Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 115 references

DFT based comparative analysis of physical properties of binary metallic diborides XB$_2$ (X = Cr, Mo and W)

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A comparative DFT study of CrB2, MoB2, and WB2 finds all three are hard, ultra-incompressible metallic diborides, and predicts WB2 alone is ductile.

desk verdict Routine but useful DFT property scan of three diborides; the WB2 'superior and ductile' claim rests on a mixed-functional comparison and needs same-functional verification before it can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19687 v1 pith:EDJBSBVO submitted 2024-12-27 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.supr-con

Razu Ahmed , Md. Sohel Rana , Md. Sajidul Islam , S. H. Naqib This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.supr-con
keywords densityfunctionaltheorymetallicdiboridesthermo-mechanicalpropertiesoptoelectronicsuperconductivityelasticconstantshardnessWB2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using density functional theory, the paper computes the structural, elastic, electronic, optical, thermo-mechanical, and superconducting properties of the three layered hexagonal diborides CrB2, MoB2, and WB2. Its central claim is that all three are mechanically stable, ultra-incompressible, hard metals with high Debye temperatures, while CrB2 and MoB2 are brittle and WB2 is ductile. If this is right, WB2 stands out as the practically interesting compound: it is predicted to have the highest elastic stiffness and hardness together with enough ductility for structural use, plus a very high melting temperature near 3509 K. The paper also predicts metallic behavior with strong infrared and visible reflectivity, useful for solar-heat-blocking coatings, and estimates superconducting transition temperatures for all three, with MoB2 highest.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the five independent elastic constants of the hexagonal AlB2 structure, namely C11, C12, C13, C33, and C44, obtained from the stress-strain relationship in the DFT calculations. These constants enter the Born stability criteria, the Voigt-Reuss-Hill averaging for bulk and shear moduli, and derived indicators such as Pugh's ratio, Cauchy pressure, Poisson's ratio, hardness formulas, Debye temperature, and melting-temperature estimates. The graphite-like boron layer with strong B-B bonds alternating with close-packed metal layers is the structural feature behind the high stiffness and high Debye temperature.

What would settle it

Measure single-crystal elastic constants of WB2 by resonant ultrasound spectroscopy and compute Pugh's ratio and Cauchy pressure; the signature claim collapses if the measured ratio falls below 1.75 or the Cauchy pressure turns negative.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the AlB2-type diborides of chromium, molybdenum, and tungsten are ultra-incompressible hard metals, and that they split into two mechanical classes despite the same crystal structure: CrB2 and MoB2 are brittle, while WB2 is ductile. The load-bearing numbers come from the calculated elastic constants, for example WB2 with C11 = 717 GPa, C44 = 202 GPa, bulk modulus 438 GPa, shear modulus 204 GPa, and B/G = 2.14, which places it on the ductile side of Pugh's criterion while retaining high hardness estimates. The electronic structure is metallic with a high density of states at the Fermi level, and the derived Debye and melting temperatures are high. The paper concludes that WB2 is mechanically superior to the other two and a candidate for high-temperature structural and abrasion-resistant applications, and that MoB2 is the best solar-heat-blocking coating candidate of the three.

Load-bearing premise

The calculations assume that ignoring magnetism gives the right answer for CrB2, which is known to order magnetically below about 88 K, and that using a different approximate method for each compound does not distort the comparison; if either assumption fails, the mechanical classifications can shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • WB2 is predicted to be usable where hardness and ductility are both required, such as cutting tools, abrasion-resistant coatings, and load-bearing high-temperature parts.
  • CrB2 and MoB2, being brittle, would be more likely to fail by cracking under mechanical shock despite their hardness.
  • All three compounds should resist compression and shear well, with high Debye temperatures; WB2's predicted melting point near 3509 K makes it a candidate for very-high-temperature service.
  • Optical results imply that the diborides, MoB2 in particular, could serve as coatings that reflect infrared and visible light to reduce solar heating, and as ultraviolet absorbers.
  • The superconducting estimates rank MoB2 first with a predicted transition temperature near 27 K, suggesting these diborides remain interesting for pressure-tuned superconductivity research.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If WB2's ductile-hard combination is confirmed experimentally, the same layered metal-boron chemistry could be explored in neighboring diboride alloys, which the paper itself does not attempt.
  • Because CrB2 is known to order magnetically below about 88 K and the paper uses non-spin-polarized calculations, a spin-polarized treatment could shift both its elastic moduli and its predicted superconducting temperature.
  • The comparison mixes different DFT approximations for the three compounds, so part of the brittle-versus-ductile split could be a computational artifact; repeating all three with one consistent approximation is the cheapest check.
  • The superconducting estimates use density-of-states-based electron-phonon coupling rather than full phonon calculations, so the absolute transition temperatures are more suggestive than final; direct phonon calculations are the natural next test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a first-principles DFT study (CASTEP) of the structural, elastic, electronic, optical, thermo-mechanical, and superconducting properties of AlB2-type CrB2, MoB2, and WB2. It computes lattice parameters, elastic constants, polycrystalline moduli, hardness indices, mechanical anisotropy, band structures and densities of states, sound velocities, Debye temperatures, thermal conductivities, optical spectra, and McMillan-theory superconducting transition temperatures. The central claims are that all three diborides are mechanically stable, ultra-incompressible, hard, and metallic, and that WB2 is ductile while CrB2 and MoB2 are brittle, making WB2 mechanically superior and promising for structural and high-temperature applications.

Significance. If the results are reliable, the prediction that WB2 combines high hardness with ductility would be of practical interest for hard coatings and structural applications, and the newly reported direction-dependent elastic and optical anisotropy data could serve as a useful reference. The paper is broadly reproducible in that it uses standard CASTEP settings and compares against available experiments and prior calculations. However, the central comparative claim rests on a mixed set of exchange-correlation functionals and on a non-spin-polarized treatment of CrB2, which puts the quantitative ranking and the brittleness/ductility classification in doubt without additional calculations.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 2 and Tables 2-4] The three compounds are computed with different exchange-correlation functionals: GGA-PBE for CrB2 and LDA for MoB2 and WB2. Because LDA is known to overbind and overestimate elastic constants, the comparison of WB2's moduli (B=437.6 GPa, G=204.4 GPa) with those of CrB2 and MoB2 is not like-for-like. The cited GGA result for WB2 (Ref [22]) gives B=325.6 GPa and G=136.7 GPa, roughly 34% and 50% lower, yet Section 4 states "very good agreement" with that work. The central claim that WB2 is mechanically superior and ductile (B/G=2.14) may be an artifact of the functional choice; a consistent functional across all three compounds is required to support the comparative conclusion.
  2. [Section 2 and Section 3.2] CrB2 is known to be an itinerant antiferromagnet below 88 K (Ref [21]), but all calculations are non-spin-polarized. The elastic constants, Pugh ratio, hardness, and Debye temperature for CrB2 in Tables 2-5 and 10 are therefore obtained from a nonmagnetic ground state, and these quantities could change if magnetic ordering is included. A spin-polarized calculation, or at least a justification that the antiferromagnetic ordering does not affect the elastic properties, is needed before the CrB2 brittleness and hardness conclusions can be accepted.
  3. [Table 8, WB2 row] The reported mass density for WB2, 1342.11 kg/m3, is a factor of 10 lower than the values for CrB2 (5437.49 kg/m3) and MoB2 (7695.13 kg/m3) and is inconsistent with the unit-cell volume, composition, and the n values given in Table 10, which imply ρ ≈ 13,400 kg/m3 for WB2. This typo appears in a table that feeds into sound velocities, acoustic impedance, and Debye temperature; the sound velocities themselves seem to have been computed with the correct density, but the erroneous tabulated value undermines confidence in the reported numbers.
  4. [Section 3.4(a), Eqs. (42)-(43) and Table 9] The assignment of longitudinal and transverse sound velocities is incorrect. For a hexagonal crystal along [100], the longitudinal velocity is sqrt(C11/ρ) and the two transverse velocities are sqrt(C44/ρ) and sqrt((C11-C12)/2ρ), but Eq. (42) labels sqrt((C11-C12)/2ρ) as υ_l and sqrt(C11/ρ) as υ_t1. Table 9 follows this swapped labeling, so the columns referred to as "longitudinal" are actually the slow transverse mode and vice versa. This mislabeling affects the physical interpretation of acoustic anisotropy in Eqs. (52) and should be corrected.
  5. [Table 1 and Section 3.1] The optimized c lattice parameter for WB2 (3.32 Å) differs from the cited experimental value (3.05 Å, Ref [13]) by about 9%, and for CrB2 the computed c (2.94 Å) is about 4% lower than the experimental value (3.07 Å). The statement that the computed lattice parameters are "in excellent agreement with the experimental results" is therefore not supported by Table 1. Since the elastic constants and derived properties depend on the relaxed geometry, this discrepancy should at least be discussed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 2, CrB2 row] The reference column cites [24] for the CrB2 elastic constants, but reference [24] is the Kohn-Sham DFT paper; the correct source appears to be reference [23] (Okamoto et al.).
  2. [Table 4, MoB2 row] The B/G ratio for MoB2 is 1.75, exactly at the Pugh threshold, and the Poisson ratio is 0.26, also at the critical value; the statement that MoB2 is brittle should be softened or justified with additional criteria.
  3. [Paragraph after Table 4] The sentence "Very good agreement with the calculated parameters is found" is contradicted by the large differences in B and G for WB2 compared with Ref [22] (B = 437.6 vs 325.6 GPa, G = 204.4 vs 136.7 GPa); the statement should be rephrased to reflect the actual level of agreement.
  4. [Section 3.5, Eq. (7)] The optical conductivity formula contains undefined symbols (Wcv, E_0) and appears dimensionally inconsistent as written; please provide the standard CASTEP implementation or clarify the notation.
  5. [Reference list] A few reference numbers are misassigned in the text (for example, Table 2 cites [24] for CrB2 elastic data, while the reference list attributes [23] to Okamoto et al.); the citation list should be rechecked throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's derived properties follow from DFT inputs through standard closed-form relations, with experimental values used only for comparison.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: DFT total-energy and band-structure calculations yield lattice constants, elastic constants, and N(EF); the Voigt-Reuss-Hill formulas (Eqs. 10-19), hardness formulas (Eqs. 20-24), sound-velocity and Debye-temperature formulas (Eqs. 37-44), and the McMillan-based superconducting relations (Eqs. 53-55) then transform those ground-state outputs into mechanical, thermophysical, and superconducting descriptors. No step re-inserts a target quantity as an input: the empirical hardness and Tc formulas are applied to the present compounds rather than fitted to them, and experimental values appear only in comparison tables (Tables 1, 2, 5, 12), not as fitting constraints. The mixed GGA/LDA functional choices and the apparent WB2 density misprint in Table 8 are correctness or data-quality concerns, not circularity. The self-citations are to the authors' earlier DFT papers for standard formulas, but the central formulas are also anchored to independent sources such as McMillan (1968), Slack (1979), and Cahill (1992), so the self-citations are not load-bearing. Overall, the reported properties are consequences of the DFT inputs under stated models, and no constructed equivalence between input and output is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computed results rest on standard DFT and on empirical formulas imported from the literature. No target quantity is fitted within this paper, but the validity of the functionals (especially for magnetic CrB2), the heuristic mu* formula, and the empirical hardness/Tc models are unverified for these compounds. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Coulomb pseudopotential coefficient in mu* formula (Eq. 54) = 0.26
    Imported from Ref [110] heuristic; directly sets mu* and thus the superconducting Tc. Not derived or fit in this paper, but its choice controls the Tc output.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption DFT with GGA-PBE (CrB2) and LDA (MoB2, WB2) exchange-correlation functionals accurately describes the ground-state structural, elastic, and electronic properties of these diborides.
    Section 2 defines the computational scheme; no validation against spin-polarized or hybrid calculations is provided, and the 7-9% c-axis errors in Table 1 contradict the 'excellent agreement' claim.
  • ad hoc to paper CrB2 can be treated as nonmagnetic in its ground-state calculation.
    CrB2 is an itinerant antiferromagnet with TN ~ 88 K (Ref [21]); the paper does not report spin-polarized calculations, so this is an unstated ad hoc assumption.
  • domain assumption The empirical formulas for hardness (Eqs. 20-24), fracture toughness (Eq. 25), melting temperature (Eq. 45), thermal conductivity (Eqs. 48-50), and superconducting Tc (Eq. 53) are applicable to XB2 compounds.
    These formulas were fitted to other material classes and are used here without independent validation for diborides.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DFT based comparative analysis of physical properties of binary metallic diborides XB$_2$ (X = Cr, Mo and W)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EDJBSBVO

@misc{pith2026241219687,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DFT based comparative analysis of physical properties of binary metallic diborides XB$_2$ (X = Cr, Mo and W)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EDJBSBVO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19687}
}
abstract

Transition-metal borides (TMBs) have long attracted attention of the researchers because of their unique mechanical and electrical properties including superconductivity. We have explored the structural, mechanical, electronic, optical, and some thermophysical properties of XB$_2$ (X = Cr, Mo and W) binary metallic diborides in detail employing density functional theory based first-principles method. Many of the physical properties, including direction-dependent mechanical properties, optical properties, and thermo-mechanical properties are being investigated for the first time.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [24]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  2. [22]

    X. Hao, Y. Xu, Z. Wu, D. Zhou, X. Liu, X. Cao, and J. Meng, Low-Compressibility and Hard Materials ReB2 and WB2: Prediction from First-Principles Study, Phys. Rev. B 74, 224112 (2006)

    2006

  3. [21]

    Pei et al., Pressure-Induced Superconductivity in Itinerant Antiferromagnet CrB 2, arXiv:2109.15213

    C. Pei et al., Pressure-Induced Superconductivity in Itinerant Antiferromagnet CrB 2, arXiv:2109.15213

    arXiv

  4. [100]

    G. A. Slack, The Thermal Conductivity of Nonmetallic Crystals , Solid State Phys. 34, 1–71 (1979)

    work page 1979

  5. [13]

    H. P. Woods, F. E. Wawner, and B. G. Fox, Tungsten Diboride: Preparation and Structure, Science 151, 75 (1966)

    1966

  6. [1]

    R. B. Kaner, J. J. Gilman, and S. H. Tolbert, Designing Superhard Materials, Science 308, 1268 (2005)

    2005

  7. [2]

    P. F. McMillan, New Materials from High -Pressure Experiments, Nat. Mater. 1, 19 (2002). 34

    2002

  8. [3]

    P. Wang, R. Kumar, E. M. Sankaran, X. Qi, X. Zhang, D. Popov, A. L. Cornelius, B. Li, Y. Zhao, and L. Wang, Vanadium Diboride (VB 2) Synthesized at High Pressure: Elastic, Mechanical, Electronic, and Magnetic Properties and Thermal Stability , Inorg. Chem. 57, 1096 (2018)

    2018

Show all 115 references
  1. [4]

    Mohammadi, A

    R. Mohammadi, A. T. Lech, M. Xie, B. E. Weaver, M. T. Yeung, S. H. Tolbert, and R. B. Kaner, Tungsten Tetraboride, an Inexpensive Superhard Material, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 10958 (2011)

    2011

  2. [5]

    Carenco, D

    S. Carenco, D. Portehault, C. Boissière, N. Mézailles, and C. Sanchez, Nanoscaled Metal Borides and Phosphides: Recent Developments and Perspectives , Chem. Rev. 113, 7981 (2013)

    2013

  3. [6]

    Yu Wang, X

    D. Yu Wang, X. Li, and Y. Xu Wang, First-Principles Inv estigation of Hexagonal WB2 Surfaces, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 044712 (2012)

    2012

  4. [7]

    R. W. G. Wyckoff, Crystal Structures-Volume 1 (Wiley, New York, 1965)

    1965

  5. [8]

    Beck, Metallurgy: Electronic Structure and Alloy Chemistry of the Transition Elements (Interscience-Wiley, New York, 1963)

    P. Beck, Metallurgy: Electronic Structure and Alloy Chemistry of the Transition Elements (Interscience-Wiley, New York, 1963)

    1963

  6. [9]

    AmreenBano and N. K. Gaur, Chemical Topology of 2 -Dimensional MoB 2 Sheet: First-Principles Study, AIP Conf. Proc. 2265, 030686 (2020)

    2020

  7. [10]

    Chung, M

    H.-Y. Chung, M. B. Weinberger, J. B. Levine, A. Kavner, J. -M. Yang, S. H. Tolbert, and R. B. Kaner, Synthesis of Ultra -Incompressible Superhard Rhenium Diboride at Ambient Pressure, Science 316, 436 (2007)

    2007

  8. [11]

    Wang et al., Crystal Structures, Elastic Properties, and Hardness of High -Pressure Synthesized CrB2 and CrB4, J

    S. Wang et al., Crystal Structures, Elastic Properties, and Hardness of High -Pressure Synthesized CrB2 and CrB4, J. Superhard Mater. 36, 279 (2014)

    2014

  9. [12]

    Q. Tao, X. Zhao, Y. Chen, J. Li, Q. Li, Y. Ma, J. Li, T. Cui, P. Zhu, and X. Wang, Enhanced Vickers Hardness by Quasi -3D Boron Network in MoB 2, RSC Adv. 3, 18317 (2013)

    2013

  10. [14]

    Eisterer, J

    M. Eisterer, J. Emhofer, S. Sorta, M. Zehetmayer, and H. W. Weber, Connectivity and Critical Currents in Polycrystalline MgB 2, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 22, 034016 (2009)

    2009

  11. [15]

    I. R. Shein and A. L. Ivanovskii, Elastic Properties of Mono - and Polycrystalline Hexagonal AlB 2 -like Diborides of s, p and d Metals from First -Principles 35 Calculations, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 415218 (2008)

    2008

  12. [16]

    Bauer, A

    A. Bauer, A. Regnat, C. G. F. Blum, S. Gottlieb -Schönmeyer, B. Pedersen, M. Meven, S. Wurmehl, J. Kuneš, and C. Pfleiderer, Low-Temperature Properties of Single - Crystal CrB2, Phys. Rev. B 90, 064414 (2014)

    2014

  13. [17]

    Dovale -Farelo, P

    V. Dovale -Farelo, P. Tavadze, M. J. Ver straete, A. Bautista -Hernández, and A. H. Romero, Exploring the Elastic and Electronic Properties of Chromium Molybdenum Diboride Alloys, J. Alloys. Compd. 866, 158885 (2021)

    2021

  14. [18]

    Akopov, M

    G. Akopov, M. T. Yeung, and R. B. Kaner, Rediscovering the Crystal Chemistry of Borides, Adv. Mater. 29, 1604506 (2017)

    2017

  15. [19]

    Y. Quan, K. -W. Lee, and W. E. Pickett, MoB2 under Pressure: Superconducting Mo Enhanced by Boron, Phys. Rev. B 104, 224504 (2021)

    2021

  16. [20]

    Pei et al., Pressure-Induced Superconductivity at 32 K in MoB2, Natl

    C. Pei et al., Pressure-Induced Superconductivity at 32 K in MoB2, Natl. Sci. Rev. 10, nwad034 (2023)

    2023

  17. [23]

    N. L. Okamoto, M. Kusakari, K. Tanaka, H. Inui, and S. Otani, Anisotropic Elastic Constants and Thermal Expansivities in Monocrystal CrB 2, TiB 2, and ZrB 2, Acta Mater. 58, 76 (2010)

    2010

  18. [25]

    S. J. Clark, M. D. Segall, C. J. Pickard, P. J. Hasnip, M. I. J. Probert, K. Refson, and M. C. Payne, First Principles Methods Using CASTEP , Z. Kristallogr. 220, 567 (2005)

    2005

  19. [26]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  20. [27]

    Lewin, E

    M. Lewin, E. H. Lieb, and R. Seiringer, The Local Density Approximation in Density Functional Theory, Pure Appl. Analysis 2, 35 (2020)

    2020

  21. [28]

    Sahni, K

    V. Sahni, K. -P. Bohnen, and M. K. Harbola, Analysis of the L ocal-Density 36 Approximation of Density-Functional Theory, Phys. Rev. A 37, 1895 (1988)

    1988

  22. [29]

    Vanderbilt, Soft Self -Consistent Pseudopotentials in a Generalized Eigenvalue Formalism, Phys

    D. Vanderbilt, Soft Self -Consistent Pseudopotentials in a Generalized Eigenvalue Formalism, Phys. Rev. B 41, 7892 (1990)

    1990

  23. [30]

    M. C. Payne, M. P. Teter, D. C. Allan, T. A. Arias, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Iterative Minimization Techniques for Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations: Molecular Dynamics and Conjugate Gradients, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 1045 (1992)

    1992

  24. [31]

    T. H. Fischer and J. A lmlof, General Methods for Geometry and Wave Function Optimization, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 9768 (1992)

    1992

  25. [32]

    O. H. Nielsen and R. M. Martin, First-Principles Calculation of Stress , Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 697 (1983)

    1983

  26. [33]

    J. P. Watt, HashinShtrikman Bounds on the Effective Elastic Moduli of Polycrystals with Orthorhombic Symmetry, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 6290 (1979)

    1979

  27. [34]

    J. P. Watt and L. Peselnick, Clarification of the Hashin Shtrikman Bounds on the Effective Elastic Moduli of Polycrystals with Hexagonal, Trigona l, and Tetragonal Symmetries, J. Appl. Phys. 51, 1525 (1980)

    1980

  28. [35]

    S. Saha, T. P. Sinha, and A. Mookerjee, Electronic Structure, Chemical Bonding, and Optical Properties of Paraelectric, Phys. Rev. B 62, 8828 (2000)

    2000

  29. [36]

    Murtaza, N

    G. Murtaza, N. Yousaf, M. Yaseen , A. Laref, and S. Azam, Systematic Studies of the Structural and Optoelectronic Characteristics of CaZn 2X2 (X = N, P, As, Sb, Bi) , Mater. Res. Express 5, 016304 (2018)

    2018

  30. [37]

    Ahmed, M

    R. Ahmed, M. Mahamudujjaman, M. A. Afzal, M. S. Islam, R. S. Islam, and S. H. Naqib, DFT Based Comparative Analysis of the Physical Properties of Some Binary Transition Metal Carbides XC (X = Nb, Ta, Ti) , J. Mater. Res. Technol. 24, 4808 (2023)

    2023

  31. [38]

    A hmed, M

    R. A hmed, M. Islam, M. M. Hossain, M. A. Ali, M. M. Uddin, and S. H. Naqib, A Comprehensive First -Principles Insights into the Physical Properties of Binary Intermetallic Zr3Ir Compound, Results Mater. 21, 100518 (2024)

    2024

  32. [39]

    Md. S. Islam, R. Ahmed, Md. Maham udujjaman, R. S. Islam, and S. H. Naqib, A Comparative Study of the Structural, Elastic, Thermophysical, and Optoelectronic Properties of CaZn 2X2 (X = N, P, As) Semiconductors via Ab -Initio Approach, Results Phys. 44, 106214 (2023)

    2023

  33. [40]

    Aronsson, T

    B. Aronsson, T. Lundström, and S. Rundqvist, Borides, Silicides, and Phosphides: A 37 Critical Review of Their Preparation, Properties and Crystal Chemistry (Methuen, 1965)

    1965

  34. [41]

    W. E. Pearson, The Crystal Chemistry and Physics of Metals and Alloys (New York: Interscience, 1972)

    1972

  35. [42]

    M. I. Naher, M. Mahamudujjaman, A. Tasnim, R. S. Islam, and S. H. Naqib, Ab -Initio Insights into the Elastic, Bonding, Phonon, Optoelectronic and Thermophysical Properties of SnTaS2, Solid State Sci. 131, 106947 (2022)

    2022

  36. [43]

    M. A. Hadi, M. Zahanggir Alam, I. Ahmed, A. M. M. Tanveer Karim, S. H. Naqib, A. Chroneos, and A. K. M. A. Islam, A Density Functional Theory Approach to the Effects of C and N Substitution at the B -Site of the First Boride MAX Phase Nb 2SB, Mater. Today Commun. 29, 102910 (2021)

    2021

  37. [44]

    Voigt, Lehrbuch der Kristallphysik (mit Ausschluss der Kristalloptik) , (Vieweg + Teubner Verlag, 1966)

    W. Voigt, Lehrbuch der Kristallphysik (mit Ausschluss der Kristalloptik) , (Vieweg + Teubner Verlag, 1966)

    1966

  38. [45]

    Reuss, Berechnung Der Fließgrenze von Mischkristallen Auf Grund Der Plastizitätsbedingung Für Einkristalle, Z

    A. Reuss, Berechnung Der Fließgrenze von Mischkristallen Auf Grund Der Plastizitätsbedingung Für Einkristalle, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 9, 49 (1929)

    1929

  39. [46]

    Hill, The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate , Proc

    R. Hill, The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate , Proc. Phys. Soc. A 65, 349 (1952)

    1952

  40. [47]

    Hill, Elastic Properties of Reinforced Solids: Some Theoretical Principles , J

    R. Hill, Elastic Properties of Reinforced Solids: Some Theoretical Principles , J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11, 357 (1963)

    1963

  41. [48]

    Mattesini, R

    M. Mattesini, R. Ahuja, and B. Johansson, Cubic Hf 3N4 and Zr 3N4: A Class of Hard Materials, Phys. Rev. B 68, 184108 (2003)

    2003

  42. [49]

    Kleinman, Deformation Potentials in Silicon

    L. Kleinman, Deformation Potentials in Silicon. I. Uniaxial Strain , Phys. Rev. 128, 2614 (1962)

    1962

  43. [50]

    Jamal, S

    M. Jamal, S. Jalali Asadabadi, I. Ahmad, and H. A. Rahnamaye Aliabad, Elastic Constants of Cubic Crystals, Comput. Mat. Sci. 95, 592 (2014)

    2014

  44. [51]

    Feng and S

    W. Feng and S. Cui, Mechanical and Electronic Properties of Ti 2AlN and Ti 4AlN3: A First-Principles Study, Can. J. Phys. 92, 1652 (2014)

    2014

  45. [52]

    Z. Sun, D. Music, R. Ahuja, and J. M. Schneider, Theoretical Investigation of the Bonding and Elastic Properties of Nanolayered Ternary Nitrides , Phys. Rev. B 71, 193402 (2005)

    2005

  46. [53]

    M. E. Eberhart and T. E. Jones, Cauchy Pressure and the Generalized Bonding Model 38 for Nonmagnetic Bcc Transition Metals, Phys. Rev. B 86, 134106 (2012)

    2012

  47. [54]

    Y. Wu, Y. Duan, X. Wang, M. Peng, L. Shen, and H. Qi, Elastic Anisotropy and Thermal Properties of Zr -Al-N Ternary Nitrides Using First -Principles Explorations, Mater. Today Commun. 33, 104651 (2022)

    2022

  48. [55]

    Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics , 8th ed

    C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics , 8th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2005)

    2005

  49. [56]

    Yildirim, H

    A. Yildirim, H. Koc, and E. Deligoz, First-Principles Study of the Structural, Elastic, Electronic, Optical, and Vibrational Properties of Intermetallic Pd 2Ga, Chinese Phys. B 21, 037101 (2012)

    2012

  50. [57]

    Rajagopalan, S

    M. Rajagopalan, S. Praveen Kumar, and R. Anuthama, FP-LAPW Study of the Elastic Properties of Al2X (X=Sc,Y,La,Lu), Phys. B Condens. Matter 405, 1817 (2010)

    2010

  51. [58]

    S. F. Pugh, XCII. Relations between the Elastic Moduli and the Plastic Properties of Polycrystalline Pure Metals, J. Sci. 45, 823 (1954)

    1954

  52. [59]

    Moussali, M

    A. Moussali, M. B. Amina, B. Fassi, I. Ameri, M. Ameri, and Y. Al -Douri, First- Principles Calculations to Investigate Structural and Thermodynamic Properties of Ni2LaZ (Z = As, Sb and Bi) Heusler Alloys, Indian J. Phys. 94, 1733 (2020)

    2020

  53. [60]

    Vaitheeswaran, V

    G. Vaitheeswaran, V. Kanchana, A. Svane, and A. Delin, Elastic Properties of MgCNi3— a Superconducting Perovskite, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 326214 (2007)

    2007

  54. [61]

    Fadila, M

    B. Fadila, M. Ameri, D. Bensaid, M. Noureddine, I. Ameri, S. Mesbah, and Y. Al - Douri, Structural, Magnetic, Electronic and Mechanical Properties of Full -Heusler Alloys Co 2YAl (Y = Fe, Ti): First Principles Calculations with Different Exchange - Correlation Potentials, J. M...

    2018

  55. [62]

    W. D. C. Jr and D. G. Rethwisch, Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering: An Integrated Approach (John Wiley & Sons, 2020)

    2020

  56. [63]

    H. Fu, D. Li, F. Peng, T. Gao, and X. Cheng, Ab Initio Calculations of Elastic Constants and Thermodynamic Properties of NiAl under High Pressures , Comput. Mat. Sci. 44, 774 (2008)

    2008

  57. [64]

    Haines, J

    J. Haines, J. Léger, and G. Bocquillon, Synthesis and Design of Superhard Materials , Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 31, 1 (2001)

    2001

  58. [65]

    Vitos, P

    L. Vitos, P. A. Korzhavyi, and B. Johansson, Stainless Steel Optimization from Quantum Mechanical Calculations, Nat. Mater. 2, 1 (2003). 39

    2003

  59. [66]

    K. J. Puttlitz and K. A. Stalter, in Handbook of Lead -Free Solder Technology for Microelectronic Assemblies (Springer, New York, 2005), p. 95

    2005

  60. [67]

    R. C. Lincoln, K. M. Koliwad, and P. B. Ghate, Morse-Potential Evaluation of Second- and Thi rd-Order Elastic Constants of Some Cubic Metals , Phys. Rev. 157, 463 (1967)

    1967

  61. [68]

    S.-H. Jhi, J. Ihm, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Electronic Mechanism of Hardness Enhancement in Transition-Metal Carbonitrides, Nature 399, 6732 (1999)

    1999

  62. [69]

    X.-Q. Chen, H. Niu, D. Li, and Y. Li, Modeling Hardness of Polycrystalline Materials and Bulk Metallic Glasses, Intermetallics 19, 1275 (2011)

    2011

  63. [70]

    Y. Tian, B. Xu, and Z. Zhao, Microscopic Theory of Hardness and Design of Novel Superhard Crystals, Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 33, 93 (2012)

    2012

  64. [71]

    D. M. Teter, Computational Alchemy: The Search for New Superhard Materials , MRS Bull. 23, 22 (1998)

    1998

  65. [72]

    N. Miao, B. Sa, J. Zhou, and Z. Sun, Theoretical Investigation on the Transition-Metal Borides with Ta3B4-Type Structure: A Class of Hard and Refractory Materials , Comput. Mater. Sci. 50, 1559 (2011)

    2011

  66. [73]

    Mazhnik and A

    E. Mazhnik and A. R. Oganov, A Model of Hardness and Fracture Toughness of Solids, J. Appl. Phys. 126, 125109 (2019)

    2019

  67. [74]

    H. Niu, S. Niu, and A. R. Oganov, Simple and Accurate Model of Fracture Toughness of Solids, J. Appl. Phys. 125, 065105 (2019)

    2019

  68. [75]

    Yin et al., Hardness and Elastic Moduli of High Pressure Synthesized MoB2 and WB 2 Compacts, High Press

    S. Yin et al., Hardness and Elastic Moduli of High Pressure Synthesized MoB2 and WB 2 Compacts, High Press. Res. 33, 409 (2013)

    2013

  69. [76]

    Ravindran, L

    P. Ravindran, L. Fast, P. A. Korzhavyi, B. Johansson, J. Wills, and O. Eriksson, Density Functional Theory for Calculation of Elastic Properties of Orthorhombic Crystals: Application to TiSi2, J. Appl. Phys. 84, 4891 (1998)

    1998

  70. [77]

    X. Gao, Y. Jiang, R. Zhou, and J. Feng, Stability and Elastic Properties of Y –C Binary Compounds Investigated by First Principles Calculations , J. Alloys Compd. 587, 819 (2014)

    2014

  71. [78]

    J. Wang, Y. Zhou, T. Liao, and Z. Lin, First-Principles Prediction of Low Shear-Strain Resistance of Al 3BC3: A Metal Borocarbide Containing Short Linear BC 2 Units, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 021917 (2006). 40

    2006

  72. [79]

    C. M. Kube and M. de Jong, Elastic Constants of Polycrystals with Generally Anisotropic Crystals, J. Appl. Phys. 120, 165105 (2016)

    2016

  73. [80]

    Arsigny, P

    V. Arsigny, P. Fillard, X. Pennec, and N. Ayache, Fast and Simple Calculus on Tensors in the Log -Euclidean Framework , in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2005 , Vol. 3749 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005), pp. 115–122

    2005

  74. [81]

    C. M. Kube, Elastic Anisotropy of Crystals, AIP Adv. 6, 095209 (2016)

    2016

  75. [82]

    S. I. Ranganathan and M. Ostoja -Starzewski, Universal Elastic Anisotropy Index , Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 055504 (2008)

    2008

  76. [83]

    Y. H. Duan, Y. Sun, M. J. Pen g, and S. G. Zhou, Anisotropic Elastic Properties of the Ca–Pb Compounds, J. Alloys Compd. 595, 14 (2014)

    2014

  77. [84]

    Gaillac, P

    R. Gaillac, P. Pullumbi, and F. -X. Coudert, ELATE: An Open -Source Online Application for Analysis and Visualization of Elastic Tensors , J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28, (2016)

    2016

  78. [85]

    Md. S. Rana, R. Ahmed, Md. S. Islam, R. S. Islam, and S. H. Naqib, DFT Based Investigation of Structural, Elastic, Optoelectronic, Thermophysical and Superconducting State Properties of Binary Mo 3P at Different Pressures, Next Mater. 6, 100284 (2025)

    2025

  79. [86]

    Boudiaf, A

    K. Boudiaf, A. Bouhemadou, Y. Al -Douri, R. Khenata, S. Bin -Omran, and N. Guechi, Electronic and Thermoelectric Properties of the Layered BaFAgCh (Ch = S, Se and Te): First-Principles Study, J. Alloys Compd. 759, 32 (2018)

    2018

  80. [87]

    Bekhti -Siad, K

    A. Bekhti -Siad, K. Bettine, D. P. Rai, Y. Al -Douri, X. Wang, R. Khenata, A. Bouhemadou, and C. H. Voon, Electronic, Optical and Thermoelectric Investigations of Zintl Phase AE 3AlAs3 (AE = Sr, Ba): First-Principles Calculations, Chinese J. Phys. 56, 870 (2018)

    2018

  81. [88]

    Belhachemi, H

    A. Belhachemi, H. Abid, Y. Al -Douri, M. Sehil, A. Bouhemadou, and M. Ameri, First-Principles Calculations to Investigate the Structural, Electronic and Optical Properties of Zn1-xMgxTe Ternary Alloys, Chinese J. Phys. 55, 1018 (2017)

    2017

  82. [89]

    A. H. Reshak and S. Auluck, Theoretical Investigation of the Electronic and Optical Properties of ZrX2 (X=S, Se and Te), Phys. B Condens. Matter 353, 230 (2004)

    2004

  83. [90]

    J.-H. Xu, T. Oguchi, and A. J. Freeman, Crystal Structure, Phase Stabi lity, and Magnetism in Ni3V, Phys. Rev. B 35, 6940 (1987). 41

    1987

  84. [91]

    Schreiber, O

    E. Schreiber, O. L. Anderson, and N. Soga, Elastic Constants and Their Measurement (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974)

    1974

  85. [92]

    M. F. Ashby, P. J. Ferreira, and D. L. Schodek, Material Classes, Structure, and Properties, in Nanomaterials, Nanotechnologies and Design (Elsevier, 2009), pp. 87 – 146

    2009

  86. [93]

    J. R. Christman, Fundamentals of Solid State Physics (Wiley, New York, 1988)

    1988

  87. [94]

    O. L. Anderson, A Simplified Method for Calculating the Debye T emperature from Elastic Constants, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 24, 909 (1963)

    1963

  88. [95]

    M. E. Fine, L. D. Brown, and H. L. Marcus, Elastic Constants versus Melting Temperature in Metals, Scr. Metall. 18, 951 (1984)

    1984

  89. [96]

    Salamon, Chapter 6 - Advanced Ceramics , in Advanced Ceramics for Dentistry (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2014), pp

    D. Salamon, Chapter 6 - Advanced Ceramics , in Advanced Ceramics for Dentistry (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2014), pp. 103–122

    2014

  90. [97]

    M. A. Ali, M. M. Hossain, M. M. Uddin, A. K. M. A. Islam, and S. H. Naqib, Understanding the Improvement of Thermo -Mechanical and Optical Properties of 212 MAX Phase Borides Zr2AB2 (A = In, Tl), J. Mater. Res. Technol. 15, 2227 (2021)

    2021

  91. [98]

    D. R. Clarke, Materials Selection Guidelines for Low Thermal Conductivity Thermal Barrier Coatings, Surf. Coat. Technol. 163–164, 67 (2003)

    2003

  92. [99]

    M. M. Hossain, M. A. Ali, M. M. Uddin, A. K. M. A. Islam, and S. H. Naqib, Origin of High Hardness and Optoelectronic and Thermo -Physical Properties of Boron -Rich Compounds B 6X (X = S, Se): A Comprehensive Study via DFT Approach , J. Appl. Phys. 129, 175109 (2021)

    2021

  93. [101]

    C. L. Julian, Theory of Heat Conduction in Rare -Gas Crystals, Phys. Rev. 137, A128 (1965)

    1965

  94. [102]

    D. G. Cahill, S. K. Watson, and R. O. Pohl, Lower Limit to the Thermal Conductivity of Disordered Crystals, Phys. Rev. B 46, 6131 (1992)

    1992

  95. [103]

    M. I. Naher and S. H. Naqib, A Comprehensive Study of the Thermophysical and Optoelectronic Properties of Nb 2P5 via Ab-Initio Technique, Results Phys. 28, 104623 (2021)

    2021

  96. [104]

    Parvin and S

    F. Parvin and S. H. Naqib, Pressure Dependence of Structural, Elastic, Electronic, Thermodynamic, and Optical Properties of van Der Waals -Type NaSn 2P2 Pnictide 42 Superconductor: Insights from DFT Study, Results Phys. 21, 103848 (2021)

    2021

  97. [105]

    Roknuzzaman, M

    M. Roknuzzaman, M. Hadi, M. Abden, M. T. Nasir, A. K. M. Islam, M. Ali, K. Ostrikov, and S. H. Naqib, Physical Properties of Predicted Ti 2CdN versus Existing Ti2CdC MAX Phase: An Ab Initio Study, Comput. Mater. Sci. 113, 148 (2015)

    2015

  98. [106]

    M. A. Hadi, R. V. Vovk, and A. Chroneos, Physical Properties of the Recently Discovered Zr 2(Al1-xBix)C MAX Phases , J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 27, 11925 (2016)

    2016

  99. [107]

    W. L. McMillan, Transition Temperature of Strong -Coupled Superconductors, Phys. Rev. 167, 331 (1968)

    1968

  100. [108]

    Md. S. Islam, R. Ahmed, M. M. Hossain, M. A. Ali, M. M. Uddin, and S. H. Naqib, Ab-Initio Insights into the Physical Properties of XIr3(X = La, Th) Superconductors: A Comparative Analysis, Results Mater. 22, 100568 (2024)

    2024

  101. [109]

    Rahman Rano, I

    B. Rahman Rano, I. M. Syed, and S. H. Naqib, Elastic, Electronic, Bonding, and Optical Properties of WTe 2 Weyl Semimetal: A Comparative Investigation with MoTe 2 from First Principles, Results Phys. 19, 103639 (2020)

    2020

  102. [110]

    A. K. M. A. Islam and S. H. Naqib, Possible Explanation of High -Tc in Some 2D Cuprate Superconductors, J. of Phys. Chem. Solids 58, 1153 (1997)

    1997

  103. [111]

    S. Ram, V. Kanchana, G. Vaitheeswaran, A. Svane, S. B. Dugdale, and N. E. Christensen, Electronic topological transition in LaSn 3 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 85, 174531 (2012)

    2012

  104. [112]

    Z. Lin, L. V. Zhigilei, and V. Celli, Electron-phonon coupling and electron heat capacity of metals under conditions of strong electron -phonon nonequilibrium, Phys. Rev. B 77, 075133 (2008)

    2008

  105. [113]

    Islam, S

    J. Islam, S. K. Mitro, M. M. Hossain, M. M. Uddin, N. Jahan, A. K. M. A. Islam, S. H. Naqib, and M. A. Ali, Exploration of the physical properties of the newly synthesized kagome superconductor LaIr 3Ga2 using different exchange -correlation functionals , Phys. Chem. Chem. Phy...

    2022

  106. [114]

    Guguchia et al., Tunable anomalous Hall conductivity through volume -wise magnetic competition in a topological kagome magnet, Nat

    Z. Guguchia et al., Tunable anomalous Hall conductivity through volume -wise magnetic competition in a topological kagome magnet, Nat. Commun. 11, 1 (2020)

    2020

  107. [115]

    Pei et al., Pressure Induced Superconductivity in WB 2 and ReB2 through Modifying the B Layers, Sci

    C. Pei et al., Pressure Induced Superconductivity in WB 2 and ReB2 through Modifying the B Layers, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 287412 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.