REVIEW 2 cited by
On the Effectiveness of Random Weights in Graph Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
On the Effectiveness of Random Weights in Graph Neural Networks
read the original abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse tasks on graph-structured data, primarily through the use of learned weights in message passing layers. In this paper, we demonstrate that random weights can be surprisingly effective, achieving performance comparable to end-to-end training counterparts, across various tasks and datasets. Specifically, we show that by replacing learnable weights with random weights, GNNs can retain strong predictive power, while significantly reducing training time by up to 6$\times$ and memory usage by up to 3$\times$. Moreover, the random weights combined with our construction yield random graph propagation operators, which we show to reduce the problem of feature rank collapse in GNNs. These understandings and empirical results highlight random weights as a lightweight and efficient alternative, offering a compelling perspective on the design and training of GNN architectures.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Half a Link can Be Enough to Predict a Whole Link: Understanding Generalization in Knowledge Graph Foundation Models
KGFMs can predict links using observed half-links, with performance varying across four scenarios of half-link visibility in inference graphs.
-
Mind the Unseen Mass: Unmasking LLM Hallucinations via Soft-Hybrid Alphabet Estimation
SHADE adaptively combines coverage and spectral signals to estimate semantic alphabet size from few LLM samples, yielding better performance than baselines in low-sample regimes for alphabet estimation and QA error detection.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.