REVIEW 3 cited by
TREC iKAT 2023: The Interactive Knowledge Assistance Track Overview
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Conversational Information Seeking has evolved rapidly in the last few years with the development of Large Language Models providing the basis for interpreting and responding in a naturalistic manner to user requests. iKAT emphasizes the creation and research of conversational search agents that adapt responses based on the user's prior interactions and present context. This means that the same question might yield varied answers, contingent on the user's profile and preferences. The challenge lies in enabling Conversational Search Agents (CSA) to incorporate personalized context to effectively guide users through the relevant information to them. iKAT's first year attracted seven teams and a total of 24 runs. Most of the runs leveraged Large Language Models (LLMs) in their pipelines, with a few focusing on a generate-then-retrieve approach.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Adaptive Personalized Conversational Information Retrieval
Explicit per-turn personalization level detection plus per-level weighted fusion of personalized and non-personalized query rewrites improves retrieval on TREC iKAT 2023 and 2024.
-
RALI@TREC iKAT 2024: Achieving Personalization via Retrieval Fusion in Conversational Search
Fusing BM25 rankings from non-personalized, expanded, and personalized query rewrites achieved the best passage retrieval scores for RALI at TREC iKAT 2024, though no ablation isolates the fusion effect.
-
Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap
A survey that organizes LLM-powered deep research agents into static versus dynamic workflows and single versus multi agent architectures, and reviews their benchmarks and open challenges.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.