Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Complementary Language Model and Parallel Bi-LRNN for False Trigger Mitigation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.08113 v1 pith:EG74AX5T submitted 2020-08-18 eess.AS cs.CLcs.LGcs.SD

classification eess.AScs.CLcs.LGcs.SD
keywords modelfalselanguagetriggerbi-lrnncomplementaryparallelrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

False triggers in voice assistants are unintended invocations of the assistant, which not only degrade the user experience but may also compromise privacy. False trigger mitigation (FTM) is a process to detect the false trigger events and respond appropriately to the user. In this paper, we propose a novel solution to the FTM problem by introducing a parallel ASR decoding process with a special language model trained from "out-of-domain" data sources. Such language model is complementary to the existing language model optimized for the assistant task. A bidirectional lattice RNN (Bi-LRNN) classifier trained from the lattices generated by the complementary language model shows a $38.34\%$ relative reduction of the false trigger (FT) rate at the fixed rate of $0.4\%$ false suppression (FS) of correct invocations, compared to the current Bi-LRNN model. In addition, we propose to train a parallel Bi-LRNN model based on the decoding lattices from both language models, and examine various ways of implementation. The resulting model leads to further reduction in the false trigger rate by $10.8\%$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools