REVIEW 1 cited by
Fair Algorithms for Clustering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Fair Algorithms for Clustering
read the original abstract
We study the problem of finding low-cost Fair Clusterings in data where each data point may belong to many protected groups. Our work significantly generalizes the seminal work of Chierichetti et.al. (NIPS 2017) as follows. - We allow the user to specify the parameters that define fair representation. More precisely, these parameters define the maximum over- and minimum under-representation of any group in any cluster. - Our clustering algorithm works on any $\ell_p$-norm objective (e.g. $k$-means, $k$-median, and $k$-center). Indeed, our algorithm transforms any vanilla clustering solution into a fair one incurring only a slight loss in quality. - Our algorithm also allows individuals to lie in multiple protected groups. In other words, we do not need the protected groups to partition the data and we can maintain fairness across different groups simultaneously. Our experiments show that on established data sets, our algorithm performs much better in practice than what our theoretical results suggest.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
COVAriance-Induced Fairness Gap Penalty for Subgroup-Fair Clustering
A covariance quantity is proven exactly equal to a subgroup-fairness gap for clustering, yielding COVA-FC, a scalable algorithm that can also enforce marginal fairness.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.