Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Data-Free Model Stealing in a Hard Label Setting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.11022 v1 pith:EGONXSEP submitted 2022-04-23 cs.CR cs.CV

classification cs.CRcs.CV
keywords settingmodelaccessdata-freegradientshardlabelquery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning models deployed as a service (MLaaS) are susceptible to model stealing attacks, where an adversary attempts to steal the model within a restricted access framework. While existing attacks demonstrate near-perfect clone-model performance using softmax predictions of the classification network, most of the APIs allow access to only the top-1 labels. In this work, we show that it is indeed possible to steal Machine Learning models by accessing only top-1 predictions (Hard Label setting) as well, without access to model gradients (Black-Box setting) or even the training dataset (Data-Free setting) within a low query budget. We propose a novel GAN-based framework that trains the student and generator in tandem to steal the model effectively while overcoming the challenge of the hard label setting by utilizing gradients of the clone network as a proxy to the victim's gradients. We propose to overcome the large query costs associated with a typical Data-Free setting by utilizing publicly available (potentially unrelated) datasets as a weak image prior. We additionally show that even in the absence of such data, it is possible to achieve state-of-the-art results within a low query budget using synthetically crafted samples. We are the first to demonstrate the scalability of Model Stealing in a restricted access setting on a 100 class dataset as well.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SoK: Data Reconstruction Attacks Against Machine Learning Models: Definition, Metrics, and Benchmark

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors define data reconstruction attacks and measure them with dataset-level FID, sample-level distance and coverage, and an LLM visual judge, finding reconstruction quality tracks memorization.

Pith tools