Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 56 references

The paper establishes that CO2 laser annealing, using a laser-crystallized YIG seed layer, can produce phase-pure Ce:YIG films on silicon-based photonic chips, and that a SiN Mach-Zehnder isolator made this way achieves 27.1 dB isolation at

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 16:38 UTC pith:E5AFDRTV

load-bearing objection First laser-annealed Ce:YIG isolator on SiN works, but the headline propagation loss is an inference with unquantified assumptions. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.17905 v1 pith:E5AFDRTV submitted 2026-07-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.optics

Localized crystallization of Ce:YIG thin films on Si using CO2 laser annealing for integrated nonreciprocal photonic device applications

Xinran Ji , Junxian Wang , Tianchi Zhang , Xuan Zhao , Di Wu , Zixuan Wei , Yizhi Chen , Jialong Wang
show 1 more author
Lei Bi
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.optics
keywords Ce:YIGCO2 laser annealingmagneto-optical garnetYIG seed layeroptical isolatorsilicon nitride photonicsnonreciprocal photonicsFaraday rotation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish a backend-compatible way to put magneto-optical garnet films on silicon photonic chips: instead of heating the whole wafer above 800°C, a CO2 laser is used to anneal a thin Ce:YIG film locally, with a pre-crystallized YIG seed layer stabilizing the garnet phase. The authors show that the laser-annealed films achieve Faraday rotation and magnetization close to those of rapid-thermal-annealed films, and they demonstrate a working SiN Mach-Zehnder isolator with 27.1 dB isolation and 10.1 dB insertion loss. If true, this is an existence proof that nonreciprocal photonic devices can be made on silicon without a full-wafer high-temperature anneal, which matters for integrating isolators and circulators into photonic circuits. The main caveat is that the headline Ce:YIG propagation loss of 188 dB/cm is extracted indirectly from device loss using simulated mode confinement rather than measured directly.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a sputtered Ce:YIG film can be crystallized locally on silicon-based photonic platforms by CO2 laser annealing when it is grown on a laser-crystallized YIG seed layer. The resulting films reach roughly 97.5% garnet phase purity, are crack-free, and show Faraday rotations of about -6573 deg/cm at 1200 nm and -2544 deg/cm at 1550 nm, comparable to rapid-thermal-annealed references. On a SiN Mach-Zehnder isolator, the laser-annealed Ce:YIG produces a nonreciprocal phase shift of 5.78 rad/cm, corresponding to a Faraday rotation of about -2317.7 deg/cm, and a 27.1 dB one-way isolation ratio at 1552.7 nm, with an on-chip insertion loss of 10.1 dB. Th

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a two-step CO2 laser annealing process: a 50 nm YIG seed layer is first laser-crystallized, then a 120 nm Ce:YIG film deposited on it is annealed with the same 10.6 µm laser. The seed layer acts as a structural template that stabilizes the garnet phase and suppresses cracks and secondary phases. The laser is absorbed mainly by the SiO2 layer, creating a localized high-temperature zone while keeping the surrounding chip below 400°C. The nonreciprocal device is a Mach-Zehnder interferometer in which the Ce:YIG-loaded arm provides a nonreciprocal phase shift; the quoted Ce:YIG propagation loss is extracted from the measured total waveguide loss using simulated moda

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the device's total measured loss is exactly the sum of Ce:YIG, YIG, and SiN losses weighted by simulated confinement factors, with the SiN loss fixed at 0.5 dB/cm from earlier work; if the simulated mode profile, the assumed SiN loss, or the additivity assumption is wrong, the headline Ce:YIG propagation loss and the comparison to RTA films change.

What would settle it

Directly measure the propagation loss of a laser-annealed Ce:YIG/YIG/SiN waveguide without assuming the SiN loss—for example, by cutback measurements across several waveguide lengths or by ring-resonator linewidth fitting—and compare the result with the extracted 188±16.5 dB/cm. A significant disagreement would show that the confinement-weighted extraction in Eq. (1) is the source of error.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Laser annealing could replace full-wafer high-temperature annealing for Ce:YIG crystallization, enabling monolithic magneto-optical isolators, circulators, and switches in back-end silicon photonic processing.
  • The YIG seed layer is sufficient to suppress secondary phases and cracks in Ce:YIG, suggesting the same bilayer strategy may work for other garnet compositions that are hard to crystallize on amorphous substrates.
  • The demonstrated MZI isolator is, by the authors' account, the first integrated nonreciprocal device based on laser-annealed Ce:YIG, with an isolation ratio of 27.1 dB at 1552.7 nm.
  • Thermal localization can be improved from a ~2.3 mm hot zone toward ~200 µm by shrinking the laser spot or using shorter-wavelength lasers, so only the device area would be exposed to high temperature.
  • The measured Faraday rotation of about -2317.7 deg/cm is close to the rapid-thermal-annealed reference of -2500 deg/cm, indicating the localized route can approach conventional annealing performance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the 188 dB/cm Ce:YIG loss is not directly measured, the true value could be lower if the assumed SiN loss of 0.5 dB/cm is overestimated; a direct cutback or ring-resonator measurement would settle the comparison with RTA films.
  • The seed-layer approach likely generalizes beyond Ce:YIG: any garnet that struggles to nucleate on amorphous silicon-compatible substrates could be grown on a laser-crystallized YIG template, removing the need for lattice-matched substrates.
  • The demonstrated thermal confinement suggests that with a smaller spot or a visible-wavelength laser, crystallization could be confined to a single circuit block, enabling per-device annealing in a chip-scale manufacturing flow.
  • The remaining loss gap relative to RTA films (188 vs 79 dB/cm) points to oxygen stoichiometry and Ce³⁺ oxidation as the main lever; suppressing Ce³⁺ oxidation during laser annealing could close most of that gap.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a CO2-laser-annealing route for crystallizing 120 nm Ce:YIG films on SiO2/Si substrates and SiN waveguides, using a pre-crystallized YIG seed layer to stabilize the garnet phase. It systematically studies laser power and oxygen partial pressure and reports phase-pure, crack-free films with Ms = 146.3 emu/cm3, saturation Faraday rotation of -6573±375 deg/cm at 1200 nm and -2544±310 deg/cm at 1550 nm, comparable to RTA-grown films. On SiN waveguides, the authors fabricate a Mach-Zehnder interferometer isolator and report an NRPS of 5.78 rad/cm, Faraday rotation -2317.7±94.8 deg/cm, propagation loss 188.2±16.5 dB/cm, isolation ratio 27.1 dB, and insertion loss 10.1 dB at 1552.7 nm. They also demonstrate spatial confinement of the >400 °C thermal region to about 2.3 mm with a focused laser spot.

Significance. If confirmed, this would be an important existence proof: localized laser annealing of Ce:YIG on a silicon-compatible platform, without full-wafer high-temperature annealing, yielding a working nonreciprocal MZI isolator. The paper's direct measurements — XRD, EBSD, XPS, VSM, free-space Faraday rotation, and the isolation/insertion-loss spectra — are substantial strengths. The main quantitative claim that needs scrutiny is the extracted Ce:YIG propagation loss, which is not directly measured and rests on several assumptions. The device demonstration and the free-space MO properties are nevertheless valuable and largely independent of that extraction.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.3, Eq. (1)] The headline α_Ce:YIG = 188.2±16.5 dB/cm is load-bearing for the comparison to RTA films (79±5.0 dB/cm), but it is not directly measured. Equation (1) assumes the total waveguide loss is an additive weighted sum, using (i) COMSOL confinement factors 11.37%, 6.17%, 65.75% with no uncertainty; (ii) α_SiN = 0.5 dB/cm taken from ref. 50 rather than measured on this chip; and (iii) α_YIG = 75.9±5.4 dB/cm measured before Ce:YIG deposition, which may change after the second laser anneal. Because Γ_Ce:YIG is only about 11%, a modest systematic error in the simulated mode profile or in α_SiN shifts the extracted Ce:YIG loss by tens of dB/cm — enough to move the result from 'inferior to RTA' to 'comparable to RTA.' Please provide a direct cutback measurement or, at minimum, a sensitivity analysis with error propagation, and justify the assumption that the YIG seed loss is unchanged after Ce:YIG an
  2. [§3.2 vs §3.3] There is an internal inconsistency between the ellipsometry result and the loss extraction. Section 3.2 and Fig. 5(f) report an extinction coefficient k = 0 at 1550 nm for the optimal LA-Ce:YIG film, with the text saying the extinction coefficient 'could not be accurately measured by ellipsometry, indicating a relatively low loss.' Yet §3.3 attributes 188.2 dB/cm of waveguide loss to Ce:YIG via Eq. (1). If the material is truly transparent at 1550 nm, the waveguide loss must be dominated by scattering or radiation, and the additive absorption-weighted model in Eq. (1) is not appropriate. If instead the ellipsometric k is unreliable, that should be stated explicitly. This reconciliation is needed for the quantitative loss claim to be credible.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Fig. 5(f)] Grammar/clarity: 'Figures 5(f) shows' should be 'Figure 5(f) shows'; 'extinction ratio' should be 'extinction coefficient' where referring to k.
  2. [Abstract and §3.3] The phrase 'propagation loss of 188.2±16.5 dB/cm' should be qualified as an extracted/model-dependent value, not a directly measured material loss.
  3. [Fig. 6(a)] Please clarify how the 400 °C and 850 °C thresholds are calibrated on the infrared camera image; the spatial confinement claim depends on this calibration.
  4. [References] Reference formatting is inconsistent (e.g., refs. 31 and 50 mix journal, title, and volume information in nonstandard ways). A careful cleanup would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central device metrics are directly measured, and the extracted Ce:YIG loss is a model-based inverse calculation, not a fitted quantity masquerading as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claims are the MZI isolation ratio (27.1 dB), insertion loss (10.1 dB), and Faraday rotation extracted from the NRPS peak shift (-2317.7 ± 94.8 deg/cm). These are experimentally measured quantities, not outputs of a fitted model. The propagation loss of Ce:YIG (188.2 ± 16.5 dB/cm) is obtained by rearranging Eq. (1), which sums material losses weighted by COMSOL confinement factors, using a previously measured YIG loss and an assumed SiN loss from ref. [50]. This is an extraction from a measured total waveguide loss with independently stated inputs, not a prediction that is forced by construction to match one of those inputs. Although the result is model-dependent — the confinement factors carry no error bars, the SiN loss is taken from an earlier paper, and the YIG loss is measured before Ce:YIG deposition — these are correctness/uncertainty concerns, not circularity. The self-citations ([31], [37], [50]) provide prior calibration values and measurement procedures, but they do not define the present result; the claimed existence of crack-free, phase-pure laser-annealed Ce:YIG on SiN and the demonstrated nonreciprocal device behavior stand on direct XRD/EBSD, SEM, VSM, transmission, and NRPS measurements. No self-definitional step, fitted-input-called-prediction step, imported uniqueness theorem, or renaming of a known result was found.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, particles, forces, or dimensions; it recombines known materials and processes. The central device-performance numbers rest on two externally-supplied inputs (αSiN and simulated confinement factors) and the additive-loss model. Laser power and oxygen pressure are empirical optimization variables rather than fitted constants in a derivation.

free parameters (2)
  • αSiN (SiN propagation loss) = 0.5 dB/cm
    Assumed from previous work (ref. 50) and used directly in Eq. (1) to solve for αCe:YIG; no uncertainty given.
  • Confinement factors ΓCe:YIG, ΓYIG, ΓSiN = 11.37%, 6.17%, 65.75%
    COMSOL simulation outputs used as weights in Eq. (1); no uncertainty is propagated, and different mode/geometry inputs would change the extracted αCe:YIG.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption CO2-laser heating of the film stack is dominated by absorption in the SiO2 layer, so the Ce:YIG/YIG layers and SiN waveguides do not significantly change the temperature distribution.
    Invoked in Section 3 (Figures 1c-d) and Section 3.3 to claim thermal localization; supported only by simulation, not verified by in-film thermometry.
  • domain assumption A pre-crystallized 50 nm YIG seed layer stabilizes the garnet phase of the Ce:YIG film.
    Core process premise stated in the Introduction and used throughout; no no-seed control is reported in this paper.
  • domain assumption Propagation losses add linearly as αWG = ΓCe:YIG·αCe:YIG + ΓYIG·αYIG + ΓSiN·αSiN, and SiO2 cladding loss is negligible.
    Used in Section 3.3, Eq. (1) to derive αCe:YIG = 188.2 dB/cm; if the additivity assumption fails, the headline loss is wrong.
  • domain assumption The non-reciprocal phase shift measured from the MZI peak shift is directly related to Faraday rotation via the mode confinement and interaction length.
    Used to convert NRPS = 5.78 rad/cm into Faraday rotation -2317.7 deg/cm; the conversion is standard but depends on simulated mode overlap.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13974 in / 12900 out tokens · 114559 ms · 2026-08-01T16:38:11.513506+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Laser annealing (LA) technique has emerged as an effective method for localized crystallization of magneto-optical (MO) garnet thin films on semiconductor substrates. However, no studies have explored the crystallization and magneto-optical (MO) properties of cerium-substituted yttrium iron garnet (Ce:YIG, Ce1Y2Fe5O12) thin films for integrated photonic device applications using LA technique. In this study, we provide a comprehensive investigation into the laser annealing of Ce:YIG films deposited on SiO2 substrates and silicon nitride photonic waveguides for integrated nonreciprocal photonic device applications. Garnet phase was successfully observed in films grown on SiO2 substrates, and SiN waveguides with laser annealing of sputtered Ce:YIG films on top of a laser annealed Y3Fe5O12 seed layer. The magneto-optical (MO) properties of Ce:YIG films on oxidized Si substrates were found to be comparable to those prepared by rapid thermal annealing (RTA). A Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) type optical isolator based on Ce:YIG film on SiN was fabricated, exhibiting a saturation Faraday rotation of -2317.7 deg/cm and propagation loss of 188.2 dB/cm. Isolation ratio of 27.1 dB and insertion loss of 10.1 dB were achieved at 1552.7 nm wavelength.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Control and readout of a superconducting qubit using a photonic link,

    F. Lecocq, F. Quinlan, K. Cicak, J. Aumentado, S. A. Diddams, J. D. Teufel, “Control and readout of a superconducting qubit using a photonic link,” Nature 2021, 591, 575–579

    2021

  2. [2]

    Integrated non-reciprocal magneto-optics with ultra-high endurance for photonic in-memory computing

    P. Pintus, M. Dumont, V. Shah, T. Murai, Y. Shoji, D. N. Huang, G. Moody, J. E. Bowers, N. Youngblood, “Integrated non-reciprocal magneto-optics with ultra-high endurance for photonic in-memory computing” Nat. Photon. 2025, 19, 54-62

    2025

  3. [3]

    Unified laser stabilization and isolation on a silicon chip,

    A. D. White, G. H. Ahn, R. Luhtaru, J. Guo, T. J. Morin, A. Saxena, L. Chang, A. Majumdar, K. V. Gasse, J. E. Bowers, J. Vučković, “Unified laser stabilization and isolation on a silicon chip,” Nat. Photon. 2024, 18, 1305-1311

    2024

  4. [4]

    Recent development in integrated Lithium niobate photonics,

    Z. Xie, F. Bo, J.T. Lin, H. Hu, X. L. Cai, X. H. Tian, Z.W. Fang, J. M. Chen, M. Wang, F. Chen, Y. Cheng, J. J. Xu, S. H. Zhu, “Recent development in integrated Lithium niobate photonics,”Advances in Physics: X, 2024, 9

    2024

  5. [5]

    An integrated magneto-optic modulator for cryogenic applications,

    P. Pintus, L. Ranzani, S. Pinna, D. N. Huang, M. V. Gustafsson, F. Karinou, G. A. Casula, Y. Shoji, Y. Takamura, T. Mizumoto, M. Soltani, J. E. Bowers, “An integrated magneto-optic modulator for cryogenic applications,” Nat. Electron. 2022, 5, 604–610

    2022

  6. [6]

    On - chip optical isolation in monolithically integrated non -reciprocal optical resonators,

    L. Bi, J. J. Hu, P. Jiang, D. H. Kim, G. F. Dionne, L. C. Kimerling, C. A. Ross, “On - chip optical isolation in monolithically integrated non -reciprocal optical resonators,” Nat. 16 Photonics 2011, 5, 758–762

    2011

  7. [7]

    Monolithic on -chip nonreciprocal photonics based on magneto -optical thin films

    J. J. Hu, X. Y. Sun, Q. Y. Du, M. Onbasli, C. A. Ross, “Monolithic on -chip nonreciprocal photonics based on magneto -optical thin films” Integrated Optics: Devices, Materials, and Technologies XX. SPIE, 2016, 9750, 160-170

    2016

  8. [8]

    Silicon integrated Bi2TbFe5O12 thin films for O-band nonreciprocal photonic device applications,

    T. C. Zhang, Y. C. Yang, D. Wu, J. X. Wang, Z. X. Wei, W. Yan, L. Bi, "Silicon integrated Bi2TbFe5O12 thin films for O-band nonreciprocal photonic device applications," Opt Mater Express 2024, 14, 767-777

    2024

  9. [9]

    Monolithic integration of broadband optical isolators for polarization-diverse silicon photonics,

    Y. Zhang, Q. Y. Du, C. T. Wang, T. Fakhrul, S. Y. Liu, L. J. Deng, D. N. Huang, P. Pintus, J. Bowers, C. A. Ross, J. J. Hu, L. Bi, “Monolithic integration of broadband optical isolators for polarization-diverse silicon photonics,” Optica 2019, 6, 473-478

    2019

  10. [10]

    Silicon -based integrated polarization -independent magneto-optical isolator,

    S. Y. Liu, D. Minemura, Y. Shoji, “Silicon -based integrated polarization -independent magneto-optical isolator,” Optica 2023, 10, 373-378

    2023

  11. [11]

    Self-holding magneto-optical switch integrated on silicon photonic platforms,

    J. P. Wang, S. Taniguchi, Y. Shoji, “Self-holding magneto-optical switch integrated on silicon photonic platforms,” Opt. Express 2024, 32, 28570-28581

    2024

  12. [12]

    Interface-Mediated YIG/Ce:YIG Bilayers Structure with Enhanced Magneto -optical Properties via Pulsed Laser Deposition,

    Z. R. Jin, H. J. Zhou, X. D. Zhang, K. Cao, R. Chen, “Interface-Mediated YIG/Ce:YIG Bilayers Structure with Enhanced Magneto -optical Properties via Pulsed Laser Deposition,” ACS Mater. Lett. 2023, 5(3) 803-810

    2023

  13. [13]

    Enhanced magneto- optical effect in Y 1.5Ce1.5Fe5O12 thin films deposited on silicon by pulsed laser deposition,

    Y. Zhang, C. T. Wang, X. Liang, B. Peng, H. P. Lu, P. H. Zhou, L. Zhang, J. X. Xie, L. J. Deng, M. Zahradnik, L. Beran, M. Kucera, M. Veis, C. A. Ross, L. Bi, “Enhanced magneto- optical effect in Y 1.5Ce1.5Fe5O12 thin films deposited on silicon by pulsed laser deposition,” J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 703, 591-599

    2017

  14. [14]

    Dysprosium Substituted Ce:YIG Thin Films for Temperature Insensitive Integrated Optical Isolator Applications

    Z. Wei, W. Yan, J. Qin, L. J. Deng, L. Bi, “Dysprosium Substituted Ce:YIG Thin Films for Temperature Insensitive Integrated Optical Isolator Applications.”Materials 2022, 15, 1691

    2022

  15. [15]

    Effect of post -annealing temperature on the microstructure and magnetic properties of Ce:YIG thin films deposited on Si substrates,

    X. T. Zhou, W. J. Cheng, F.T. Lin, X.M. Ma, W. Z. Shi, “Effect of post -annealing temperature on the microstructure and magnetic properties of Ce:YIG thin films deposited on Si substrates,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 253, 2108-2112

    2006

  16. [16]

    Recent advances in development of magnetic garnet thin films for applications in spintronics and photonics

    Y. C. Yang, T. Liu, L. Bi, L. J. Deng, “Recent advances in development of magnetic garnet thin films for applications in spintronics and photonics” J. Alloy. Compd. 2021, 860, 158235

    2021

  17. [17]

    Europium -substituted cerium iron garnet thin films for silicon-integrated nonreciprocal photonic device applications,

    Y. C. Yang, T. C. Zhang, D. Wu, Z. X. Wei, J. X. Wang, Y. F. Xie, S. Y. Chen, Y. Z. Chen, J. J. Su, J. Qin, T. Liu, L. Bi, “Europium -substituted cerium iron garnet thin films for silicon-integrated nonreciprocal photonic device applications,” APL Mater. 20 25, 13 (5), 051109

  18. [18]

    J.Y. Lian, Y. Chen, Z. Liu, M.K. Zhu, G.S. Wang, W.B. Zhang, X.L. Dong, “Annealing 17 effects on the microstructure and magnetic properties of Y 3Fe5O12 films deposited on Si/SiO 2 substrates by RF magnetron sputtering,“ Ceram. Int. 2017, 43(10), 7477-7481

    2017

  19. [19]

    Thickness -dependent magnetooptical properties of ion beam sputtered polycrystalline Ce1Y2Fe5O12 films,

    Y. Yoshihara, T. Sugita, P. B. Lim, Y. Tamba, H. Inoue, K. Ishiyama, M. Inoue, C. A. Ross, T. Goto, “Thickness -dependent magnetooptical properties of ion beam sputtered polycrystalline Ce1Y2Fe5O12 films,” Opt. Mater. 2022, 133, 112967

    2022

  20. [20]

    Crack-free Y3Fe5O12 films deposited on Si substrate obtained by two-step annealing process,

    K. F. Li, H. Zheng, P. Zheng, J. D. Xu, J. J. Chen, J. J. Zhou, L. Zheng, “Crack-free Y3Fe5O12 films deposited on Si substrate obtained by two-step annealing process,” Mater. Lett. 2018, 228, 21-24

    2018

  21. [21]

    Enhancing superconductivity in CoSi 2 films with laser annealing,

    P. Dumas, F. Gustavo, M. Opprecht, G. Freychet, P. Gergaud, S. Kerdilè s, S. Guillemin, J. L. Lábár, B. Pécz, F. Lefloch, F. Nemouchi, “Enhancing superconductivity in CoSi 2 films with laser annealing,”J. Appl. Phys. 2024, 136, 105103

    2024

  22. [22]

    Combined magnetron sputtering and laser annealing process for the fabrication of proton conducting thin films

    J. Wallis, O. Ravkina, F. Kä ufer, R.V. Mallinckrodt, A. -E. Surkus, H. Wulff, J. Wartmann, A. Kruth, “Combined magnetron sputtering and laser annealing process for the fabrication of proton conducting thin films ”Vacuum 2024, 229, 113582

    2024

  23. [23]

    Low Resistivity Aluminum Doped Layers Formed Using High Dose High Temperature Implants and Laser Annealing,

    F. Mazzamuto, Z. Chehadi, F. Roze, M. Opprecht, A. Gupta, S. Kerdilè s, T. Tabata, M. Ameen, D. D. Roh, C. Sohl, M. Lazar, L. M. Rubin, L. Thuries, “Low Resistivity Aluminum Doped Layers Formed Using High Dose High Temperature Implants and Laser Annealing,” Solid State Phenomena 2024, 359, 21-28

    2024

  24. [24]

    Effects of thermal and laser annealing on the structure of Ge 2Sb2Te5 thin films,

    K. Turmanovaa, O. Prikhodkoa, Zh. Tolepova, S. Maksimovaa, N. Manabaevb, N. Almasc, “Effects of thermal and laser annealing on the structure of Ge 2Sb2Te5 thin films,” Chalcogenide Letters 2024, 21, 575-581

    2024

  25. [25]

    Microstructure and soft magnetic properties of nanocrystalline Fe –Si–B–Cu–Nb soft magnetic alloy by laser annealing,

    Y. X. Yao, H. X. Huang, M. Y. Ni, S. Yang, “Microstructure and soft magnetic properties of nanocrystalline Fe –Si–B–Cu–Nb soft magnetic alloy by laser annealing,” AIP Adv. 2024, 14, 015016

    2024

  26. [26]

    Refining silicon nitride waveguide quality through femtosecond laser annealing,

    P. H. Wang, C. H. Chen, N. L. Hou, J. H. Cao, H. Y. Zheng, H. W. Chen, “Refining silicon nitride waveguide quality through femtosecond laser annealing,” Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 15638

    2024

  27. [27]

    Micron -scale crystallization of Bi:YIG by laser rapid thermal annealing at controlled atmosphere,

    A. Shelaev, Y. Sgibnev, S. Efremova, P.Tananaev, A. Baryshev, “Micron -scale crystallization of Bi:YIG by laser rapid thermal annealing at controlled atmosphere,” Opt Laser Technol 2022, 155, 108411

    2022

  28. [28]

    Selective Crystallization of Magnetic Garnet Films on Bragg Mirrors by Laser Annealing,

    Y. Suzuki, T. Goto, Y. Eto, H. Takagi, P. B. Lim, A. V. Baryshev, M. Inoue, “Selective Crystallization of Magnetic Garnet Films on Bragg Mirrors by Laser Annealing,” J. Magn. Soc. Jpn. 2012, 36, 183–187

    2012

  29. [29]

    Crystallization of Bismuth -Substituted Yttrium Iron Garnet under Low -Energy High-Repetition Rate Femtosecond Laser Pulses,

    Y. Sgibnev, A. Shelaev, D. Kulikova, A. Salatov, P. Tananaev, G. Yankovskii, A. 18 Baryshev, “Crystallization of Bismuth -Substituted Yttrium Iron Garnet under Low -Energy High-Repetition Rate Femtosecond Laser Pulses,” Cryst. Growth Des. 2022 22, 1196-1201

    2022

  30. [30]

    Vacuum laser annealing of magnetooptical cerium-substituted yttrium iron garnet films,

    H. Miyashita, Y. Yoshihara, K. Mori, T. Koguchi, P. B. Lim, M. Inoue, K. Ishiyama, T. Goto, “Vacuum laser annealing of magnetooptical cerium-substituted yttrium iron garnet films,” Opt. Mater. 2023, 146, 114530

    2023

  31. [31]

    Crystallization of Y3Fe5O12 thin films on silicon photonic waveguides using CO2 laser annealing

    J.X. Wang, S. G. Cai, Y. C. Yang, Z. X. Wei, T. C. Zhang, W. Yan, L. Bi, Opt. Mater. Express “Crystallization of Y3Fe5O12 thin films on silicon photonic waveguides using CO2 laser annealing” Opt Mater Express 2024, 14, 1579-1589

    2024

  32. [32]

    Silicon integrated nonrcciprocal photonic devices using monolithically integrated magnetic oxides,

    Y. Zhang, K. Y. Shui, J. Qin, X. Liang, L.X. Nie, L.J. Deng, L. Bi, “Silicon integrated nonrcciprocal photonic devices using monolithically integrated magnetic oxides,” 2016 IEEE 13TH International Conference On Group IV Photonics (GFP) 2016, 52-53

    2016

  33. [33]

    Integration of bulk -quality thin film magneto -optical cerium -doped yttrium iron garnet on silicon nitride photonic substrates

    M. C. Onbasli, T. Goto, X. Y. Sun, N. Huynh, C. A. Ross, “Integration of bulk -quality thin film magneto -optical cerium -doped yttrium iron garnet on silicon nitride photonic substrates” Opt. Express 2014, 22, 25183-25192

    2014

  34. [34]

    Crystallization of high gyrotropy garnets with decreasing thermal processing budgets as analyzed by electron backscatter diffraction,

    K. Srinivasan, N. C. A. Seaton, R. M. Peng, M. Li, B. J. H. Stadler, “Crystallization of high gyrotropy garnets with decreasing thermal processing budgets as analyzed by electron backscatter diffraction,” Opt. Mater. Express 2023, 13, 357-367

    2023

  35. [35]

    Growth of magnetooptical cerium-substituted yttrium iron garnet on yttrium aluminum garnet using ion beam sputtering,

    Y. Yoshihara, Y. Ishiyama, T. Watanabe, P. B. Lim, M. Inoue, C. A. Ross, T. Goto, “Growth of magnetooptical cerium-substituted yttrium iron garnet on yttrium aluminum garnet using ion beam sputtering,”Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023, 123, 112404

    2023

  36. [36]

    Systematic and collaborative approach to problem solving using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy,

    N. Fairley, V. Fernandez, M. Richard -Plouet, C. Guillot-Deudon, J. Walton, E. Smith, D. Flahaut, M. Greiner, M. Biesinger, S. Tougaard, D. Morgan, J. Baltrusaitis, “Systematic and collaborative approach to problem solving using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy,” Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2021, 5, 100112

    2021

  37. [37]

    Ultra - broadband magneto-optical isolators and circulators on a silicon nitride photonics platform,

    W. Yan, Z. X. Wei, Y. C. Yang, D. Wu, Z. J. Zhang, X. Y. Song, J. Qin, L. Bi, “Ultra - broadband magneto-optical isolators and circulators on a silicon nitride photonics platform,” Optica 2024, 11, 376-384

    2024

  38. [38]

    The role of Dy incorporation in the magnetic behavior and structural characterization of synthetic Ce, Bi -substituted yttrium iron garnet,

    M.R. Khalifeh, H. Shokrollahi, S.M. Arab, H. Yang, “The role of Dy incorporation in the magnetic behavior and structural characterization of synthetic Ce, Bi -substituted yttrium iron garnet,” Mater Chem Phys 2020, 247, 122838

    2020

  39. [39]

    Cerium Substitution in Yttrium Iron Garnet: Valence State, Structure, and Energetics,

    X. F. Guo, A. H. Tavakoli, S. Sutton, R. K. Kukkadapu, L. Qi, A. Lanzirotti, M. Newville, M. Asta, A. Navrotsky, “Cerium Substitution in Yttrium Iron Garnet: Valence State, Structure, and Energetics,” Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 1133-1143

    2014

  40. [40]

    Optical and magneto-optical behavior of Cerium Yttrium Iron Garnet thin films at wavelengths of 200–1770 nm,

    M. C. Onbasli, L. Beran, M. Zahradník, M. Kučera, R. Antoš, J. Mistrík, G. F. Dionne, 19 M. Veis, C. A. “Optical and magneto-optical behavior of Cerium Yttrium Iron Garnet thin films at wavelengths of 200–1770 nm,” Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23640

    2016

  41. [41]

    High Figure of Merit Magneto -Optical Ce- and Bi-Substituted Terbium Iron Garnet Films Integrated on Si,

    T. Fakhrul, S. Tazlaru, B. Khurana, L. Beran, J. Bauer, M. Vančík, A. Marchese, E. Tsotsos, M. Kučera, Y. Zhang, M. Veis, C. A. Ross, “High Figure of Merit Magneto -Optical Ce- and Bi-Substituted Terbium Iron Garnet Films Integrated on Si,” Adv. Optical Mater. 2021, 9, 2100512

    2021

  42. [42]

    Magneto -Optical Bi -Substituted Yttrium and Terbium Iron Garnets for On -Chip Crystallization via Microheaters,

    K. Hayashi, K.P. Dao, M.J. Gross, L. Ranno, J.X.B. Sia, T. Fakhrul, Q.Y. Du, N. Chatterjee, J.J. Hu, C.A. Ross, “Magneto -Optical Bi -Substituted Yttrium and Terbium Iron Garnets for On -Chip Crystallization via Microheaters,” Adv. Optical Mater. 2024, 12(25), 2400708

    2024

  43. [43]

    First principles calculation on the magnetic, optical properties and oxygen vacancy effect of Ce xY3−xFe5O12

    X. Liang, J. L. Xie, L. J. Deng, L. Bi, “First principles calculation on the magnetic, optical properties and oxygen vacancy effect of Ce xY3−xFe5O12” Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 052401

    2015

  44. [44]

    Influence of growth atmosphere on solubility limit of Ce3+ ions in Ce-substituted fibrous yttrium iron garnet single crystals,

    T. Sekijima, H. Itoh, T. Fujii, K. Wakino, M. Okada, “Influence of growth atmosphere on solubility limit of Ce3+ ions in Ce-substituted fibrous yttrium iron garnet single crystals,” J. Cryst. Growth 2001, 229, 409-414

    2001

  45. [45]

    Structural and magnetic characteristics of yttrium iron garnet (YIG, Ce:YIG) films prepared by RF magnetron sputter techniques,

    M.-B Park, N. -H Cho, “Structural and magnetic characteristics of yttrium iron garnet (YIG, Ce:YIG) films prepared by RF magnetron sputter techniques,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2001, 231, 2-3

    2001

  46. [46]

    Growth optimization and magnetic behavior of cerium substituted Yttrium Iron Garnet (CexY3-xFe5O12),

    M. Hussain, F. Mohmed, F. A. Dar, S. Rubab, A. Ahmad, Y. H. Lin, “Growth optimization and magnetic behavior of cerium substituted Yttrium Iron Garnet (CexY3-xFe5O12),” Mater. Res. Express, 2019, 6, 086452

    2019

  47. [47]

    Effect of oxygen growth -pressure on microstructural and magnetic properties of pulse laser deposited epitaxial YIG thin films,

    S. K. Jha, M. Sharma, N. K. Puri, B. K. Kuanr, “Effect of oxygen growth -pressure on microstructural and magnetic properties of pulse laser deposited epitaxial YIG thin films,” J. Alloy. Compd. 2021, 889, 161741,

    2021

  48. [48]

    Ce-Substituted YIG Films Grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition for Magneto-optic Waveguide Devices,

    H. Kim, A. M. Grishin, K. V. Rao, S. C. Yu, R. Sbiaa, H. L. Gall, “Ce-Substituted YIG Films Grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition for Magneto-optic Waveguide Devices,” IEEE Trans. Magn. vol. 1999, 3163-3165

    1999

  49. [49]

    Strong magneto- optical enhancement and magnetic anisotropy tuning in Ce-substituted yttrium iron garnet films grown in argon and oxygen,

    J. Hyun, L. Flajšman, J. Hohlfeld, L.D. Yao, J. Sainio, S. V. Dijken, “ Strong magneto- optical enhancement and magnetic anisotropy tuning in Ce-substituted yttrium iron garnet films grown in argon and oxygen,” Phys. Rev. Mater. 2025, 9, 094405

    2025

  50. [50]

    Waveguide -integrated high -performance magneto -optical isolators and circulators on silicon nitride platforms,

    W. Yan, Y.C. Yang, S.Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, S. Xia, T.T. Kang, W.H. Yang, J. Qin, L.J. Deng, L. Bi, “Waveguide -integrated high -performance magneto -optical isolators and circulators on silicon nitride platforms,” Optica 2020, 7, 1555-1562. 20

    2020

  51. [51]

    Crystallization of bismuth-substituted yttrium iron garnet under low-energy high- repetition rate femtosecond laser pulses,

    Y. Sgibnev, A. Shelaev, D. Kulikova, A. Salatov, P. Tananaev, G. Yankovskii, A. Baryshev, “Crystallization of bismuth-substituted yttrium iron garnet under low-energy high- repetition rate femtosecond laser pulses,” Cryst. Growth Des. 2022, 22(2), 1196-1201

    2022

  52. [52]

    Enhancement of YIG/Pt spin conductance by local Joule annealing,

    R. Kohno, N. Thiery, K. An, P. Noel, L. Vila, V. V. Naletov, N. Beaulieu, J. Ben Youssef, G. de Loubens, O. Klein, “ Enhancement of YIG/Pt spin conductance by local Joule annealing,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 118 (3), 032404

    2021

  53. [53]

    Next Generation Ceramic Substrate Fabricated at Room Temperature,

    Y. Kim, C. W. Ahn, J. J. Choi, J. Ryu, J. W. Kim, W. H. Yoon, D. S. Park, S. Y. Yoon, B. Ma, B. D. Hahn, “Next Generation Ceramic Substrate Fabricated at Room Temperature,” Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6637

    2017

  54. [54]

    G. A. Slack, Nonmetallic crystals with high thermal conductivity, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 1973, 34, 321-335

    1973

  55. [55]

    Heat transfer mechanism of electrostatic chuck surface and wafer backside to improve wafer temperature uniformity,

    T. W. Yoon, S. Il. Cho, M. Choi, S. J. Hong, “Heat transfer mechanism of electrostatic chuck surface and wafer backside to improve wafer temperature uniformity,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2023, 41, 044002

    2023

  56. [56]

    Mechanisms underlying temperature uniformity in electrostatic chucks through experimental and simulation methods,

    C. J. Liu, J. R. Gao, Z. W. He, K. Han, Z. Yang, K. D. Xu, S. W. Zhuang, “Mechanisms underlying temperature uniformity in electrostatic chucks through experimental and simulation methods,” Appl. Therm. Eng. 2023, 238, 122011

    2023