REVIEW 2 cited by
LEMoN: Label Error Detection using Multimodal Neighbors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large repositories of image-caption pairs are essential for the development of vision-language models. However, these datasets are often extracted from noisy data scraped from the web, and contain many mislabeled instances. In order to improve the reliability of downstream models, it is important to identify and filter images with incorrect captions. However, beyond filtering based on image-caption embedding similarity, no prior works have proposed other methods to filter noisy multimodal data, or concretely assessed the impact of noisy captioning data on downstream training. In this work, we propose, theoretically justify, and empirically validate LEMoN, a method to identify label errors in image-caption datasets. Our method leverages the multimodal neighborhood of image-caption pairs in the latent space of contrastively pretrained multimodal models to automatically identify label errors. Through empirical evaluations across eight datasets and twelve baselines, we find that LEMoN outperforms the baselines by over 3% in label error detection, and that training on datasets filtered using our method improves downstream captioning performance by more than 2 BLEU points over noisy training.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ArtiFact: A Large-Scale Multi-Modal Cultural Heritage Dataset
ArtiFact is a new multi-modal dataset of 651k museum records used to benchmark cross-modal error detection with seven error categories and semantic query processing challenges.
-
On the Difficulty of Learning a Meta-network for Training Data Selection
Analysis of MTS reveals poor GSNR and uninformative features; larger batches and distribution-based features yield 5.49% and 2.89% gains on benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.