REVIEW
Experimental Study on CTL model checking using Machine Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Experimental Study on CTL model checking using Machine Learning
read the original abstract
The existing core methods, which are employed by the popular CTL model checking tools, are facing the famous state explode problem. In our previous study, a method based on the Machine Learning (ML) algorithms was proposed to address this problem. However, the accuracy is not satisfactory. First, we conduct a comprehensive experiment on Graph Lab to seek the optimal accuracy using the five machine learning algorithms. Second, given the optimal accuracy, the average time is seeked. The results show that the Logistic Regressive (LR)-based approach can simulate CTL model checking with the accuracy of 98.8%, and its average efficiency is 459 times higher than that of the existing method, as well as the Boosted Tree (BT)-based approach can simulate CTL model checking with the accuracy of 98.7%, and its average efficiency is 639 times higher than that of the existing method.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.