Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Dynamical-System analysis of single-axion monodromy inflation with periodically-modulated potentials

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For a single axion with a cosine-modulated linear potential, this paper classifies every de Sitter-like fixed point and shows the stable ladder of vacua appears for exactly one range of the scale ratio.

desk verdict A useful fixed-point classification for modulated axion potentials, but the stability of the dS vacua rests on an unproved inequality (B5) that a referee should push on. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02746 v1 pith:E5VBJ6HZ submitted 2025-07-03 gr-qc hep-th

Panagiotis Dorlis , Nick E. Mavromatos , Sotirios-Neilos Vlachos , Makarios Vyros This is my paper
classification gr-qchep-th MSC 37C7537N2083F05
keywords axionmonodromyperiodically-modulatedpotentialsdynamicalsystemsanalysisdeSittervacuainflationarystabilitybifurcationstring-inspiredcosmologyslow-rollinflation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a single axion field with a linear potential modulated by a cosine term, the shape expected when instanton effects sit on top of axion monodromy, can support stable or metastable de Sitter inflation, and for which parameter values. Using expansion-normalized variables, the authors reduce the Friedmann and Klein-Gordon equations to a two-dimensional autonomous dynamical system and classify all fixed points by stability. They find that the behavior is governed by the ratio $\gamma/\delta$ of the linear scale to the cosine scale: for $|\gamma/\delta|\ge 1$ the earlier linear-axion behavior survives, while for $|\gamma/\delta|\le 1$ an infinite family of fixed points appears, with stable spiral and stable node points acting as de Sitter vacua. These de Sitter vacua exist only for $\gamma/\delta\in[-1,-0.3365)$, and at $|\gamma/\delta|=1$ the families merge into saddles in a bifurcation. The stable ladder is physically striking because it offers a discrete sequence of vacua with decreasing effective cosmological constant that can asymptotically end at a Minkowski vacuum.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the expansion-normalized dynamical system, in which the scalar-field cosmology is written in variables $x=\kappa\dot b/(\sqrt6 H)$ and $y=\kappa\sqrt{|V|}/(\sqrt3 H)$ together with the Friedmann constraint $x^2+y^2=1$. By setting $x=\cos\varphi$ and compactifying the variable $\tilde\lambda=-1/(\kappa b)$ through $\zeta=\tilde\lambda/(\tilde\lambda+1)$, the authors obtain the two-dimensional autonomous flow (3.2) on the bounded phase space $\varphi\in[0,\pi]$, $\zeta\in[0,1)$. The parameter ratio $\gamma/\delta=(\Lambda_0^3 f_b)/\Lambda_1^4$ controls the relative strength of the linear and cosine terms; it enters the fixed-point conditions (3.5) and the positivity constraint (3.9), thereby deciding whether the stable de Sitter ladder exists, where the bifurcation occurs, and whether a purely cosine regime is approached.

What would settle it

Scan the discriminant $f_1(\gamma,\delta,c_1)$ over the allowed region $\gamma/\delta\in[-1,-0.3365)$, $\delta\gtrsim 1$, and $c_1\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\}$, checking whether $\sqrt{f_1(\gamma,\delta,c_1)}\ge 3$ at any point; finding such a point would break the claimed stable-node stability of the $C_{c1}$ family. In parallel, solving the positivity condition (3.9) numerically checks whether the boundary $\gamma/\delta\simeq -0.3365$ is correctly located.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for $\gamma<0$ and $|\gamma/\delta|\le 1$, the dynamical system (3.2) has two infinite families of fixed points along $\varphi=\pi/2$. The first family, $C_{c1}(\gamma,\delta)$, consists of stable spirals or stable nodes that correspond to classically stable de Sitter vacua, while the second family, $D_{c2}(\gamma,\delta)$, consists of saddles corresponding to potential maxima. These de Sitter vacua exist precisely when $\gamma/\delta\in[-1,-0.3365)$; at $|\gamma/\delta|=1$ the two families degenerate into a single family of saddle points, which the authors identify as a bifurcation. In the string and brane compactification model with a square-root-plus-cosine potential, additional fixed points of the same stable and saddle types appear only when $\beta\le 1/(2\pi)$; for realistic exponentially suppressed worldsheet instantons, the dynamics reduces to the linear-like case. The paper also identifies initial conditions that yield slow-roll inflation lasting about 50 to 60 e-foldings.

Load-bearing premise

The classification of the first family of fixed points as stable nodes rests on an inequality in Appendix B, stated without proof, that the negative eigenvalue $-3$ always dominates the square-root discriminant over the entire allowed parameter region; if that inequality fails anywhere, the stable-node label for those vacua would be wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $|\gamma/\delta|\ge 1$, the modulated system inherits the unstable and saddle fixed points of the linear-axion potential, so inflation there requires tuned initial conditions to achieve 50 to 60 e-foldings.
  • For $|\gamma/\delta|\le 1$ with $\gamma/\delta\in[-1,-0.3365)$, there is an infinite discrete family of classically stable de Sitter vacua with decreasing potential minima, and post-inflationary tunneling could move the universe down this ladder toward a near-Minkowski vacuum.
  • At $|\gamma/\delta|=1$, the two fixed-point families merge into a family of saddles, so no stable de Sitter endpoint exists on that boundary.
  • In the string and brane compactification model, extra stable and saddle fixed points require $\beta\le 1/(2\pi)$; for the physically expected exponentially suppressed worldsheet instantons, only the linear-like infinity points survive, yielding metastable inflation with the phenomenologically desired 50 to 60 e-foldings.
  • During the inflationary phase the slow-roll conditions hold, with the axion field value and its velocity staying in the ranges $|b|/M_{\rm Pl}\sim O(10)$ and $\dot b/(H_I M_{\rm Pl})\sim O(10^{-1})$, consistent with a cosmologically inferred inflation lifetime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the descending ladder of de Sitter minima suggests a vacuum-cascade mechanism for relaxing the cosmological constant, but the paper does not compute tunneling rates between adjacent minima; adding instanton actions for these transitions would show whether the cascade can complete within a Hubble time.
  • Inference: the fixed-point map for the string compactification model implies that if future observations or model-building requirements need additional stable de Sitter points, they would force worldsheet-instanton scales far larger than the usual exponentially suppressed values, effectively excluding the standard compactification regime.
  • Inference: The same dynamical-system treatment could be applied to two-axion models with different scale hierarchies; because the paper's conclusion notes that such models produce distinguishing gravitational-wave profiles, the fixed-point classification could predict which hierarchy supports metastable inflation and which does not.
  • Inference: The Minkowski endpoint at $\gamma/\delta\simeq -0.3365$ is a concrete target for future tests: a numerical evolution or lattice simulation that watches a modulated axion potential settle to a zero-potential minimum would discriminate this scenario from a purely linear monodromy potential.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies flat FLRW cosmologies with a single canonically normalized axion field and periodically modulated monodromy potentials of the form V(b)=Λ0^3 b + Λ1^4 cos(b/fb), and a compactification-axion analog of the form V(φa)=Λ2^4 ℓ^2 sqrt(1+(φa/(ℓ^2 fa))^2)+Λws^4 cos(φa/(2πfa)). Using expansion-normalized variables x=cos φ and a compactified field variable ζ, the authors reduce the Friedmann-Klein-Gordon system to two-dimensional autonomous systems, (3.2) and (6.7). For the linear-plus-cosine potential they identify critical points O1, A1, B1 and two one-parameter families C_c1(γ,δ), D_c2(γ,δ) for |γ/δ|≤1, classify the C family as stable spirals/nodes and the D family as saddles, analyze the degenerate |γ/δ|=1 case by center-manifold methods, and derive a de Sitter existence window γ/δ∈[-1,-0.3365). They then construct inflationary trajectories with O(50-60) e-foldings in several parameter regimes, discuss the interpretation of the C family as a discrete sequence of de Sitter vacua accessible by tunneling, and extend the analysis to the string/brane compactification-axion model. Appendices provide eigenvalue formulas, the purely cosine case, and center-manifold calculations for two special cases.

Significance. If the classification is fully established, the paper provides a useful catalogue of fixed-point structures for a class of modulated axion potentials, going beyond the linear-potential analysis of Ref. [7]. The main technical strengths are the explicit general eigenvalue expressions in Appendix B, the nontrivial center-manifold treatment of the degenerate |γ/δ|=1 case, and the clear numerical phase portraits and tables for representative parameters. The work is also honest about the speculative status of the tunneling interpretation and about the approximate character of the mapping from the Chern-Simons condensate model to the simple scalar-field system. The principal weakness is that the stable-node classification of the C_c1 family rests on an inequality, Eq. (B5), that is stated without proof or numerical verification over the full allowed parameter region. This is a local, fixable gap: the inequality appears to be equivalent to the de Sitter positivity condition at the corresponding minimum, but the equivalence is not shown. The paper does not ship code, but the numerical tables are reproducible in principle from the displayed formulas.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B, Eq. (B5)] The assertion |−3| > sqrt(f1(γ,δ,c1)) is load-bearing for the stable-node entry of Table III, yet it is stated without proof. Writing a=−γ/δ>0, θ=arcsin(a), and q=sqrt(1−a²), the numerator of the fractional term inside f1 is proportional to q[q − a((2c1+1)π − θ)]. Hence (B5) is equivalent to a((2c1+1)π − θ) − q > 0, which is precisely the condition V(b1)>0 at the corresponding minimum. This equivalence should be stated and proved; alternatively, the authors should provide a numerical scan of (B5) over the full allowed domain, including |γ/δ| near 0.3365, several values of δ, and a range of c1. Without one of these, the stable-node classification of the entire C_c1 family is not fully supported.
  2. [Section III A, Eq. (3.10), and Figure 1 caption] The statement that the de Sitter condition 'is positive only when γ/δ ∈ [−1,−0.3365)' is correct only for the c1=0 minimum. For fixed γ/δ with −0.3365 < γ/δ < 0, minima with sufficiently large c1 still satisfy V>0 and are stable fixed points of the same C_c1 family. For example, with δ=10 and γ=−3.2 (γ/δ=−0.32), the c1=1 point has ζ≃0.524 and V>0, while the c1=0 minimum has V<0. The paper should therefore clarify that (3.10) is the condition for the shallowest minimum to be de Sitter, i.e. for the monotone tunneling sequence to have a Minkowski endpoint, and not a condition for the existence of all stable de Sitter vacua in the C family. The caption 'Only de-Sitter vacua appear for...' should be rephrased accordingly.
  3. [Section II, Eqs. (2.2)-(2.12)] The mapping from the Chern-Simons condensate model to the scalar-field system (2.6)-(2.8) is explicitly approximate: the Cotton-tensor terms of the gravitational CS anomaly are absent from the dynamical system, and the consistency argument is based on the slow-roll estimate (2.12). This is acknowledged in the text, and the main classification claims do not depend on the CS embedding. Still, because the abstract and introduction motivate the modulated potential through the CS condensate, it would strengthen the paper to state more clearly which results of Section VII, if any, rely on the CS interpretation rather than on the independent scalar-field system.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical glitches, e.g. 'F ormalism' in the Section II heading, 'dbrane' in the Section VI heading, and 'Friedman-Lemaˆitre' in the abstract; these should be corrected in a final pass.
  2. [Section III A, below Eq. (3.5)] The sentence 'we have further assumed that ζ, γ, δ ≠ 0, 2' is confusing: the value 2 does not appear to play a role, and the intended statement is that the denominators in (3.5) are nonzero. Please rewrite.
  3. [Appendix B, D-family eigenvalues] In the displayed eigenvalues for D_c2(γ,δ), the denominator contains '- 2πc2γ + γ arcsin(γ/δ)', while the numerator contains '- 2πc2γδ sqrt(...)'; the notational correspondence between the two expressions should be checked and made uniform.
  4. [Section VI, Eq. (6.12)] The bound β ≤ 1/(2π) for the existence of extra critical points follows from bounding the first term in (6.12) by 2πβ, but this one-line derivation is not given; adding it would improve readability.
  5. [Tables I and II] The tables list only γ=−3.7, δ=10. A short statement in the text that this parameter choice is representative, and that the analytic eigenvalue formulas of Appendix B cover the general case, would help readers judge the scope of the numerical support.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the stability classification of the C_{c1}/D_{c2} fixed-point families and the de Sitter window (3.10) are derived in-paper from the stated potential and Jacobian; self-citations to [7]/[23] support only boundary-point and phenomenological side-claims, and the unproven inequality (B5) in Appendix B is a proof gap, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained: the dynamical system (3.2) follows from the stated potential (2.11) through standard expansion-normalized variables; the fixed-point families C_{c1}(gamma,delta) and D_{c2}(gamma,delta) are obtained by solving the algebraic fixed-point condition (3.4); and the stability classification in Table III follows from the eigenvalues of the in-paper Jacobian (3.11), computed in Appendix B, together with in-paper center-manifold analyses for the degenerate cases |gamma/delta|=1 (Appendix C.1) and alpha=0 (Appendix C.2). The de Sitter existence window gamma/delta in [-1,-0.3365) is the direct numerical consequence of the inequality (3.9) on the potential at its minimum, not an imported or fitted result. Parameters gamma, delta, alpha, beta are scanned rather than tuned to pre-selected outputs, and Tables I-II illustrate the analytic eigenvalue formulas rather than fit them; no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. The self-citations to the authors' prior work [7] and [23] are real but peripheral: [7] supplies the stability of the zeta=0 boundary points O1/A1/B1 (Section III.A) and the linear-axion limit, while [23] supplies the phenomenological string-scale and spectral-index side-claims; neither feeds the novel C/D stability classification or the bifurcation structure, which are derived in this paper. The single flagged weakness, inequality (B5) in Appendix B asserted without proof for the stable-node branch, is a mathematical completeness gap rather than a circularity: the discriminant f1 is not manifestly bounded in the node region, so the claim could fail in some corner of parameter space, but the claim is not defined in terms of itself, nor is it forced by a self-citation. The Liouville discrete-inflation analogy is explicitly disclaimed as non-derived (Section IV.B). Accordingly the circularity score is 2: the paper contains several minor self-citations that carry peripheral claims, but the central stability classification does not reduce to them.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The classification itself has no fitted parameters; γ, δ, α, β are scanned model parameters. The paper's central claims rest on the standard EN-variable formalism, on the model assumption that the modulated potential describes the axion system, on the branch restriction b<0, and on an unproved eigenvalue inequality (B5) in Appendix B.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The FLRW background and single canonical scalar field with potential (2.11) capture the relevant inflationary dynamics of the Chern-Simons condensate model despite Cotton-tensor corrections.
    Section II (between Eqs. (2.10) and (2.11)) acknowledges non-trivial Cotton tensor components but argues slow-roll condition (2.12) makes the standard Friedmann-Klein-Gordon system approximately valid.
  • domain assumption The potential V(b)=Λ0^3 b + Λ1^4 cos(b/fb) is the effective single-axion potential over the field range of interest.
    Equation (2.11); the abstract itself says 'allegedly induced by non-perturbative instanton configurations.'
  • domain assumption The change of variables eλ=-1/(κb) and the restriction to b<0 (eλ≥0) with ζ∈[0,1) covers all relevant de Sitter vacua for γ<0; the non-invertibility of λ(b) is handled by restricting to intervals where V≠0 and b≠0.
    Equations (2.24)-(2.27) and Section III; the branch b<0 is selected and the analysis is repeated for eλ<0 in Section V.
  • ad hoc to paper The inequality |−3| > sqrt(f1(γ,δ,c1)) holds throughout the allowed parameter region, so the C-family eigenvalues both have negative real part.
    Appendix B, Eq. (B5): asserted without proof; the stable-node classification for large c1 depends on it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamical-System analysis of single-axion monodromy inflation with periodically-modulated potentials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E5VBJ6HZ

@misc{pith2026250702746,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamical-System analysis of single-axion monodromy inflation with periodically-modulated potentials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E5VBJ6HZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02746}
}
abstract

In this work, we study field theoretic systems of a single axion-like field with linear potentials modulated by cosine terms, allegedly induced by non-perturbative instanton configurations. These systems are considered in expanding-Universe spacetime backgrounds (of Friedman-Lema$\hat{\rm i}$tre-Robertson-Walker type). Using a dynamical-system approach, we classify the various de-Sitter like (inflationary) vacua from the point of view of their stability, which depend on the values of the model parameters. In this respect, bifurcation points are found to be present for the various models under consideration. Part of the parameter space of the systems under consideration includes the running-vacuum (approximately) linear-axion monodromy potentials, considered in previous works by some of the authors, where inflation is induced by primordial gravitational-wave condensates. A particularly interesting case, corresponding to another part of the parameter space of the models, includes a series of stable de-Sitter vacua, which physically may correspond to a series of successive tunnelings of the system, via say non-perturbative effects, with a decreasing effective cosmological constant. Under certain values of the parameters, these successive tunnelings can reach a Minkowski spacetime, with zero value of the minimum of the axion potential. The situation is not dissimilar to the one of discrete inflation that arguably characterizes some minimal non-critical-string (Liouville) models of cosmology. Finally, for comparison, we also include in this article a dynamical-system study of standard axion-monodromy-modulated potentials characterizing some string/brane-compactification models of inflation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.02746 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left panel: Only de-Sitter vacua appear for −1 ≤ γ/δ < −0.3365 and b/fb < 0. The series of vacua correspond to a decreasing effective cosmological constant, with a Minkowski end-point for γ/δ ≃ −0.3365. Right panel: For |γ/δ| ≥ 1, the linear term dominates and periodic modulations appear due to the instanton induced cosine potential. A study of this function of γ/δ, reveals that it is positive only when γ δ ∈ [−1 , … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Phase space (left panel) and EoS (right panel) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Phase space (left panel) and EoS (right panel) for the model corresponding to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Upper panel: Phase space for γ = −3.7 and δ = 10. There are trajectories which lead to eternal inflation classically (e.g. the purple-colored curve), while others (the green-colored curve) avoid it. Middle and Lower panels: specific regions of the phase portrait, demon…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: EoS for different values of φi , ζi for γ = −3.7 and δ = 10. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Phase Portrait for = -60 and = 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 N = loga 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 b Equation of state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase space (left panel) and EoS (right panel) for initial conditions ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The plots correspond to the case in figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: As in figure 7, but for the the case depicted in figure 3, with initial conditions φi = 0.01, and different values of ζi. The slow-roll conditions of inflation are demonstrated. Liouville-string cosmologies [34], based on unitary minimal conformal models as their “inte…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: As in figures 7, 8 but for the model depicted in figure 6, corresponding to the initial conditions φi = 0.01, ζi = 0.065. Again, the satisfaction of the slow-roll conditions during inflation is evident. universe finds itself in one of these vacua. From then on, it evol…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Phase space of (5.2) for |γ/δ| ≤ 1 (left panel) and for |γ/δ| ≥ 1 (right panel). VI. String/dbrane inspired potential for compactification axions In this final section we use the dynamical-system formalism to study the following potential, arising in string theory sce…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Potential (6.1) for different choice of parameters which has immediate effect on phase space and the relevant cosmologies. Note that the parameter β is responsible for the appearance or not of the infinite series of critical points in the potential, where β = 1/2π cor…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Phase space of dynamical system (6.8) for different initial conditions. Not all initial conditions result in eternal de-Sitter-like spacetimes, like the blue curve corresponding to the initial conditions φi = 0.10, ζi = 0.50. Now, we make some general comments regardi…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Phase space (left panel) and EoS (right panel) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The plots correspond to the string/brane-inspired case of figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Phase space for purely cosine case for two values of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_15.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards a unified quantum field theory of dark energy and inflation: unstable de Sitter vacuum and running vacuum

    gr-qc 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The vacuum energy of quantum fields, computed exactly in de Sitter spacetime and then allowed to decay into radiation, can drive H^4-powered inflation and leave a slowly running dark energy δρ_vac ~ m_Pl^2 H^2, unifyi...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [7]

    Bouhmadi-L´ opez, J

    M. Bouhmadi-L´ opez, J. Marto, J. Morais, and C. M. Silva, JCAP 03, 042 (2017), arXiv:1611.03100 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2017

  2. [1]

    0 √ 6 2 ζ2 3 1 1 # , P−1 =  − 2 ζ2 3√ 6 1 2 ζ2 3√ 6 0   , D =

    Stability analysis for |γ/δ| = 1 case First, we examine the case when |γ/δ| = 1, whereupon the dynamical system (3.2) becomes : φ′ =  3 cosφ − r 3 2   ζ − ζ sin (1−ζ) ζ δ 1 − ζ + ζ 1 δ cos (1−ζ) ζ δ     sin φ ζ ′ = √ 6 cos φ ζ2 . (C1) Except for the fixed points at infinity ( i.e. ζ = 0), the system (C1) possesses also one family of critical point...

    work page

  3. [2]

    −3 cos(2θ) 0 − √ 6 ζ 2 cos(θ) −2 √ 6 ζ sin(θ) # ⇒ J|θ=0 ζ=0 =

    Stability analysis for the α = 0 (infinite-compactification-radius) case of the string/brane-inspired model of [28] To study this case, we use center manifold theory [1, 30, 31] upon focusing on the A 2 = (π/2, 0) fixed point of the dynamical system (6.8). The procedure is the same as before. We ”move” the point, via a coordinate transformation, to the or...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Bahamonde, C

    S. Bahamonde, C. G. B¨ ohmer, S. Carloni, E. J. Copeland, W. Fang, and N. Tamanini, Phys. Rept. 775-777, 1 (2018), arXiv:1712.03107 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [4]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, Phys. Dark Univ. 5-6, 75 (2014), arXiv:1303.3787 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [5]

    Constructing dark energy models with late time de Sitter attractor

    J.-g. Hao and X.-z. Li, Phys. Rev. D 68, 083514 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0306033

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  7. [6]

    Scalar field cosmology in phase space

    V. Faraoni and C. S. Protheroe, Gen. Rel. Grav. 45, 103 (2013), arXiv:1209.3726 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    M. W. Hossain and A. Maqsood, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103512 (2024), arXiv:2311.17825 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Dorlis, N

    P. Dorlis, N. E. Mavromatos, and S.-N. Vlachos, Phys. Rev. D 110, 063512 (2024), arXiv:2403.09005 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Basilakos, N

    S. Basilakos, N. E. Mavromatos, and J. Sol` a Peracaula, Phys. Rev. D 101, 045001 (2020), arXiv:1907.04890 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Basilakos, N

    S. Basilakos, N. E. Mavromatos, and J. Sol` a Peracaula, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135342 (2020), arXiv:2001.03465 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    N. E. Mavromatos and J. Sol` a Peracaula, Eur. Phys. J. ST 230, 2077 (2021), arXiv:2012.07971 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [13]

    N. E. Mavromatos and J. Sol` a Peracaula, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 1152 (2021), arXiv:2105.02659 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    N. E. Mavromatos, Lect. Notes Phys. 1017, 3 (2023), arXiv:2205.07044 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Jackiw and S

    R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. D 68, 104012 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0308071

    2003 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Alexander and N

    S. Alexander and N. Yunes, Phys. Rept. 480, 1 (2009), arXiv:0907.2562 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Svrcek and E

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, JHEP 06, 051 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605206

    2006 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Sola Peracaula, Phil

    J. Sola Peracaula, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 380, 20210182 (2022), arXiv:2203.13757 [gr-qc]. 35

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Moreno-Pulido, J

    C. Moreno-Pulido, J. Sola Peracaula, and S. Cheraghchi, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 637 (2023), arXiv:2301.05205 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    G´ omez-Valent, N

    A. G´ omez-Valent, N. E. Mavromatos, and J. Sol` a Peracaula, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 015026 (2024), arXiv:2305.15774 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Sola Peracaula, A

    J. Sola Peracaula, A. Gomez-Valent, J. de Cruz Perez, and C. Moreno-Pulido, Universe 9, 262 (2023), arXiv:2304.11157 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    M. J. Duncan, N. Kaloper, and K. A. Olive, Nucl. Phys. B 387, 215 (1992)

    1992

  16. [24]

    Bedroya and C

    A. Bedroya and C. Vafa, JHEP 09, 123 (2020), arXiv:1909.11063 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Dorlis, N

    P. Dorlis, N. E. Mavromatos, and S.-N. Vlachos, Universe 11, 15 (2025), arXiv:2411.12519 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B 766, 21 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0605264

    2007 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Ooguri, E

    H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu, and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 788, 180 (2019), arXiv:1810.05506 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Palti, Fortsch

    E. Palti, Fortsch. Phys. 67, 1900037 (2019), arXiv:1903.06239 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    S. K. Garg and C. Krishnan, JHEP 11, 075 (2019), arXiv:1807.05193 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    McAllister, E

    L. McAllister, E. Silverstein, and A. Westphal, Phys. Rev. D 82, 046003 (2010), arXiv:0808.0706 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Eguchi, P

    T. Eguchi, P. B. Gilkey, and A. J. Hanson, Phys. Rept. 66, 213 (1980)

    1980

  24. [32]

    C. G. Boehmer, T. Harko, and S. V. Sabau, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 16, 1145 (2012), arXiv:1010.5464 [math-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  25. [33]

    C. G. Boehmer, N. Chan, and R. Lazkoz, Phys. Lett. B 714, 11 (2012), arXiv:1111.6247 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Dynamical systems in cosmology

    C. G. Boehmer and N. Chan, “Dynamical systems in cosmology.” (2017) arXiv:1409.5585 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  27. [35]

    S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Engineering, 1st ed. (Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 2000)

    2000

  28. [36]

    Antoniadis, C

    I. Antoniadis, C. Bachas, J. R. Ellis, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. B 211, 393 (1988)

    1988

  29. [37]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, Vol. 55 (Courier Corporation, 1965)

    1965

  30. [38]

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang, and C. Vafa, (2022), arXiv:2212.06187 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Z. Zhou, J. Jiang, Y.-F. Cai, M. Sasaki, and S. Pi, Phys. Rev. D 102, 103527 (2020), arXiv:2010.03537 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    N. E. Mavromatos, V. C. Spanos, and I. D. Stamou, Phys. Rev. D 106, 063532 (2022), arXiv:2206.07963 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D 73, 064030 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0512160

    2006 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Crowder and N

    J. Crowder and N. J. Cornish, Phys. Rev. D 72, 083005 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0506015

    2005 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, 3rd ed

    L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, 3rd ed. (Springer-Verlag, 2001) https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-1-4613-0003-8

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.