pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23480 · v1 · pith:EEDJ45GVnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

A Multiband Study of the HR 4796A Disk in the Optical Using MagAO-X

Jay K. Kueny , Alycia J. Weinberger , Zhe-Yu Daniel Lin , Joseph D. Long , Jared R. Males , Joshua Liberman , Jialin Li , Sebastiaan Haffert
show 13 more authors
Laird M. Close Eden McEwen Maggie Y. Kautz Olivier Guyon Logan Pearce Parker T. Johnson Katie Twitchell Alex Hedglen Avalon Gower Warren Foster Jhen Lumbres Lauren Schatz Elena Tonucci
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 07:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords debris diskHR 4796Ascattering phase functionadaptive opticsdust grainsmultiband imagingforward modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multi-band images of the HR 4796A debris disk show scattering phase functions dominated by large, highly absorptive grains.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports high signal-to-noise total intensity images of the HR 4796A debris disk captured in four optical filters from 527 nm to 909 nm using MagAO-X on the Magellan telescope. Forward modeling of the data, including a pixel-based freeform disk model to avoid self-subtraction artifacts, yields scattering phase functions that are strongly forward-peaked with a minimum near 65 degrees. These phase functions, together with a red spectral slope, lead the authors to conclude that the observed scattering arises primarily from large, highly absorptive grains. A faint exterior halo and a compact clump appear in the models but are not captured by standard broken power-law density profiles. The work supplies empirical phase functions that can be compared directly against grain scattering calculations.

Core claim

The authors detect the full extent of the HR 4796A disk, including its minor-axis forward-scattering lobes, in g', r', i', and z' bands. Modeling the scattering phase function with a Legendre polynomial basis produces highly forward-scattering curves whose shape and wavelength dependence indicate that large, highly absorptive grains dominate the scattering. Additional model features include a red spectral slope, an exterior dust halo not fit by a broken power law, and a localized clump in the freeform reconstruction.

What carries the argument

Scattering phase function modeled as a linear combination of Legendre polynomials, fitted to the observed angular brightness distribution after forward modeling to remove angular differential imaging artifacts.

If this is right

  • The disk contains a faint halo of dust exterior to the main ring that requires density profiles beyond simple broken power laws.
  • Dust in the system exhibits a red spectral slope across the optical bands.
  • Freeform modeling reveals a compact, clump-like brightness enhancement along the disk.
  • Future comparisons with irregular grain scattering models are required to extract specific size and composition constraints.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The measured phase functions provide a direct empirical template that can be applied to other debris disks observed at similar wavelengths to test whether large-grain dominance is common.
  • If the absorptive grains are confirmed, the disk may retain a higher fraction of primordial material than disks dominated by small, icy scatterers.
  • The clump feature could be monitored for orbital motion to test whether it traces a shepherding planet or a recent collision.

Load-bearing premise

The Legendre polynomial expansion of chosen order, combined with the regularization used in the fit, reproduces the true angular scattering behavior without introducing spurious features.

What would settle it

A new observation or re-reduction that yields a scattering phase function with a backscattering peak or a flat wavelength dependence at the same scattering angles would contradict the large-grain interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23480 by Alex Hedglen, Alycia J. Weinberger, Avalon Gower, Eden McEwen, Elena Tonucci, Jared R. Males, Jay K. Kueny, Jhen Lumbres, Jialin Li, Joseph D. Long, Joshua Liberman, Katie Twitchell, Laird M. Close, Lauren Schatz, Logan Pearce, Maggie Y. Kautz, Olivier Guyon, Parker T. Johnson, Sebastiaan Haffert, Warren Foster, Zhe-Yu Daniel Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Final KLIP-RDI reductions using MagAO-X data at i ′ and z ′ showing the disk in a north-up, east-left orientation. The colorbar shows SBdisk/Fstar (arcsec−2 ) units. The central, high speckle noise region and field exterior to 1. ′′34 have been blocked with a software mask. The star is located at (0,0). patterns to compute the needed x- and y-shift to center the PSF. Finally, we applied these computed x- a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Final KLIP-ADI reductions using MagAO-X data showing the disk in a north-up, east-left orientation. We show the disk images at g ′ r ′ i ′ z ′ in a left-to-right progression. The colorbar shows SBdisk/Fstar (arcsec−2 ) units. The two white dotted lines trace the elliptical region where the likelihood was maximized by the MCMC for all our disk images [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Signal-to-noise per pixel maps of our KLIP-reduced disk images at g ′ , r ′ , i ′ , and z ′ . The star and field outside of 1. ′′34 have been blocked with a software mask. The colorbar represents S/N. We optimized the signal-to-noise of the disk in the reduced images by performing a grid search over the pyklip hyperparameters, as described in Kueny et al. (2024). We optimized the number of KLIP modes, the … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top row: Deprojected KLIP-ADI images of the disk at g ′ r ′ i ′ z ′ as labeled. We retained the original disk position angle in our deprojected images for a better comparison to the images. The region where we quantify the azimuthal flux ranges between 74 to 91 au from the star. The dashed white lines intersect at the location of the star while the white cross marks the measured center of the disk. Bottom … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Forward modeling results for all our images at g ′ , r ′ , i ′ , and z ′ . The columns show, in left to right progression, our best fitting disk model, the disk model convolved with the instrument PSF and then forward modeled, our KLIP-reduced image, and the residuals between the best-fit forward model and the KLIP-reduced image for each of the passbands. The colorbars in the first 4 columns show surface b… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top: averaged freeform disk model shown in a linear stretch representing a deconvolved image of the disk in a wide ∼ 500 nm to 900 nm bandpass. Bottom: The SPF extracted separately from the north- and south-half of the averaged optimized freeform disk model shown with blue and red lines, respectively. The curves have been normalized such that the north-half SPF at the 90 degree scattering angle is 1. the s… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The averaged freeform model made by combining all our data can theoretically reveal structure that spans fewer pixels than a resolution element (i.e., 1 λ/D). We made this model by averaging optimized freeform models using all g ′ r ′ i ′ z ′ data from 2023A, 2024A, and 2025A. Top row: the same averaged freeform model image in two flavors: (left) with a hard colorbar stretch and (right) Gaussian smoothed a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: 5.3. Dust distribution in the disk From our physical disk modeling results, we recover a thin eccentric ring with a very steep inner edge (αin ∼ 45) and stellar offsets in both the x− and y−directions on the order of 1.5—2.5 au shifting the model toward the southeast. We fit for the opening angles ho for our KLIP-ADI images but held them fixed at h0 = 1.0% for our KLIP-RDI models as we found that those ima… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Residuals map between our best-fit forward models and our KLIP-reduced ADI images for r ′ -band showing a consistent halo of underfit disk flux over the whole azimuthal range. We extracted the radial dust profiles at four distinct locations in the deprojected disk image and best-fit forward model as annotated in the top panel. Radial cuts 1 through 4 correspond to 45◦ , 135◦ , 225◦ , and 305◦ measured cou… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of the best-fit HG solutions from our forward modeling analysis on our ADI images at g ′ , r ′ , i ′ , and z ′ . The SPF is plotted on a log scale on the y-axis and the scattering angle in degrees is plotted linearly on the x-axis. We only include the 3σ uncertainty associated with the i ′ -band filter results as a representative uncertainty estimation for clarity. 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 S… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison of our best-fit model SPFs to our KLIP-RDI and KLIP-ADI data at i ′ and z ′ . For the KLIP-RDI images, we fit a custom SPF made from a basis of Legendre polynomials shown as the blue and red dashed lines for i ′ -band and z ′ -band, respectively. For the KLIP-ADI images, we fit HG SPFs which we plot as green and black dotted lines for i ′ -band and z ′ -band, respectively. We plotted the SPF al… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Radial brightness profiles extracted along the disk’s major axis using our deprojected KLIP-ADI images. We used circular apertures centered on every pixel along the major axis of radius 63 mas. We denote the surface brightness profiles of the north and south ansae as the dashed and solid lines respectively. Black and magenta lines representing profiles from the KLIP-reduced data and best-fit forward model… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Comparison of the SPFs extracted from our freeform disk models to our data at g ′ , r ′ , i ′ , and z ′ . We extracted the SPF for the north and south halves of the disk separately for analyzing asymmetry. We illustrate each SPF in log scale along the y-axis and linearly along the x-axis. We illustrate uncertainties as shaded regions. Top and Middle rows: In the ADI data, the dip in the south side SPF fro… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison of our extracted photometry at the disk ansae (purple and black points) and values reported in the literature. We include Hubble Space Telescope and MagAO data from Rodigas et al. (2014)’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: SPFs for irregular dust particles from glitterin adopting a single size parameter x = (2πr)/λ = 35.0 where we have varied the complex index of refraction as labeled in the plot legend. The shaded regions are 13◦ away from θ = 0◦ and 180◦ which are not observable based on the inclination of the disk. The SPF calculated using the particles with the highest amount of absorption (blue line) most-closely align… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present total intensity images of the debris disk around HR 4796A from observations spanning 2023 to 2025 with the Magellan extreme adaptive optics instrument (MagAO-X). We detected the disk at high signal-to-noise ratios at $g' (527$ nm), $r' (615$ nm), $i' (762$ nm), and $z' (909 $ nm). Additionally, we present images collected using the "star-hopping" technique that show the entirety of the disk, including the dramatic forward-scattering at the minor axis. We subjected our images to a battery of modeling techniques to constrain the geometry and photometry of the disk. Leveraging our clear detections of the disk's minor axis, we modeled the scattering phase function (SPF) using a basis of the Legendre polynomials. To mitigate self-subtraction artifacts in our angular differential imaging, we implemented a forward-modeling pipeline that generates a pixel-based freeform disk forward model leading to a deconvolved image of the disk. Our best-fit disk models reveal: (1) highly forward-scattering SPFs with a minimum at the $\sim65^{\circ}$ scattering angle, (2) a faint halo of dust just exterior to the spine of the disk that is not well-described by a broken power law density profile, (3) a red spectral slope for the dust, and finally (4) a compact, clump-like feature in the freeform disk models. Our empirically-measured SPFs suggest that the scattering is dominated by large, highly-absorptive grains. However, we emphasize the need for testing advanced irregular grain models using our SPFs to learn more about the physical and chemical properties of this complex system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents high-SNR total-intensity images of the HR 4796A debris disk obtained with MagAO-X in the g', r', i', and z' bands (2023–2025). It uses star-hopping observations to capture the full disk including the forward-scattering minor axis, applies a pixel-based freeform forward model to mitigate ADI self-subtraction, and fits the scattering phase function (SPF) with a Legendre polynomial basis. The resulting models show a highly forward-scattering SPF with a minimum near 65°, a faint exterior halo not captured by a broken power-law density profile, a red spectral slope, and a compact clump; the authors conclude that the SPF indicates scattering dominated by large, highly absorptive grains.

Significance. If the SPF shape is robust, the multiband empirical measurements supply new optical constraints on dust properties in a benchmark debris disk, complementing existing infrared data. Strengths include the high-SNR detections across four bands, the star-hopping technique for complete azimuthal coverage, and the forward-modeling pipeline that addresses a known ADI limitation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Modeling section] Modeling section (SPF fitting paragraph): The order of the Legendre polynomial basis is unspecified and no validation is described for truncation order, regularization strength, or comparison against alternatives such as a Henyey-Greenstein function or Mie-based models. Because the reported minimum at ~65° is used to infer that scattering is dominated by large, highly-absorptive grains, this choice is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Results section] Results section (SPF and grain-size paragraph): The inference that the SPF minimum is physical rather than an artifact of the polynomial expansion or residual forward-model mismatch is not supported by any sensitivity tests; without such tests the grain-property conclusion rests on an unverified functional form.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Band notation contains typographic inconsistencies (e.g., '$g' (527$ nm)' and '$z' (909 $ nm)'); consistent LaTeX formatting would improve readability.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'a battery of modeling techniques' is vague; listing the specific methods (forward modeling, Legendre fit, etc.) would clarify the scope of the analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the paper accordingly to improve clarity and robustness of the SPF analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Modeling section] Modeling section (SPF fitting paragraph): The order of the Legendre polynomial basis is unspecified and no validation is described for truncation order, regularization strength, or comparison against alternatives such as a Henyey-Greenstein function or Mie-based models. Because the reported minimum at ~65° is used to infer that scattering is dominated by large, highly-absorptive grains, this choice is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript should explicitly state the order of the Legendre polynomial basis, the truncation criterion, regularization strength, and provide some validation. The current text does not include these details. In revision we will specify the basis order used, describe how it was selected, report the regularization value, and add a short comparison to a Henyey-Greenstein fit to show that the ~65° minimum is not an artifact of the chosen functional form. We already caution in the abstract and conclusion that physical grain models are still needed; the added material will reinforce that the Legendre representation is an empirical measurement tool rather than a direct physical model. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section] Results section (SPF and grain-size paragraph): The inference that the SPF minimum is physical rather than an artifact of the polynomial expansion or residual forward-model mismatch is not supported by any sensitivity tests; without such tests the grain-property conclusion rests on an unverified functional form.

    Authors: We agree that sensitivity tests are required to demonstrate that the ~65° minimum is robust. The present manuscript does not contain these tests. In the revised version we will add explicit checks that vary the polynomial order and assess the effect of plausible forward-model residuals on the recovered SPF shape. These tests will be described in the results section and will support that the minimum is not driven by the basis choice or residual artifacts. We note that the manuscript already qualifies the grain-size conclusion as suggestive and calls for further irregular-grain modeling; the new tests will make that qualification more quantitative. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical SPF fit from observations is self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports direct imaging observations of the HR 4796A disk across multiple bands, applies forward-modeling to mitigate ADI self-subtraction, and fits a Legendre polynomial basis to the resulting SPF data. The reported SPF shape (forward-scattering with ~65° minimum) and grain-size inference are outputs of this data-driven process rather than reductions of the model inputs by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing steps; the Legendre basis is presented as a modeling choice whose adequacy is an assumption (not a definitional equivalence). The derivation chain remains independent of the target claims and is consistent with standard observational astronomy practice.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5942 in / 1066 out tokens · 30747 ms · 2026-06-26T07:24:23.425553+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

134 extracted references · 115 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    MODE=swspectr+INS.NAME=SKYCALC Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Astropy:. 2013 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  2. [2]

    E., et al

    Nature Methods , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 , language =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 2020

  3. [3]

    Joye, W. A. and Mandel, E. , editor =. New. Astronomical. 2003 , pages =

    2003

  4. [4]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    The. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab095e , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab095e 2019

  5. [5]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Limits of. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2005 , note =. doi:10.1086/431209 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1086/431209 2005

  6. [6]

    and Close, Laird M

    Males, Jared R. and Close, Laird M. and Guyon, Olivier and Hedglen, Alexander D. and Van Gorkom, Kyle and Long, Joseph D. and Kautz, Maggie Y. and Lumbres, Jennifer and Schatz, Lauren and Rodack, Alexander T. and Miller, Kelsey L. and Doelman, David S. and Snik, Frans and Knight, Justin M. and Morzinski, Katie M. and Gasho, Victor and Keller, Christoph U....

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2561682 2020

  7. [7]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Angular. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2006 , note =. doi:10.1086/500401 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1086/500401 2006

  8. [8]

    and Chen, Christine and Wang, Jason J

    Mazoyer, Johan and Arriaga, Pauline and Hom, Justin and Millar-Blanchaer, Maxwell A. and Chen, Christine and Wang, Jason J. and Duchêne, Gaspard and Patience, Jennifer and Pueyo, Laurent , editor =. Ground-based and. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1117/12.2560091 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2560091 2020

  9. [9]

    2015 , note =

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/811/1/18 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/811/1/18 2015

  10. [10]

    2016 , note =

    The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/5/128 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/5/128 2016

  11. [11]

    2015 , note =

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/108 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/2/108 2015

  12. [12]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Discovery of concentric broken rings at sub-arcsec separations in the. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628396 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628396 2016

  13. [13]

    2016 , note =

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/824/2/117 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/824/2/117 2016

  14. [14]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , author =

    emcee:. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , author =. 2013 , note =

    2013

  15. [15]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Diffuse radiation in the. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 1941 , note =

    1941

  16. [16]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    An. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2019 , note =

    2019

  17. [17]

    and Ruffio, Jean-Baptise and De Rosa, Robert J

    Wang, Jason J. and Ruffio, Jean-Baptise and De Rosa, Robert J. and Aguilar, Jonathan and Wolff, Schuyler G. and Pueyo, Laurent , year =

  18. [18]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Stumbling over. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac63a9 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac63a9 2022

  19. [19]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , author =

    Techniques and. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , author =. 2014 , note =

    2014

  20. [20]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Scattering by. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2003 , note =

    2003

  21. [21]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Magellan. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2014 , note =

    2014

  22. [22]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    On the. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 1999 , note =

    1999

  23. [23]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    Reference. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2019 , note =

    2019

  24. [24]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Impact of angular differential imaging on circumstellar disk images , volume =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2012 , note =

    2012

  25. [25]

    Wyatt, M. C. ; Panić , translator =. Five steps in the evolution from protoplanetary to debris disk , volume =. 2015 , note =

    2015

  26. [26]

    Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer , author =

    Effect of morphology on light scattering by agglomerates , volume =. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer , author =. 2015 , note =

    2015

  27. [27]

    Optics Letters , author =

    Efficient subpixel image registration algorithms , volume =. Optics Letters , author =. 2008 , note =

    2008

  28. [28]

    Nature Astronomy , author =

    Spatially resolved imaging of the inner. Nature Astronomy , author =. 2023 , note =

    2023

  29. [29]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Gaia. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2023 , note =

    2023

  30. [30]

    Science , author =

    What makes a planet habitable? , volume =. Science , author =. 2019 , note =

    2019

  31. [31]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    The. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2006 , note =

    2006

  32. [32]

    2014 , pages =

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/96 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/798/2/96 2014

  33. [33]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Revealing asymmetrical dust distribution in the inner regions of. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140319 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140319 2021

  34. [34]

    2012 , pages =

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/755/2/L28 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/755/2/l28 2012

  35. [35]

    2020 , note =

    The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ababa6 , number =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ababa6 2020

  36. [36]

    and Vigan, A

    Milli, J. and Vigan, A. and Mouillet, D. and Lagrange, A. -M. and Augereau, J. -C. and Pinte, C. and Mawet, D. and Schmid, H. M. and Boccaletti, A. and Matrà, L. and Kral, Q. and Ertel, S. and Chauvin, G. and Bazzon, A. and Ménard, F. and Beuzit, J. -L. and Thalmann, C. and Dominik, C. and Feldt, M. and Henning, T. and Min, M. and Girard, J. H. and Galich...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527838 2017

  37. [37]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    Debris. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab9199 , number =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab9199 2020

  38. [38]

    and Engler, N

    Milli, J. and Engler, N. and Schmid, H. M. and Olofsson, J. and Ménard, F. and Kral, Q. and Boccaletti, A. and Thébault, P. and Choquet, E. and Mouillet, D. and Lagrange, A. -M. and Augereau, J. -C. and Pinte, C. and Chauvin, G. and Dominik, C. and Perrot, C. and Zurlo, A. and Henning, T. and Beuzit, J. -L. and Avenhaus, H. and Bazzon, A. and Moulin, T. a...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935363

  39. [39]

    and Potier, A

    Galicher, R. and Potier, A. and Mazoyer, J. and Wahhaj, Z. and Baudoz, P. and Chauvin, G. , month = jun, year =. Increasing the raw contrast of. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449196 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449196

  40. [40]

    and Ginski, C

    de Regt, S. and Ginski, C. and Kenworthy, M. A. and Caceres, C. and Garufi, A. and Gledhill, T. M. and Hales, A. S. and Huelamo, N. and Kóspál, Á. and Millar-Blanchaer, M. A. and Pérez, S. and Schreiber, M. R. , month = apr, year =. Polarimetric differential imaging with. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348736 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348736

  41. [41]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    A uniform analysis of debris discs with the. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2024 , note =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae368 , number =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae368 2024

  42. [42]

    and Olofsson, J

    Thebault, P. and Olofsson, J. and Kral, Q. , month = jun, year =. A reinvestigation of debris disc halos , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202345995 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202345995

  43. [43]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Multiband. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9aba , number =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9aba 2020

  44. [44]

    1999 , note =

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , author =. 1999 , note =. doi:10.1086/311921 , number =

    work page doi:10.1086/311921 1999

  45. [45]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    The. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaa3f3 , number =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaa3f3 2018

  46. [46]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    Astrometric. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad924f , number =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad924f 2025

  47. [47]

    and Males, Jared R

    McEwen, Eden A. and Males, Jared R. and Guyon, Olivier and Haffert, Sebastiaan Y. and Long, Joseph D. and Close, Laird M. and Van Gorkom, Kyle and Lumbres, Jennifer and Hedglen, Alexander D. and Schatz, Lauren and Kautz, Maggie Y. and Pearce, Logan A. and Kueny, Jay and McLeod, Avalon L. and Foster, Warren B. and Li, Jialin and Roberts, Roz and Weinberger...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3020254 2024

  48. [48]

    and Milli, J

    Wahhaj, Z. and Milli, J. and Romero, C. and Cieza, L. and Zurlo, A. and Vigan, A. and Peña, E. and Valdes, G. and Cantalloube, F. and Girard, J. and Pantoja, B. , month = apr, year =. A search for a fifth planet around. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038794 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038794

  49. [49]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Probing. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2024 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0f96 , number =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0f96 2024

  50. [50]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    The. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2008 , note =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/2/735 , number =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/2/735 2008

  51. [51]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , author =

    Complex. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , author =. 2008 , note =. doi:10.1086/527546 , number =

    work page doi:10.1086/527546 2008

  52. [52]

    and Milli, J

    Olofsson, J. and Milli, J. and Bayo, A. and Henning, Th. and Engler, N. , month = aug, year =. The challenge of measuring the phase function of debris discs. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038237 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038237

  53. [53]

    2018 , note =

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty135 , number =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty135 2018

  54. [54]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Polarimetry with the. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/182 , number =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/182 2015

  55. [55]

    and Milli, J

    Olofsson, J. and Milli, J. and Thébault, P. and Kral, Q. and Ménard, F. and Janson, M. and Augereau, J. -C. and Bayo, A. and Beamín, J. C. and Henning, Th. and Iglesias, D. and Kennedy, G. M. and Montesinos, M. and Pawellek, N. and Schreiber, M. R. and Zamora, C. and Carbillet, M. and Feautrier, P. and Fusco, T. and Madec, F. and Rabou, P. and Sevin, A. a...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935998

  56. [56]

    2009 , note =

    The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2009 , note =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/137/1/53 , number =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/137/1/53 2009

  57. [57]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Dust. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2006 , note =. doi:10.1086/505736 , number =

    work page doi:10.1086/505736 2006

  58. [58]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Space. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2000 , note =. doi:10.1086/309188 , number =

    work page doi:10.1086/309188 2000

  59. [59]

    and Samland, M

    Christiaens, V. and Samland, M. and Henning, Th. and Portilla-Revelo, B. and Perotti, G. and Matthews, E. and Absil, O. and Decin, L. and Kamp, I. and Boccaletti, A. and Tabone, B. and Marleau, G. -D. and van Dishoeck, E. F. and Güdel, M. and Lagage, P. -O. and Barrado, D. and Caratti o Garatti, A. and Glauser, A. M. and Olofsson, G. and Ray, T. P. and Sc...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349089

  60. [60]

    2017 , note =

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2867 , number =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2867 2017

  61. [61]

    2022 , note =

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac7729 , number =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac7729 2022

  62. [62]

    and Hartmann, Lee W

    Stauffer, John R. and Hartmann, Lee W. and Barrado y Navascues, David , month = dec, year =. An. doi:10.1086/176544 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1086/176544

  63. [63]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    A. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 1998 , keywords =. doi:10.1086/306184 , number =

    work page doi:10.1086/306184 1998

  64. [64]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Modeling the. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2003 , note =. doi:10.1086/374865 , number =

    work page doi:10.1086/374865 2003

  65. [65]

    and Mawet, D

    Milli, J. and Mawet, D. and Pinte, C. and Lagrange, A. -M. and Mouillet, D. and Girard, J. H. and Augereau, J. -C. and De Boer, J. and Pueyo, L. and Choquet, É. , month = may, year =. New constraints on the dust surrounding. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423950 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423950

  66. [66]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Mid-. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 1998 , note =. doi:10.1086/311525 , number =

    work page doi:10.1086/311525 1998

  67. [67]

    Lagrange, A. -M. and Milli, J. and Boccaletti, A. and Lacour, S. and Thebault, P. and Chauvin, G. and Mouillet, D. and Augereau, J. C. and Bonnefoy, M. and Ehrenreich, D. and Kral, Q. , month = oct, year =. An insight in the surroundings of. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219187 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219187

  68. [68]

    Moerchen, M. M. and Churcher, L. J. and Telesco, C. M. and Wyatt, M. and Fisher, R. S. and Packham, C. , month = feb, year =. Asymmetric heating of the. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014881 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014881

  69. [69]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , author =

    Images of the. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , author =. 2011 , note =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/743/1/L6 , number =

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/743/1/l6 2011

  70. [70]

    and Biller, Beth A

    Wahhaj, Zahed and Liu, Michael C. and Biller, Beth A. and Nielsen, Eric L. and Hayward, Thomas L. and Kuchner, Marc and Close, Laird M. and Chun, Mark and Ftaclas, Christ and Toomey, Douglas W. , month = jul, year =. The. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323335 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323335

  71. [71]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    Multiband. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab91b1 , number =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab91b1 2020

  72. [72]

    Meredith and Duchêne, Gaspard and Matthews, Brenda C

    Hughes, A. Meredith and Duchêne, Gaspard and Matthews, Brenda C. , month = sep, year =. Debris. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-052035 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-052035

  73. [73]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Saturn's. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/811/1/67 , number =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/811/1/67 2015

  74. [74]

    and Canovas, H

    Min, M. and Canovas, H. and Mulders, G. D. and Keller, C. U. , month = jan, year =. The effects of disk and dust structure on observed polarimetric images of protoplanetary disks , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117333 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117333

  75. [75]

    and Kama, M

    Min, M. and Kama, M. and Dominik, C. and Waters, L. B. F. M. , month = jan, year =. The lunar phases of dust grains orbiting. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913065 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913065

  76. [76]

    and Pennypacker, Carlton R

    Purcell, Edward M. and Pennypacker, Carlton R. , month = dec, year =. Scattering and. doi:10.1086/152538 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1086/152538

  77. [77]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    The spin-orbit alignment of the. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2009 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911854 , number =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911854 2009

  78. [78]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.20070 , journal =

    Roumesy, Maxime and Ménard, François and Tazaki, Ryo and Duchêne, Gaspard and Martinien, Laurine and Zerna, Rémi , month = may, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.20070 , journal =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.20070

  79. [79]

    Annalen der Physik , author =

    Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer. Annalen der Physik , author =. 1935 , pages =. doi:10.1002/andp.19354160705 , number =

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19354160705 1935

  80. [80]

    Annalen der Physik , author =

    Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer. Annalen der Physik , author =. 1936 , pages =. doi:10.1002/andp.19364170706 , number =

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19364170706 1936

Showing first 80 references.