pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.08015 · v1 · pith:E2GURDCHnew · submitted 2025-12-08 · 🪐 quant-ph · cs.IT· math.IT

Information-Theoretic Analysis of Weak Measurements and Their Reversal

Luis D. Zambrano Palma , Yusef Maleki , M. Suhail Zubairy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 23:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cs.ITmath.IT
keywords weak measurementsnull-resultinformation extractionShannon entropymutual informationquantum reversibilitydynamical characterization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Null-result weak measurements yield a dynamical characterization of information extraction using entropy and related measures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a dynamical characterization of null-result weak measurements on quantum systems. It quantifies the information extracted over time by monitoring how quantities like Shannon entropy and mutual information evolve during the process. This reveals both the total amount of information obtained and the rate at which it accumulates, for qubits, qutrits, and multilevel systems. The approach also addresses the reversibility of these weak measurements through an information-theoretic lens. Readers would care because it provides concrete tools to track and understand information flow in continuous quantum monitoring without requiring a detection event.

Core claim

We develop a dynamical characterization of null-result weak measurements that quantifies the information extracted over time, revealing the amount of the obtained information and also the rate of the information accumulation. The characterizations are obtained by examining the time-dependent evolution of the information theoretic quantities such as Shannon entropy, mutual information, fidelity, and relative entropy in qubit and qutrit systems and a general framework for multilevel systems.

What carries the argument

Time-dependent evolution of information-theoretic quantities (Shannon entropy, mutual information, fidelity, relative entropy) that quantify continuous state updates in the absence of photon detection.

If this is right

  • Information gain in null-result weak measurements can be tracked continuously through changes in entropy and mutual information.
  • The rate of information accumulation depends on the system's dimension, as seen in comparisons between qubits and qutrits.
  • Reversibility of the weak measurement is linked to the information measures accumulated during the process.
  • General multilevel quantum systems admit similar dynamical characterizations of information extraction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such characterizations might enable optimized protocols for quantum state preparation using weak measurements.
  • Connections could be drawn to continuous weak measurement schemes in quantum optics for real-time feedback.
  • Experimental verification could involve measuring entropy rates in systems like single atoms or superconducting circuits.

Load-bearing premise

The standard model of null-result weak measurements accurately captures continuous state updates without undetected noise or additional decoherence channels.

What would settle it

Measuring the time evolution of Shannon entropy or mutual information in a qubit undergoing null-result weak measurement and checking if the observed accumulation rate matches the predicted dynamical curve.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.08015 by Luis D. Zambrano Palma, M. Suhail Zubairy, Yusef Maleki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Information-theoretic quantities as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Information-theoretic quantities as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Instantaneous rates of change of information gain, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Instantaneous rates of change of information gain, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study trade-off relations in information extraction from quantum systems subject to null-result weak measurements, where the absence of a detected photon continuously updates the system state. We present a detailed analysis of qubit and qutrit systems and investigate a general framework for a multilevel quantum system. We develop a dynamical characterization of null-result weak measurements that quantifies the information extracted over time, revealing the amount of the obtained information and also the rate of the information accumulation. The characterizations are obtained by examining the time-dependent evolution of the information theoretic quantities. More specifically, we consider Shannon entropy, mutual information, fidelity, and relative entropy to characterize the weak measurement dynamics. Our results provide an information theoretic analysis of the weak measurement process and highlight the dynamical nature of information extraction and reversibility in the weak measurement processes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper develops an information-theoretic framework for analyzing null-result weak measurements in qubit, qutrit, and general multilevel quantum systems. It characterizes the continuous state evolution under no-click dynamics by tracking the time dependence of Shannon entropy, mutual information, fidelity, and relative entropy, with the goal of quantifying both the total information extracted and the rate of its accumulation, while also addressing trade-offs and reversibility.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a dynamical, information-theoretic description of weak-measurement trajectories that could inform protocols for continuous monitoring and reversal in quantum sensing or error correction. The explicit use of standard functionals on the non-Hermitian evolution operator is a clear strength, though the absence of numerical benchmarks or robustness tests limits immediate applicability.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / general framework] The central claim that the modeled trajectory isolates the information extraction rate rests on the assumption that the no-click evolution (typically generated by a non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonian) captures all relevant dynamics. No explicit check is provided against additional Lindblad channels arising from finite detector efficiency or undetected scattering; such perturbations would cause the conditional state to deviate from the assumed trajectory and thereby change the computed entropy and mutual-information rates.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the modeled trajectory isolates the information extraction rate rests on the assumption that the no-click evolution (typically generated by a non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonian) captures all relevant dynamics. No explicit check is provided against additional Lindblad channels arising from finite detector efficiency or undetected scattering; such perturbations would cause the conditional state to deviate from the assumed trajectory and thereby change the computed entropy and mutual-information rates.

    Authors: We agree that the analysis is performed under the standard ideal no-click dynamics generated by the non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonian within the quantum trajectory formalism. This model is chosen precisely to isolate the information extraction arising solely from the continuous absence of detection events, allowing a clean characterization via Shannon entropy, mutual information, fidelity, and relative entropy. The manuscript does not claim to encompass all experimental imperfections; it provides the baseline theoretical description for the pure null-result case. We acknowledge that finite detector efficiency or undetected scattering would introduce additional Lindblad terms that alter the conditional state evolution and the associated rates. Because the paper focuses on the information-theoretic structure of the ideal trajectory rather than a specific noise model, we did not include explicit robustness checks against such perturbations. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the introduction and a remark in the discussion section to state this modeling assumption explicitly and note that extensions incorporating realistic detector inefficiencies can be constructed on top of the present framework. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard information measures applied directly to null-result evolution

full rationale

The paper computes time-dependent Shannon entropy, mutual information, fidelity, and relative entropy along the continuous state trajectory generated by the null-result weak measurement evolution operator. These are direct evaluations of established functionals on the density operator evolving under the given non-Hermitian effective dynamics; no parameters are fitted to a subset of results and then relabeled as predictions, no self-definitional loops appear in the definitions, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are imported via self-citation. The qubit, qutrit, and multilevel generalizations follow by explicit substitution into the same expressions. The derivation therefore remains independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on standard quantum measurement postulates and information theory definitions; no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are indicated in the provided abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Quantum state evolution under continuous null-result weak measurements follows the standard non-Hermitian or Kraus operator formalism
    Invoked implicitly when describing continuous state updates from absence of detection.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5438 in / 1177 out tokens · 35514 ms · 2026-05-16T23:58:15.504435+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    At long times, the rate tends to zero, reflecting the saturation of the information gain shown in Figs. 1 and 2. In contrast, the rate of fidelity˙F (τ )remains negative for all times, reflecting the continuous loss of similarity between the initial state and the null-result state. As described in Eq. 22, the rate always starts from zero. Its minimum corr...

    work page

  2. [2]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information(Cambridge university press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955) translated by Robert T

    J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955) translated by Robert T. Beyer

    work page 1955

  4. [4]

    A. N. Korotkov, Continuous quantum measurement of a double dot, Phys. Rev. B60, 5737 (1999)

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    Al Amri, M

    M. Al Amri, M. O. Scully, and M. S. Zubairy, Reversing the weak measurement on a qubit, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics44, 165509 (2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Z. Liao, M. Al-Amri, and M. S. Zubairy, Protecting quan- tum entanglement from amplitude damping, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics46, 145501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Maleki, Stereographic geometry of coherence and which-path information, Optics letters44, 5513 (2019)

    Y. Maleki, Stereographic geometry of coherence and which-path information, Optics letters44, 5513 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    W. H. Zurek, Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical, Reviews of modern physics75, 715 (2003)

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    Maleki and A

    Y. Maleki and A. M. Zheltikov, Witnessing quantum entanglement in ensembles of nitrogen–vacancy centers coupled to a superconducting resonator, Optics Express 26, 17849 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Haroche, Entanglement, decoherence and the quan- tum/classical boundary, Physics today51, 36 (1998)

    S. Haroche, Entanglement, decoherence and the quan- tum/classical boundary, Physics today51, 36 (1998)

    work page 1998

  11. [11]

    P. W. Shor, Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory, Physical review A52, R2493 (1995)

    work page 1995

  12. [12]

    I. L. Chuang, R. Laflamme, P. W. Shor, and W. H. Zurek, Quantum computers, factoring, and decoherence, Science 270, 1633 (1995)

    work page 1995

  13. [13]

    Bourennane, M

    M. Bourennane, M. Eibl, S. Gaertner, C. Kurtsiefer, . f. A. Cabello, and H. Weinfurter, Decoherence-free quantum information processing with four-photon entangled states, Physical review letters92, 107901 (2004)

    work page 2004

  14. [14]

    Zhang, U

    Z. Zhang, U. Agrawal, and S. Vijay, Quantum communi- cation and mixed-state order in decohered symmetry- protected topological states, Physical Review B111, 115141 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Escher, R

    B. Escher, R. L. de Matos Filho, and L. Davidovich, Gen- eral framework for estimating the ultimate precision limit in noisy quantum-enhanced metrology, Nature Physics7, 406 (2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    Maleki and A

    Y. Maleki and A. M. Zheltikov, Generating maximally- path-entangled number states in two spin ensembles cou- pled to a superconducting flux qubit, Physical Review A 97, 012312 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Vedral, Classical correlations and entanglement in quantum measurements, Phys

    V. Vedral, Classical correlations and entanglement in quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 050401 (2003)

    work page 2003

  18. [18]

    Xi and Y

    Z. Xi and Y. Li, Quantum and classical correlations in quantum measurement, Foundations of Physics43, 285 (2013)

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    Henderson and V

    L. Henderson and V. Vedral, Classical, quantum and total correlations, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General34, 6899 (2001)

    work page 2001

  20. [20]

    K. Modi, T. Paterek, W. Son, V. Vedral, and M. Williamson, Unified view of quantum and classical correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 080501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    M. M. Wilde, Recoverability in quantum information theory, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences471, 20150338 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Terashima, Information, fidelity, and reversibility in single-qubit measurements, Phys

    H. Terashima, Information, fidelity, and reversibility in single-qubit measurements, Phys. Rev. A83, 032114 (2011)

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Terashima, Information and fidelity in projective mea- surements, Phys

    H. Terashima, Information and fidelity in projective mea- surements, Phys. Rev. A85, 022124 (2012)

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    L. Fan, W. Ge, H. Nha, and M. S. Zubairy, Trade-off between information gain and fidelity under weak mea- surements, Phys. Rev. A92, 022114 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Sun, Measurement-extracted total, classical and quan- tum correlations, Physics Letters A504, 129430 (2024)

    Y. Sun, Measurement-extracted total, classical and quan- tum correlations, Physics Letters A504, 129430 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Luo, Information conservation and entropy change in quantum measurements, Phys

    S. Luo, Information conservation and entropy change in quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. A82, 052103 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    S.-W. Lee, J. Kim, and H. Nha, Complete Information Bal- ance in Quantum Measurement, Quantum5, 414 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Xi, Information gain and information leak in quantum measurements, Phys

    Z. Xi, Information gain and information leak in quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. A93, 052308 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Luo and Y

    S. Luo and Y. Sun, Quantifying the irreversibility of channels, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics218, 426 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    C. A. Fuchs and A. Peres, Quantum-state disturbance ver- sus information gain: Uncertainty relations for quantum information, Phys. Rev. A53, 2038 (1996)

    work page 2038

  31. [31]

    Y. W. Cheong and S.-W. Lee, Balance between informa- tion gain and reversibility in weak measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 150402 (2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Buscemi, M

    F. Buscemi, M. Hayashi, and M. Horodecki, Global in- formation balance in quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 210504 (2008)

    work page 2008

  33. [33]

    Mancino, M

    L. Mancino, M. Sbroscia, E. Roccia, I. Gianani, F. Somma, P. Mataloni, M. Paternostro, and M. Barbieri, The en- tropic cost of quantum generalized measurements, npj Quantum Information4, 20 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Ban, Entropy change and information gain in photon counting measurement, Physics Letters A235, 209 (1997)

    M. Ban, Entropy change and information gain in photon counting measurement, Physics Letters A235, 209 (1997)

    work page 1997

  35. [35]

    Ban, State reduction, information and entropy in quantum measurement processes, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General32, 1643 (1999)

    M. Ban, State reduction, information and entropy in quantum measurement processes, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General32, 1643 (1999)

    work page 1999

  36. [36]

    Ban, Information transmission in quantum measure- ment processes with pure operation, Journal of Physics 8 A: Mathematical and General32, 6527 (1999)

    M. Ban, Information transmission in quantum measure- ment processes with pure operation, Journal of Physics 8 A: Mathematical and General32, 6527 (1999)

    work page 1999

  37. [37]

    Ban, Information and entropy in quantum measure- ment processes, International Journal of Theoretical Physics37, 2491 (1998)

    M. Ban, Information and entropy in quantum measure- ment processes, International Journal of Theoretical Physics37, 2491 (1998)

    work page 1998

  38. [38]

    Q. Sun, M. Al-Amri, and M. S. Zubairy, Reversing the weak measurement of an arbitrary field with finite photon number, Phys. Rev. A80, 033838 (2009)

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Q. Sun, M. Al-Amri, L. Davidovich, and M. S. Zubairy, Reversing entanglement change by a weak measurement, Phys. Rev. A82, 052323 (2010)

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Koashi and M

    M. Koashi and M. Ueda, Reversing measurement and probabilistic quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2598 (1999)

    work page 1999

  41. [41]

    A. N. Korotkov and A. N. Jordan, Undoing a weak quan- tum measurement of a solid-state qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 166805 (2006)

    work page 2006

  42. [42]

    Ban, Probabilistically reversible measurements, Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and General34, 9669 (2001)

    M. Ban, Probabilistically reversible measurements, Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and General34, 9669 (2001)

    work page 2001

  43. [43]

    Kullback and R

    S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler, On information and suf- ficiency, The annals of mathematical statistics22, 79 (1951)

    work page 1951

  44. [44]

    Kullback,Information theory and statistics(Courier Corporation, 1997)

    S. Kullback,Information theory and statistics(Courier Corporation, 1997)

    work page 1997

  45. [45]

    Vedral, The role of relative entropy in quantum infor- mation theory, Rev

    V. Vedral, The role of relative entropy in quantum infor- mation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 197 (2002)

    work page 2002

  46. [46]

    Schumacher and M

    B. Schumacher and M. D. Westmoreland, Relative entropy in quantum information theory, arXiv preprint quant- ph/0004045 (2000)

    work page arXiv 2000

  47. [47]

    K. Modi, A. Brodutch, H. Cable, T. Paterek, and V. Ve- dral, The classical-quantum boundary for correlations: Discord and related measures, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1655 (2012)

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    Kuramochi and M

    Y. Kuramochi and M. Ueda, Classicality condition on a system observable in a quantum measurement and a relative-entropy conservation law, Phys. Rev. A91, 032110 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Ueda, Probability-density-functional description of quantum photodetection processes, Quantum Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B1, 131 (1989)

    M. Ueda, Probability-density-functional description of quantum photodetection processes, Quantum Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B1, 131 (1989)

    work page 1989

  50. [50]

    C. E. Shannon, Claude elwood shannon, Bell Syst. Tech. J27, 379 (1948)

    work page 1948

  51. [51]

    An Introduction to Quantum Error Correction and Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation

    D. Gottesman, An introduction to quantum error cor- rection and fault-tolerant quantum computation, arXiv preprint arXiv:0904.2557 (2009)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  52. [52]

    G. M. D’Ariano, On the heisenberg principle, namely on the information-disturbance trade-off in a quantum measurement, Fortschritte der Physik: Progress of Physics 51, 318 (2003)

    work page 2003