Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Light dilaton from top-down holographic confinement with magnetic fluxes

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A two-parameter family of top-down holographic confining theories with magnetic fluxes hosts a light approximate dilaton at one-tenth the confinement scale, far from any phase transition.

desk verdict A careful top-down supergravity calculation with a genuinely new light-dilaton result, held back mainly by an unproven assumption about the fluctuation completeness of the truncation. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.14924 v2 pith:E3EQSGZJ submitted 2026-02-16 hep-th

classification hep-th
keywords holographicconfinementlightdilatonmaximalsupergravityinsevendimensionsmagneticfluxessolitonsolutionsfirst-orderphasetransitionfluctuationspectragauge-gravityduality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that a strongly coupled, confining gauge theory with a top-down holographic dual can contain a light dilaton—a spin-0 bound state whose mass is about one-tenth the confinement scale—without tuning the parameters and without sitting near a second-order transition. The theory is a circle compactification of a six-dimensional superconformal theory, deformed by two magnetic fluxes; its gravity dual is a two-parameter family of smooth soliton solutions of maximal supergravity in seven dimensions. The authors compute the free energy and identify a first-order phase transition along a square in the flux-source plane, with the confining solutions energetically preferred inside the square. They find no tachyonic instabilities in the spin-0 and spin-2 fluctuation spectra, and a probe-approximation diagnostic shows that the lightest scalar is dominated by coupling to the trace of the stress-energy tensor, identifying it as the dilaton. A sympathetic reader would care because this supplies a calculable string-theory-derived example in which a light dilaton emerges away from criticality—the regime most relevant for composite-Higgs and dilaton phenomenology.

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-parameter analytic family of soliton backgrounds of the SO(2)xSO(2) truncation of seven-dimensional maximal supergravity, with functions H_i = 1 - Q_i^2/rho^4, f = -mu/rho^4 + (1/4)rho^2 H1 H2, and scalars phi_1, phi_2 determined through log(H1/H2) and log(H1 H2); conserved charges reduce the smooth, conical-singularity-free solutions to two free parameters, the two magnetic-flux sources. The spectra are extracted using the gauge-invariant fluctuation formalism for sigma-model scalars coupled to gravity, giving coupled equations for five spin-0 modes and one equation for spin-2 modes. The probe approximation—deliberately dropping the metric-trace component h fro

What would settle it

Compute the full fluctuation spectrum without the SO(2)xSO(2) truncation, including vector fields and the first Kaluza-Klein mode on the compact eta circle, for a background at theta = 0 and large rho_0; a negative mass-squared anywhere in the confining region, or a lightest scalar whose mass becomes comparable to M_2 once those modes are included, would falsify the paper's stability and light-dilaton claims.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that within the SO(2)xSO(2) truncation of seven-dimensional maximal supergravity, the regular soliton solutions dual to five-dimensional confining theories with two magnetic fluxes are locally stable and contain a light approximate dilaton. Over a large part of the allowed two-dimensional parameter space—not only near the first-order transition that bounds a square region in the flux plane—the lightest spin-0 gauge-invariant fluctuation has mass M_d of order M_2/10, where M_2 is the mass of the lightest spin-2 state. The dilaton identification is supported by the probe approximation: when the metric-trace part of the gauge-invariant scalar is neglected, the light

Load-bearing premise

The stability and dilaton conclusions assume that the SO(2)xSO(2) truncation, keeping only spin-0 and spin-2 zero-momentum fluctuations, captures the full supergravity spectrum; the paper itself notes the truncation is not generally consistent, so omitted modes could in principle harbor tachyons or mix with the light scalar.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A composite scalar as light as M_d ~ 0.1 M_2 is attainable in a string-derived confining theory without tuning bare parameters, so light-dilaton model building has a concrete top-down existence proof away from criticality.
  • The first-order transition is the boundary of the stable confining region; inside the square the confining vacuum is both globally preferred and locally stable, a property not guaranteed in earlier top-down examples where tachyons accompanied the transition.
  • Because the ratio M_2/Lambda is nearly constant, mass ratios quoted in units of M_2 are equivalent to ratios in units of the physical energy scale, making the quoted hierarchy a stable, scheme-independent statement.
  • The probe-approximation test gives an operational meaning to 'dilaton': a state whose mass is missed when the coupling to the trace of the stress-energy tensor is removed; future computations can use the same test to identify dilatons in other models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the truncation's spectral completeness is eventually verified, this would be the first top-down example in which magnetic-flux parameters, rather than criticality, control the dilaton mass; a dense scan of the two-flux square could reveal where the suppression is strongest and whether it vanishes at the corners.
  • The same backgrounds could be used to compute the dilaton decay constant and couplings through two- and three-point functions; those numbers are what composite-Higgs phenomenology would need, and a 1/10 mass ratio would put such a dilaton in an experimentally interesting window.
  • The paper restricts fluctuations to zero momentum along the compact eta circle; turning on that momentum generates a Kaluza-Klein tower that might mix with the dilaton and shift its mass, so checking the first such mode is a natural extension before applying these results to phenomenology.
  • The symmetry exchanging the two fluxes maps theta to pi/2 - theta; the four sample lines suggest the suppression persists for all ratios, but the interpolation is not proven, so testing intermediate angles would determine whether M_d/M_2 is minimized at the symmetric point or along the axes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a two-parameter family of seven-dimensional maximal-supergravity backgrounds obtained by an SO(2)×SO(2) truncation, dimensionally reduced on a circle to six dimensions. The solutions are regular solitons with a shrinking η circle and are interpreted holographically as strongly coupled confining field theories with two magnetic fluxes. The authors compute the holographically renormalized free energy, identify a square-shaped first-order transition line in the two-source parameter plane, and compute the spin-0 and spin-2 fluctuation spectra of the soliton backgrounds. They report two main claims: (i) no tachyonic modes are found in the computed sectors over the confining parameter space; and (ii) over a large portion of that space the lightest spin-0 bound state is an approximate dilaton, with mass ratio M_d/M_2 ≃ 1/10, without fine tuning. The background solutions and fluctuation equations are presented explicitly, with analytic UV expansions, and the numerical spectra are documented with cutoff checks and a data-release reference.

Significance. If the central results hold, this is a significant top-down addition to the holographic dilaton programme: it provides an explicit, calculable example in which a light dilaton emerges away from a first-order transition and without proximity to a second-order one, in contrast with the previous catalogue of models. The paper has real strengths: the background family is given in closed form (Eqs. (40)–(44)), the gauge-invariant fluctuation formalism is set out in detail in Appendix E, the free-energy computation is explicit (Eq. (76)), and the numerical spectra are accompanied by stated UV/IR cutoffs, convergence tests in Appendix F, and a data release. I also find the reader's circularity score warranted: the dilaton ratio is a computed output rather than an input, and the probe approximation is used only as a diagnostic. The central limitation is not internal inconsistency but the restricted fluctuation sector: the no-tachyon and dilaton-identification statements are established only inside the SO(2)×SO(2)-truncated system at zero momentum on the η circle, and the paper does not demonstrate that the omitted 7D/11D modes decouple in the linearized problem.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II.A, Sec. IV, Appendix E] The stability claim is load-bearing and is not yet supported outside the truncated sector. The analysis keeps only the five scalar fluctuations of the SO(2)×SO(2)-invariant sigma model (Eq. (E15)–(E24)) and the spin-2 metric fluctuation (Eq. (88)), at zero KK momentum along η. The full 7D maximal supergravity contains additional charged scalars, the eight coset gauge bosons, and vector/KK modes that are truncated away. Footnote 7 says the truncation is consistent only for backgrounds with F^(1)∧F^(2)=0, which addresses the background equations; it does not by itself prove that linearized fluctuations of the omitted fields decouple or have positive spectrum in this background. Since the abstract and outlook state 'no evidence of local instabilities' and 'no further instabilities', the authors should either prove positivity/decoupling of the omitted sectors (e.g., by computing their kineti
  2. [Sec. II.A and Sec. IV (spectra)] The fluctuation computation also ignores KK modes along the compact η circle: the dimensional reduction explicitly sets to zero all η-dependent fluctuations and all momentum along η. In a confining soliton geometry with a shrinking circle, KK excitations along η are not automatically heavier than the spin-2 glueball scale, and they could in principle contain tachyonic or light charged states. The 'lightest spin-2 state as confinement scale' comparison is therefore made within a restricted set of modes. The paper should state this restriction explicitly in the abstract or conclusion and, ideally, estimate the η-KK spectrum or argue why these modes cannot be lighter than the computed states.
  3. [Sec. IV.A, Fig. 3(e)] The identification of the lightest spin-0 state as an approximate dilaton rests on the probe approximation, in which the contribution of the metric trace h to the gauge-invariant scalar combinations is dropped. The logic is clear and follows Ref. [52], but the paper presents only a binary diagnostic: the lightest state is missed by the probe, so it is called a dilaton, while the next-to-lightest state is captured. Since the central novelty is that this state is a dilaton with M_d/M_2 ≃ 1/10, it would strengthen the claim to quantify the mixing, for example by projecting the normalized mode onto h versus the scalar fluctuations, or by showing that the state has an approximate Killing-vector/scale-invariance interpretation. Without such a quantitative check, 'contains a substantial dilaton contribution' is reasonable but heuristic.
  4. [Sec. IV, Fig. 3 and Appendix F] The quoted ratio M_d/M_2 ≃ 1/10 is extracted from numerical spectra with stated cutoffs, but the paper does not provide error bars or a precise definition of how the ratio is read off the plots. Appendix F shows some IR-cutoff dependence, especially for the second-lightest scalar state. The main lightest-state result appears robust, but for a quantitative claim of 'one order of magnitude' the paper should state the numerical uncertainty on the ratio, or provide a table of representative eigenvalues for the four branches.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV.A] Typo: 'first-oder' should be 'first-order'.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] Typo: 'could has well' should be 'could have well'.
  3. [Appendix E] The UV expansions (E25)–(E29) are extremely long; a short paragraph stating the normalization convention for the ten free parameters and how the numerical matching is performed would help reproducibility. The paper mentions this in the text, but the conventions are not fully spelled out.
  4. [Eq. (44)] The two branches denoted by '±' in A^(i)_7 are not explained in the surrounding text; a sentence connecting the sign choice to the parameter domains or to the symmetries of the system would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the light-dilaton and no-tachyon claims are computed from the explicit supergravity action and background solutions, with no fitted parameters and no self-citation chain forcing the result.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained: it starts from the SO(2)xSO(2)-truncated 7D maximal supergravity action, Eq. (8)/(14), constructs closed-form soliton backgrounds, Eqs. (40)-(44), computes the holographically renormalized free energy, Eq. (78), and solves the gauge-invariant scalar and tensor fluctuation equations numerically to obtain the spectra in Fig. 3. The central ratio M_d/M_2 ~ 1/10 is an output of that eigenvalue problem; no parameter is fitted to this value, and no 'prediction' reduces to an input by the paper's own equations. The probe approximation in Sec. IV A is explicitly presented as a diagnostic tool: because the gauge-invariant combination, Eq. (E4), contains the metric trace h, dropping h and observing that the lightest state is missed is a physical inference about h contamination, not a circular definition of the dilaton mass, which is obtained from the full calculation. Footnote 7 honestly states that the SO(2)xSO(2) truncation is not in general consistent, but that statement delimits the domain of validity (backgrounds with F^(1)∧F^(2)=0) and flags a possible completeness limitation for the 'no tachyons' claim; it is a scope caveat, not a circular step. Self-citations to Refs. [43,52,53-58] supply programmatic context and the fluctuation formalism, but the spectra and phase structure are computed here from the displayed action, and no uniqueness theorem or prior result is invoked to force the light-dilaton conclusion. Hence no load-bearing step reduces by construction, and the correct finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a computed consequence of an existing top-down supergravity action; no new entities are introduced and no constants are fitted to data. The main unproven inputs are the standard holographic dictionary, the restricted truncation, and the diagnostic probe approximation.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence and the holographic dictionary
    Used to interpret gravity backgrounds, free energy, and fluctuation spectra as dual strong-coupling field-theory data; standard in the field but not proven within the paper.
  • standard math The 7D maximal SO(5) gauged supergravity action and its SO(2)xSO(2) truncation
    Taken from Refs. [152-154,199]; the central action is Eq. (8) and the scalar/gauge content is fixed by this truncation.
  • domain assumption Consistency of the SO(2)xSO(2) truncation for backgrounds with F^(1)∧F^(2)=0
    Footnote 7 states the truncation is not generally consistent and is valid for solutions with F^(1)∧F^(2)=0; the paper does not prove this extends to the linearized fluctuation spectrum.
  • standard math Gauge-invariant fluctuation formalism of Refs. [44-52]
    The equations are reproduced in Appendix E, but the validity of the formalism for these soliton backgrounds is assumed from the literature.
  • domain assumption Probe approximation diagnoses dilaton coupling by omitting the metric-trace contribution
    Section IV.A: the probe spectrum failing to reproduce a state is interpreted as evidence the state is mostly dilaton; this is a diagnostic, not a rigorous proof.
  • domain assumption Numerical shooting/matching with IR cutoff converges sufficiently
    Appendix F shows convergence for selected points, but no full error estimate is provided across all the reported spectra.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Light dilaton from top-down holographic confinement with magnetic fluxes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E3EQSGZJ

@misc{pith2026260214924,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Light dilaton from top-down holographic confinement with magnetic fluxes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E3EQSGZJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.14924}
}
read the original abstract

A two-parameter class of higher-dimensional, strongly coupled, confining field theories in the presence of magnetic fluxes for two Abelian gauge groups admits a top-down, holographic dual description. The corresponding two-parameter family of regular background solutions of the classical equations of maximal supergravity in seven dimensions descends from maximal supergravity in eleven dimensions. We study the global and local stability properties of these solutions. We identify lines of zero-temperature first-order phase transitions, describing a polygon (a square) in the space of parameters, identified with the two fluxes. The transition separates the family of gravity solutions dual to confining theories, inside the polygon, from those outside, in which the field theory is realised in a conformal phase. In the spectrum of fluctuations of the supergravity equations, interpreted as bound states of the dual, confining field theories, we find no evidence of local instabilities (tachyons). Over a significant portion of parameter space, that extends far away from the proximity to the transition, we identify an approximate dilaton, the mass of which is one order of magnitude smaller than the scale set by confinement. Our findings complement those emerging in other holographic models discussed in the literature, in which either the dilaton mass is only mildly lower than the confinement scale (when approaching a first-order transitions), or parametrically suppressed (when reaching the proximity to a second-order one).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.14924 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Parameters and functions appearing in the soliton (confining) solutions, as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Left panel: phase diagram of the model, in the plane defined by the sources [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Top four panels: mass spectra, normalised to the mass of the lightest spin-2 fluctuation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Gravitational invariants for a selection of soliton (confining) solutions, as a function of the holographic direction, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Examples of mass spectra, normalised to the mass of the lightest spin-2 fluctuation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bound states and deconfinement from Romans supergravity with magnetic flux

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Holographic duals from Romans supergravity with Abelian magnetic flux yield confining 4D theories with a flux-driven zero-temperature deconfinement transition and a spectrum dominated by two nearly degenerate light sc...

  2. Dilatonic states, phase transitions, and criticality in holography

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review of holographic examples indicating that a light dilaton appears near critical endpoints of first-order zero-temperature phase transitions, with explicit but lower-dimensional demonstrations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

229 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [52]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,Glueballs on the Baryonic Branch of Klebanov-Strassler: dimensional deconstruction and a light scalar particle,JHEP06(2017) 003 [1703.10158]

  2. [1]

    Upon imposing the constraint to avoid a conical singularity, the Ricci Scalar calculated for solutions along the line of phase transition, whereµ= 0 (andQ 2 1 =Q 2 2 =ϱ 4

    (ϱ4 −Q 2 2))6/5 h 15Q4 1Q4 2 + 48µϱ6 Q2 1 +Q 2 2 −32µQ 2 1Q2 2ϱ2 + 126ϱ12 Q2 1 +Q 2 2 + 23 + 6Q2 1Q2 2ϱ4 Q2 1 +Q 2 2 −3ϱ 8 3Q4 1 + 52Q2 1Q2 2 + 3Q4 2 −105ϱ 16 i .(D3) Here, the first expression is valid as long as the vector fields all vanish in the background, the second has been obtained by making use of the equations of motion, and the third by making ...

  3. [2]

    When computing the free energy of a general solution, the superpotential plays the role of a counterterm in our prescription

    +· · ·, one finds that the first-order equations are ∂ρA= 1 2 +· · ·,(B7) ∂ρϕ1,2 =−ϕ 1,2 +· · ·.(B8) By settingz=e −ρ/2, one finds thate A ∝ 1 z andϕ 1,2 ∝z 2, indicating that gravity solutions obtained as small perturbations of the AdS7 ones have a dual description in terms of deformations of a six-dimensional CFT, in the presence of two operators of dim...

  4. [3]

    Conversely, in the case of the AdS 7, domain-wall solutions, the Ricci Scalar takes on the constant value− 21 2

    is given by R(µ=0) =− 3(35ϱ8 −14ϱ 4ϱ4 0 −5ϱ 8 0) 10ϱ8 (ϱ4−ϱ4 0)2 ϱ8 1 5 .(D4) This expression diverges at the end of space, whenϱ=ϱ 0. Conversely, in the case of the AdS 7, domain-wall solutions, the Ricci Scalar takes on the constant value− 21 2 . We calculate three gravitational invariants,R,R M NRM N, andR M N P QRM N P Q, for the confining solutions. ...

  5. [4]

    Primed variables stand for derivatives in respect toρ, so that g′ =∂ ρg(ρ)

    Fluctuation equations for the scalars We report here the explicit form of the fluctuation equations used for the numerical study the results of which are reported in the body of the paper, written in terms of the variableρ. Primed variables stand for derivatives in respect toρ, so that g′ =∂ ρg(ρ). The five gauge-invariant scalar fluctuations, n aϕ1 ,a ϕ2...

  6. [5]

    + 5 √ 2A(1) 7 ′′ ) + 40e ϕ1√ 2 ϕ′ 1A(1) 7 ′ −5e ϕ1√ 2 + √ 10ϕ2 ϕ′ 1A(1) 7 ′ !# aA(1) 7 " 160 √ 2e2A+2 √ 2 5 ϕ2 (A′)2A(2) 7 ′ ∂ρ + e2A+ √ 2 5 ϕ2 40e √ 5 2 ϕ2 A(2) 7 ′ 2 √ 2A′ sinh ϕ1√ 2 +ϕ ′ 1 cosh ϕ1√ 2 + 16e √ 2 5 ϕ2 (A′)2A(2) 7 ′ (25 √ 2A′ + √ 5(2ϕ′ 2 −9χ ′)−10ϕ ′

  7. [6]

    + 5 √ 2A(2) 7 ′′ −5e √ 10ϕ2 ϕ′ 1A(2) 7 ′ + 40ϕ′ 1A(2) 7 ′ !# aA(2) 7 + " −16 √ 5e2 √ 2 5 ϕ2 A′ 2 −2e2 √ 2ϕ1 A(1) 7 ′ 2 + 2 A(2) 7 ′ 2 + e √ 2ϕ1 −1 e 8χ+ϕ2√ 10 + ϕ1√ 2 + √ 2A′e 4 √ 2 5 χ+ ϕ1√ 2 40e √ 5 2 ϕ2 e √ 2ϕ1 −1 χ′ − √ 5 4e √ 5 2 ϕ2 e √ 2ϕ1 + 1 + 8e ϕ1√ 2 −e ϕ1√ 2 + √ 10ϕ2 ϕ′ 1 + 5 4e √ 5 2 ϕ2 e √ 2ϕ1 + 1 + 8e ϕ1√ 2 −e ϕ1√ 2 + √ 10ϕ2 χ′e 4 √ 2 5 χ+ ϕ...

  8. [7]

    −5 −4e √ 5 2 ϕ2 e √ 2ϕ1 + 1 −8e ϕ1√ 2 +e ϕ1√ 2 + √ 10ϕ2 e2A+ √ 2 5 ϕ2 A(1) 7 ′ A(2) 7 ′ # aA(2) 7 +

    + √ 10A(2) 7 ′′ # e2A+2 √ 2 5 aA(2) 7 + " 160 A′ 2 e2A+ √ 2 5 (4χ+ϕ2)+ √ 2ϕ1 ∂2 ρ + 16 A′ 2 50A′ − √ 10χ′ e2A+ √ 2 5 (4χ+ϕ2)+ √ 2ϕ1 ∂ρ + 8 A′ 2 −16e2A+2 √ 2ϕ1+2 √ 2 5 ϕ2 A(1) 7 ′ 2 −16e 2A+2 √ 2 5 ϕ2 A(2) 7 ′ 2 +e 4 √ 2 5 χ+ √ 2ϕ1 20M 2e √ 2 5 (χ+ϕ2) −e 2A e √ 10ϕ2 −8 + 4 e √ 2ϕ1 + 1 e 2A+ 8χ+5ϕ2√ 10 + ϕ1√ 2 −8 √ 10 4e √ 5 2 ϕ2 e √ 2ϕ1 + 1 + 8e ϕ1√ 2 −e ϕ...

Show all 229 references
  1. [8]

    In the numerical calculations of the spectra reported in the main body, we retained terms up to tenth order in these expansions

    UV Expansions We provide the leading terms in the UV expansions of the fluctuations used to improve the numerical calculation of the spectrum, in terms of variablez= 1 ϱ . In the numerical calculations of the spectra reported in the main body, we retained terms up to tenth ord...

  2. [9]

    + 120aϕ2 4 M 4 + 1120aϕ2 2 M 6 − 12M 2 √ 5aϕ1 2 (Q2 2 −Q 2

  3. [10]

    + 8 √ 10(a A(1) 7 0 Q1 +a A(2) 7 0 Q2)√µ + 60aϕ2 2 µ − 4 15 M 2 log[z](3 √ 5aϕ1 2 (Q1 −Q 2)(Q1 +Q 2) + 3aϕ2 2 (Q2 1 +Q 2

  4. [11]

    + 40aϕ2 2 M 4) + z10 1350 180 √ 5aϕ1 4 (Q2 2 −Q 2 1)M 2 + 3 √ 5aϕ1 2 (Q1 −Q 2)(Q1 +Q 2)(57(Q2 1 +Q 2 2)−430M 4) + −120aϕ2 4 M 2(9(Q2 1 +Q 2

  5. [12]

    + 5M4) + 24(75aϕ2 4 µ−96a χ 0 (Q2 1 +Q 2 2)µ)− 33 24 √ 10√µ 15a A(1) 7 4 Q1 + 15a A(2) 7 4 Q2 + 2(a A(1) 7 0 Q1 +a A(2) 7 0 Q2)(3(Q2 1 +Q 2 2)−5M 4) − aϕ2 2 (279Q4 1 + 279Q4 2 + 3690Q2 2M 4 + 700M8 + 18Q2 1(46Q2 2 + 205M4) + 3300M2µ) + 480M 2 log[z] 10aϕ2 2 M 6 + 3M2( √ 5aϕ1 2...

  6. [13]

    For the tensor fluctuations, the expressions are simpler, and depend on two free parameters that we denote asT 0 andT 6

    + 8( √ 10a A(1) 7 4 Q1 √µ+ √ 10a A(2) 7 4 Q2 √µ+ 4a χ 0 (Q2 1 +Q 2 2)µ))− 150aχ 0 Q2 1Q2 2M 2 + 40aχ 0 M 10(39−40 log[z])−20a χ 0 (Q2 1 +Q 2 2)M 6(23 + 120 log[z]) + 6M 4(25aχ 6 + 350aχ 0 µ−8 √ 10(a A(1) 7 0 Q1 +a A(2) 7 0 Q2)√µ) +O(z 12). For the tensor fluctuations, the expr...

  7. [14]

    2 √ 5e2A+2 √ 2 5 ϕ2 −e2 √ 2ϕ1 A(1) 7 ′ 2 + A(2) 7 ′ 2 + 3 e √ 2ϕ1 −1 e 8χ+ϕ2√ 10 + ϕ1√ 2 # pϕ2 +

    Probe Approximation We report here the equations obeyed by the scalar fluctuations treated in the probe approximation defined in the main body of the text. In this Appendix, we denote the fluctuations as n pϕ1 ,p ϕ2 ,p χ,p A(1) 7 ,p A(2) 7 o , to distinguish them from the gaug...

  8. [15]

    Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

  9. [16]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B 428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

  10. [17]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

  11. [18]

    Aharony, S.S

    O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111]

  12. [19]

    Maldacena,Wilson loops in large N field theories,Phys

    J.M. Maldacena,Wilson loops in large N field theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 4859 [hep-th/9803002]

  13. [20]

    Rey and J.-T

    S.-J. Rey and J.-T. Yee,Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity, Eur. Phys. J. C22(2001) 379 [hep-th/9803001]

  14. [21]

    Brandhuber, N

    A. Brandhuber, N. Itzhaki, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,Wilson loops in the large N limit at finite temperature, Phys. Lett. B434(1998) 36 [hep-th/9803137]

  15. [22]

    Brandhuber, N

    A. Brandhuber, N. Itzhaki, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,Wilson loops, confinement, and phase transitions in large N gauge theories from supergravity,JHEP06(1998) 001 [hep-th/9803263]

  16. [23]

    Brandhuber and K

    A. Brandhuber and K. Sfetsos,Wilson loops from multicenter and rotating branes, mass gaps and phase structure in gauge theories,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 851 [hep-th/9906201]

  17. [24]

    Nunez, M

    C. Nunez, M. Piai and A. Rago,Wilson Loops in string duals of Walking and Flavored Systems,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 086001 [0909.0748]

  18. [25]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 505 [hep-th/9803131]

  19. [26]

    Wen and H.-X

    C.-K. Wen and H.-X. Yang,QCD(4) glueball masses from AdS(6) black hole description,Mod. Phys. Lett. A20(2005) 997 [hep-th/0404152]

  20. [27]

    Kuperstein and J

    S. Kuperstein and J. Sonnenschein,Non-critical, near extremal AdS(6) background as a holographic laboratory of four dimensional YM theory,JHEP11(2004) 026 [hep-th/0411009]

  21. [28]

    Brower, S.D

    R.C. Brower, S.D. Mathur and C.-I. Tan,Glueball spectrum for QCD from AdS supergravity duality,Nucl. Phys. B587 (2000) 249 [hep-th/0003115]

  22. [29]

    Elander, A.F

    D. Elander, A.F. Faedo, C. Hoyos, D. Mateos and M. Piai,Multiscale confining dynamics from holographic RG flows, JHEP05(2014) 003 [1312.7160]

  23. [30]

    Candelas and X.C

    P. Candelas and X.C. de la Ossa,Comments on Conifolds,Nucl. Phys. B342(1990) 246

  24. [31]

    Chamseddine and M.S

    A.H. Chamseddine and M.S. Volkov,NonAbelian BPS monopoles in N=4 gauged supergravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.79 (1997) 3343 [hep-th/9707176]

  25. [32]

    Klebanov and M.J

    I.R. Klebanov and M.J. Strassler,Supergravity and a confining gauge theory: Duality cascades and chi SB resolution of naked singularities,JHEP08(2000) 052 [hep-th/0007191]

  26. [33]

    Maldacena and C

    J.M. Maldacena and C. Nunez,Towards the large N limit of pure N=1 superYang-Mills,Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 588 [hep-th/0008001]

  27. [34]

    Butti, M

    A. Butti, M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini and A. Zaffaroni,The Baryonic branch of Klebanov-Strassler solution: A supersymmetric family of SU(3) structure backgrounds,JHEP03(2005) 069 [hep-th/0412187]

  28. [35]

    Klebanov and E

    I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten,Superconformal field theory on three-branes at a Calabi-Yau singularity,Nucl. Phys. B 536(1998) 199 [hep-th/9807080]

  29. [36]

    Klebanov and A.A

    I.R. Klebanov and A.A. Tseytlin,Gravity duals of supersymmetric SU(N) x SU(N+M) gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B 578(2000) 123 [hep-th/0002159]

  30. [37]

    Papadopoulos and A.A

    G. Papadopoulos and A.A. Tseytlin,Complex geometry of conifolds and five-brane wrapped on two sphere,Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) 1333 [hep-th/0012034]

  31. [38]

    Dymarsky, I.R

    A. Dymarsky, I.R. Klebanov and N. Seiberg,On the moduli space of the cascading SU(M+p) x SU(p) gauge theory, JHEP01(2006) 155 [hep-th/0511254]

  32. [39]

    Andrews and N

    R.P. Andrews and N. Dorey,Deconstruction of the Maldacena-Nunez compactification,Nucl. Phys. B751(2006) 304 [hep-th/0601098]

  33. [40]

    Hoyos-Badajoz, C

    C. Hoyos-Badajoz, C. Nunez and I. Papadimitriou,Comments on the String dual to N=1 SQCD,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 086005 [0807.3039]

  34. [41]

    Nunez, I

    C. Nunez, I. Papadimitriou and M. Piai,Walking Dynamics from String Duals,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25(2010) 2837 [0812.3655]

  35. [42]

    Elander, C

    D. Elander, C. Nunez and M. Piai,A Light scalar from walking solutions in gauge-string duality,Phys. Lett. B686 (2010) 64 [0908.2808]

  36. [43]

    Cassani and A.F

    D. Cassani and A.F. Faedo,A Supersymmetric consistent truncation for conifold solutions,Nucl. Phys. B843(2011) 455 [1008.0883]

  37. [44]

    I. Bena, G. Giecold, M. Grana, N. Halmagyi and F. Orsi,Supersymmetric Consistent Truncations of IIB onT 1,1,JHEP 04(2011) 021 [1008.0983]

  38. [45]

    Bennett, E

    S. Bennett, E. Caceres, C. Nunez, D. Schofield and S. Young,The Non-SUSY Baryonic Branch: Soft Supersymmetry Breaking of N=1 Gauge Theories,JHEP05(2012) 031 [1111.1727]

  39. [46]

    Dymarsky and S

    A. Dymarsky and S. Kuperstein,Non-supersymmetric Conifold,JHEP08(2012) 033 [1111.1731]. 37

  40. [47]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Martelli,The Unwarped, resolved, deformed conifold: Fivebranes and the baryonic branch of the Klebanov-Strassler theory,JHEP01(2010) 104 [0906.0591]

  41. [48]

    Gaillard, D

    J. Gaillard, D. Martelli, C. Nunez and I. Papadimitriou,The warped, resolved, deformed conifold gets flavoured,Nucl. Phys. B843(2011) 1 [1004.4638]

  42. [49]

    Caceres, C

    E. Caceres, C. Nunez and L.A. Pando-Zayas,Heating up the Baryonic Branch with U-duality: A Unified picture of conifold black holes,JHEP03(2011) 054 [1101.4123]

  43. [50]

    Elander, J

    D. Elander, J. Gaillard, C. Nunez and M. Piai,Towards multi-scale dynamics on the baryonic branch of Klebanov-Strassler,JHEP07(2011) 056 [1104.3963]

  44. [51]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,On the glueball spectrum of walking backgrounds from wrapped-D5 gravity duals,Nucl. Phys. B 871(2013) 164 [1212.2600]

  45. [53]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,Calculable mass hierarchies and a light dilaton from gravity duals,Phys. Lett. B772(2017) 110 [1703.09205]

  46. [54]

    Bianchi, D.Z

    M. Bianchi, D.Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis,Holographic renormalization,Nucl. Phys. B631(2002) 159 [hep-th/0112119]

  47. [55]

    Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class

    K. Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067]

  48. [56]

    Papadimitriou and K

    I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis,AdS / CFT correspondence and geometry,IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys.8(2005) 73 [hep-th/0404176]

  49. [57]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Dilatonic states near holographic phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 106018 [2010.04100]

  50. [58]

    Bianchi, M

    M. Bianchi, M. Prisco and W. Mueck,New results on holographic three point functions,JHEP11(2003) 052 [hep-th/0310129]

  51. [59]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and W. Mueck,Bulk dynamics in confining gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B736(2006) 82 [hep-th/0507285]

  52. [60]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and W. Mueck,Glueballs vs. Gluinoballs: Fluctuation Spectra in Non-AdS/Non-CFT,Nucl. Phys. B 789(2008) 1 [hep-th/0612224]

  53. [61]

    Elander,Glueball Spectra of SQCD-like Theories,JHEP03(2010) 114 [0912.1600]

    D. Elander,Glueball Spectra of SQCD-like Theories,JHEP03(2010) 114 [0912.1600]

  54. [62]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,Light scalars from a compact fifth dimension,JHEP01(2011) 026 [1010.1964]

  55. [63]

    Elander,Aspects of gauge-gravity duality., Ph.D

    P.A.D. Elander,Aspects of gauge-gravity duality., Ph.D. thesis, Swansea U., 2010.1010.1988

  56. [64]

    Elander,Light scalar from deformations of the Klebanov-Strassler background,Phys

    D. Elander,Light scalar from deformations of the Klebanov-Strassler background,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 126012 [1401.3412]

  57. [65]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Holographic glueballs from the circle reduction of Romans supergravity,JHEP02 (2019) 101 [1811.01010]

  58. [66]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Probing the holographic dilaton,JHEP06(2020) 177 [2004.05656]

  59. [67]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Light dilaton in a metastable vacuum,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 046009 [2011.07049]

  60. [68]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Coulomb branch of N=4 SYM and dilatonic scions in supergravity,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021) 046003 [2103.06721]

  61. [69]

    Elander, A

    D. Elander, A. Fatemiabhari and M. Piai,Phase transitions and light scalars in bottom-up holography,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) 015021 [2212.07954]

  62. [70]

    Faedo, C

    A.F. Faedo, C. Hoyos, M. Piai, R. Rodgers and J.G. Subils,Light holographic dilatons near critical points,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024) 126017 [2406.04974]

  63. [71]

    Fatemiabhari, C

    A. Fatemiabhari, C. Nunez, M. Piai and J. Rucinski,Stability of holographic confinement with magnetic fluxes,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 066009 [2411.16854]

  64. [72]

    Elander, A.F

    D. Elander, A.F. Faedo, M. Piai, R. Rodgers and J.G. Subils,Light dilaton near critical points in top-down holography, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 126020 [2502.19226]

  65. [73]

    Lucini, A

    B. Lucini, A. Patella, A. Rago and E. Rinaldi,Infrared conformality and bulk critical points: SU(2) with heavy adjoint quarks,JHEP11(2013) 106 [1309.1614]

  66. [74]

    Bennett, D.K

    E. Bennett, D.K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini et al.,Lattice studies of the Sp(4) gauge theory with two fundamental and three antisymmetric Dirac fermions,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 014501 [2202.05516]

  67. [75]

    Cresswell-Hogg, D.F

    C. Cresswell-Hogg, D.F. Litim and R. Zwicky,Dilaton Physics from Asymptotic Freedom,2502.00107

  68. [76]

    Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K

    S. Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (1985), 10.1017/CBO9780511565045

  69. [77]

    Migdal and M.A

    A.A. Migdal and M.A. Shifman,Dilaton Effective Lagrangian in Gluodynamics,Phys. Lett. B114(1982) 445

  70. [78]

    Leung, S.T

    C.N. Leung, S.T. Love and W.A. Bardeen,Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Scale Invariant Quantum Electrodynamics,Nucl. Phys. B273(1986) 649

  71. [79]

    Bardeen, C.N

    W.A. Bardeen, C.N. Leung and S.T. Love,The Dilaton and Chiral Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986) 1230

  72. [80]

    Yamawaki, M

    K. Yamawaki, M. Bando and K.-i. Matumoto,Scale Invariant Technicolor Model and a Technidilaton,Phys. Rev. Lett. 56(1986) 1335

  73. [81]

    Holdom,Techniodor,Phys

    B. Holdom,Techniodor,Phys. Lett. B150(1985) 301

  74. [82]

    Holdom and J

    B. Holdom and J. Terning,A Light Dilaton in Gauge Theories?,Phys. Lett. B187(1987) 357

  75. [83]

    Holdom and J

    B. Holdom and J. Terning,No Light Dilaton in Gauge Theories,Phys. Lett. B200(1988) 338

  76. [84]

    Appelquist and Y

    T. Appelquist and Y. Bai,A Light Dilaton in Walking Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 071701 [1006.4375]. 38

  77. [85]

    Grinstein and P

    B. Grinstein and P. Uttayarat,A Very Light Dilaton,JHEP07(2011) 038 [1105.2370]

  78. [86]

    Matsuzaki and K

    S. Matsuzaki and K. Yamawaki,Dilaton Chiral Perturbation Theory: Determining the Mass and Decay Constant of the Technidilaton on the Lattice,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 082002 [1311.3784]

  79. [87]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir,Low-energy effective action for pions and a dilatonic meson,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 054502 [1603.04575]

  80. [88]

    Kasai, K.-i

    A. Kasai, K.-i. Okumura and H. Suzuki,A dilaton-pion mass relation,1609.02264

  81. [89]

    Hansen, K

    M. Hansen, K. Langæble and F. Sannino,Extending Chiral Perturbation Theory with an Isosinglet Scalar,Phys. Rev. D 95(2017) 036005 [1610.02904]

  82. [90]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir,Effective pion mass term and the trace anomaly,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 016003 [1611.04275]

  83. [91]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Dilaton EFT Framework For Lattice Data,JHEP07(2017) 035 [1702.04410]

  84. [92]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Analysis of a Dilaton EFT for Lattice Data,JHEP03(2018) 039 [1711.00067]

  85. [93]

    Cat` a, R.J

    O. Cat` a, R.J. Crewther and L.C. Tunstall,Crawling technicolor,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 095007 [1803.08513]

  86. [94]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir,Large-mass regime of the dilaton-pion low-energy effective theory,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 056025 [1805.00198]

  87. [95]

    Cat` a and C

    O. Cat` a and C. M¨ uller,Chiral effective theories with a light scalar at one loop,Nucl. Phys. B952(2020) 114938 [1906.01879]

  88. [96]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Dilaton potential and lattice data,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 075025 [1908.00895]

  89. [97]

    Golterman, E.T

    M. Golterman, E.T. Neil and Y. Shamir,Application of dilaton chiral perturbation theory toN f = 8,SU(3)spectral data,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 034515 [2003.00114]

  90. [98]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir,Explorations beyond dilaton chiral perturbation theory in the eight-flavor SU(3) gauge theory,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 114507 [2009.13846]

  91. [99]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Dilaton Effective Field Theory,Universe9(2023) 10 [2209.14867]

  92. [100]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Dilaton Effective Field Theory across the Conformal Edge,2512.16863

  93. [101]

    Cao, J.-N

    Q.-H. Cao, J.-N. Ding, B.-H. Ge, H. Sun and J.-H. Yu,Effective Field Theory Description of Light Dilaton,2601.16534

  94. [102]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Nearly Conformal Composite Higgs Model,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 191804 [2012.09698]

  95. [103]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Composite two-Higgs doublet model from dilaton effective field theory,Nucl. Phys. B983(2022) 115930 [2205.03320]

  96. [104]

    Cacciapaglia, D.Y

    G. Cacciapaglia, D.Y. Cheong, A. Deandrea, W. Isnard and S.C. Park,Composite hybrid inflation: dilaton and waterfall pions,JCAP10(2023) 063 [2307.01852]

  97. [105]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Dilaton forbidden dark matter,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 035013 [2404.07601]

  98. [106]

    Goldberger, B

    W.D. Goldberger, B. Grinstein and W. Skiba,Distinguishing the Higgs boson from the dilaton at the Large Hadron Collider,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 111802 [0708.1463]

  99. [107]

    Hong, S.D.H

    D.K. Hong, S.D.H. Hsu and F. Sannino,Composite Higgs from higher representations,Phys. Lett. B597(2004) 89 [hep-ph/0406200]

  100. [108]

    Dietrich, F

    D.D. Dietrich, F. Sannino and K. Tuominen,Light composite Higgs from higher representations versus electroweak precision measurements: Predictions for CERN LHC,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 055001 [hep-ph/0505059]

  101. [109]

    Vecchi,Phenomenology of a light scalar: the dilaton,Phys

    L. Vecchi,Phenomenology of a light scalar: the dilaton,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 076009 [1002.1721]

  102. [110]

    Hashimoto and K

    M. Hashimoto and K. Yamawaki,Techni-dilaton at Conformal Edge,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 015008 [1009.5482]

  103. [111]

    Del Debbio and R

    L. Del Debbio and R. Zwicky,Dilaton and massive hadrons in a conformal phase,JHEP08(2022) 007 [2112.11363]

  104. [112]

    Zwicky,The Dilaton Improves Goldstones,2306.12914

    R. Zwicky,The Dilaton Improves Goldstones,2306.12914

  105. [113]

    Zwicky,QCD with an Infrared Fixed Point and a Dilaton,2312.13761

    R. Zwicky,QCD with an Infrared Fixed Point and a Dilaton,2312.13761

  106. [114]

    Eichten, K

    E. Eichten, K. Lane and A. Martin,A Higgs Impostor in Low-Scale Technicolor,1210.5462

  107. [115]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,The decay constant of the holographic techni-dilaton and the 125 GeV boson,Nucl. Phys. B 867(2013) 779 [1208.0546]

  108. [116]

    Chacko and R.K

    Z. Chacko and R.K. Mishra,Effective Theory of a Light Dilaton,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 115006 [1209.3022]

  109. [117]

    Bellazzini, C

    B. Bellazzini, C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, J. Serra and J. Terning,A Higgslike Dilaton,Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2333 [1209.3299]

  110. [118]

    T. Abe, R. Kitano, Y. Konishi, K.-y. Oda, J. Sato and S. Sugiyama,Minimal Dilaton Model,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 115016 [1209.4544]

  111. [119]

    Bellazzini, C

    B. Bellazzini, C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, J. Serra and J. Terning,A Naturally Light Dilaton and a Small Cosmological Constant,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 2790 [1305.3919]

  112. [120]

    Hernandez-Leon and L

    P. Hernandez-Leon and L. Merlo,Distinguishing A Higgs-Like Dilaton Scenario With A Complete Bosonic Effective Field Theory Basis,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 075008 [1703.02064]

  113. [121]

    Goldberger and M.B

    W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise,Modulus stabilization with bulk fields,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4922 [hep-ph/9907447]

  114. [122]

    DeWolfe, D.Z

    O. DeWolfe, D.Z. Freedman, S.S. Gubser and A. Karch,Modeling the fifth-dimension with scalars and gravity,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 046008 [hep-th/9909134]

  115. [123]

    Goldberger and M.B

    W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise,Phenomenology of a stabilized modulus,Phys. Lett. B475(2000) 275 [hep-ph/9911457]

  116. [124]

    Csaki, M.L

    C. Csaki, M.L. Graesser and G.D. Kribs,Radion dynamics and electroweak physics,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 065002 [hep-th/0008151]. 39

  117. [125]

    Arkani-Hamed, M

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati and L. Randall,Holography and phenomenology,JHEP08(2001) 017 [hep-th/0012148]

  118. [126]

    Rattazzi and A

    R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni,Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model,JHEP04(2001) 021 [hep-th/0012248]

  119. [127]

    Kofman, J

    L. Kofman, J. Martin and M. Peloso,Exact identification of the radion and its coupling to the observable sector,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 085015 [hep-ph/0401189]

  120. [128]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,A composite light scalar, electro-weak symmetry breaking and the recent LHC searches,Nucl. Phys. B864(2012) 241 [1112.2915]

  121. [129]

    Kutasov, J

    D. Kutasov, J. Lin and A. Parnachev,Holographic Walking from Tachyon DBI,Nucl. Phys. B863(2012) 361 [1201.4123]

  122. [130]

    Evans and K

    N. Evans and K. Tuominen,Holographic modelling of a light technidilaton,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 086003 [1302.4553]

  123. [131]

    Hoyos, U

    C. Hoyos, U. Kol, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,The holographic dilaton,JHEP10(2013) 181 [1307.2572]

  124. [132]

    Megias and O

    E. Megias and O. Pujolas,Naturally light dilatons from nearly marginal deformations,JHEP08(2014) 081 [1401.4998]

  125. [133]

    Elander, R

    D. Elander, R. Lawrance and M. Piai,Hyperscaling violation and Electroweak Symmetry Breaking,Nucl. Phys. B897 (2015) 583 [1504.07949]

  126. [134]

    Megias, O

    E. Megias, O. Pujolas and M. Quiros,On light dilaton extensions of the Standard Model,EPJ Web Conf.126(2016) 05010 [1512.06702]

  127. [135]

    Athenodorou, E

    A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner, D. Elander, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini et al.,Large mass hierarchies from strongly-coupled dynamics,JHEP06(2016) 114 [1605.04258]

  128. [136]

    Elander, A.F

    D. Elander, A.F. Faedo, D. Mateos, D. Pravos and J.G. Subils,Mass spectrum of gapped, non-confining theories with multi-scale dynamics,JHEP05(2019) 175 [1810.04656]

  129. [137]

    Pomarol, O

    A. Pomarol, O. Pujolas and L. Salas,Holographic conformal transition and light scalars,JHEP10(2019) 202 [1905.02653]

  130. [138]

    Cruz Rojas, D.K

    J. Cruz Rojas, D.K. Hong, S.H. Im and M. J¨ arvinen,Holographic light dilaton at the conformal edge,JHEP05(2023) 204 [2302.08112]

  131. [139]

    Pomarol and L

    A. Pomarol and L. Salas,Exploring the conformal transition from above and below,2312.08332

  132. [140]

    Cruz Rojas, D.K

    J. Cruz Rojas, D.K. Hong, S.H. Im and M. J¨ arvinen,Holographic analysis of near-conformal dynamics and light dilaton, 2504.18623

  133. [141]

    Kaplan, J.-W

    D.B. Kaplan, J.-W. Lee, D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov,Conformality Lost,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 125005 [0905.4752]

  134. [142]

    Breitenlohner and D.Z

    P. Breitenlohner and D.Z. Freedman,Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity,Annals Phys.144(1982) 249

  135. [143]

    Gorbenko, S

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov and B. Zan,Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs,JHEP10(2018) 108 [1807.11512]

  136. [144]

    Gorbenko, S

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov and B. Zan,Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs II. Two-dimensional Potts model atQ >4,SciPost Phys.5(2018) 050 [1808.04380]

  137. [145]

    Jensen, A

    K. Jensen, A. Karch, D.T. Son and E.G. Thompson,Holographic Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless Transitions,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 041601 [1002.3159]

  138. [146]

    Faedo, C

    A.F. Faedo, C. Hoyos, D. Mateos and J.G. Subils,Holographic Complex Conformal Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020) 161601 [1909.04008]

  139. [147]

    Bea, O.J.C

    Y. Bea, O.J.C. Dias, T. Giannakopoulos, D. Mateos, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia, J.E. Santos et al.,Crossing a large-N phase transition at finite volume,JHEP02(2021) 061 [2007.06467]

  140. [148]

    F.R. Ares, M. Hindmarsh, C. Hoyos and N. Jokela,Gravitational waves from a holographic phase transition,JHEP21 (2020) 100 [2011.12878]

  141. [149]

    Y. Bea, J. Casalderrey-Solana, T. Giannakopoulos, D. Mateos, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia and M. Zilh˜ ao,Domain collisions,JHEP06(2022) 025 [2111.03355]

  142. [150]

    Y. Bea, J. Casalderrey-Solana, T. Giannakopoulos, D. Mateos, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia and M. Zilh˜ ao,Bubble wall velocity from holography,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) L121903 [2104.05708]

  143. [151]

    Y. Bea, J. Casalderrey-Solana, T. Giannakopoulos, A. Jansen, S. Krippendorf, D. Mateos et al.,Spinodal Gravitational Waves,2112.15478

  144. [152]

    Y. Bea, J. Casalderrey-Solana, T. Giannakopoulos, A. Jansen, D. Mateos, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia et al.,Holographic bubbles with Jecco: expanding, collapsing and critical,JHEP09(2022) 008 [2202.10503]

  145. [153]

    Escriv` a and J.G

    A. Escriv` a and J.G. Subils,Primordial black hole formation during a strongly coupled crossover,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) L041301 [2211.15674]

  146. [154]

    Romans,The F(4) Gauged Supergravity in Six-dimensions,Nucl

    L.J. Romans,The F(4) Gauged Supergravity in Six-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B269(1986) 691

  147. [155]

    DeWitt and P

    B.S. DeWitt and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Explicit Construction of the Exceptional Superalgebras F(4) andG(3),J. Math. Phys.23(1982) 1953

  148. [156]

    Giani, M

    F. Giani, M. Pernici and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,GAUGED N=4 d = 6 SUPERGRA VITY,Phys. Rev. D30(1984) 1680

  149. [157]

    Romans,Massive N=2a Supergravity in Ten-Dimensions,Phys

    L.J. Romans,Massive N=2a Supergravity in Ten-Dimensions,Phys. Lett. B169(1986) 374

  150. [158]

    Ferrara, A

    S. Ferrara, A. Kehagias, H. Partouche and A. Zaffaroni,AdS(6) interpretation of 5-D superconformal field theories, Phys. Lett. B431(1998) 57 [hep-th/9804006]

  151. [159]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C.N. Pope,Gauged six-dimensional supergravity from massive type IIA,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 5226 [hep-th/9906221]

  152. [160]

    Brandhuber and Y

    A. Brandhuber and Y. Oz,The D-4 - D-8 brane system and five-dimensional fixed points,Phys. Lett. B460(1999) 307 [hep-th/9905148]

  153. [161]

    D’Auria, S

    R. D’Auria, S. Ferrara and S. Vaula,Matter coupled F(4) supergravity and the AdS(6) / CFT(5) correspondence,JHEP 10(2000) 013 [hep-th/0006107]. 40

  154. [162]

    Nishimura,Conformal supergravity from the AdS / CFT correspondence,Nucl

    M. Nishimura,Conformal supergravity from the AdS / CFT correspondence,Nucl. Phys. B588(2000) 471 [hep-th/0004179]

  155. [163]

    Andrianopoli, R

    L. Andrianopoli, R. D’Auria and S. Vaula,Matter coupled F(4) gauged supergravity Lagrangian,JHEP05(2001) 065 [hep-th/0104155]

  156. [164]

    Nunez, I.Y

    C. Nunez, I.Y. Park, M. Schvellinger and T.A. Tran,Supergravity duals of gauge theories from F(4) gauged supergravity in six-dimensions,JHEP04(2001) 025 [hep-th/0103080]

  157. [165]

    Gursoy, C

    U. Gursoy, C. Nunez and M. Schvellinger,RG flows from spin(7), CY 4 fold and HK manifolds to AdS, Penrose limits and pp waves,JHEP06(2002) 015 [hep-th/0203124]

  158. [166]

    Pilch, P

    K. Pilch, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and P.K. Townsend,Compactification ofd= 11Supergravity on S(4) (Or 11 = 7 + 4, Too),Nucl. Phys. B242(1984) 377

  159. [167]

    Pernici, K

    M. Pernici, K. Pilch and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Gauged Maximally Extended Supergravity in Seven-dimensions,Phys. Lett. B143(1984) 103

  160. [168]

    Pernici, K

    M. Pernici, K. Pilch, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and N.P. Warner,Noncompact Gaugings and Critical Points of Maximal Supergravity in Seven-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B249(1985) 381

  161. [169]

    Nastase, D

    H. Nastase, D. Vaman and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Consistent nonlinear K K reduction of 11-d supergravity on AdS(7) x S(4) and selfduality in odd dimensions,Phys. Lett. B469(1999) 96 [hep-th/9905075]

  162. [170]

    Cvetic, M.J

    M. Cvetic, M.J. Duff, P. Hoxha, J.T. Liu, H. Lu, J.X. Lu et al.,Embedding AdS black holes in ten-dimensions and eleven-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B558(1999) 96 [hep-th/9903214]

  163. [171]

    Lu and C.N

    H. Lu and C.N. Pope,Exact embedding of N=1, D = 7 gauged supergravity in D = 11,Phys. Lett. B467(1999) 67 [hep-th/9906168]

  164. [172]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu, C.N. Pope, A. Sadrzadeh and T.A. Tran,S**3 and S**4 reductions of type IIA supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B590(2000) 233 [hep-th/0005137]

  165. [173]

    Campos, G

    V.L. Campos, G. Ferretti, H. Larsson, D. Martelli and B.E.W. Nilsson,A Study of holographic renormalization group flows in D = 6 and D = 3,JHEP06(2000) 023 [hep-th/0003151]

  166. [174]

    Samtleben and M

    H. Samtleben and M. Weidner,The Maximal D=7 supergravities,Nucl. Phys. B725(2005) 383 [hep-th/0506237]

  167. [175]

    Pernici, K

    M. Pernici, K. Pilch and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Gauged N=8 D=5 Supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B259(1985) 460

  168. [176]

    Gunaydin, L.J

    M. Gunaydin, L.J. Romans and N.P. Warner,Gauged N=8 Supergravity in Five-Dimensions,Phys. Lett. B154(1985) 268

  169. [177]

    Gunaydin, L.J

    M. Gunaydin, L.J. Romans and N.P. Warner,Compact and Noncompact Gauged Supergravity Theories in Five-Dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B272(1986) 598

  170. [178]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu, C.N. Pope, A. Sadrzadeh and T.A. Tran,Consistent SO(6) reduction of type IIB supergravity on S**5,Nucl. Phys. B586(2000) 275 [hep-th/0003103]

  171. [179]

    Pilch and N.P

    K. Pilch and N.P. Warner,N=2 supersymmetric RG flows and the IIB dilaton,Nucl. Phys. B594(2001) 209 [hep-th/0004063]

  172. [180]

    Bakas and K

    I. Bakas and K. Sfetsos,States and curves of five-dimensional gauged supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B573(2000) 768 [hep-th/9909041]

  173. [181]

    Anabal´ on, H

    A. Anabal´ on, H. Nastase and M. Oyarzo,Supersymmetric AdS solitons and the interconnection of different vacua ofN = 4 Super Yang-Mills,JHEP05(2024) 217 [2402.18482]

  174. [182]

    Faedo, D

    A.F. Faedo, D. Mateos, D. Pravos and J.G. Subils,Mass Gap without Confinement,JHEP06(2017) 153 [1702.05988]

  175. [183]

    Elander, A.F

    D. Elander, A.F. Faedo, D. Mateos and J.G. Subils,Phase transitions in a three-dimensional analogue of Klebanov-Strassler,JHEP06(2020) 131 [2002.08279]

  176. [184]

    Melvin,Pure magnetic and electric geons,Phys

    M.A. Melvin,Pure magnetic and electric geons,Phys. Lett.8(1964) 65

  177. [185]

    Astorino,Charging axisymmetric space-times with cosmological constant,JHEP06(2012) 086 [1205.6998]

    M. Astorino,Charging axisymmetric space-times with cosmological constant,JHEP06(2012) 086 [1205.6998]

  178. [186]

    Lim,Electric or magnetic universe with a cosmological constant,Phys

    Y.-K. Lim,Electric or magnetic universe with a cosmological constant,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 084022 [1807.07199]

  179. [187]

    Kastor and J

    D. Kastor and J. Traschen,Geometry of AdS-Melvin Spacetimes,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 045016 [2009.14771]

  180. [188]

    Casalderrey-Solana, H

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, H. Liu, D. Mateos, K. Rajagopal and U.A. Wiedemann,Gauge/String Duality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions, Cambridge University Press (2014), 10.1017/9781009403504, [1101.0618]

  181. [189]

    Horowitz and A

    G.T. Horowitz and A. Strominger,Black strings and P-branes,Nucl. Phys. B360(1991) 197

  182. [190]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.W. Peet,Entropy and temperature of black 3-branes,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 3915 [hep-th/9602135]

  183. [191]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking,Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 2752

  184. [192]

    Chamblin, R

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C.V. Johnson and R.C. Myers,Charged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 064018 [hep-th/9902170]

  185. [193]

    Chamblin, R

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C.V. Johnson and R.C. Myers,Holography, thermodynamics and fluctuations of charged AdS black holes,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 104026 [hep-th/9904197]

  186. [194]

    Gubser,Thermodynamics of spinning D3-branes,Nucl

    S.S. Gubser,Thermodynamics of spinning D3-branes,Nucl. Phys. B551(1999) 667 [hep-th/9810225]

  187. [195]

    Cai and K.-S

    R.-G. Cai and K.-S. Soh,Critical behavior in the rotating D-branes,Mod. Phys. Lett. A14(1999) 1895 [hep-th/9812121]

  188. [196]

    Cvetic and S.S

    M. Cvetic and S.S. Gubser,Phases of R charged black holes, spinning branes and strongly coupled gauge theories,JHEP 04(1999) 024 [hep-th/9902195]

  189. [197]

    Cvetic and S.S

    M. Cvetic and S.S. Gubser,Thermodynamic stability and phases of general spinning branes,JHEP07(1999) 010 [hep-th/9903132]

  190. [198]

    Kim, S.-J

    K.-Y. Kim, S.-J. Sin and I. Zahed,Dense hadronic matter in holographic QCD,J. Korean Phys. Soc.63(2013) 1515 41 [hep-th/0608046]

  191. [199]

    Horigome and Y

    N. Horigome and Y. Tanii,Holographic chiral phase transition with chemical potential,JHEP01(2007) 072 [hep-th/0608198]

  192. [200]

    Kobayashi, D

    S. Kobayashi, D. Mateos, S. Matsuura, R.C. Myers and R.M. Thomson,Holographic phase transitions at finite baryon density,JHEP02(2007) 016 [hep-th/0611099]

  193. [201]

    Mateos, S

    D. Mateos, S. Matsuura, R.C. Myers and R.M. Thomson,Holographic phase transitions at finite chemical potential, JHEP11(2007) 085 [0709.1225]

  194. [202]

    Nakamura, Y

    S. Nakamura, Y. Seo, S.-J. Sin and K.P. Yogendran,A New Phase at Finite Quark Density from AdS/CFT,J. Korean Phys. Soc.52(2008) 1734 [hep-th/0611021]

  195. [203]

    Karch and A

    A. Karch and A. O’Bannon,Metallic AdS/CFT,JHEP09(2007) 024 [0705.3870]

  196. [204]

    Anabalon and S.F

    A. Anabalon and S.F. Ross,Supersymmetric solitons and a degeneracy of solutions in AdS/CFT,JHEP07(2021) 015 [2104.14572]

  197. [205]

    Anabal´ on, D

    A. Anabal´ on, D. Astefanesei, J. Oliva, G. Ortega and J. Urbina,Phase Transitions and Black Hole Stability in Gauged N = 8 Supergravity,2512.05088

  198. [206]

    Nunez, M

    C. Nunez, M. Oyarzo and R. Stuardo,Confinement and D5-branes,JHEP03(2024) 080 [2311.17998]

  199. [207]

    Nunez, M

    C. Nunez, M. Oyarzo and R. Stuardo,Confinement in (1 + 1) dimensions: a holographic perspective from I-branes, JHEP09(2023) 201 [2307.04783]

  200. [208]

    Fatemiabhari and C

    A. Fatemiabhari and C. Nunez,From conformal to confining field theories using holography,JHEP03(2024) 160 [2401.04158]

  201. [209]

    Chatzis, A

    D. Chatzis, A. Fatemiabhari, C. Nunez and P. Weck,Conformal to confining SQFTs from holography,JHEP08(2024) 041 [2405.05563]

  202. [210]

    Chatzis, A

    D. Chatzis, A. Fatemiabhari, C. Nunez and P. Weck,SCFT deformations via uplifted solitons,Nucl. Phys. B1006 (2024) 116659 [2406.01685]

  203. [211]

    Chatzis, M

    D. Chatzis, M. Hammond, G. Itsios, C. Nunez and D. Zoakos,Universal observables, SUSY RG-flows and holography, JHEP08(2025) 134 [2506.10062]

  204. [212]

    Chatzis, M

    D. Chatzis, M. Hammond, G. Itsios, C. Nunez and D. Zoakos,Supersymmetric AdS Solitons, Coulomb Branch Flows and Twisted Compactifications,2511.18128

  205. [213]

    Liu and R

    J.T. Liu and R. Minasian,Black holes and membranes in AdS(7),Phys. Lett. B457(1999) 39 [hep-th/9903269]

  206. [214]

    Wu,Two-charged non-extremal rotating black holes in seven-dimensional gauged supergravity: The Single-rotation case,Phys

    S.-Q. Wu,Two-charged non-extremal rotating black holes in seven-dimensional gauged supergravity: The Single-rotation case,Phys. Lett. B705(2011) 383 [1108.4158]

  207. [215]

    Witten,Some comments on string dynamics, inSTRINGS 95: Future Perspectives in String Theory, pp

    E. Witten,Some comments on string dynamics, inSTRINGS 95: Future Perspectives in String Theory, pp. 501–523, 7, 1995 [hep-th/9507121]

  208. [216]

    Strominger and M

    A. Strominger and M. Dine,Open p-branes,Phys. Lett. B383(1996) 44 [hep-th/9512059]

  209. [217]

    Witten,Five-branes and M-theory on an orbifold,Nucl

    E. Witten,Five-branes and M-theory on an orbifold,Nucl. Phys. B463(1996) 383 [hep-th/9512219]

  210. [218]

    Lambert, C

    N. Lambert, C. Papageorgakis and M. Schmidt-Sommerfeld,M5-Branes, D4-Branes and Quantum 5D super-Yang-Mills, JHEP01(2011) 083 [1012.2882]

  211. [219]

    Bobev, M

    N. Bobev, M. David, J. Hong and R. Mouland,AdS 7 black holes from rotating M5-branes,JHEP09(2023) 143 [2307.06364]

  212. [220]

    Chong, M

    Z.W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C.N. Pope,Non-extremal charged rotating black holes in seven-dimensional gauged supergravity,Phys. Lett. B626(2005) 215 [hep-th/0412094]

  213. [221]

    Chow,Single-rotation two-charge black holes in gauged supergravity,1108.5139

    D.D.K. Chow,Single-rotation two-charge black holes in gauged supergravity,1108.5139

  214. [222]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,Towards top-down holographic composite Higgs: minimal coset from maximal supergravity, JHEP03(2022) 049 [2110.02945]

  215. [223]

    Elander, A

    D. Elander, A. Fatemiabhari and M. Piai,Holographic vacuum misalignment,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 015040 [2405.08714]

  216. [224]

    Csaki, J

    C. Csaki, J. Erlich, T.J. Hollowood and J. Terning,Holographic RG and cosmology in theories with quasilocalized gravity,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 065019 [hep-th/0003076]

  217. [225]

    Panico and A

    G. Panico and A. Wulzer,The Composite Nambu-Goldstone Higgs, vol. 913, Springer (2016), 10.1007/978-3-319-22617-0, [1506.01961]

  218. [226]

    Cacciapaglia, C

    G. Cacciapaglia, C. Pica and F. Sannino,Fundamental Composite Dynamics: A Review,Phys. Rept.877(2020) 1 [2002.04914]

  219. [227]

    Piai and J

    M. Piai and J. Rucinski,Light dilaton from top-down holographic confinement with magnetic fluxes - data release, Feb.,

  220. [229]

    Arnowitt, S

    R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C.W. Misner,The Dynamics of general relativity,Gen. Rel. Grav.40(2008) 1997 [gr-qc/0405109]

  221. [2026]

    10.5281/zenodo.18633529

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.