Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

The mass of the gluino-glue bound state in large-$N$ $\mathcal{N}=1$ Supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports the first non-perturbative determination of the gluino-glue mass in large-$N$ $\mathcal{N}=1$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, obtaining $w_0M_{\tilde g g}=1.21(11)$ in the SUSY limit.

desk verdict First large-N gluino-glue mass is a real result, but the quoted SUSY-limit error misses a fit-shape systematic that shifts the central value by roughly 0.4. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02348 v2 pith:EAE3PIDS submitted 2024-12-03 hep-lat hep-ph

Claudio Bonanno , Margarita García Pérez , Antonio González-Arroyo , Ken-Ichi Ishikawa , Masanori Okawa This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-lathep-ph PACS 11.15.Ha12.60.Jv
keywords gluino-glueboundstatelarge-NlimitN=1supersymmetricYang-MillstheorylatticegaugetwistedEguchi-Kawaireductionvolumeindependencechiral-continuumgluinomass
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes the first non-perturbative value of the gluino-glue mass in large-$N$ $\mathcal{N}=1$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, using numerical Monte Carlo simulations of a twisted volume-reduced lattice model. After taking the thermodynamic limit and then the chiral-continuum limit that restores supersymmetry, the authors obtain $w_0M_{\tilde g g}=1.21(11)$, equivalently $M/\Lambda_{\mathrm{NSVZ}}=8.94\pm1.01$. This matters because the gluino-glue state is expected to belong to the lightest supermultiplet, so the number fixes the mass gap of the infinite-color theory and provides a non-perturbative target for analytic approaches. The result is larger than the $SU(2)$ and $SU(3)$ values and is consistent with a mild growth in $1/N^2$.

What carries the argument

The argument runs through large-$N$ twisted volume reduction: the twisted Eguchi-Kawai (TEK) model, a single-site matrix model with twisted boundary conditions, reproduces the infinite-volume, infinite-color lattice theory when center symmetry is preserved. Adjoint Wilson fermions are added through the TEK Wilson-Dirac operator, and the gluino-glue mass is extracted from the exponential decay of the correlator built from a clover-discretized field strength and the gluino propagator, with a generalized eigenvalue problem and stout smearing used to isolate the lightest state. Finite-$N$ effects in the TEK model act as finite-volume effects, so the $N=169,289,361$ data are extrapolated with an exponential finite-volume ansatz; the SUSY limit is then reached with a combined linear fit in $a/\sqrt{8t_1}$ and $8t_1 m_\pi^2$, justified by the absence of chiral logarithms in partially quenched chiral perturbation theory.

What would settle it

Take the same $N=169,289,361$ ensembles and redo the chiral-continuum fit including the mixed term $c_3(a/\sqrt{8t_1})(8t_1 m_\pi^2)$ with higher statistics; the reported coefficient $c_3=0.21(20)$ is consistent with zero but shifts the central value from 1.21 to 1.61, so a determination of $c_3$ at the two-$\sigma$ level would settle which SUSY-limit mass is right. Alternatively, data at a new, smaller lattice spacing would test whether the linear ansatz still describes the approach to the continuum limit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the mass of the lightest gluino-glue bound state in $\mathcal{N}=1$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at infinite number of colors is $w_0M_{\tilde g g}=1.21(11)$ in the supersymmetric (chiral-continuum) limit, with $w_0$ the gradient-flow hadronic scale defined in Eq. (3.5). Expressed in the NSVZ scheme, this is $M_{\tilde g g}/\Lambda_{\mathrm{NSVZ}}=8.94\pm1.01$. The value comes from lattice Monte Carlo simulations of the twisted Eguchi-Kawai reduced model at $N=169,289,361$, extrapolated first to the thermodynamic limit and then to zero lattice spacing and zero adjoint-pion mass. The authors state that the large-$N$ result is close to but larger than the known $SU(2)$ and $SU(3)$ values, confirming the trend that the mass grows mildly with $N$ and is consistent with a naive $1/N^2$ extrapolation of the finite-$N$ data.

Load-bearing premise

Everything hinges on the assumption that the data approach the supersymmetric limit along a straight line in the lattice spacing $a$ and in the squared adjoint-pion mass $m_\pi^2$, with no extra mixed correction; the paper itself reports that including such a mixed term changes the central value from 1.21 to 1.61, so the final number is only as solid as this assumption.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under the standard supersymmetry argument that the gluino-glue state is degenerate with the lightest scalar and pseudoscalar states, the result fixes the mass gap of large-$N$ $\mathcal{N}=1$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills at $M/\Lambda_{\mathrm{NSVZ}}=8.94\pm1.01$.
  • The infinite-$N$ value $w_0M_{\tilde g g}=1.21(11)$ is larger than the $N=2$ value $0.823(56)$ and the $N=3$ value $1.042(46)$; combined with those it supports a mild $1/N^2$ approach to the large-$N$ limit, with the fitted leading coefficient $1.212(71)$ matching the direct determination.
  • The result gives a concrete non-perturbative target that analytic, holographic, or semiclassical approaches to large-$N$ supersymmetric gauge theories must reproduce.
  • Because the same twisted-reduction setup already produced the large-$N$ gluino condensate and scale setting, the framework is now able to deliver renormalized large-$N$ SUSY observables independent of standard finite-volume lattice spectroscopy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The obvious next check is to resolve the mixed-term coefficient $c_3$: with current errors $c_3=0.21(20)$ is consistent with zero, but the central value moves from 1.21 to 1.61 when it is included, so a higher-statistics determination of $c_3$ would tell whether the quoted SUSY-limit mass is stable.
  • The paper's proposed route to the other supermultiplet members is a spatially reduced lattice with temporal extent $N_t>1$; if such a simulation confirmed threefold degeneracy at large $N$, it would strengthen the supersymmetry-restoration picture and turn the gluino-glue mass into a genuine mass-gap prediction.
  • One could also test the $1/N^2$ trend with an independent standard-lattice $SU(4)$ or $SU(5)$ calculation; agreement with the fit would support large-$N$ scaling at surprisingly small color numbers, while disagreement would signal corrections beyond the naive leading term.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper computes the mass of the gluino-glue bound state in large-N N=1 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory using twisted Eguchi-Kawai volume reduction and dynamical adjoint Wilson fermions. The authors use previously generated ensembles from Ref. [27] for N=169, 289, 361 at three values of the inverse 't Hooft coupling b and several gluino masses. They extract the mass from a GEVP-improved time correlator in the reduced model, verify it against an effective-mass plateau from the GEVP eigenvalues, and extrapolate to the thermodynamic limit with an exponential finite-volume ansatz. They then perform a combined chiral and continuum extrapolation, Eq. (3.11), to reach the SUSY limit and quote w0 M_gluino-glue = 1.21(11) at N=infinity, equivalently M/Lambda_NSVZ = 8.94(1.01). The large-N result is compared with SU(2) and SU(3) determinations and found to be consistent with a mild 1/N^2 growth.

Significance. If the quoted central value survives a more careful treatment of the extrapolation uncertainty, this is the first non-perturbative large-N value of the gluino-glue mass and a strong result for the large-N SUSY theory; the comparison with finite-N lattice data provides a useful test of 1/N^2 scaling. The paper has notable internal strengths: two consistent mass-determination procedures, a stable thermodynamic extrapolation across volume cuts, and a complete propagation of the result into scale-invariant units. The main weakness is the model dependence of the chiral-continuum extrapolation, which is currently not reflected in the quoted error.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.11)-(3.12)] The central SUSY-limit value is not robust to the inclusion of the mixed term c3 (a/sqrt(8t1))(8t1 m_pi^2) that the authors themselves test in the paragraph following Eq. (3.12). They find c3 = 0.21(20), which is only about one standard deviation from zero, yet the intercept moves from w0 M = 1.21 to 1.61, a shift of 0.40, about 3.6 times the quoted error 0.11. The statement that the two results are compatible is achieved only by accepting a four-times-larger uncertainty; it does not justify quoting 1.21(11) as the headline. Because within each b value the data points are strongly correlated, with smaller m_pi occurring at smaller a, the intercept of fit (3.11) has high leverage and the omission of the mixed term is a load-bearing modeling assumption. Please either include the c3 term in the central fit and report the corresponding value, or provide a systematic error that covers the variation between fit ansatze, and propagate the resulting uncertainty to Eqs. (3.13), (3.16)/(4.1) and the comparison in Sec. 3.3.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.1)] The uncertainty quoted in Eq. (4.1), M/Lambda_NSVZ = 8.94 +/- 1.01, includes only the statistical errors from the mass fit and the inputs of Refs. [27,28]. The dominant systematic effect identified in Sec. 3.2, namely the change of the chiral-continuum fit ansatz, is not represented in this number. Without a quantitative systematic error from the extrapolation, the error budget is incomplete; the revised version should either state explicitly that Eq. (4.1) is conditional on the linear ansatz (3.11) or enlarge the error accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3, opening paragraph] The phrase 'SUSY-restorting limit' contains a typo and should read 'SUSY-restoring limit'.
  2. [Table 1] The b=0.345 rows and some b=0.350 rows have no entries in the N=169 column; the caption should state whether those ensembles were not generated or whether the values were omitted.
  3. [Eq. (3.19)] For the 1/N^2 fit with three data points and two parameters, please report the number of degrees of freedom and the p-value; the statement that the chi-squared is 'very small' is not informative without these details.
  4. [Sec. 3.3] Please clarify the mismatch between the SUSY-limit value of w0 M_gluino-glue reported in Table 1 and the value shown in Fig. 1 of Ref. [37]; a brief explanation would help the reader assess the reliability of the quoted SU(3) value.
  5. [Fig. 3] The large-N points are continuum-subtracted, while the SU(2) and SU(3) points are SUSY-limit values at a=0; using distinct symbols and an explicit legend entry for these two categories would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the gluino-glue mass is computed from new correlator data, and the prior self-citations used for scale setting and Lambda conversion are independent inputs, not re-statements of the target result.

full rationale

I find no circular step in the derivation chain. The central quantity w0 M_gluino-glue is obtained from lattice correlators fitted via Eq. (2.20), then extrapolated to the thermodynamic limit with Eq. (3.8) and to the chiral-continuum limit with Eq. (3.11). None of these equations uses the final mass as an input: the data in Tables 1 and 2 are new measurements of the gluino-glue correlator. The scale-setting ratio w0/sqrt(8t1) = 0.586(10) and the NSVZ Lambda parameter combination sqrt(8t1) Lambda_NSVZ = 0.231(15) are taken from the authors' previous independent determinations [27, 28]; these are necessary for unit conversion but are not derived from the gluino-glue mass, so citing them is normal self-citation rather than circularity. The chiral-continuum ansatz (3.11) is a modeling assumption, and the paper openly tests its stability by adding a mixed term, reporting c3 = 0.21(20) and a shifted intercept of 1.61(40). That sensitivity is a legitimate concern about the extrapolation's robustness and the quoted error, but it is not a circularity: the headline value is not identical to an input by construction, and the data are new. The N-dependence fit in Eq. (3.19) includes the new N=infinity point, but it is presented as a consistency check and does not feed back into the principal determination. Overall, the derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense, and no step reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of twisted volume reduction for the gluino-glue correlator, on the extraction formula for the reduced-model correlator, on the sign of the Pfaffian, and on the chiral-continuum fit form. The only fitted quantities are the coefficients of the finite-volume and chiral-continuum extrapolation functions. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or entities are introduced; the adjoint pion is a standard partially-quenched artifact used for mass tuning, not a physical state claimed by this work.

free parameters (5)
  • A1 = not quoted
    Amplitude of the exponential finite-volume correction in Eq. (3.8), assumed independent of b and k; fitted globally to the N-dependence of a M_gluino-glue.
  • A2 = not quoted
    Decay rate of the exponential finite-volume correction in Eq. (3.8); fitted globally.
  • c1 = not quoted
    Coefficient of the O(a) lattice-spacing term in the chiral-continuum fit Eq. (3.11).
  • c2 = not quoted
    Coefficient of the 8t1 m_pi^2 term in the chiral-continuum fit Eq. (3.11).
  • c3 = 0.21(20)
    Optional mixed lattice-spacing and pion-mass term added to test stability of Eq. (3.11); compatible with zero but shifts the central SUSY-limit value from 1.21 to 1.61.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Large-N twisted volume reduction equates the SU(N) TEK matrix model with adjoint Wilson fermions to the infinite-volume lattice SYM theory for single-trace observables, with finite-N corrections behaving as finite-volume corrections.
    Basis for using N=169, 289, 361 TEK ensembles to extract the gluino-glue mass; invoked throughout Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 3.1.
  • domain assumption The gluino-glue mass can be extracted from the zero-momentum temporal correlator reconstructed by Fourier anti-transform in the reduced model, Eq. (2.11), using the clover-discretized field strength and the adjoint Wilson-Dirac propagator.
    The paper follows Refs. [36-38,58] and verifies consistency with GEVP effective masses, but the reduced-model reconstruction is a nontrivial transfer-matrix assumption.
  • domain assumption The sign of the Pfaffian is positive on all generated RHMC trajectories, so sign-quenched sampling equals the full theory.
    Stated in Sec. 2.1, inherited from Ref. [27]; if negative eigenmodes occurred, the reweighting in Eq. (2.6) would be needed and could change results.
  • domain assumption The chiral-continuum limit is described by Eq. (3.11): linear O(a) discretization correction plus O(m_pi^2) adjoint-pion dependence, with no chiral logarithm, as derived in partially-quenched chiral perturbation theory.
    Used to obtain the SUSY-limit value (3.12); the paper's own c3 test shows sensitivity to omitted mixed terms, making this assumption load-bearing.
  • domain assumption The gradient-flow scales w0, sqrt(8t1), and their N=infinity ratio w0/sqrt(8t1)=0.586(10) from Ref. [27] are valid and apply to the SUSY-limit conversion in Eq. (3.10).
    Eq. (3.10) uses this ratio; any additional gluino-mass or lattice-spacing dependence in the ratio would shift the final w0 M value.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The mass of the gluino-glue bound state in large-$N$ $\mathcal{N}=1$ Supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EAE3PIDS

@misc{pith2026241202348,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The mass of the gluino-glue bound state in large-$N$ $\mathcalN=1$ Supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EAE3PIDS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02348}
}
abstract

We provide a first-principles non-perturbative determination of the mass of the lightest gluino-gluon bound state (gluino-glue) in large-$N$ $\mathcal{N}=1$ Supersymmetric Yang--Mills theory by means of numerical Monte Carlo simulations of the lattice-discretized theory, and exploiting large-$N$ twisted volume reduction. Our large-$N$ determination is consistent with naive extrapolation of previously-known $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ and $\mathrm{SU}(3)$ results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.02348 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left panel: example of the exponential fit to the gluino-glue best overlapping correlator in the range 0.5 < τ /w0 < 3 according to (2.20). Right panel: constant fit to the plateau in the effective mass (2.22) observed in the same range of Euclidean times. Both fits give perfectly agreeing results for the gluino-glue mass. Plots refer to N = 361, b = 0.345, κ = 0.1800. We did not choose the popular scale √ 8t0, corr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Extrapolation towards the thermodynamic N = ∞ limit of our finite-volume determina￾tions of aMg˜g reported in Tab. 1 according to fit function (3.8). The shown global best fit corresponds to exp[−ℓ/√ 8t1] < 0.04, i.e., ℓ/√ 8t1 ≳ 3.2. Best fit yields a reduced chi-squared of 1.08 with 13 degrees of freedom, corresponding to a p-value ≃ 37% As outlined in Sec. 2.1, in the TEK model finite-N effects manifest themselves… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Extrapolation towards the SUSY limit of the N = ∞ gluino-glue mass in units of the reference hadronic scale w0 according to the fit function (3.11). We obtain a reduced chi-squared of about 0.32 with 9 degrees of freedom. Plot shows the continuum best-fit curve, i.e., the curve obtained from the best fit of the data to Eq. (3.11) with c1 = 0. Also the depicted points correspond to continuum extrapolated determinatio… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Best fit of the results for w0Mg˜g as a function of N reported in Tab. 3 according to a fit function f(N) = A + B/N2 . Best fit results are reported in Eq. (3.19). Ref. [67] in order to express it in terms of the same scale defined in Eq. (3.5). In the end one finds: w…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The large-$N$ Yang--Mills $\Lambda$-parameter from step scaling

    hep-lat 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    First non-asymptotic-scaling determination of the large-N Yang-Mills Λ-parameter yields √(8t₀)Λ_MS(N=∞) = 0.639(36).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [27]

    Butti, M

    P. Butti, M. Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo, K.-I. Ishikawa and M. Okawa,Scale setting for large-N SUSY Yang-Mills on the lattice , JHEP 07 (2022) 074 [ 2205.03166]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, Supergauge Transformations in Four-Dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 70 (1974) 39

    1974

  3. [2]

    Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields. Vol. 3: Supersymmetry . Cambridge University Press, 6, 2013

    2013

  4. [3]

    ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions , Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions , Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974) 461

    1974

  5. [4]

    Witten, Baryons in the 1/n Expansion , Nucl

    E. Witten, Baryons in the 1/n Expansion , Nucl. Phys. B 160 (1979) 57

    1979

  6. [5]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [ hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  7. [6]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, Large N field theories, string theory and gravity , Phys. Rept. 323 (2000) 183 [ hep-th/9905111]

    arXiv 2000

  8. [7]

    Curci and G

    G. Curci and G. Veneziano, Supersymmetry and the Lattice: A Reconciliation? , Nucl. Phys. B 292 (1987) 555

    1987

Show all 92 references
  1. [8]

    Montvay, An algorithm for gluinos on the lattice , Nucl

    I. Montvay, An algorithm for gluinos on the lattice , Nucl. Phys. B 466 (1996) 259 [hep-lat/9510042]

    1996 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Eguchi and H

    T. Eguchi and H. Kawai, Reduction of dynamical degrees of freedom in the large- N gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1063

    1982

  3. [10]

    Bhanot, U

    G. Bhanot, U. M. Heller and H. Neuberger, The quenched Eguchi-Kawai model , Physics Letters B 113 (1982) 47

    1982

  4. [11]

    Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M

    A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M. Okawa,A twisted model for large- N lattice gauge theory, Physics Letters B 120 (1983) 174. – 15 –

    1983

  5. [12]

    Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M

    A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M. Okawa,Twisted-eguchi-kawai model: A reduced model for large-N lattice gauge theory , Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 2397

    1983

  6. [13]

    Kovtun, M

    P. Kovtun, M. ¨Unsal and L. G. Yaffe, Volume independence in large N(c) QCD-like gauge theories, JHEP 06 (2007) 019 [ hep-th/0702021]

    2007 arXiv

  7. [14]

    ¨Unsal and L

    M. ¨Unsal and L. G. Yaffe, Center-stabilized Yang-Mills theory: Confinement and large N volume independence, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 065035 [ 0803.0344]

    2008 arXiv

  8. [15]

    D. B. Kaplan, Dynamical Generation of Supersymmetry , Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984) 162

    1984

  9. [16]

    ’t Hooft, A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories , Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories , Nucl. Phys. B 153 (1979) 141

    1979

  10. [17]

    Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M

    A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M. Okawa,Large N reduction with the Twisted Eguchi-Kawai model, JHEP 07 (2010) 043 [ 1005.1981]

    2010 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M

    A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M. Okawa,The string tension from smeared Wilson loops at large N, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2013) 1524 [ 1206.0049]

    2013 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M

    A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M. Okawa,Testing volume independence of SU(N) pure gauge theories at large N , JHEP 12 (2014) 106 [ 1410.6405]

    2014 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A

    M. Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo, L. Keegan and M. Okawa,The SU (∞) twisted gradient flow running coupling , JHEP 01 (2015) 038 [ 1412.0941]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M

    A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M. Okawa,Large N meson masses from a matrix model , Phys. Lett. B 755 (2016) 132 [ 1510.05428]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A

    M. Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M. Okawa,Perturbative contributions to Wilson loops in twisted lattice boxes and reduced models , JHEP 10 (2017) 150 [ 1708.00841]

    2017 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A

    M. Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M. Okawa,Meson spectrum in the large N limit, JHEP 04 (2021) 230 [ 2011.13061]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Bonanno, P

    C. Bonanno, P. Butti, M. Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo, K.-I. Ishikawa and M. Okawa, The large-N limit of the chiral condensate from twisted reduced models , JHEP 12 (2023) 034 [2309.15540]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M

    A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M. Okawa,Twisted space-time reduced model of large N QCD with two adjoint Wilson fermions , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 014514 [ 1305.6253]

    2013 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A

    M. Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo, L. Keegan and M. Okawa,Mass anomalous dimension of Adjoint QCD at large N from twisted volume reduction , JHEP 08 (2015) 034 [1506.06536]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bonanno, P

    C. Bonanno, P. Butti, M. Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo, K.-I. Ishikawa and M. Okawa, Nonperturbative determination of the N = 1 supersymmetric Yang-Mills gluino condensate at large N , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 074507 [ 2406.08995]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Supersymmetric Instanton Calculus (Gauge Theories with Matter) , Nucl. Phys. B 260 (1985) 157

    1985

  22. [30]

    N. M. Davies, T. J. Hollowood, V. V. Khoze and M. P. Mattis, Gluino condensate and magnetic monopoles in supersymmetric gluodynamics , Nucl. Phys. B 559 (1999) 123 [hep-th/9905015]. – 16 –

    1999 arXiv

  23. [31]

    M. M. Anber and E. Poppitz, Higher-order gaugino condensates on a twisted T4: In the beginning, there was semi-classics , 2408.16058

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    M¨ unster and H

    G. M¨ unster and H. St¨ uwe,Partially quenched chiral perturbation theory for N = 1 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, PoS LA TTICE2014(2014) 310 [ 1411.1540]

    2014 arXiv

  25. [33]

    M¨ unster and H

    G. M¨ unster and H. St¨ uwe,The mass of the adjoint pion in N = 1 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 05 (2014) 034 [ 1402.6616]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Bergner, P

    G. Bergner, P. Giudice, G. M¨ unster, I. Montvay and S. Piemonte, The light bound states of supersymmetric SU(2) Yang-Mills theory , JHEP 03 (2016) 080 [ 1512.07014]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    S. Ali, H. Gerber, I. Montvay, G. M¨ unster, S. Piemonte, P. Scior et al., Analysis of Ward identities in supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 404 [1802.07067]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [36]

    S. Ali, G. Bergner, H. Gerber, P. Giudice, I. Montvay, G. M¨ unster et al., The light bound states of N = 1 supersymmetric SU(3) Yang-Mills theory on the lattice , JHEP 03 (2018) 113 [1801.08062]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    S. Ali, G. Bergner, H. Gerber, I. Montvay, G. M¨ unster, S. Piemonte et al., Numerical results for the lightest bound states in N = 1 supersymmetric SU(3) Yang-Mills theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 221601 [ 1902.11127]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    S. Ali, G. Bergner, H. Gerber, S. Kuberski, I. Montvay, G. M¨ unster et al., Variational analysis of low-lying states in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory , JHEP 04 (2019) 150 [1901.02416]

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Bergner, C

    G. Bergner, C. L´ opez and S. Piemonte, Study of center and chiral symmetry realization in thermal N = 1 super Yang-Mills theory using the gradient flow , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 074501 [1902.08469]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Bergner, S

    G. Bergner, S. Piemonte and M. ¨Unsal, Investigating two-dimensional adjoint QCD on the lattice, JHEP 07 (2024) 048 [ 2404.03801]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Bergner and S

    G. Bergner and S. Catterall, Supersymmetry on the lattice , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 (2016) 1643005 [1603.04478]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Bergner, G

    G. Bergner, G. M¨ unster and S. Piemonte, Exploring Gauge Theories with Adjoint Matter on the Lattice, Universe 8 (2022) 617 [ 2212.10371]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Schaich, Lattice studies of supersymmetric gauge theories , Eur

    D. Schaich, Lattice studies of supersymmetric gauge theories , Eur. Phys. J. ST 232 (2023) 305 [2208.03580]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    S. Ali, G. Bergner, H. Gerber, I. Montvay, G. M¨ unster, S. Piemonte et al., Continuum extrapolation of Ward identities in N = 1 supersymmetric SU(3) Yang–Mills theory , Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 548 [ 2003.04110]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Ishikawa and M

    T. Ishikawa and M. Okawa, Z D N symmetry breaking on the numerical simulation of twisted Eguchi-Kawai model, talk given at the Annual Meeting of the Physical Society of Japan , March 28–31, Sendai, Japan (2003)

    2003

  38. [46]

    Bietenholz, J

    W. Bietenholz, J. Nishimura, Y. Susaki and J. Volkholz, A Non-perturbative study of 4-D U(1) non-commutative gauge theory: The Fate of one-loop instability , JHEP 10 (2006) 042 [hep-th/0608072]

    2006 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Teper and H

    M. Teper and H. Vairinhos, Symmetry breaking in twisted Eguchi-Kawai models , Phys. Lett. B 652 (2007) 359 [ hep-th/0612097]. – 17 –

    2007 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Azeyanagi, M

    T. Azeyanagi, M. Hanada, T. Hirata and T. Ishikawa, Phase structure of twisted Eguchi-Kawai model, JHEP 01 (2008) 025 [ 0711.1925]

    2008 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Chamizo and A

    F. Chamizo and A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo,Tachyonic instabilities in 2 + 1 dimensional Yang–Mills theory and its connection to number theory , J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 265401 [1610.07972]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A

    M. Garc ´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo, M. Koren and M. Okawa,The spectrum of 2+1 dimensional Yang-Mills theory on a twisted spatial torus , JHEP 07 (2018) 169 [ 1807.03481]

    2018 arXiv

  43. [51]

    E. I. Bribi´ an and M. Garc ´ ıa P´ erez,The twisted gradient flow coupling at one loop , JHEP 03 (2019) 200 [ 1903.08029]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    A. D. Kennedy, I. H´ orvath and S. Sint,A New exact method for dynamical fermion computations with nonlocal actions , Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 73 (1999) 834 [hep-lat/9809092]

    1999 arXiv

  45. [53]

    M. A. Clark and A. D. Kennedy, The RHMC algorithm for two flavors of dynamical staggered fermions, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 129 (2004) 850 [ hep-lat/0309084]

    2004 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Clark, A

    M. Clark, A. Kennedy and Z. Sroczynski, Exact 2+1 flavour RHMC simulations , Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 140 (2005) 835 [ hep-lat/0409133]

    2005 arXiv

  47. [55]

    M. A. Clark, P. de Forcrand and A. D. Kennedy, Algorithm shootout: R versus RHMC , PoS LA T2005(2006) 115 [ hep-lat/0510004]

    2006 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Clark and A

    M. Clark and A. Kennedy, Accelerating dynamical fermion computations using the rational hybrid Monte Carlo (RHMC) algorithm with multiple pseudofermion fields , Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 051601 [ hep-lat/0608015]

    2007 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Clark and A

    M. Clark and A. Kennedy, Accelerating Staggered Fermion Dynamics with the Rational Hybrid Monte Carlo (RHMC) Algorithm , Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 011502 [hep-lat/0610047]

    2007 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Donini, M

    A. Donini, M. Guagnelli, P. Hern´ andez and A. Vladikas, Towards N=1 superYang-Mills on the lattice, Nucl. Phys. B 523 (1998) 529 [ hep-lat/9710065]

    1998 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Berg and A

    B. Berg and A. Billoire, Glueball Spectroscopy in Four-Dimensional SU(3) Lattice Gauge Theory. 1., Nucl. Phys. B 221 (1983) 109

    1983

  52. [60]

    Michael, Adjoint Sources in Lattice Gauge Theory , Nucl

    C. Michael, Adjoint Sources in Lattice Gauge Theory , Nucl. Phys. B 259 (1985) 58

    1985

  53. [61]

    L¨ uscher and U

    M. L¨ uscher and U. Wolff,How to Calculate the Elastic Scattering Matrix in Two-dimensional Quantum Field Theories by Numerical Simulation , Nucl. Phys. B 339 (1990) 222

    1990

  54. [62]

    Morningstar and M

    C. Morningstar and M. Peardon, Analytic smearing of SU(3) link variables in lattice qcd , Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 054501

    2004

  55. [63]

    Albanese et al., Glueball Masses and String Tension in Lattice QCD , Phys

    APE collaboration, M. Albanese et al., Glueball Masses and String Tension in Lattice QCD , Phys. Lett. B 192 (1987) 163

    1987

  56. [64]

    Narayanan and H

    R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger, Infinite N phase transitions in continuum Wilson loop operators, JHEP 03 (2006) 064 [ hep-th/0601210]

    2006 arXiv

  57. [65]

    L¨ uscher,Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm , Commun

    M. L¨ uscher,Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm , Commun. Math. Phys. 293 (2010) 899 [ 0907.5491]

    2010 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Lohmayer and H

    R. Lohmayer and H. Neuberger, Continuous smearing of Wilson Loops , PoS LA TTICE2011(2011) 249 [ 1110.3522]. – 18 –

    2011 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Bergner, P

    G. Bergner, P. Giudice, I. Montvay, G. M¨ unster and S. Piemonte, Influence of topology on the scale setting , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130 (2015) 229 [ 1411.6995]

    2015 arXiv

  60. [68]

    V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Instanton Effects in Supersymmetric Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 229 (1983) 407

    1983

  61. [69]

    M. A. Shifman and A. I. Vainshtein, Solution of the Anomaly Puzzle in SUSY Gauge Theories and the Wilson Operator Expansion , Nucl. Phys. B 277 (1986) 456

    1986

  62. [70]

    Finnell and P

    D. Finnell and P. Pouliot, Instanton calculations versus exact results in four-dimensional SUSY gauge theories , Nucl. Phys. B 453 (1995) 225 [ hep-th/9503115]

    1995 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Armoni, M

    A. Armoni, M. Shifman and G. Veneziano, QCD quark condensate from SUSY and the orientifold large N expansion , Phys. Lett. B 579 (2004) 384 [ hep-th/0309013]

    2004 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Lucini and M

    B. Lucini and M. Teper, SU (N ) gauge theories in four-dimensions: Exploring the approach to N = ∞, JHEP 06 (2001) 050 [ hep-lat/0103027]

    2001 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Lucini, M

    B. Lucini, M. Teper and U. Wenger, Glueballs and k-strings in SU (N ) gauge theories: Calculations with improved operators , JHEP 06 (2004) 012 [ hep-lat/0404008]

    2004 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Lucini, A

    B. Lucini, A. Rago and E. Rinaldi, Glueball masses in the large- N limit, JHEP 08 (2010) 119 [1007.3879]

    2010 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Lucini and M

    B. Lucini and M. Panero, SU(N ) gauge theories at large N , Phys. Rept. 526 (2013) 93 [1210.4997]

    2013 arXiv

  68. [76]

    G. S. Bali, F. Bursa, L. Castagnini, S. Collins, L. Del Debbio, B. Lucini et al., Mesons in large-N QCD, JHEP 06 (2013) 071 [ 1304.4437]

    2013 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Bonati, M

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, P. Rossi and E. Vicari, θ dependence of 4D SU (N ) gauge theories in the large-N limit, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 085017 [ 1607.06360]

    2016 arXiv

  70. [78]

    M. C` e, M. Garcia Vera, L. Giusti and S. Schaefer, The topological susceptibility in the large-N limit of SU( N ) Yang-Mills theory , Phys. Lett. B 762 (2016) 232 [ 1607.05939]

    2016 arXiv

  71. [79]

    DeGrand and Y

    T. DeGrand and Y. Liu, Lattice study of large Nc QCD, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 034506 [1606.01277]

    2016 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Hern´ andez, C

    P. Hern´ andez, C. Pena and F. Romero-L´ opez,Large Nc scaling of meson masses and decay constants, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 865 [ 1907.11511]

    2019 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Bennett, J

    E. Bennett, J. Holligan, D. K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini et al., Color dependence of tensor and scalar glueball masses in Yang-Mills theories , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 011501 [ 2004.11063]

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    DeGrand, Topological susceptibility in QCD with two flavors and 3-5 colors: a pilot study , Phys

    T. DeGrand, Topological susceptibility in QCD with two flavors and 3-5 colors: a pilot study , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 114509 [ 2004.09649]

    2020 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Hern´ andez and F

    P. Hern´ andez and F. Romero-L´ opez,The large Nc limit of QCD on the lattice , Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (2021) 52 [ 2012.03331]

    2021 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Bonanno, C

    C. Bonanno, C. Bonati and M. D’Elia, Large-N SU(N ) Yang-Mills theories with milder topological freezing, JHEP 03 (2021) 111 [ 2012.14000]

    2021 arXiv

  77. [85]

    DeGrand, Finite temperature properties of QCD with two flavors and three, four and five colors, Phys

    T. DeGrand, Finite temperature properties of QCD with two flavors and three, four and five colors, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 094513 [ 2102.01150]

    2021 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Athenodorou and M

    A. Athenodorou and M. Teper, SU(N) gauge theories in 3+1 dimensions: glueball spectrum, string tensions and topology , JHEP 12 (2021) 082 [ 2106.00364]. – 19 –

    2021 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Bonanno, M

    C. Bonanno, M. D’Elia, B. Lucini and D. Vadacchino, Towards glueball masses of large-N SU(N) pure-gauge theories without topological freezing , Phys. Lett. B 833 (2022) 137281 [2205.06190]

    2022 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Bennett, D

    E. Bennett, D. K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Piai et al., Color dependence of the topological susceptibility in Yang-Mills theories , Phys. Lett. B 835 (2022) 137504 [2205.09254]

    2022 arXiv

  81. [89]

    T. A. DeGrand and E. Wickenden, Lattice study of the chiral properties of large- Nc QCD, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 094516 [ 2309.12270]

    2023 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Bonanno, The topological susceptibility slope χ′ of the pure-gauge SU(3) Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 01 (2024) 116 [ 2311.06646]

    C. Bonanno, The topological susceptibility slope χ′ of the pure-gauge SU(3) Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 01 (2024) 116 [ 2311.06646]

    2024 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Bonanno, M

    C. Bonanno, M. D’Elia and L. Verzichelli, The θ-dependence of the SU (N ) critical temperature at large N , JHEP 02 (2024) 156 [ 2312.12202]

    2024 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Bonanno, C

    C. Bonanno, C. Bonati, M. Papace and D. Vadacchino, The θ-dependence of the Yang-Mills spectrum from analytic continuation , JHEP 05 (2024) 163 [ 2402.03096]. – 20 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.