Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 300 references

Holography shows that when a confining gauge theory's line of first-order phase transitions ends at a critical point, a light dilaton — a scalar bound state with arbitrarily diallable mass — appears in the spectrum.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 04:32 UTC pith:QQX66XQS

load-bearing objection Useful but self-referential review of the authors' holographic dilaton programme; the central identification of the light scalar as a dilaton rests on a diagnostic that is necessary but not sufficient. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22497 v1 pith:QQX66XQS submitted 2026-07-24 hep-th hep-ph

Dilatonic states, phase transitions, and criticality in holography

Daniel Elander , Maurizio Piai This is my paper
classification hep-th hep-ph PACS 11.25.Tq
keywords dilatonholographygauge-gravity dualityconfinementphase transitionscritical pointbound-state spectraprobe approximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Whether a confining gauge theory can host a dilaton — the pseudo-Goldstone boson of approximate scale invariance — with a mass far below the confinement scale is an open question in quantum field theory. This review synthesises a holography-based programme that tests one proposed answer: the dilaton becomes light when the theory sits near a zero-temperature phase transition. Surveying six top-down supergravity constructions and three bottom-up models, the authors compute free energies and bound-state spectra and find a consistent pattern — a parametrically light scalar appears precisely where a line of first-order transitions ends at a critical point, and the probe-approximation test identifies the state as a genuine dilaton. In the two sharpest examples the scalar is exactly massless at the critical point, and its mass can be dialled arbitrarily small by approaching it. The authors are explicit that all known realisations are in fewer than four spacetime dimensions, leaving the four-dimensional question open.

Core claim

The central claim, stated in Section VI, is that holography as a calculation technique has provided evidence — "proven explicitly both in top-down and bottom-up holographic constructions" — that if a confining quantum field theory has a line of first-order, zero-temperature phase transitions in its parameter space and that line ends at a critical point, then in close proximity of that point the spectrum of bound states contains a light scalar whose mass can be dialled to be arbitrarily light by choosing the control parameters closer to the critical point. The scalar qualifies as a dilaton because it is sourced by the trace of the energy-momentum tensor: in the probe approximation, which negl

What carries the argument

The argument rests on three tools. First, the gauge-gravity dictionary (Eqs. (1)–(3)): the quantum generating functional of the strongly coupled boundary field theory equals the classical on-shell action of a weakly coupled higher-dimensional gravity theory; the review explicitly postulates this equivalence rather than deriving it. Second, the probe approximation (Section III.D), a diagnostic that recomputes the scalar spectrum while neglecting the fluctuation of the trace of the metric — a light scalar that disappears or shifts grossly under this test is declared a dilaton, since it is sourced by the dilatation operator. Third, holographic renormalisation of the free energy as a function of

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the gauge-gravity dictionary itself — the postulate that the classical, weakly coupled supergravity saddle point reliably computes the strong-coupling physics of the dual field theory — together with the expectation that the lower-dimensional examples reproduce the physics of a four-dimensional confining gauge theory; the paper states the dictionary as an assumption in Section II, and everything in the review stands or falls on it.

What would settle it

Compute or simulate a confining gauge theory whose zero-temperature phase diagram contains a line of first-order transitions ending at a critical point, and measure the lightest scalar-singlet mass as the control parameters approach that point: if the mass does not tend to zero as the free energy becomes continuous with divergent second derivative, the paper's central claim is wrong for that case. The sharpest in-paper target is the Section IV.F construction — the claim predicts an exactly massless scalar at the point where the free energy's second derivative diverges, so recomputing that spec

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A light dilaton in a confining theory signals proximity to the critical end point of a first-order transition line, and its mass relative to the confinement scale can be dialled continuously by tuning the control parameters — arbitrarily small near the critical point.
  • The pattern is stable across the nine surveyed examples, which differ in spacetime dimension, field content, and confinement mechanism (shrinking circles vs. magnetic fluxes), so the effect is not an artifact of a single construction.
  • At the critical point itself the dilaton is exactly massless, and it remains a physically realised, stable state as the parameters approach the point along the stable branch.
  • For composite-Higgs model building, the mechanism supplies what dilaton effective field theory cannot: an origin for the small, unprotected quartic coupling and the light mass, tied to proximity to criticality rather than to a tuned potential.
  • The survey sets a concrete agenda — in four-dimensional lattice or field-theory settings, look for a light scalar singlet appearing where a zero-temperature first-order line weakens toward a critical point.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editor's inference: read in reverse, the survey predicts that the natural hunting ground for a light dilaton is not the edge of the conformal window per se but the vicinity of a weak first-order transition; a walking theory with no nearby critical point is the case the mechanism says is unlikely to produce a parametrically light scalar.
  • Editor's inference: the spectra shown imply the dilaton mass should vanish with a definite power of the distance to the critical point; extracting that critical exponent from the plotted data is a direct, doable extension the paper does not perform.
  • Editor's inference: if the mechanism survives the move to four dimensions, the control parameter that tunes the dilaton mass would double as a dial for the electroweak hierarchy — a concrete route from TeV-scale strong dynamics to a 125 GeV scalar without fine-tuning.
  • Editor's inference: the probe-approximation criterion could be translated into a lattice observable — a scalar singlet whose mass responds strongly to the insertion that couples to the trace of the stress tensor — giving a spectroscopy-based test of the mechanism independent of holography.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This is a review of a holographic research programme that asks whether a light dilaton can appear as a dynamical bound state in confining gauge theories, in particular when a line of first-order zero-temperature phase transitions ends at a critical point. The paper assembles the necessary technology (domain-wall/soliton backgrounds, fluctuation spectra, free-energy computation, and a probe approximation intended to detect coupling to the trace of the energy-momentum tensor), then summarizes several top-down and bottom-up examples. The central conclusion, stated most explicitly in Section VI, is that in the two known examples with a critical endpoint the spectrum contains a parametrically light scalar that the authors identify as a dilaton, while acknowledging that all examples have dual QFTs of dimension lower than four and that some branches involve singular or large-curvature solutions.

Significance. The paper is a useful and fairly presented status report. Its strengths are the systematic comparison of different constructions, the explicit documentation of limitations (metastable branches, singular domain-wall solutions, large curvature near some transitions, absence of a four-dimensional example), and the self-contained technology section. If the identification of the light critical-endpoint scalar as a dilaton is accepted, the review provides concrete evidence for a mechanism that is difficult to test by other means and connects holography to the dEFT/lattice literature. However, the central claim rests on a relatively narrow basis: two endpoint examples and a single diagnostic for dilaton nature. The paper would be strengthened by either additional evidence for the Goldstone-boson character of the scalar or a more cautious wording of the conclusion.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III.D, Eqs. (59)-(60), and Section VI] The probe approximation identifies a state as a dilaton by the fact that it disappears or changes mass when the metric fluctuation h is neglected. Sections IV.F and V.C use this to call the critical-point scalar 'undoubtedly a dilaton' and 'clear evidence'. Overlap with T^μ_μ is necessary but not sufficient for a pseudo-Goldstone dilaton: at a second-order endpoint a massless scalar is generic from diverging susceptibility, and any holographic scalar can mix with h. The paper reports no independent check such as a decay constant F_d as m_d→0, the m_d^2 F_d^2/trace-anomaly relation, or a dEFT comparison. Since the central conclusion in Section VI depends on identifying the scalar as a dilaton, the authors should supply such evidence or explicitly restrict the claim to 'a light scalar with strong overlap with T^μ_μ'.
  2. [Section VI, first paragraph] The sentence 'if there is a line of first-order phase transitions ... then ... contains a light scalar' is stated as a general result, but the supporting endpoint examples are exactly two, Refs. [253] and [254], both with lower-dimensional dual QFTs. The open questions listed immediately after make clear that this is not a theorem, yet the wording of the central claim does not carry that caveat. I recommend adding an explicit sentence distinguishing the verified lower-dimensional examples from the conjectural generalization to four-dimensional QFT, and noting the absence of independent confirmation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section IV.F] The critical value b_0^CP is quoted as 0.9815 in the text, while the caption of Fig. 7 and the subsequent text give b_0^CP ≃ 0.6815. Please reconcile this numerical inconsistency.
  2. [Section IV.C] The text contains a long unmarked excerpt from Ref. [250], including equations (146)-(148), figure captions, and page numbers. This should be removed or clearly set off as a quotation with attribution; as it stands it disrupts the narrative and raises copyright/permission issues.
  3. [Sections IV.B and IV.C] Minor typos: 'spce' in Section IV.B should be 'space', and 'brunch' in Section IV.C should be 'branch'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Genuine spectral computations, but the identification of the light scalar as a dilaton is fixed by the paper's own probe-approximation criterion rather than independently derived.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section III.D (probe approximation), applied in Sections IV.F and V.C, and summarized in Section VI]
    "if one finds that the light scalar state mentioned above no longer is present after the approximation has been made, or that its mass is greatly different, one can conclude that the state, computed correctly with the gauge-invariant formalism, is a dilaton, as it is sourced by the dilatation operator. ... This state is undoubtedly a dilaton, as shown by the fact that the probe approximation fails completely to capture its very existence."

    The probe approximation is introduced as the very criterion for being a dilaton: a mode that disappears when the metric fluctuation h is neglected is declared 'sourced by the dilatation operator' and hence a dilaton. The flagship top-down and bottom-up examples then use exactly that criterion as the only evidence that the light state at the critical endpoint is a dilaton. No independent check of dilaton low-energy properties (e.g. a finite decay constant F_d in the m_d -> 0 limit, or a relation m_d^2 F_d^2 to the trace anomaly) is reported. At a second-order critical point a massless scalar is expected on generic grounds, so the non-trivial content is the identification of that scalar as a dilaton; that identification is imposed by the diagnostic itself rather than derived from independent

full rationale

This is a review of a computational programme rather than a new derivation. Within each model, the mass spectra are obtained by solving the linearized gauge-invariant fluctuation equations (Eqs. (55)-(58)) and the free energy from holographic renormalization (Eq. (65)); the phase diagrams are not produced by fitting the dilaton mass. Thus the existence and parametric lightness of a scalar near a critical endpoint is a genuine, calculation-heavy result, and the frequent self-citations to Refs. [248-256] refer to explicit computations rather than to a bare assertion. The circularity is concentrated in the interpretation step: the paper's only operative criterion for 'this light scalar is a dilaton' is the probe approximation of Section III.D, whose diagnostic output (the state is missed when h is neglected) is equated with 'sourced by the dilatation operator' and hence with dilatonhood. The review does not report an independent check of dilaton low-energy theorems, so the central identification reduces to the authors' own diagnostic. The paper itself flags the main caveats: the dual field theories are lower-dimensional, some solutions approach singular or large-curvature regions, and the bottom-up model has no known microscopic origin. Those are limitations on the strength of the evidence, not additional circularity. Overall score 4: substantial independent spectral content, but the load-bearing identification of the scalar as a dilaton is supplied by the paper's own definitional criterion rather than by independent evidence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities and no new parameters; it is a review. The central claim inherits the free parameters and assumptions of the surveyed models, especially the ad hoc superpotentials of the bottom-up constructions and the truncation assumptions of the top-down supergravity reductions. The holographic dictionary itself is the largest unproven input.

free parameters (3)
  • Bottom-up superpotential coefficients (e.g., degree-six polynomial of Model B in [253]; quadratic superpotential in [251
    Chosen by hand to produce the desired AdS vacuum and phase structure. The critical-point coordinates in Ref. [253] are consequences of these choices, so the central result is not parameter-free.
  • Fixed/scanned model parameters in bottom-up Model B [253] = phi_Q = 10 fixed; phi_M^c ~ 1.088, ell_Lambda^c ~ 5.186
    One parameter is held fixed for convenience and the other is scanned; the location of the critical point depends on this choice.
  • Operator scaling dimension Delta in the bottom-up model of [251] = scanned; special value Delta = 5/2 (BF-bound saturation)
    Controls the dimension of the deforming operator; the degree of dilaton-mass suppression along stable branches depends on its value.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Gauge-gravity duality dictionary, Eqs. (1)-(3)
    The review assumes the AdS/CFT correspondence and the classical saddle-point (weak-strong) limit from the outset. This is the computational framework, not derived within the paper.
  • domain assumption Classical supergravity approximation is valid for the dual QFTs of interest
    Spectra and free energies are computed at leading order in the gravity theory. The paper itself requires small curvature and regularity, and flags places where these conditions are violated (singular DW branches, divergent curvature at flux-transition edges).
  • domain assumption Truncation to a few scalar fields captures the relevant light spectrum and phase structure
    Top-down examples reduce maximal/half-maximal supergravities to one-to-seven scalars; Kaluza-Klein towers and other fields are ignored. The review assumes this truncation does not remove the light dilaton or change the phase structure.
  • ad hoc to paper Probe approximation identifies the dilaton
    The diagnostic from Ref. [157] interprets failure of the probe spectrum to reproduce the gauge-invariant scalar mass as evidence of coupling to the trace of the stress tensor. This criterion is central to labeling the light scalar a dilaton and is not independently benchmarked.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 56446 in / 11641 out tokens · 128743 ms · 2026-08-01T04:32:18.169611+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The dilaton is the hypothetical scalar particle associated with spontaneous breaking of approximate scale invariance. It has been predicted to arise dynamically, as a bound state, in special extensions of the standard model of particle physics based on composite dynamics. In confining gauge theories, generic arguments suggest that the scale of explicit symmetry breaking coincides with the confinement scale, that governs also its spontaneous breaking, by setting the size of all the condensates, as well as the masses of bound states and their excitations. Whether a light dilaton can nevertheless exist in such a context is an open question in quantum field theory, answering which has potentially transformative implications from a conceptual viewpoint, besides having striking phenomenological ramifications. It has been suggested that the mass of the dilaton might be suppressed, in respect to the confinement scale, in the special case in which the underlying strongly coupled dynamics undergoes a zero-temperature (weak) phase transition. Identifying the special conditions under which this happens is the subject of ongoing investigations. A dedicated programme of exploration, carried out within the context of gauge-gravity dualities (holography), has been set up to test the viability of this mechanism. We review the relevant technology within holography, and the status of such a programme, by comparing results obtained in a survey of explicit examples. We do so both within the bottom-up, simplified version of gauge-gravity dualities, but also within the more refined, and complete, top-down approach to holography, in which the gravity theory is known to have a more fundamental origin. We highlight the first examples of confining theories in which a parametrically light holographic dilaton forms as a bound state in a region of parameter space in proximity to a critical point of the field theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22497 by Daniel Elander, Maurizio Piai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Cartoons illustrating the behaviour of the Van der Waals gas. Left panel: the pressure, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: In the theory discussed in Sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: In the theory discussed in Sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The free energy density FIG4: In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: In the theory discussed in Sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: In the theory discussed in Sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: In the theory discussed in Sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: For the theory discussed in Sec. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: In the theory discussed in Sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: In the theory discussed in Sec. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The phase diagram of model B. The solid curve indicates the critical value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Mass spectrum of spin-zero states as a function of the vacuum expectation value of the operator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 251 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Migdal and M.A

    A.A. Migdal and M.A. Shifman,Dilaton Effective Lagrangian in Gluodynamics,Phys. Lett. B114(1982) 445

    1982

  2. [2]

    Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K

    S. Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (1985), 10.1017/CBO9780511565045

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511565045 1985

  3. [3]

    Goldberger, B

    W.D. Goldberger, B. Grinstein and W. Skiba,Distinguishing the Higgs boson from the dilaton at the Large Hadron Collider,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 111802 [0708.1463]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    Djouadi,The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking

    A. Djouadi,The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the standard model,Phys. Rept. 457(2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503172]. 42 [5]ATLAScollaboration,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1 [1207.7214]. [6]CMScollaboration,Observation of a Ne...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  5. [7]

    Leung, S.T

    C.N. Leung, S.T. Love and W.A. Bardeen,Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Scale Invariant Quantum Electrodynamics,Nucl. Phys. B273(1986) 649

    1986

  6. [8]

    Bardeen, C.N

    W.A. Bardeen, C.N. Leung and S.T. Love,The Dilaton and Chiral Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986) 1230

    1986

  7. [9]

    Yamawaki, M

    K. Yamawaki, M. Bando and K.-i. Matumoto,Scale Invariant Technicolor Model and a Technidilaton,Phys. Rev. Lett. 56(1986) 1335

    1986

  8. [10]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3370 [hep-ph/9905221]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  9. [11]

    Goldberger and M.B

    W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise,Modulus stabilization with bulk fields,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4922 [hep-ph/9907447]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  10. [12]

    DeWolfe, D.Z

    O. DeWolfe, D.Z. Freedman, S.S. Gubser and A. Karch,Modeling the fifth-dimension with scalars and gravity,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 046008 [hep-th/9909134]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  11. [13]

    Goldberger and M.B

    W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise,Phenomenology of a stabilized modulus,Phys. Lett. B475(2000) 275 [hep-ph/9911457]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  12. [14]

    Csaki, M.L

    C. Csaki, M.L. Graesser and G.D. Kribs,Radion dynamics and electroweak physics,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 065002 [hep-th/0008151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  13. [15]

    Arkani-Hamed, M

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati and L. Randall,Holography and phenomenology,JHEP08(2001) 017 [hep-th/0012148]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  14. [16]

    Rattazzi and A

    R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni,Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model,JHEP04(2001) 021 [hep-th/0012248]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  15. [17]

    Kofman, J

    L. Kofman, J. Martin and M. Peloso,Exact identification of the radion and its coupling to the observable sector,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 085015 [hep-ph/0401189]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  16. [18]

    Hong, S.D.H

    D.K. Hong, S.D.H. Hsu and F. Sannino,Composite Higgs from higher representations,Phys. Lett. B597(2004) 89 [hep-ph/0406200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  17. [19]

    Dietrich, F

    D.D. Dietrich, F. Sannino and K. Tuominen,Light composite Higgs from higher representations versus electroweak precision measurements: Predictions for CERN LHC,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 055001 [hep-ph/0505059]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  18. [20]

    Vecchi,Phenomenology of a light scalar: the dilaton,Phys

    L. Vecchi,Phenomenology of a light scalar: the dilaton,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 076009 [1002.1721]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  19. [21]

    Hashimoto and K

    M. Hashimoto and K. Yamawaki,Techni-dilaton at Conformal Edge,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 015008 [1009.5482]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  20. [22]

    Appelquist and Y

    T. Appelquist and Y. Bai,A Light Dilaton in Walking Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 071701 [1006.4375]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  21. [23]

    Chacko and R.K

    Z. Chacko and R.K. Mishra,Effective Theory of a Light Dilaton,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 115006 [1209.3022]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [24]

    Bellazzini, C

    B. Bellazzini, C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, J. Serra and J. Terning,A Higgslike Dilaton,Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2333 [1209.3299]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [25]

    T. Abe, R. Kitano, Y. Konishi, K.-y. Oda, J. Sato and S. Sugiyama,Minimal Dilaton Model,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 115016 [1209.4544]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  24. [26]

    Eichten, K

    E. Eichten, K. Lane and A. Martin,A Higgs Impostor in Low-Scale Technicolor,1210.5462

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [27]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,The decay constant of the holographic techni-dilaton and the 125 GeV boson,Nucl. Phys. B 867(2013) 779 [1208.0546]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  26. [28]

    Hernandez-Leon and L

    P. Hernandez-Leon and L. Merlo,Distinguishing A Higgs-Like Dilaton Scenario With A Complete Bosonic Effective Field Theory Basis,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 075008 [1703.02064]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [29]

    Bellazzini, C

    B. Bellazzini, C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, J. Serra and J. Terning,A Naturally Light Dilaton and a Small Cosmological Constant,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 2790 [1305.3919]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [30]

    Cacciapaglia, C

    G. Cacciapaglia, C. Pica and F. Sannino,Fundamental Composite Dynamics: A Review,Phys. Rept.877(2020) 1 [2002.04914]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [31]

    Cohen and H

    A.G. Cohen and H. Georgi,Walking Beyond the Rainbow,Nucl. Phys. B314(1989) 7

    1989

  30. [32]

    Caswell,Asymptotic Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories to Two Loop Order,Phys

    W.E. Caswell,Asymptotic Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories to Two Loop Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.33(1974) 244

    1974

  31. [33]

    Banks and A

    T. Banks and A. Zaks,On the Phase Structure of Vector-Like Gauge Theories with Massless Fermions,Nucl. Phys. B 196(1982) 189

    1982

  32. [34]

    Holdom and J

    B. Holdom and J. Terning,A Light Dilaton in Gauge Theories?,Phys. Lett. B187(1987) 357

    1987

  33. [35]

    Holdom and J

    B. Holdom and J. Terning,No Light Dilaton in Gauge Theories,Phys. Lett. B200(1988) 338

    1988

  34. [36]

    Grinstein and P

    B. Grinstein and P. Uttayarat,A Very Light Dilaton,JHEP07(2011) 038 [1105.2370]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [37]

    Sannino and K

    F. Sannino and K. Tuominen,Orientifold theory dynamics and symmetry breaking,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 051901 43 [hep-ph/0405209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  36. [38]

    Dietrich and F

    D.D. Dietrich and F. Sannino,Conformal window of SU(N) gauge theories with fermions in higher dimensional representations,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 085018 [hep-ph/0611341]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  37. [39]

    Ryttov and F

    T.A. Ryttov and F. Sannino,Supersymmetry inspired QCD beta function,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 065001 [0711.3745]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [40]

    Pica and F

    C. Pica and F. Sannino,Beta Function and Anomalous Dimensions,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 116001 [1011.3832]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [41]

    Pica and F

    C. Pica and F. Sannino,UV and IR Zeros of Gauge Theories at The Four Loop Order and Beyond,Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 035013 [1011.5917]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  40. [42]

    Kim, D.K

    B.S. Kim, D.K. Hong and J.-W. Lee,Into the conformal window: Multirepresentation gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 056008 [2001.02690]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  41. [43]

    Lee,Conformal window from conformal expansion,Phys

    J.-W. Lee,Conformal window from conformal expansion,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 076006 [2008.12223]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [44]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Infrared Zero ofβand Value ofγ m for an SU(3) Gauge Theory at the Five-Loop Level, Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 105015 [1607.06866]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [45]

    Ryttov,Consistent Perturbative Fixed Point Calculations in QCD and Supersymmetric QCD,Phys

    T.A. Ryttov,Consistent Perturbative Fixed Point Calculations in QCD and Supersymmetric QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016) 071601 [1604.00687]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [46]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Scheme-independent calculation ofγ ¯ψψ,IR for an SU(3) gauge theory,Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 105014 [1608.00068]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [47]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Scheme-Independent Series Expansions at an Infrared Zero of the Beta Function in Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 125005 [1610.00387]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  46. [48]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Higher-Order Scheme-Independent Calculations of Physical Quantities in the Conformal Phase of a Gauge Theory,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 085012 [1701.06083]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [49]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Higher-order scheme-independent series expansions ofγ ¯ψψ,IR andβ ′ IR in conformal field theories,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 105004 [1703.08558]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [50]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Infrared fixed point physics in SO(N c) and Sp(N c) gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 105015 [1709.05358]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [51]

    Gracey, T.A

    J.A. Gracey, T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Scheme-Independent Calculations of Anomalous Dimensions of Baryon Operators in Conformal Field Theories,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 116018 [1805.02729]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [52]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Scheme-Independent Calculations of Properties at a Conformal Infrared Fixed Point in Gauge Theories with Multiple Fermion Representations,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 096003 [1809.02242]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  51. [53]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Scheme-Independent Series for Anomalous Dimensions of Higher-Spin Operators at an Infrared Fixed Point in a Gauge Theory,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 076018 [2002.08979]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  52. [54]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Anomalous dimensions at an infrared fixed point in an SU(Nc) gauge theory with fermions in the fundamental and antisymmetric tensor representations,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 056007 [2307.12426]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  53. [55]

    Chetyrkin,Quark mass anomalous dimension to O (alpha-s**4),Phys

    K.G. Chetyrkin,Quark mass anomalous dimension to O (alpha-s**4),Phys. Lett. B404(1997) 161 [hep-ph/9703278]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  54. [56]

    Vermaseren, S.A

    J.A.M. Vermaseren, S.A. Larin and T. van Ritbergen,The 4-loop quark mass anomalous dimension and the invariant quark mass,Phys. Lett. B405(1997) 327 [hep-ph/9703284]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  55. [57]

    Baikov, K.G

    P.A. Baikov, K.G. Chetyrkin and J.H. K¨ uhn,Five-Loop Running of the QCD Coupling Constant,Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 082002 [1606.08659]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [58]

    Herzog, B

    F. Herzog, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J.A.M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt,The five-loop beta function of Yang-Mills theory with fermions,JHEP02(2017) 090 [1701.01404]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [59]

    Rummukainen and K

    K. Rummukainen and K. Tuominen,Lattice Computations for Beyond Standard Model Physics,Universe8(2022) 188. [60]LatKMIcollaboration,Light composite scalar in eight-flavor QCD on the lattice,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 111502 [1403.5000]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  58. [61]

    Appelquist et al.,Strongly interacting dynamics and the search for new physics at the LHC,Phys

    T. Appelquist et al.,Strongly interacting dynamics and the search for new physics at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 114514 [1601.04027]. [62]LatKMIcollaboration,Light flavor-singlet scalars and walking signals inN f = 8QCD on the lattice,Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 014508 [1610.07011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [63]

    Gasbarro and G.T

    A.D. Gasbarro and G.T. Fleming,Examining the Low Energy Dynamics of Walking Gauge Theory,PoS LA TTICE2016(2017) 242 [1702.00480]. [64]Lattice Strong Dynamicscollaboration,Nonperturbative investigations of SU(3) gauge theory with eight dynamical flavors,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 014509 [1807.08411]. [65]Lattice Strong Dynamics (LSD)collaboration,Goldstone boson...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [66]

    Hasenfratz,Emergent strongly coupled ultraviolet fixed point in four dimensions with eight K¨ ahler-Dirac fermions, 44 Phys

    A. Hasenfratz,Emergent strongly coupled ultraviolet fixed point in four dimensions with eight K¨ ahler-Dirac fermions, 44 Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 014513 [2204.04801]. [67]Lattice Strong Dynamicscollaboration,Light scalar meson and decay constant in SU(3) gauge theory with eight dynamical flavors,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 054501 [2306.06095]. [68]LSDcollaboratio...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  61. [70]

    Kotov, D

    A.Y. Kotov, D. Nogradi, K.K. Szabo and L. Szikszai,More on the flavor dependence of m ρ/fπ,JHEP07(2021) 202 [2107.05996]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  62. [71]

    Chung and D

    H.S. Chung and D. Nogradi,fϱ/mϱand fπ/mϱratios and the conformal window,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 074039 [2302.06411]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  63. [72]

    Nogradi and H.S

    D. Nogradi and H.S. Chung,Mesonic decay constant and mass ratios and the conformal window,PoSLA TTICE2023 (2024) 084 [2311.08668]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  64. [73]

    Fodor, K

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi, C. Schroeder and C.H. Wong,Can the nearly conformal sextet gauge model hide the Higgs impostor?,Phys. Lett. B718(2012) 657 [1209.0391]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  65. [74]

    Fodor, K

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, S. Mondal, D. Nogradi and C.H. Wong,Toward the minimal realization of a light composite Higgs,PoSLA TTICE2014(2015) 244 [1502.00028]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [75]

    Fodor, K

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, S. Mondal, D. Nogradi and C.H. Wong,Status of a minimal composite Higgs theory,PoS LA TTICE2015(2016) 219 [1605.08750]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  67. [76]

    Fodor, K

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi and C.H. Wong,The twelve-flavorβ-function and dilaton tests of the sextet scalar,EPJ Web Conf.175(2018) 08015 [1712.08594]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  68. [77]

    Fodor, K

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti and C.H. Wong,Tantalizing dilaton tests from a near-conformal EFT,PoS LA TTICE2018(2019) 196 [1901.06324]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  69. [78]

    Fodor, K

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti and C.H. Wong,Dilaton EFT from p-regime to RMT in theϵ-regime,PoS LA TTICE2019(2020) 246 [2002.05163]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  70. [79]

    Athenodorou, E

    A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner and B. Lucini,Infrared regime of SU(2) with one adjoint Dirac flavor,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 114508 [1412.5994]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  71. [80]

    Athenodorou, E

    A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner, D. Elander, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini et al.,Large mass hierarchies from strongly-coupled dynamics,JHEP06(2016) 114 [1605.04258]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  72. [81]

    Athenodorou, E

    A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner and B. Lucini,Investigating the conformal behavior of SU(2) with one adjoint Dirac flavor,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 074519 [2103.10485]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  73. [82]

    Athenodorou, E

    A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner, P. Butti, J. Lenz and B. Lucini,SU(2) gauge theory with one and two adjoint fermions towards the continuum limit,2408.00171

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [83]

    Bennett et al.,Symplectic lattice gauge theories in the grid framework: Approaching the conformal window,Phys

    E. Bennett et al.,Symplectic lattice gauge theories in the grid framework: Approaching the conformal window,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 094508 [2306.11649]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  75. [84]

    Bennett, D.K

    E. Bennett, D.K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini et al.,Meson spectroscopy in the Sp(4) gauge theory with three antisymmetric fermions,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 074511 [2412.01170]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  76. [85]

    Matsuzaki and K

    S. Matsuzaki and K. Yamawaki,Dilaton Chiral Perturbation Theory: Determining the Mass and Decay Constant of the Technidilaton on the Lattice,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 082002 [1311.3784]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  77. [86]

    Li, Y.-L

    Y.-L. Li, Y.-L. Ma and M. Rho,Chiral-scale effective theory including a dilatonic meson,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 114011 [1609.07014]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  78. [87]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir,Low-energy effective action for pions and a dilatonic meson,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 054502 [1603.04575]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  79. [88]

    Kasai, K.-i

    A. Kasai, K.-i. Okumura and H. Suzuki,A dilaton-pion mass relation,1609.02264

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [89]

    Hansen, K

    M. Hansen, K. Langæble and F. Sannino,Extending Chiral Perturbation Theory with an Isosinglet Scalar,Phys. Rev. D 95(2017) 036005 [1610.02904]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.