Pith. sign in

REVIEW

G-TRACER: Expected Sharpness Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.13914 v1 pith:E2BBXRZL submitted 2023-06-24 stat.ML cs.LG

G-TRACER: Expected Sharpness Optimization

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords optimizationg-tracerobjectiveoptimizersratioregularizationadam-tracerapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a new regularization scheme for the optimization of deep learning architectures, G-TRACER ("Geometric TRACE Ratio"), which promotes generalization by seeking flat minima, and has a sound theoretical basis as an approximation to a natural-gradient descent based optimization of a generalized Bayes objective. By augmenting the loss function with a TRACER, curvature-regularized optimizers (eg SGD-TRACER and Adam-TRACER) are simple to implement as modifications to existing optimizers and don't require extensive tuning. We show that the method converges to a neighborhood (depending on the regularization strength) of a local minimum of the unregularized objective, and demonstrate competitive performance on a number of benchmark computer vision and NLP datasets, with a particular focus on challenging low signal-to-noise ratio problems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.