REVIEW 2 cited by
Observable quantum entanglement due to gravity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
No experiment to date has provided evidence for quantum features of the gravitational interaction. Recently proposed tests suggest looking for the generation of quantum entanglement between massive objects as a possible route towards the observation of such features. Motivated by advances in optical cooling of mirrors, here we provide a systematic study of entanglement between two masses that are coupled gravitationally. We first consider the masses trapped at all times in harmonic potentials (optomechanics) and then the masses released from the traps. This leads to the estimate of the experimental parameters required for the observation of gravitationally induced entanglement. The optomechanical setup demands LIGO-like mirrors and squeezing or long coherence times, but the released masses can be light and accumulate detectable entanglement in a timescale shorter than their coherence times. No macroscopic quantum superposition develops during the evolution. We discuss the implications from such thought experiments regarding the nature of the gravitational coupling.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Classical theories of gravity produce entanglement
In quantum field theory, a classical gravitational potential can entangle two superposed masses through virtual matter exchange, so gravitationally induced entanglement is not by itself proof of quantum gravity.
-
Classical and quantum mechanics across representations: an operational reading of the Wigner Weyl correspondence
The robust classical–quantum boundary across Wigner–Weyl representations is noncommutative star-multiplication, not negativity or the choice of phase-space versus Hilbert-space language.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.