Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

The paper argues that LHCb's forward VELO detector can discover quirks — heavy particles joined by a hidden-flux-tube string — in the Λ∼1000 eV region that central LHC detectors cannot reach.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 10:42 UTC pith:E7W4T5PV

load-bearing objection A credible, well-scoped proposal, but the headline reach rests on a background-free assumption that is argued qualitatively, not demonstrated—cite it as a proposal, not as an existing constraint. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2601.09023 v2 pith:E7W4T5PV submitted 2026-01-13 hep-ph hep-ex

Searching for Quirks at LHCb

Xabier Cid Vidal , Miguel Fern\'andez G\'omez , Matthew Low , Alejandro Novo Cal , Yuhsin Tsai , Carlos V\'azquez Sierra This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords quirkshidden confining forceflux tubelong-lived particlesLHCb VELOforward physicssoftware triggerneutral naturalness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Quirks are hypothetical heavy particles charged under both the Standard Model and a new confining force; a produced quirk–antiquirk pair is connected by a flux tube that stretches and pulls the pair back, creating macroscopic, oscillating trajectories. The paper proposes that LHCb's forward Vertex Locator (VELO), with its fine pixel resolution and fully software-based trigger, is uniquely suited to seeing the resulting signature: pairs of hits in successive detector stations that are back-to-back in azimuth and lie in a single plane. Using a toy simulation of the VELO geometry, the authors project that requiring at least five such co-planar, back-to-back hit pairs selects quirks efficiently across the mass–confinement plane without needing initial-state radiation. They conclude that with 10 fb⁻¹ (2026) or 300 fb⁻¹ (HL-LHC) LHCb would set the first dedicated constraints on quirks in the Λ∼1000 eV region, complementing existing central-detector searches. A sympathetic reader would care because this is a concrete, near-term path to testing hidden-sector models — neutral naturalness and dark matter — that otherwise have no dedicated search in that parameter range.

Core claim

Quirks are heavy particles charged under both the Standard Model and a new confining force; when produced as a pair they are connected by a flux tube whose tension pulls them back after they separate. The paper's central claim is that this string-like dynamics, combined with the forward boost at LHCb, produces a distinctive experimental signature: back-to-back, planar hits in successive VELO stations with little transverse recoil, unlike any Standard Model track. Using a toy simulation of the VELO geometry with ~10 µm hit resolution, the authors show that requiring at least five consecutive modules with nearly opposite azimuthal hits and small radial separation selects quirk events with high

What carries the argument

The load-bearing experimental object is the VELO, LHCb's vertex detector: 52 pixel modules arranged along the beam pipe with ~10 µm single-hit resolution and no magnetic field, so quirk trajectories between string oscillations are straight. The search selection is a topological hit-pairing algorithm: pair hits in opposite modules, require azimuthal difference near 180°, radial difference below 5 mm, planarity across modules, and at least five consecutive stations containing such pairs. The enabling mechanism is LHCb's fully software-based trigger, which buffers full event information and allows an offline ML-based tracker to reconstruct quirk trajectories and suppress Standard Model backgrou

Load-bearing premise

The projected exclusion contours rest on the assumption, stated in Sections 5 and 6, that after the hit-pair selection and a proposed offline ML filter the background is effectively zero, and that a dedicated quirk trigger will exist in 2026; if either fails, the Λ∼1000 eV reach disappears.

What would settle it

Run a background-only VELO simulation of inelastic proton–proton collisions through the same hit-generation and selection code, requiring at least five consecutive stations with back-to-back planar hits, azimuthal difference near 180°, and radial difference below 5 mm, plus an ML filter modeled on real LHCb data. If that rate exceeds a few events per 10 fb⁻¹, the background-free assumption underlying the 95% CL contours is falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the background-free assumption holds, LHCb's 2026 dataset (10 fb⁻¹) alone would set the first dedicated constraints on quirks with hidden-confinement scales near 1000 eV, a region existing central-detector searches leave essentially open.
  • Because the selection does not rely on initial-state radiation, LHCb can collect quirk pairs produced with little transverse recoil — events that standard central-detector triggers discard.
  • A successful search would tie neutral naturalness and dark-matter models that predict quirks to a concrete discovery channel in the forward region.
  • The same VELO hit-pair topology, once implemented as a trigger line, would remain usable through Run 4 and improve with the 4D timing of the future VELO upgrade.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the geometric selection is largely model-independent for any pair of long-lived charged particles moving on a plane through the beam axis, so the projected reach could be recast as a generic forward-region constraint on string-connected hidden-sector states, not only quirks.
  • Inference: the strongest near-term test of this projection is empirical: before 2026, LHCb could inject simulated quirk hits into real VELO background events and measure how often the five-station selection survives, turning the assumed background-free hypothesis into a measured efficiency.
  • Inference: if the offline ML tracker achieves the assumed discrimination, the same buffered-trigger architecture could extend LHCb's reach to other non-prompt, non-pointing exotic signatures, such as dark photons or axion-like particles decaying to collimated pairs.
  • Inference: the paper's assumption of 100% detection efficiency for charged quirks ignores energy loss and stopping; a dedicated simulation of ionization and hadronic interactions would likely soften the projected contours at low Λ, where quirks oscillate over longer distances.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a search for quirks at LHCb using the VELO vertex detector. Quirk pairs in the forward region are expected to produce back-to-back, planar hit patterns across multiple VELO stations. The authors simulate quirk trajectories with a standalone toy model of the VELO geometry, apply geometric selections (≥5 stations with back-to-back hits, small Δr and Δφ), assume a background-free selection, and derive 95% CL sensitivity projections for 10 fb^-1 (2026) and 300 fb^-1 (HL-LHC) using the Feldman-Cousins method. The central claim is that LHCb can probe quirk parameter space, especially around Λ ~ 1000 eV, that is inaccessible to existing ATLAS and CMS searches.

Significance. If the background-free assumption and the simplified efficiency model are validated, the proposed search would provide a genuinely novel forward-region probe of quirk parameter space, complementary to central-detector searches. The paper introduces a concrete geometric signature and a clear projection framework, grounded in the LHCb trigger architecture. It also discusses data-driven control channels for material backgrounds. However, the central numerical claim of 'unprecedented sensitivity' depends on at least two load-bearing assumptions that are asserted rather than demonstrated: the background is reduced to negligible levels, and the 100% detection efficiency for charged quirks. The paper would benefit from quantitative background estimates and a robustness study of the sensitivity contours against these assumptions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5 and Section 6, Fig. 2] The sensitivity contours are computed with the Feldman-Cousins method under a background-free hypothesis, but the background study is qualitative: 'only a handful of candidates survive' with no event counts, no ML performance metrics, no trigger-rate estimates, and no scaling to 10 or 300 fb^-1. Because the zero-background limit is a direct input to Figure 2, any residual background shifts the projected reach. The paper itself acknowledges in the conclusions that 'further studies will be necessary to fully validate the background-free hypothesis.' Please quantify the expected background yield after the full selection and show the sensitivity for, e.g., 1 or 3 expected background events, or otherwise demonstrate that the background is below the O(0.1) level.
  2. [Section 6] The signal yield uses 'a simplified assumption of 100% detection efficiency for quirks with electric charge QE = ±1, regardless of their mass.' No energy loss, multiple scattering, charge misidentification, or tracking efficiency is modeled. Since this efficiency multiplies the signal linearly, and the 30% charged-hadronisation fraction from Ref. [13] is taken without uncertainty, the absolute normalization of the sensitivity contours in Figure 2 is not robust. Please provide a detector-efficiency map as a function of (m_Q, Λ) or show the sensitivity band corresponding to a reasonable range of efficiencies (e.g., 50–100%).
  3. [Section 4] The near-term 2026 projection assumes 'we hypothesize that a trigger for quirks could be developed.' The LHCb software trigger has finite bandwidth, and no rate estimate for the proposed hit-level criteria is given. Without a trigger-rate estimate, the 10 fb^-1 sensitivity projection is not operationally grounded. The ultimate 300 fb^-1 projection is less affected, but the paper should state this assumption more cautiously and quantify the rate at which the proposed selection would pass the trigger.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 2 caption] Typo: 'Bounds are showed' should be 'Bounds are shown.'
  2. [Section 5] Typo: 'inconsecutive VELO stations' should be 'in consecutive VELO stations.'
  3. [Section 4] The selection criteria (Δr < 5 mm, Δφ near 180°, ≥5 stations) are described in prose but not collected in a table. A summary table would improve reproducibility.
  4. [Section 4] The 'standalone code' is not provided. For a projection paper, this is acceptable, but a short appendix with the simulation parameters or a link to the code would make the study reproducible.
  5. [References] Reference [19] has a spacing issue ('F ASER2'); also the arXiv number format for the paper itself is unusual but likely reflects the submission system.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the LHCb sensitivity projections are conditional consequences of explicitly stated inputs (external quirk dynamics, assumed 30% charged hadronisation fraction, and an assumed background-free hypothesis), not quantities derived from themselves.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: take the quirk flux-tube dynamics and benchmark from external literature (refs [12,13]); simulate hits in the VELO geometry; apply geometric selections to get efficiencies; multiply by luminosity, cross-section, and the assumed 30% charged-hadronisation fraction; then set Feldman-Cousins 95% CL limits with zero background. Each of these ingredients is stated as an input or taken from an external, published benchmark. No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed a prediction, and there is no equation in which an output quantity is defined in terms of itself. The background-free hypothesis is asserted in Section 5 ('we assume a background-free hypothesis') and used in Section 6, but the paper explicitly labels it as an assumption to be validated ('further studies will be necessary to fully validate the background-free hypothesis'). If that assumption fails, the reach would shrink, but that is an unvalidated assumption or correctness risk, not circularity. The 100% detection efficiency and the hypothesized 2026 trigger are likewise explicit assumptions rather than disguised outputs. The self-citations (e.g., refs [4], [12], [17]) are published external results and are not used as uniqueness theorems or as unverified ansätze that carry the derivation. The central claim is therefore a conditional projection, not a circular derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's reach is computed from prior-literature model dynamics plus several hand-chosen efficiencies and cuts. No parameters are fitted to data, so the ledger is dominated by domain assumptions and selection choices. No new particles, forces, or mediators are introduced; quirks are taken from prior literature.

free parameters (5)
  • Charged hadronisation fraction = 0.3
    Assumed 30% of quirks form charged particles, taken from benchmarks in Reference [13]; directly scales the signal yield (Section 6).
  • Quirk detection efficiency = 1.0
    Assumed 100% detection efficiency for Q_E=±1 quirks regardless of mass; authors note detailed material interaction studies are needed (Section 6).
  • Minimum VELO stations with paired hits = 5
    Selection threshold chosen by hand; controls background vs signal efficiency (Sections 4, 6).
  • Radial difference cut Δr = < 5 mm
    Geometric selection on paired-hit radial separation, chosen to reject combinatorial backgrounds (Section 4).
  • Azimuthal difference cut Δφ = ≈ 180°
    Back-to-back requirement; max Δφ variation across modules used for planarity (Section 4).
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Quirk flux-tube dynamics (string tension pulls pair back at separation ℓ ~ m_Q/Λ²)
    Central model from refs [1–3,12,13]; the signal topology, pair multiplicity, and acceptance depend on it (Section 1).
  • domain assumption No SM-charged states below Λ, so the flux tube does not break by light pair production
    Quirk definition from ref [3]; if the hidden sector has light states, the signature changes (Section 1).
  • domain assumption Confining group SU(N_c) with N_c=2
    Production cross-section scaling adopted from prior literature for comparison (Section 1).
  • domain assumption VELO geometry and 10 μm single-hit resolution as publicly described
    Toy simulation uses refs [46,47]; accuracy of geometry implementation is unverified (Section 4).
  • ad hoc to paper 100% detection efficiency for charged quirks regardless of mass
    Authors say it is a simplified assumption requiring validation (Section 6).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 9238 in / 10559 out tokens · 96487 ms · 2026-08-03T10:42:36.337942+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Quirks are heavy particles connected by a flux tube from a hidden confining force that remain weakly constrained in large regions of their parameter space. This flux tube acts as a string that, at short enough distance, stretches as the quirk pair separates, then pulls the pair back together leading to interesting dynamics. We propose a novel search using the LHCb Vertex Locator (VELO), whose forward geometry and software-based trigger are uniquely suited to detecting the characteristic back-to-back, planar hit patterns produced by quirk pairs with little transverse recoil. Using detailed simulations of the VELO geometry, together with simple geometric selections, we present different sensitivity projections, demonstrating that LHCb can probe parameter regions inaccessible to existing ATLAS and CMS searches and offering a powerful, complementary path toward discovering quirks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. First Search for Quirks at the LHC with FASER

    hep-ex 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    FASER's first search for quirks found no candidates and excluded quirk masses up to ~179 GeV for infracolor confinement scales between 300 eV and 100 keV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Okun,THETONS,Pisma Zh

    L.B. Okun,THETONS,Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.31(1979) 156

    1979

  2. [2]

    Okun,THETA PARTICLES,Nucl

    L.B. Okun,THETA PARTICLES,Nucl. Phys. B173(1980) 1

    1980

  3. [3]

    Kang and M.A

    J. Kang and M.A. Luty,Macroscopic Strings and ’Quirks’ at Colliders,JHEP11(2009) 065 [0805.4642]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    Batell, M

    B. Batell, M. Low, E.T. Neil and C.B. Verhaaren,Review of Neutral Naturalness, in Snowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.05531]. – 9 –

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Cai, H.-C

    H. Cai, H.-C. Cheng and J. Terning,A Quirky Little Higgs Model,JHEP05(2009) 045 [0812.0843]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Burdman, Z

    G. Burdman, Z. Chacko, H.-S. Goh and R. Harnik,Folded supersymmetry and the LEP paradox,JHEP02(2007) 009 [hep-ph/0609152]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  7. [7]

    Burdman, Z

    G. Burdman, Z. Chacko, H.-S. Goh, R. Harnik and C.A. Krenke,The Quirky Collider Signals of Folded Supersymmetry,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 075028 [0805.4667]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Craig, A

    N. Craig, A. Katz, M. Strassler and R. Sundrum,Naturalness in the Dark at the LHC,JHEP 07(2015) 105 [1501.05310]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Craig, S

    N. Craig, S. Knapen, P. Longhi and M. Strassler,The Vector-like Twin Higgs,JHEP07 (2016) 002 [1601.07181]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  10. [10]

    Kribs, T.S

    G.D. Kribs, T.S. Roy, J. Terning and K.M. Zurek,Quirky Composite Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 095001 [0909.2034]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    Asadi, G.D

    P. Asadi, G.D. Kribs and M.A. Luty,Quirks Live in Cool Universes,2512.20696

    arXiv

  12. [12]

    Farina and M

    M. Farina and M. Low,Constraining Quirky Tracks with Conventional Searches,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 111801 [1703.00912]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    Knapen, H.K

    S. Knapen, H.K. Lou, M. Papucci and J. Setford,Tracking down Quirks at the Large Hadron Collider,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 115015 [1708.02243]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Evans and M.A

    J.A. Evans and M.A. Luty,Stopping Quirks at the LHC,JHEP06(2019) 090 [1811.08903]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Curtin, S

    D. Curtin, S. Dreyer, M.F. Costa, S. Heim, G. Kasieczka, L. Moureaux et al.,Quirk SUEP, 2506.11192

    arXiv

  16. [16]

    Condren and D

    L. Condren and D. Whiteson,Finding Unexpected Non-Helical Tracks,2509.08878

    arXiv

  17. [17]

    Forsyth, M

    J. Forsyth, M. Low, C. Tenney and C.B. Verhaaren,Visible collider signals of natural quirks, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 115021 [2504.02940]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Q. Sha, D. Murnane, M. Fieg, S. Tong, M. Zakharyan, Y. Fang et al.,Learning to Reconstruct Quirky Tracks,2410.00269

    arXiv

  19. [19]

    J.L. Feng, J. Li, X. Liao, J. Ni and J. Pei,Discovering quirks through timing at F ASER and future forward experiments at the LHC,JHEP06(2024) 197 [2404.13814]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    J. Li, T. Li, J. Pei and W. Zhang,The quirk trajectory,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 651 [2002.07503]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    J. Li, J. Pei, L. Ran and W. Zhang,The quirk signal at F ASER and F ASER 2,JHEP12 (2021) 109 [2108.06748]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    J. Li, T. Li, J. Pei and W. Zhang,Uncovering quirk signal via energy loss inside tracker, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 056006 [1911.02223]. [23]ATLAScollaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,JINST 3(2008) S08003. [24]CMScollaboration,The CMS Experiment at the CERN LHC,JINST3(2008) S08004

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  23. [25]

    Akiba et al.,The LHCb VELO Upgrade module construction,JINST19(2024) P06023 [2404.13615]

    K. Akiba et al.,The LHCb VELO Upgrade module construction,JINST19(2024) P06023 [2404.13615]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [26]

    [27]CMScollaboration,Search for heavy stable charged particles with12.9 fb −1 of 2016 data,

    LHCb collaboration,The LHCb Detector at the LHC,JINST3(2008) S08005. [27]CMScollaboration,Search for heavy stable charged particles with12.9 fb −1 of 2016 data, . – 10 – [28]ATLAScollaboration,Search for new phenomena in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum inppcollisions at √s= 13TeV using the ATLAS detector,Phys. Rev....

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  25. [30]

    CMS Luminosity Public Results

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS Luminosity Public Results.” https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/LumiPublicResults, 2025

    2025

  26. [31]

    ATLAS Luminosity Public Results Run 3

    ATLAS Collaboration, “ATLAS Luminosity Public Results Run 3.” https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/LuminosityPublicResultsRun3, 2025

    2025

  27. [32]

    LHCb collaboration,Search for massive long-lived particles decaying semileptonically atp (s) = 13TeV,2110.07293

    arXiv

  28. [33]

    LHCb collaboration,Search for long-lived particles decaying toe ±µ∓ν,Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021) 261 [2012.02696]

    arXiv 2021

  29. [34]

    LHCb collaboration,Searches for low-mass dimuon resonances,JHEP10(2020) 156 [2007.03923]

    arXiv 2020

  30. [35]

    LHCb collaboration,Search forA ′ →µ +µ− Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 041801 [1910.06926]

    arXiv 2020

  31. [36]

    LHCb collaboration,Search for Dark Photons Produced in 13 TeVppCollisions,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 061801 [1710.02867]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [37]

    LHCb collaboration,Updated search for long-lived particles decaying to jet pairs,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 812 [1705.07332]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [38]

    LHCb collaboration,Search for massive long-lived particles decaying semileptonically in the LHCb detector,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 224 [1612.00945]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [39]

    LHCb collaboration,Search for Higgs-like bosons decaying into long-lived exotic particles, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 664 [1609.03124]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [40]

    LHCb collaboration,Search for long-lived scalar particles inB + →K +χ(µ+µ−)decays, Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 071101 [1612.07818]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  36. [41]

    LHCb collaboration,Search for Majorana neutrinos inB − →π +µ−µ− decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 131802 [1401.5361]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  37. [42]

    LHCb collaboration,Search for long-lived particles decaying to jet pairs,Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) 152 [1412.3021]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [43]

    LHCb collaboration,Physics case for an LHCb Upgrade II - Opportunities in flavour physics, and beyond, in the HL-LHC era,1808.08865

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [44]

    End of the 2025 proton-proton collision run

    LHCb collaboration, B. Pietrzyk et al., “End of the 2025 proton-proton collision run.” https://lhcb-outreach.web.cern.ch/2025/11/11/ end-of-the-2025-proton-proton-collision-run/, 11, 2025

    2025

  40. [45]

    Aaij et al.,Allen: A high level trigger on GPUs for LHCb,Comput

    R. Aaij et al.,Allen: A high level trigger on GPUs for LHCb,Comput. Softw. Big Sci.4 (2020) 7 [1912.09161]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  41. [46]

    Buchanan et al.,Spatial resolution and efficiency of prototype sensors for the LHCb VELO Upgrade,JINST17(2022) P06038 [2201.12130]

    E. Buchanan et al.,Spatial resolution and efficiency of prototype sensors for the LHCb VELO Upgrade,JINST17(2022) P06038 [2201.12130]. – 11 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [47]

    V. Coco, K. Akiba, J. Back, C. Bertella, A. Bitadze, O. Boente Garc ´ ıa et al.,Velo Upgrade Module Nomenclature, Tech. Rep. LHCb-PUB-2019-008, CERN-LHCb-PUB-2019-008, CERN, Geneva (2019)

    2019

  43. [48]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Ask, J.R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2,Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159 [1410.3012]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [49]

    Alexander et al.,Mapping the material in the LHCb vertex locator using secondary hadronic interactions,JINST13(2018) P06008 [1803.07466]

    M. Alexander et al.,Mapping the material in the LHCb vertex locator using secondary hadronic interactions,JINST13(2018) P06008 [1803.07466]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [50]

    Adinolfi et al.,Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC,Eur

    M. Adinolfi et al.,Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. C73 (2013) 2431 [1211.6759]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  46. [51]

    LHCb collaboration,Search for long-lived heavy charged particles using a ring imaging Cherenkov technique at LHCb,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 595 [1506.09173]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [52]

    Feldman and R.D

    G.J. Feldman and R.D. Cousins,A Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 3873 [physics/9711021]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  48. [53]

    LHCb VELO Upgrade II group collaboration,The LHCb VELO Upgrade II: Design and development of the readout electronics,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A1063(2024) 169238. – 12 –

    2024