Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Investigating impact of bit-flip errors in control electronics on quantum computation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.05511 v1 pith:E45EMDQZ submitted 2024-05-09 quant-ph cs.ET

Investigating impact of bit-flip errors in control electronics on quantum computation

classification quant-ph cs.ET
keywords quantumerrorsamplitudebitsgatememoriescodecontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we investigate the impact of bit flip errors in FPGA memories in control electronics on quantum computing systems. FPGA memories are integral in storing the amplitude and phase information pulse envelopes, which are essential for generating quantum gate pulses. However, these memories can incur faults due to physical and environmental stressors such as electromagnetic interference, power fluctuations, and temperature variations and adversarial fault injections, potentially leading to errors in quantum gate operations. To understand how these faults affect quantum computations, we conducted a series of experiments to introduce bit flips into the amplitude (both real and imaginary components) and phase values of quantum pulses using IBM's simulated quantum environments, FakeValencia, FakeManila, and FakeLima. Our findings reveal that bit flips in the exponent and initial mantissa bits of the real amplitude cause substantial deviations in quantum gate operations, with TVD increases as high as ~200%. Interestingly, the remaining bits exhibited natural tolerance to errors. We proposed a 3-bit repetition error correction code, which effectively reduced the TVD increases to below 40% without incurring any memory overhead. Due to reuse of less significant bits for error correction, the proposed approach introduces maximum of 5-7% extra TVD in nominal cases. However, this can be avoided by sacrificing memory area for implementing the repetition code.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.