Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 52 references

Partial Compositeness: from Anarchy to Symmetry

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A two-stage composite-Higgs flow generates the quark flavor hierarchy and then protects it, bringing the compositeness scale down to 5-10 TeV.

desk verdict Two-stage anarchy-to-symmetry RG is a genuinely new route to MFV composite Higgs at 5-10 TeV, at the cost of an assumed IR CFT that the paper states plainly. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05332 v1 pith:EHEP26M5 submitted 2025-07-07 hep-ph hep-th

Kaustubh Agashe , Lorenzo Ricci , Raman Sundrum This is my paper
classification hep-phhep-th
keywords compositeHiggspartialcompositenessminimalflavorviolationhierarchiesemergentsymmetriesrenormalizationgroupCPneutrinomasses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a two-stage renormalization-group flow that resolves the central tension of composite Higgs models: flavor-anarchic partial compositeness produces the observed fermion mass hierarchies, but it also produces flavor- and CP-violating effects that force the compositeness scale above $O(100)$ TeV. The proposal is that the strong dynamics above an intermediate flavor scale $\Lambda_{\rm fl}$ is anarchic, generating hierarchical Yukawa couplings, while below $\Lambda_{\rm fl}$ it tumbles into a new phase that is almost scale-invariant and possesses accidental $U(3)_U \times U(3)_D$ and CP symmetries. In that second stage the right-handed fermion mixings flow to universal fixed points, so that at the compositeness scale $m_*$ the low-energy theory has the minimal flavor violation form rather than an anarchic one. If this works, the compositeness scale can be as low as $5$-$10$ TeV, putting the new composite states within LHC and future collider reach, with the new states coupling to all fermion generations.

What carries the argument

The engine of the proposal is the two-stage renormalization-group flow of the elementary-composite mixing couplings $\lambda^{ai}_\psi$ in $L_{\rm mix} = \lambda\, \mathcal{O}\, \psi$, separated by the flavor scale $\Lambda_{\rm fl}$. In Stage-I the anomalous dimensions $\gamma^a_\psi$ of the composite operators are ordered and anarchic, so the running itself creates the fermion mass hierarchy. In Stage-II the strong dynamics is assumed to have an accidental $U(3)_U \times U(3)_D$ (and CP) symmetry, with $O_{\rm DL}$ irrelevant ($\gamma_{\rm DL}>0$) and $O_{\rm UR,DR}$ relevant ($\gamma_{\rm UR}=\gamma_{\rm DR}<0$); the negative anomalous dimensions drive the right-handed mixing matrices to the universal fixed point $\lambda_{\rm DR}(m_*) = g_* \sqrt{-\gamma_{\rm DR}}\, I_3$, which is exactly the identity structure required by minimal flavor violation. The $O(1)$ anarchic matching matrices at $\Lambda_{\rm fl}$ are harmless because a unitary rotation can absorb them without disturbing the fixed-point form.

What would settle it

A conformal-bootstrap or lattice search for the assumed Stage-II fixed point would settle the claim: if no scale-invariant phase exists with accidental $U(3)_U \times U(3)_D$ and CP symmetry, universal negative anomalous dimensions for the right-handed operators, $\gamma_{\rm DL}>0$, and no coupling to $O_Q$, then the promised hierarchy-and-protection mechanism has no ultraviolet completion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the minimal flavor violation ansatz for the composite Higgs, in which the strong dynamics respects $U(3)_U \times U(3)_D$ and is broken only by spurions proportional to the Yukawa matrices, need not be inserted by hand: it can emerge from a UV-anarchic partial compositeness model. Stage-I, from the Planck scale down to $\Lambda_{\rm fl}$, has no flavor symmetries; hierarchically ordered anomalous dimensions make the linear mixing couplings $\lambda$ hierarchical, reproducing the observed quark masses and mixings, including a large top Yukawa through relevant deformations. At $\Lambda_{\rm fl}$ the dynamics undergoes a sudden transition to Stage-II, an almost scale-invariant phase with accidental $U(3)_U \times U(3)_D$ and CP symmetries. There the right-handed mixings are attracted to a universal fixed point proportional to the identity, the left-handed mixings are rescaled uniformly, and the anarchic matching matrices can be absorbed by unitary rotations, so the low-energy EFT takes the minimal flavor violation form of Eqs. (8,9). The same construction generates hierarchical charged leptons while leaving neutrino masses small and anarchic, and current flavor and CP bounds allow $m_* \sim 5$-$10$ TeV.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the strong dynamics has a second, lower-energy phase with the required accidental family symmetries and CP conservation, and that the sudden transition into that phase does not reintroduce $O(1)$ anarchic flavor violation; the paper states this as an assumption rather than deriving it from a microscopic theory.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The compositeness scale can be as low as $m_* \sim 5$-$10$ TeV while satisfying current flavor and CP tests, so new composite states are within LHC and future collider reach.
  • Because all generations of right-handed fermions become significantly composite, new resonances can be produced directly from valence quarks and leptons and can decay into all generations, not just into top, Higgs, $W$ and $Z$.
  • Future lepton colliders would gain a direct probe of leptonic compositeness at these low scales, with sensitivity beyond anarchic models.
  • Dirac neutrino masses can be naturally much smaller than charged-lepton masses while remaining anarchic, giving large neutrino mixings and allowing either CP-conserving or CP-violating neutrino sectors.
  • A less symmetric variant with partial up-type universality can reach $m_* \sim 5$ TeV, at the edge of LHC sensitivity, while remaining compatible with precision flavor bounds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper leaves implicit: the assumed Stage-II fixed point should appear in the conformal data as degenerate family anomalous dimensions, so a conformal-bootstrap or lattice search for a $U(3)_U \times U(3)_D \times CP$-symmetric phase is a concrete way to test the construction.
  • An extension the authors do not perform: an explicit five-dimensional warped realization with a stabilized intermediate brane could verify that the semi-permeable brane's matching matrices are indeed absorbable and that flavor-violating thresholds stay negligible.
  • A natural generalization beyond the paper: the same anarchy-to-symmetry flow could be applied to other strongly coupled beyond-Standard-Model sectors that need both UV-generated hierarchies and IR flavor protection, such as composite dark matter models.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a two-stage renormalization-group framework for partial compositeness. In the far UV (Stage-I), the strong dynamics is flavor-anarchic and the mixings between elementary quarks and composite operators with different anomalous dimensions generate hierarchical Yukawa structures. At an intermediate flavor scale Λfl, a rapid transition ('tumbling') leads to Stage-II, an assumed IR CFT with accidental U(3)_U × U(3)_D and CP symmetries, in which right-handed mixings flow to universal fixed points and left-handed mixings undergo a universal rescaling. The authors claim that this reproduces the MFV composite-Higgs ansatz of Eqs. (8,9), thereby allowing m* ~ 5–10 TeV, and they extend the construction to leptons, with hierarchical charged leptons and small, anarchic Dirac neutrino masses from bilinear operators. The paper also discusses a less symmetric variant and summarizes current experimental constraints.

Significance. If the central claim held, this would be a valuable step toward combining the hierarchy-generating power of anarchic partial compositeness with the flavor/CP protection of emergent symmetries, potentially lowering the compositeness scale into LHC and future-collider reach. The paper presents an elegant two-stage picture with a 5D dual, analytic RG solutions, and a claimed numerical check, and it makes concrete phenomenological distinctions (e.g., compositeness of all right-handed generations, distinctive decay channels). However, the result is conditional on several strong assumptions that are not derived from a microscopic theory, and one of the technical steps involving the matching matrix appears to be invalid as stated. The significance is therefore real but the current manuscript does not yet establish the central mechanism.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Eqs. (22)–(24), footnote 10]
  2. [Sec. III, Eq. (19)]
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (19) and Sec. IV]
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption]
  2. [App. C, LEP bound paragraph]
  3. [Eqs. (11) and (27)]
  4. [App. A, Eq. (A12)]
  5. [Around Eq. (25) and App. A]
  6. [Eq. (C9) and nearby text]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the two-stage RG derivation is self-contained, with the IR CFT assumptions explicit and benchmark exponents honestly fitted; remaining self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained and not circular. Stage-I evolves anarchic O(1) mixings through assumed scaling-dimension spectra (Eqs. (13), (A1), (A2)) to produce hierarchical matrices for \lambda_{UL,DL}; this is a genuine RG calculation from stated inputs. The benchmark exponents in (25) are explicitly fitted to observed masses and mixings (footnote 11), so they are model parameters, not predictions masquerading as outputs. The only sense in which the MFV structure is 'input' is the explicit assumption in Eq. (19) that the Stage-II CFT possesses accidental U(3)_U x U(3)_D and CP symmetry and no longer includes O_Q; the paper labels this 'assumed' rather than deriving it from anarchy, so the framework is conditional on an unsupported dynamical hypothesis. That is a correctness risk, not circularity. The matching through \Lambda_{fl} and the U_D rotation used to absorb c^ab_DL (Eqs. (22)-(24), footnote 10) are order-of-magnitude redefinitions of O(1) anarchic matrices, not the importation of the target result. Self-citations to [18], [47], and [42] are to separate analyses or technical tools and are not load-bearing for the hierarchy derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 4 invented entities

The model carries a large number of hand-chosen exponents and scales, and the central mechanism is conditional on an unconstructed IR CFT. The listed free parameters and axioms underpin the derivation, and the paper does not derive any of them from a UV completion.

free parameters (8)
  • Stage-I quark anomalous dimensions gamma_Q^a, gamma_UL^a, gamma_DL^a, gamma_UR^a, gamma_DR^a = Eq. (25): -gamma_Q ~ (0.4,0.3,0.05), gamma_DL ~ (0.1,0.05,0.05), gamma_UL ~ (0.2,0.05,-0.05), -gamma_UR,DR ~ O(0.1)
    Chosen by hand so the two-stage RG reproduces observed quark masses and CKM angles; not derived from a UV completion.
  • Stage-II quark anomalous dimensions gamma_UL, gamma_DL, gamma_UR, gamma_DR, and variants gamma_TL, gamma_TR = Eq. (25): gamma_UL=-0.15, gamma_DL=0.05, gamma_UR=-0.5, gamma_DR=-0.6; App. B: gamma_TR=-1
    Set to create the universal right-handed fixed point and the hierarchy exponents; fit to observed fermion data.
  • Lepton-sector anomalous dimensions and Higgs operator dimension gamma_H = gamma_H - gamma_UR ~ 2.5 and gamma_H >= 1, with Lambda_fl ~ sqrt(Lambda_UV m*)
    Chosen to make neutrino masses small and charged-lepton bilinear terms subdominant; not predicted.
  • Composite scale m* = 10 TeV in the MFV benchmark, 5 TeV in the partial-universality benchmark (Eqs. C6, C7)
    Phenomenological target at the edge of current constraints, not a prediction.
  • Strong coupling g* = g* = 3 in the benchmarks
    Chosen to maximize the allowed parameter space; not derived from the strong dynamics.
  • Flavor scale Lambda_fl = 10^6 TeV in App. B; also Lambda_fl ~ sqrt(Lambda_UV m*) in the lepton discussion
    Selected to satisfy Delta F = 2 bounds and to produce the desired hierarchy exponents; constraints require Lambda_fl > (10^4-10^5) g* TeV.
  • UV scale Lambda_UV = m_Planck ~ 10^16 TeV
    Assumed as an input of the model.
  • Matching matrices c_ab, initial mixings lambda(Lambda_UV), and bilinear seeds Y_nu(Lambda_fl) = O(1) anarchic matrices
    Unknown brane-localized and UV coefficients; they affect the numerical fit but are not predicted by the framework.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT duality maps the strong RG flow to a 5D warped EFT with branes.
    Used throughout Sec. I and Fig. 2(b) to motivate the mid-brane construction; no proof given, but standard in the composite Higgs literature.
  • domain assumption Approximately conformal strong dynamics with 1/N and 1/Delta_gap expansions.
    Required for two CFT-like stages and for a tractable low-lying operator spectrum; no microscopic realization is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper Stage-II IR CFT with accidental U(3)_U x U(3)_D x CP symmetry, universal scaling dimensions, and no O_Q operator.
    Load-bearing input in Eq. (19) and the surrounding text; assumed, not constructed or derived.
  • ad hoc to paper Rapid 'tumbling' transition at Lambda_fl with O(1) matching matrices that do not spoil hierarchies.
    Assumed in Sec. III; anarchic O(1) matching matrices c_ab could reintroduce flavor violation if not aligned by rotations.
  • standard math Top Yukawa fixed point coefficient c is positive, following Ref. [46].
    Needed in Eqs. (6)-(7) for the relevant deformation to reach an IR fixed point; cited from prior work.
  • domain assumption Stage-II strong dynamics preserves CP to protect the neutron EDM.
    Assumed after Eq. (19); if CP is broken, EDM constraints would reappear.
  • domain assumption Large-N estimate that O_H^dagger O_H has dimension approximately 2(1+gamma_H), so it is not relevant.
    Footnote 13 prevents a reintroduced hierarchy problem, but depends on the unspecified large-N CFT.
invented entities (4)
  • Intermediate flavor-scale brane or defect at Lambda_fl
    purpose: Separates the UV anarchic CFT slice from the IR symmetric CFT slice and stabilizes the two-stage geometry.
    Postulated model-building device; no independent signal or calculation of its properties is given.
  • Emergent U(3)_U x U(3)_D x CP-symmetric IR CFT
    purpose: Provides the universal right-handed fixed point and the GIM suppression central to the mechanism.
    No explicit CFT is constructed; its existence is the main assumption of the paper.
  • Auxiliary bulk field q'_L in the 5D dual
    purpose: Combines with q_L through UV boundary mixing to produce the distinctive light-mode profiles in Fig. 2(b).
    A holographic auxiliary; footnote 3 gives an equivalent 4D orbifold description without it.
  • Right-handed neutrinos nu_i
    purpose: Enable small Dirac neutrino masses with anarchic mixings via the bilinear operator in Eqs. (26)-(29).
    Introduced beyond the Standard Model; parameters are chosen to match the observed neutrino scale, with no independent prediction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Partial Compositeness: from Anarchy to Symmetry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EHEP26M5

@misc{pith2026250705332,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Partial Compositeness: from Anarchy to Symmetry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EHEP26M5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05332}
}
abstract

Within the Composite Higgs paradigm, Partial Compositeness has emerged as an elegant mechanism for generating large flavor hierarchies such as are observed in the quark and lepton masses and mixings. This mechanism exploits the strong renormalization group effects of the compositeness dynamics when these are {\it not} flavor-symmetric. Despite its remarkable properties, at this point it is stringently constrained by the body of flavor- and CP-violation tests, so that the compositeness scale must be at least $O(100)$ TeV, beyond the direct reach of proposed colliders. On the other hand, Composite Higgs theories with flavor-symmetric strong dynamics, but with realistic flavor-violating hierarchies introduced in an ad hoc manner, can extend the GIM mechanism of the standard model and thereby be far less constrained, at the edge of LHC reach and well within reach of future colliders. We show how the best features of both these types of dynamics can be combined if flavor-symmetries of the strong composite dynamics are emergent in the IR near the compositeness scale but absent in the far UV. In this case, flavor hierarchies can be generated by the renormalization group flow in the UV, followed by an IR stage in which the dynamics flows towards accidental flavor and CP symmetries. We point out how the collider and low-energy phenomenology is significantly impacted by the IR stage. Our analysis includes a discussion of the distinctive features of the small neutrino masses and their large mixings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05332 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Holographic realization of APC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Schematic description of our symmetric model from the Ads-CFT dual perspective. Only the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Main sensitivity bounds for the flavor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Again, λUR reach the universal fixed point λUR∣fp = g∗ √−γUR I3 ≡ ρUR I3 , (A15) and analogously for the down-sector

    The RG evolution is than simply dλii UR d log µ = γUR λii UR+ (λii UR)3 g2∗ , (A14) for i = 1, 2, 3. Again, λUR reach the universal fixed point λUR∣fp = g∗ √−γUR I3 ≡ ρUR I3 , (A15) and analogously for the down-sector. The starting point of the RG for λUL,DL in Stage- II is λai UL(Λfl)= cab u λbi UL(Λ+ fl) , (A16) for the up-sector, where λbi UL(Λ+ fl) is...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Panico and A

    G. Panico and A. Wulzer, The Composite Nambu- Goldstone Higgs , Vol. 913 (Springer, 2016) arXiv:1506.01961 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    D. B. Kaplan, Flavor at SSC energies: A New mech- anism for dynamically generated fermion masses, Nucl. Phys. B 365, 259 (1991)

    work page 1991

  4. [4]

    Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures (Cambridge University Press, 1985)

    S. Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures (Cambridge University Press, 1985). 15

    work page 1985

  5. [5]

    From Fixed Points to the Fifth Dimension

    R. Sundrum, From Fixed Points to the Fifth Dimension, Phys. Rev. D 86, 085025 (2012), arXiv:1106.4501 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9905221

    arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    Sundrum, Tasi 2004 lectures: To the fifth dimen- sion and back, in Theoretical Advanced Study Insti- tute in Elementary Particle Physics: Physics in D≧ 4 (2005) pp

    R. Sundrum, Tasi 2004 lectures: To the fifth dimen- sion and back, in Theoretical Advanced Study Insti- tute in Elementary Particle Physics: Physics in D≧ 4 (2005) pp. 585–630, arXiv:hep-th/0508134

    arXiv 2005

  8. [8]

    T. Gherghetta, A Holographic View of Beyond the Standard Model Physics, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Physics of the Large and the Small(2011) pp. 165– 232, arXiv:1008.2570 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Arkani-Hamed, M

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati, and L. Randall, Holography and phenomenology, JHEP 08, 017, arXiv:hep-th/0012148

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Rattazzi and A

    R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni, Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model, JHEP 04, 021, arXiv:hep-th/0012248

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Contino, Y

    R. Contino, Y. Nomura, and A. Pomarol, Higgs as a Holographic Pseudo Goldstone Boson, Nucl. Phys. B 671, 148 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0306259

    2003 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Contino and A

    R. Contino and A. Pomarol, Holography for fermions, JHEP 11, 058, arXiv:hep-th/0406257

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Agashe, R

    K. Agashe, R. Contino, and A. Pomarol, The Mini- mal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B 719, 165 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0412089

    2005 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Grossman and M

    Y. Grossman and M. Neubert, Neutrino masses and mixings in nonfactorizable geometry, Phys. Lett. B 474, 361 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9912408

    2000 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gherghetta and A

    T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, Bulk fields and su- persymmetry in a slice of AdS, Nucl. Phys. B 586, 141 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0003129

    2000 arXiv

  8. [16]

    S. J. Huber and Q. Shafi, Fermion masses, mix- ings and proton decay in a Randall-Sundrum model, Phys. Lett. B 498, 256 (2001), arXiv:hep- ph/0010195

    2001

  9. [17]

    S. J. Huber, Flavor violation and warped geom- etry, Nucl. Phys. B 666, 269 (2003), arXiv:hep- ph/0303183

    2003

  10. [18]

    Agashe, G

    K. Agashe, G. Perez, and A. Soni, Flavor structure of warped extra dimension models, Phys. Rev. D 71, 016002 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0408134

    2005 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Glioti, R

    A. Glioti, R. Rattazzi, L. Ricci, and L. Vecchi, Ex- ploring the Flavor Symmetry Landscape, SciPost Phys. 18, 201 (2025), arXiv:2402.09503 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Frigerio, M

    M. Frigerio, M. Nardecchia, J. . Serra, and L. Vecchi, The Bearable Compositeness of Leptons, JHEP 10, 017, arXiv:1807.04279 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    R. S. Chivukula and H. Georgi, Composite Techni- color Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 188, 99 (1987)

    1987

  14. [22]

    Redi and A

    M. Redi and A. Weiler, Flavor and CP Invari- ant Composite Higgs Models, JHEP 11, 108, arXiv:1106.6357 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Barbieri, D

    R. Barbieri, D. Buttazzo, F. Sala, D. M. Straub, and A. Tesi, A 125 GeV composite Higgs boson versus flavour and electroweak precision tests, JHEP 05, 069, arXiv:1211.5085 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Redi, Leptons in Composite MFV, JHEP 09, 060, arXiv:1306.1525 [hep-ph]

    M. Redi, Leptons in Composite MFV, JHEP 09, 060, arXiv:1306.1525 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    D’Ambrosio, G

    G. D’Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B645, 155 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0207036

    2002 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Golling et al., Physics at a 100 tev pp collider: be- yond the standard model phenomena, CERN Yellow Rep

    T. Golling et al., Physics at a 100 tev pp collider: be- yond the standard model phenomena, CERN Yellow Rep. 3, 441 (2017), arXiv:1606.00947 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    S. Chen, A. Glioti, R. Rattazzi, L. Ricci, and A. Wulzer, Learning from radiation at a very high en- ergy lepton collider, JHEP05, 180, arXiv:2202.10509 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Accettura et al., Towards a muon collider, Eur

    C. Accettura et al., Towards a muon collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 864 (2023), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 84, 36 (2024)], arXiv:2303.08533 [physics.acc-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    B. A. Stefanek, Non-universal probes of composite Higgs models: new bounds and prospects for FCC- ee, JHEP 09, 103, arXiv:2407.09593 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    Redi, Composite MFV and Beyond, Eur

    M. Redi, Composite MFV and Beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2030 (2012), arXiv:1203.4220 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Barbieri, D

    R. Barbieri, D. Buttazzo, F. Sala, and D. M. Straub, Flavour physics from an approximate U (2)3 symme- try, JHEP 07, 181, arXiv:1203.4218 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, G. Perez, and L. Randall, Fla- vor anarchy in a Randall-Sundrum model with 5D minimal flavor violation and a low Kaluza- Klein scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 171604 (2008), arXiv:0710.1869 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Panico and A

    G. Panico and A. Pomarol, Flavor hierarchies from dynamical scales, JHEP 07, 097, arXiv:1603.06609 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Fuentes-Martin, G

    J. Fuentes-Martin, G. Isidori, J. M. Lizana, N. Se- limovic, and B. A. Stefanek, Flavor hierarchies, fla- vor anomalies, and Higgs mass from a warped ex- tra dimension, Phys. Lett. B 834, 137382 (2022), arXiv:2203.01952 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Covone, J

    S. Covone, J. Davighi, G. Isidori, and M. Pesut, Flavour deconstructing the composite Higgs, JHEP 01, 041, arXiv:2407.10950 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Cheung, A

    C. Cheung, A. L. Fitzpatrick, and L. Ran- dall, Sequestering CP Violation and GIM-Violation with Warped Extra Dimensions, JHEP 01, 069, arXiv:0711.4421 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Cacciapaglia, C

    G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csaki, J. Galloway, G. Maran- della, J. Terning, and A. Weiler, A GIM Mech- anism from Extra Dimensions, JHEP 04, 006, arXiv:0709.1714 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Csaki, A

    C. Csaki, A. Falkowski, and A. Weiler, A Simple Flavor Protection for RS, Phys. Rev. D 80, 016001 (2009), arXiv:0806.3757 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Csaki and D

    C. Csaki and D. Curtin, A Flavor Protection for 16 Warped Higgsless Models, Phys. Rev. D 80, 015027 (2009), arXiv:0904.2137 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  32. [40]

    S. Raby, S. Dimopoulos, and L. Susskind, Tumbling gauge theories, Nuclear Physics B 169, 373 (1980)

    1980

  33. [41]

    I. R. Klebanov and M. J. Strassler, Supergravity and a confining gauge theory: Duality cascades and chi SB resolution of naked singularities, JHEP 08, 052, arXiv:hep-th/0007191

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    S. J. Lee, Y. Nakai, and M. Suzuki, Multiple hierar- chies from a warped extra dimension, JHEP 02, 050, arXiv:2109.10938 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Agashe, P

    K. Agashe, P. Du, S. Hong, and R. Sundrum, Flavor Universal Resonances and Warped Gravity, JHEP 01, 016, arXiv:1608.00526 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise, Modulus stabi- lization with bulk fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4922 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9907447

    1999 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Barbieri, L

    R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall, and Y. Nomura, A Con- strained standard model from a compact extra di- mension, Phys. Rev. D63, 105007 (2001), arXiv:hep- ph/0011311

    2001

  38. [46]

    G. F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol, and R. Rat- tazzi, The Strongly-Interacting Light Higgs, JHEP 06, 045, arXiv:hep-ph/0703164

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Vecchi, A dangerous irrelevant UV-completion of the composite Higgs, JHEP 02, 094, arXiv:1506.00623 [hep-ph]

    L. Vecchi, A dangerous irrelevant UV-completion of the composite Higgs, JHEP 02, 094, arXiv:1506.00623 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Agashe, T

    K. Agashe, T. Okui, and R. Sundrum, A Com- mon Origin for Neutrino Anarchy and Charged Hierarchies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 101801 (2009), arXiv:0810.1277 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Bona et al., Overview and theoretical prospects for CKM matrix and CP violation from the UTfit Collaboration, PoS WIF AI2023, 007 (2024)

    M. Bona et al., Overview and theoretical prospects for CKM matrix and CP violation from the UTfit Collaboration, PoS WIF AI2023, 007 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Agashe, R

    K. Agashe, R. Contino, L. Da Rold, and A. Pomarol, A Custodial symmetry for Zb¯b, Phys. Lett. B 641, 62 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0605341

    2006 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Agashe, A

    K. Agashe, A. Delgado, M. J. May, and R. Sundrum, RS1, custodial isospin and precision tests, JHEP 08, 050, arXiv:hep-ph/0308036

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Panico, L

    G. Panico, L. Ricci, and A. Wulzer, High-energy EFT probes with fully differential Drell-Yan mea- surements, JHEP 07, 086, arXiv:2103.10532 [hep- ph]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.