Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Comparative Physical Interpretation of Spatial Variability Aware Neural Networks: A Summary of Results

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.15866 v1 pith:EBHYGV4W submitted 2021-10-29 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords interpretationphysicaltransparencycomparativemodelmodelsnetworksneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Given Spatial Variability Aware Neural Networks (SVANNs), the goal is to investigate mathematical (or computational) models for comparative physical interpretation towards their transparency (e.g., simulatibility, decomposability and algorithmic transparency). This problem is important due to important use-cases such as reusability, debugging, and explainability to a jury in a court of law. Challenges include a large number of model parameters, vacuous bounds on generalization performance of neural networks, risk of overfitting, sensitivity to noise, etc., which all detract from the ability to interpret the models. Related work on either model-specific or model-agnostic post-hoc interpretation is limited due to a lack of consideration of physical constraints (e.g., mass balance) and properties (e.g., second law of geography). This work investigates physical interpretation of SVANNs using novel comparative approaches based on geographically heterogeneous features. The proposed approach on feature-based physical interpretation is evaluated using a case-study on wetland mapping. The proposed physical interpretation improves the transparency of SVANN models and the analytical results highlight the trade-off between model transparency and model performance (e.g., F1-score). We also describe an interpretation based on geographically heterogeneous processes modeled as partial differential equations (PDEs).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools