Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Detecting Scams Using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.03147 v1 pith:E3XO7UIZ submitted 2024-02-05 cs.CR

Detecting Scams Using Large Language Models

classification cs.CR
keywords llmsscamsapplicationslanguagemodelsscamcybersecuritylarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained prominence in various applications, including security. This paper explores the utility of LLMs in scam detection, a critical aspect of cybersecurity. Unlike traditional applications, we propose a novel use case for LLMs to identify scams, such as phishing, advance fee fraud, and romance scams. We present notable security applications of LLMs and discuss the unique challenges posed by scams. Specifically, we outline the key steps involved in building an effective scam detector using LLMs, emphasizing data collection, preprocessing, model selection, training, and integration into target systems. Additionally, we conduct a preliminary evaluation using GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on a duplicated email, highlighting their proficiency in identifying common signs of phishing or scam emails. The results demonstrate the models' effectiveness in recognizing suspicious elements, but we emphasize the need for a comprehensive assessment across various language tasks. The paper concludes by underlining the importance of ongoing refinement and collaboration with cybersecurity experts to adapt to evolving threats.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CTIConnect: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented LLMs over Heterogeneous Cyber Threat Intelligence

    cs.CR 2025-10 reject novelty 6.0

    A 691-question benchmark (CTIARENA) shows LLMs need retrieval over heterogeneous cyber-threat-intelligence sources and that domain-specific retrieval beats generic RAG; the attached abstract describes a different 1,86...

  2. LLM-Assisted Authentication and Fraud Detection

    cs.CR 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LLM semantic authentication accepts 99.5% of legitimate non-exact answers at 0.1% false-accept rate while RAG fraud detection lowers false positives from 17.2% to 3.5%.

  3. Read This Paper to Get $50 Million:* An Analysis of Mobile Messaging Scams Using Reddit Data

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Reddit data analysis shows reply-based mobile scams growing nearly twice as fast as click-based ones while evading commercial and open-source detectors.