Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The HulC: Confidence Regions from Convex Hulls

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.14577 v2 pith:E74Z5U7D submitted 2021-05-30 math.ST stat.COstat.MEstat.TH

The HulC: Confidence Regions from Convex Hulls

classification math.ST stat.COstat.MEstat.TH
keywords hulcconfidencesetsadaptivecasesestimatorsanalyzebootstrap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop and analyze the HulC, an intuitive and general method for constructing confidence sets using the convex hull of estimates constructed from subsets of the data. Unlike classical methods which are based on estimating the (limiting) distribution of an estimator, the HulC is often simpler to use and effectively bypasses this step. In comparison to the bootstrap, the HulC requires fewer regularity conditions and succeeds in many examples where the bootstrap provably fails. Unlike subsampling, the HulC does not require knowledge of the rate of convergence of the estimators on which it is based. The validity of the HulC requires knowledge of the (asymptotic) median-bias of the estimators. We further analyze a variant of our basic method, called the Adaptive HulC, which is fully data-driven and estimates the median-bias using subsampling. We show that the Adaptive HulC retains the aforementioned strengths of the HulC. In certain cases where the underlying estimators are pathologically asymmetric the HulC and Adaptive HulC can fail to provide useful confidence sets. We propose a final variant, the Unimodal HulC, which can salvage the situation in cases where the distribution of the underlying estimator is (asymptotically) unimodal. We discuss these methods in the context of several challenging inferential problems which arise in parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric inference. Although our focus is on validity under weak regularity conditions, we also provide some general results on the width of the HulC confidence sets, showing that in many cases the HulC confidence sets have near-optimal width.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Risk-Controlled Post-Processing of Decision Policies

    stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Risk-controlled post-processing yields a threshold-structured policy that follows the baseline except where an oracle fallback sharply reduces conditional violation risk, achieving O(log n/n) expected excess risk in i...

  2. When Does Trial-Real-World Data Fusion Improve Precision? Model Auditing and Selection-Aware Inference for Adaptive-TMLE

    stat.ME 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Under A-TMLE, RCT+RWD efficiency gain is driven by bias magnitude not complexity, crosses break-even near one residual SD of bias, erodes with sample size, and only a block jackknife gives honest intervals for the gain.

  3. When Does Trial-Real-World Data Fusion Improve Precision? Model Auditing and Selection-Aware Inference for Adaptive-TMLE

    stat.ME 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Fusing trial and real-world data improves precision only for small real-world bias and small trials, and only a conservative block-jackknife interval gives honest uncertainty for that gain.