REVIEW 1 cited by
Flat parameter-space metric for all-sky searches for gravitational-wave pulsars
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
All-sky, broadband, coherent searches for gravitational-wave pulsars are computationally limited. It is therefore important to make efficient use of available computational resources, notably by minimizing the number of templates used to cover the signal parameter space of sky position and frequency evolution. For searches over the sky, however, the required template density (determined by the parameter-space metric) is different at each sky position, which makes it difficult in practice to achieve an efficient covering. Previous work on this problem has found various choices of sky and frequency coordinates that render the parameter-space metric approximately constant, but which are limited to coherent integration times of either less than a few days, or greater than several months. These limitations restrict the sensitivity achievable by hierarchical all-sky searches, and hinder the development of follow-up pipelines for interesting gravitational-wave pulsar candidates. We present a new flat parameter-space metric approximation, and associated sky and frequency coordinates, that do not suffer from these limitations. Furthermore, the new metric is numerically well-conditioned, which facilitates its practical use.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The G347.3-0.5 outlier from O3: a follow-up case study for continuous gravitational-wave candidates
Multi-pipeline follow-up recovers the G347.3-0.5 outlier in O3 data but finds no standard persistent continuous-wave signal in O4a or O4b, disfavouring the astrophysical interpretation under the assumed model.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.