG) abelian Chern–Simons-matter theory flows, with maximal monopole superpotential, to a non-unitary 3d TQFT T_A[M_3^(k)]; removing exactly one superpotential term associated to an internal edge C_I with chord distance s_I = ±2k is argued to produce the rank-0 3d N=4 SCFT T[M_3^(k)]. Extensive checks are presented for low n and |k|: modular S and T matrices matching Virasoro minimal models and affine VOAs, half-indices reproducing known vacuum characters (e.g., M(2,5), osp(1|2)_1, (G2)_1), superconformal indices truncating to 1 at TQFT points, and agreement across many polarisations. The paper also discusses Galois orbits of the modular data, the F-function, and the geometric distribution of conical defects.

Significance. If the central proposal is correct, it gives a geometric and 3d/3d interpretation of 3d N=4 rank-0 SCFTs and of the relation between such SCFTs and their (generally non-unitary) A-twists. The criterion (1.5) — that the location of the conical defect (at the external edge C∞ or an internal edge isotopic to C0) determines whether the IR theory is a TQFT or a non-trivial SCFT — is elegant and testable. The paper's strengths are its explicit constructions and many exact checks: the half-index identities for osp(1|2)_1 and (G2)_1 are non-trivial and impressive, as is the systematic modular-data matching over 43 polarisations for L(5,2) and the Galois-orbit analysis of the k-family. The main weakness is that the SCFT branch of (1.5) is not established for general n and |k|; the dynamical statement that removing one superpotential term drives the flow to the rank-0 N=4 point is verified by F-maximisation only in the n=1 examples.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4.3.1, Eqs. (4.59)–(4.60), §3.2 Eq. (3.23)] The paper states that it 'determines c_2d mod 8 from the 3d N=2 ACSM data,' but in the worked examples c_2d is not an independent output. The gravitational Chern–Simons level K_g is tuned (e.g., K_g=4 for k=1, K_g=8 for k=-2) so that the phase of the Seifert fibering operator reproduces the central charge of the conjectured boundary VOA, and the closed-form expression (2.31) is imported from [9]. What is demonstrated is consistency — that integer K_g exists and that the phases agree over 43 polarisations — not a derivation of c_2d from first principles. The text should state this more carefully and avoid the impression that c_2d is determined rather than matched.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Acknowledgements] Typos: 'wrok' should be 'work', 'Universty' should be 'University'.
  2. [§4.3.1, Eq. (4.55)] The notation 'eη' and 'η' is confusing; please define or rename the fugacity for the decoupled symmetry ~A.
  3. [Abstract and §4.2] The term 'near-maximal superpotential' is used in the abstract but only defined later; consider defining it explicitly in the introduction.
  4. [§2.4, Eq. (2.63)] The relation ν_A = 1 + ν̂_A is introduced without a derivation; a brief comment connecting it to (2.63) would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central TQFT/SCFT derivation is independent; the c2d matching is partially circular because the gravitational CS level is chosen to reproduce known central charges.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract and §4.3.1, around eqs. (4.59)–(4.60)]
    "To match the fibering operator with the T matrix as in (4.57), we have set the gravitational CS level to be: Kg = 4. ... we simply computed the needed Kg for each choice of σ such that (3.22) holds true for c2d = −22/5 (4.60) and for any Seifert fibering operator."

    The reported 'determination' of c2d mod 8 from the ACSM data is reverse-engineered: the target value c2d = −22/5 is taken as input (the known M(2,5) central charge, also the value predicted in [9]), and the free gravitational contact term Kg is then chosen so that the fibering-operator phase relation (3.22) yields exactly that value. The same maneuver is repeated for osp(1|2)_1 and (G2)_1, where Kg = 4 and Kg = 8 are selected to recover c2d = 2/5 and c2d = 14/5. Thus the overall T-matrix phase / c2d is not an independent prediction of the ACSM computation; it is fixed by construction. The S-matrix entries and T-matrix ratios are Kg-independent and remain genuine checks, so the circularity is partial.

full rationale

Most of the paper's derivation chain is self-contained and not circular. The identification M3^(k) = L(2n+3,2k) is obtained from explicit tetrahedron gluings and corroborated by Regina spot checks; the isotopy criterion s_I = ±2k for an internal edge to be C0 is proved by a direct Heegaard-splitting calculation, not assumed from the target SCFT. The one-fewer-superpotential prescription for reaching the 3d N=4 rank-0 SCFT is tested for n=1 by F-maximization (F ≈ 0.642965), by matching the Gang–Yamazaki superconformal index, and by low-order checks for larger nk. The half-index q-series (4.61), (4.77), and (4.88) are computed term-by-term from the ACSM data and match the known vacuum characters of M(2,5), osp(1|2)_1, and (G2)_1 without feeding in the central charge as an input to the series. The modular S-matrices and T-matrix ratios also match nontrivially. The clearest circular ingredient is the overall c2d phase: the gravitational Chern–Simons level Kg is a free UV contact term, and the paper calibrates it to reproduce already-known central charges before reporting those central charges as determined from the ACSM data. This is a scheme-calibration rather than a prediction, and it does not infect the central lens-space or SCFT/TQFT identification, so a moderate score of 4 is appropriate.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 7 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central construction's bookkeeping: the physical input is the 3d/3d conjecture plus the BPS spectrum; the output is a one-parameter family of ACSM theories. The gravitational CS level is fitted per polarisation to the expected central charge, which is the main free parameter. The polarisation choice is a gauge-like freedom with verified IR-independence in examples. No new entities are posited.

free parameters (2)
  • Gravitational Chern-Simons level K_g = K_g=4 (n=1,k=1,σ=(1,1,0,0)); 26 (GK σ=(0,0,0,0)); 4 (k=-1); 8 (k=-2)
    Chosen by hand per triangulation/polarisation so that the Seifert-fibering relation (3.22) reproduces the assumed c2d; the paper states the 'correct' value from 6d is not known (§4.3.1, p.42 and similar passages).
  • Tetrahedron polarisations σ_i = σ ∈ {0,1,2}^L; examples: (1,1,0,0), (0,0,0,0), (1,1,2,2), ...
    The DGG gauge theory depends on a polarisation choice per tetrahedron; the paper checks IR-duality of the resulting ACSM theories in explicit examples but does not derive a canonical choice from 6d.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption 3d/3d correspondence: T[M3^(k)] on R^3 is IR-equivalent to T[C] on R^3 × S1_r (eq. (1.3)), with the DGG theory associated to the triangulation of M3^(k)
    The paper is built on this conjecture; it provides consistency checks rather than a proof.
  • domain assumption The twisted product S1_r ⋉_k C is the lens space L(2n+3,2k) with singular edge C∞ (eq. (1.4))
    Stated as derived from the mutation sequence; verified with Regina in examples, assumed in general.
  • domain assumption An internal edge C_I of chord distance s_I is isotopic to C0 iff s_I=±2k mod N (eq. (2.62))
    Topological argument based on the Heegaard splitting; checked case-by-case with Regina.
  • domain assumption The minimal BPS chamber of T_A2n has exactly 2n hypermultiplets with charges ordered as in fig. 5, and the mutation method produces the 4n|k| tetrahedra
    Taken from the complete SQFT/BPS quiver literature [21,67,28]; used to build the triangulation.
  • standard math The Coulomb branch index data (2.12)-(2.13) from fixed points of the wild Hitchin moduli space
    From [34,35]; the paper re-derives the Casimir prefactor and connects it to VOA quantities.
  • domain assumption c2d(k) = -12k c4d + 2n(k-1) mod 8 (eq. (2.31)) and the Galois-conjugate S-matrix (2.28)
    Borrowed as conjectured in [9]; the paper verifies the SL(2,Z) relations and Seifert partition functions against it.
  • domain assumption F-maximization determines the superconformal R-symmetry, and axial mixing ν_A=1 corresponds to the 3d N=4 fixed point (eqs. (4.31)-(4.33))
    Standard 3d N=2 to N=4 enhancement logic; the paper checks F(ν_A) has the expected maximum in examples.
invented entities (1)
  • None (empty list) no independent evidence
    purpose: No new physical entities are introduced
    The 'conical singularity' and the axial symmetry U(1)_A(I) are geometric/labeling features of the construction, not new entities with independent falsifiable handles beyond the paper itself.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 60390 in / 18212 out tokens · 142018 ms · 2026-08-01T10:11:02.696775+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the twisted dimensional reduction of 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ Argyres--Douglas theories via the 3d/3d correspondence, focussing on $(A_1, A_{2n})$ theories realised as the class-$\mathcal{S}$ theory $T[\mathcal{C}]$ for a curve $\mathcal{C}$ with one irregular puncture. We argue the resulting 3d $\mathcal{N}=4$ rank-0 superconformal field theory (SCFT) arises as the IR fixed point of a Dimofte--Gaiotto--Gukov (DGG) abelian Chern--Simons-matter (ACSM) theory $T[M_3^{(k)}]$ for the lens space $M_3^{(k)}=L(2n+3,2k)$, obtained by fibering $\mathcal{C}$ over the circle with twist $k \in \mathbb{Z}_{2n+3}^\times$. The triangulation of $M_3^{(k)}$, derived from the 4d BPS spectrum, determines the ACSM theory including its superpotential. $T[M_3^{(k)}]$ flows to the expected SCFT when the monopole superpotential is near-maximal in a precise sense, while the maximal superpotential gives $T_A[M_3^{(k)}]$, which flows directly to a non-unitary TQFT, the topological $A$-twist of the SCFT. Geometrically, the SCFT and TQFT points are related by shifting conical singularities between edges of the triangulation, and we propose a correspondence between singular edges and SCFT points predicting when the SCFT is a unitary TQFT. The TQFTs from $M_3^{(k)}$ can support 2d vertex operator algebras (VOAs) on their holomorphic boundary, including the Schur-sector VOA of the 4d SCFT for $k=1$. For $n=k=1$, our construction reproduces the minimal 3d $\mathcal{N}=4$ SCFT of Gang and Yamazaki from $L(5,2)$, where $T_A[M_3^{(k)}]$ is the Yang--Lee TQFT supporting $M(2,5)$ on its boundary. We check our proposals in detail, reconstructing the modular structure of the IR TQFTs from partition functions on Seifert manifolds, and matching phases to determine VOA central charges $c_{\text{2d}} \bmod 8$ from the ACSM data, including the gravitational Chern--Simons level.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 90 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Gaiotto,N=2 dualities,JHEP08(2012) 034 [0904.2715]

    D. Gaiotto,N=2 dualities,JHEP08(2012) 034 [0904.2715]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Dimofte, D

    T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and S. Gukov,Gauge Theories Labelled by Three-Manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys.325(2014) 367 [1108.4389]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    Dimofte, D

    T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and S. Gukov,3-Manifolds and 3d Indices,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17(2013) 975 [1112.5179]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Dedushenko, S

    M. Dedushenko, S. Gukov, H. Nakajima, D. Pei and K. Ye,3d TQFTs from Argyres–Douglas theories,J. Phys. A53(2020) 43LT01 [1809.04638]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Dedushenko,On the 4d/3d/2d view of the SCFT/VOA correspondence,2312.17747

    M. Dedushenko,On the 4d/3d/2d view of the SCFT/VOA correspondence,2312.17747

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Arabi Ardehali, M

    A. Arabi Ardehali, M. Dedushenko, D. Gang and M. Litvinov,Bridging 4D QFTs and 2D VOAs via 3D high-temperature EFTs,2409.18130

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Gaiotto and H

    D. Gaiotto and H. Kim,3D TFTs from 4dN= 2 BPS particles,JHEP03(2025) 173 [2409.20393]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Arabi Ardehali, D

    A. Arabi Ardehali, D. Gang, N.J. Rajappa and M. Sacchi,3d SUSY enhancement and non-semisimple TQFTs from four dimensions,JHEP09(2025) 179 [2411.00766]

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Kim and J

    H. Kim and J. Song,A family of vertex algebras from Argyres-Douglas theory,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 144 [2412.20015]

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    B. Go, Q. Jia, H. Kim and S. Kim,From BPS spectra of Argyres-Douglas theories to families of 3d TFTs,JHEP08(2025) 012 [2502.15133]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    H. Kim, H. Kim and J. Song,Macdonald index from 3d TQFT,JHEP03(2026) 213 [2511.11186]

    arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    Kim and S

    M. Kim and S. Kim,3D TFTs and boundary VOAs from BPS spectra of(G, G′) Argyres-Douglas theories,2511.23194

    arXiv

  13. [13]

    Nishinaka and Y

    T. Nishinaka and Y. Yoshida,3d Chern–Simons matter theories from generalized Argyres–Douglas theories,2512.15201

    arXiv

  14. [14]

    Hamachika, T

    R. Hamachika, T. Nishinaka, S. Tanigawa and Y. Yoshida,3d SUSY enhancement with non-trivial Coulomb branch via 4dN= 2SCFT,2607.19021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli and B.C. van Rees,Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.336(2015) 1359 [1312.5344]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    Cordova and S.-H

    C. Cordova and S.-H. Shao,Schur Indices, BPS Particles, and Argyres-Douglas Theories, JHEP01(2016) 040 [1506.00265]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    Argyres and M.R

    P.C. Argyres and M.R. Douglas,New phenomena in SU(3) supersymmetric gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B448(1995) 93 [hep-th/9505062]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  18. [18]

    Argyres, M.R

    P.C. Argyres, M.R. Plesser, N. Seiberg and E. Witten,New N=2 superconformal field theories in four-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B461(1996) 71 [hep-th/9511154]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  19. [19]

    Eguchi, K

    T. Eguchi, K. Hori, K. Ito and S.-K. Yang,Study of N=2 superconformal field theories in four-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B471(1996) 430 [hep-th/9603002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  20. [20]

    Cecotti, A

    S. Cecotti, A. Neitzke and C. Vafa,R-Twisting and 4d/2d Correspondences,1006.3435

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Gaiotto, G.W

    D. Gaiotto, G.W. Moore and A. Neitzke,Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation,Adv. Math.234(2013) 239 [0907.3987]. – 65 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    Xie,General Argyres-Douglas Theory,JHEP01(2013) 100 [1204.2270]

    D. Xie,General Argyres-Douglas Theory,JHEP01(2013) 100 [1204.2270]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    Chiral symmetry algebras from superconformal symmetry in four dimensions

    C. Beem, “Chiral symmetry algebras from superconformal symmetry in four dimensions.” Seminar at Crete Center for Theoretical Physics, July, 2014

    2014

  24. [24]

    Infinite chiral symmetry in four and six dimensions

    C. Beem and L. Rastelli, “Infinite chiral symmetry in four and six dimensions.” Seminar at Harvard University, November, 2014

    2014

  25. [25]

    Beem and L

    C. Beem and L. Rastelli,Vertex operator algebras, Higgs branches, and modular differential equations,JHEP08(2018) 114 [1707.07679]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Gang and M

    D. Gang and M. Yamazaki,Three-dimensional gauge theories with supersymmetry enhancement,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 121701 [1806.07714]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    D. Gang, S. Kim, K. Lee, M. Shim and M. Yamazaki,Non-unitary TQFTs from 3DN= 4 rank 0 SCFTs,JHEP08(2021) 158 [2103.09283]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Cecotti, C

    S. Cecotti, C. Cordova and C. Vafa,Braids, Walls, and Mirrors,1110.2115

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    G.Y. Cho, D. Gang and H.-C. Kim,M-theoretic Genesis of Topological Phases,JHEP11 (2020) 115 [2007.01532]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    S. Choi, D. Gang and H.-C. Kim,Infrared phases of 3D class R theories,JHEP11(2022) 151 [2206.11982]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    D. Gang, H. Kang and S. Kim,Non-hyperbolic 3-manifolds and 3D field theories for 2D Virasoro minimal models,SciPost Phys.20(2026) 075 [2405.16377]

    arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Bonetti, S

    F. Bonetti, S. Schafer-Nameki and J. Wu,MTC[M3, G]: 3d Topological Order Labeled by Seifert Manifolds,2403.03973

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    D. Gang, B. Park and H. Sohn,Torus Knots and Minimal Models Revisited : Rational VOA characters from non-hyperbolic knots,2512.23122

    arXiv

  34. [34]

    Fredrickson and A

    L. Fredrickson and A. Neitzke,FromS1-fixed points toW-algebra representations, 1709.06142

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Fredrickson, D

    L. Fredrickson, D. Pei, W. Yan and K. Ye,Argyres-Douglas Theories, Chiral Algebras and Wild Hitchin Characters,JHEP01(2018) 150 [1701.08782]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    D. Gang, K. Jeong, T. Kim and S. Lee,Refined 3D index,2604.17449

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Closset, H

    C. Closset, H. Kim and B. Willett,Seifert fibering operators in 3dN= 2theories,JHEP 11(2018) 004 [1807.02328]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Closset and H

    C. Closset and H. Kim,Three-dimensionalN= 2 supersymmetric gauge theories and partition functions on Seifert manifolds: A review,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A34(2019) 1930011 [1908.08875]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun

    E. Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun. Math. Phys.121 (1989) 351

    1989

  40. [40]

    Closset, T.T

    C. Closset, T.T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia, Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg,Comments on Chern-Simons Contact Terms in Three Dimensions,JHEP09(2012) 091 [1206.5218]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [41]

    Closset, E

    C. Closset, E. Furrer, A. Keyes and O. Khlaif,The 3dA-model and generalised symmetries, part I: Bosonic Chern-Simons theories,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 106 [2501.11665]

    arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Jafferis, I.R

    D.L. Jafferis, I.R. Klebanov, S.S. Pufu and B.R. Safdi,Towards the F-Theorem: N=2 Field Theories on the Three-Sphere,JHEP06(2011) 102 [1103.1181]. – 66 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  43. [43]

    D. Gang, H. Kim and S. Stubbs,Three-Dimensional Topological Field Theories and Nonunitary Minimal Models,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 131601 [2310.09080]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Ferrari, N

    A.E.V. Ferrari, N. Garner and H. Kim,Boundary vertex algebras for 3dN= 4rank-0 SCFTs,SciPost Phys.17(2024) 057 [2311.05087]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    3dNrank-0 SCFT from punctured lens space

    S. Kim, “3dNrank-0 SCFT from punctured lens space.” 2026

    2026

  46. [46]

    Matveev,Complexity theory of three-dimensional manifolds,Acta Appl

    S.V. Matveev,Complexity theory of three-dimensional manifolds,Acta Appl. Math.19 (1990) 101

    1990

  47. [47]

    Jaco and J.H

    W. Jaco and J.H. Rubinstein,Layered-triangulations of 3-manifolds,math/0603601

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Jaco, J.H

    W. Jaco, J.H. Rubinstein and S. Tillmann,Minimal triangulations for an infinite family of lens spaces,J. Topol.2(2009) 157 [0805.2425]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  49. [49]

    Caorsi and S

    M. Caorsi and S. Cecotti,Geometric classification of 4dN= 2SCFTs,JHEP07(2018) 138 [1801.04542]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Benini, T

    F. Benini, T. Nishioka and M. Yamazaki,4d Index to 3d Index and 2d TQFT,Phys. Rev. D 86(2012) 065015 [1109.0283]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  51. [51]

    Kinney, J.M

    J. Kinney, J.M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla and S. Raju,An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,Commun. Math. Phys.275(2007) 209 [hep-th/0510251]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  52. [52]

    Gadde, L

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S.S. Razamat and W. Yan,Gauge Theories and Macdonald Polynomials,Commun. Math. Phys.319(2013) 147 [1110.3740]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  53. [53]

    Gukov, D

    S. Gukov, D. Pei, W. Yan and K. Ye,Equivariant Verlinde Algebra from Superconformal Index and Argyres–Seiberg Duality,Commun. Math. Phys.357(2018) 1215 [1605.06528]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Gukov and D

    S. Gukov and D. Pei,Equivariant Verlinde formula from fivebranes and vortices,Commun. Math. Phys.355(2017) 1 [1501.01310]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  55. [55]

    Dimofte,Complex Chern–Simons Theory at Level k via the 3d–3d Correspondence, Commun

    T. Dimofte,Complex Chern–Simons Theory at Level k via the 3d–3d Correspondence, Commun. Math. Phys.339(2015) 619 [1409.0857]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    Biquard and P

    O. Biquard and P. Boalch,Wild non-abelian hodge theory on curves,Compositio Mathematica140(2004) 179

    2004

  57. [57]

    Maruyoshi and J

    K. Maruyoshi and J. Song,N= 1deformations and RG flows ofN= 2SCFTs,JHEP02 (2017) 075 [1607.04281]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics, Springer (1997), 10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9 1997

  59. [59]

    Bobev, M

    N. Bobev, M. Bullimore and H.-C. Kim,Supersymmetric Casimir Energy and the Anomaly Polynomial,JHEP09(2015) 142 [1507.08553]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [60]

    Shapere and Y

    A.D. Shapere and Y. Tachikawa,Central charges of N=2 superconformal field theories in four dimensions,JHEP09(2008) 109 [0804.1957]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  61. [61]

    Xie and S.-T

    D. Xie and S.-T. Yau,4d N=2 SCFT and singularity theory Part I: Classification, 1510.01324

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    Imamura,Relation between the 4d superconformal index and theS3 partition function, JHEP09(2011) 133 [1104.4482]

    Y. Imamura,Relation between the 4d superconformal index and theS3 partition function, JHEP09(2011) 133 [1104.4482]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  63. [63]

    Closset, T.T

    C. Closset, T.T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia and Z. Komargodski,The Geometry of Supersymmetric Partition Functions,JHEP01(2014) 124 [1309.5876]. – 67 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  64. [64]

    Closset, T.T

    C. Closset, T.T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia, Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg,Contact Terms, Unitarity, and F-Maximization in Three-Dimensional Superconformal Theories,JHEP10 (2012) 053 [1205.4142]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  65. [65]

    Closset, H

    C. Closset, H. Kim and B. Willett,Supersymmetric partition functions and the three-dimensional A-twist,JHEP03(2017) 074 [1701.03171]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  66. [66]

    Buican and R

    M. Buican and R. Radhakrishnan,Galois orbits of TQFTs: symmetries and unitarity, JHEP01(2022) 004 [2109.02766]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    M. Alim, S. Cecotti, C. Cordova, S. Espahbodi, A. Rastogi and C. Vafa,BPS Quivers and Spectra of Complete N=2 Quantum Field Theories,Commun. Math. Phys.323(2013) 1185 [1109.4941]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  68. [68]

    Fomin, M

    S. Fomin, M. Shapiro and D. Thurston,Cluster algebras and triangulated surfaces. Part I: Cluster complexes,math/0608367

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    Seifert and W

    H. Seifert and W. Threlfall,Lehrbuch der topologie, vol. 31, American Mathematical Soc. (2004)

    2004

  70. [70]

    Regina: Software for low-dimensional topology

    B.A. Burton, R. Budney, W. Pettersson et al., “Regina: Software for low-dimensional topology.”http://regina-normal.github.io/, 1999–2025

    1999

  71. [71]

    Burton,Introducing Regina, The 3-Manifold Topology Software,Experimental Mathematics13(2004) 267

    B.A. Burton,Introducing Regina, The 3-Manifold Topology Software,Experimental Mathematics13(2004) 267

    2004

  72. [72]

    Bonahon and J.-P

    F. Bonahon and J.-P. Otal,Scindements de heegaard des espaces lenticulaires,Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure16(1983) 451

    1983

  73. [73]

    Closset and H

    C. Closset and H. Kim,Comments on twisted indices in 3d supersymmetric gauge theories, JHEP08(2016) 059 [1605.06531]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  74. [74]

    Jafferis,The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z,JHEP05(2012) 159 [1012.3210]

    D.L. Jafferis,The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z,JHEP05(2012) 159 [1012.3210]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  75. [75]

    Gang and K

    D. Gang and K. Yonekura,Symmetry enhancement and closing of knots in 3d/3d correspondence,JHEP07(2018) 145 [1803.04009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    Gukov and C

    S. Gukov and C. Manolescu,A two-variable series for knot complements,Quantum Topol. 12(2021) 1 [1904.06057]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    Chung,BPS invariants for a Knot in Seifert manifolds,JHEP12(2022) 122 [2201.08351]

    H.-J. Chung,BPS invariants for a Knot in Seifert manifolds,JHEP12(2022) 122 [2201.08351]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Chung,3d-3d correspondence and abelian flat connection,JHEP07(2026) 080 [2603.05236]

    H.-J. Chung,3d-3d correspondence and abelian flat connection,JHEP07(2026) 080 [2603.05236]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  79. [79]

    Rozansky,A largekasymptotics of witten’s invariant of seifert manifolds,Commun

    L. Rozansky,A largekasymptotics of witten’s invariant of seifert manifolds,Commun. Math. Phys.171(1995) 279

    1995

  80. [80]

    Reidemeister,Homotopieringe und linsenräume,Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg11(1935) 102

    K. Reidemeister,Homotopieringe und linsenräume,Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg11(1935) 102

    1935

Showing first 80 references.