Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 84 references

Superconductivity in La5Ni3O11 is a two-gap state: interlayer dz2 pairing dominates, and a weaker intralayer dx2-y2 channel explains the reduced 64 K Tc.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 16:00 UTC pith:EHLHKS5O

load-bearing objection The paper's two-gap scenario for La5Ni3O11 is plausible and the symmetry framework is useful, but the quantitative ranking of the leading pairing rests on an internally inconsistent feasibility test that mixes bare and renormalized parameters. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18094 v2 pith:EHLHKS5O submitted 2026-07-20 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Symmetry-Based Microscopic Theory of the Unconventional Pairing Mechanism in La₅Ni₃O₁₁

Guan-Hao Feng , Jun Quan This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el PACS 74.20.-z74.70.-b71.27.+a
keywords La5Ni3O11nickelate superconductorstwo-gap superconductivitys±-wave pairinginterlayer pairingorbital-selective correlationsDFT+DMFTsymmetry-based pairing analysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

La5Ni3O11, a hybrid nickelate made of alternating bilayer and monolayer blocks, superconducts at about 64 K under pressure—lower than the 80 K of the bilayer compound La3Ni2O7. The paper argues that the superconductivity lives entirely in the bilayer subsystem and is a two-gap state: a dominant interlayer pairing between nickel dz2 orbitals and a subleading intralayer pairing between dx2-y2 orbitals. The reduced transition temperature is explained by a weaker interlayer hopping ratio, which diminishes the leading pairing channel. A sympathetic reader should care because this offers a single symmetry-based mechanism that connects several nickelate superconductors, with a concrete control parameter for Tc.

Core claim

Using charge self-consistent DFT+DMFT, the authors find that in La5Ni3O11 the monolayer subsystem is a Mott insulator (with the dx2-y2 orbital too incoherent to form quasiparticles), leaving the bilayer subsystem as the only source of Cooper pairs. Enumerating all pairing symmetries allowed by the p4/mmm layer group and comparing their BCS condensation energies, they identify the leading instability as an A1g interlayer pairing between Ni dz2 orbitals (Δ_sz2), coexisting with a subleading A1g intralayer pairing between Ni dx2-y2 orbitals (Δ_sx2+y2). The combined state is fully gapped along high-symmetry directions but is s±-wave on the Fermi surface, with accidental nodes on the β pocket; it

What carries the argument

The central object is a renormalized quasiparticle Hamiltonian for the bilayer subsystem, built from orbital-selective quasiparticle weights Z derived from DFT+DMFT self-energies. On top of this, the paper defines a symmetry-based pairing analysis: all symmetry-allowed pairing matrices compatible with the p4/mmm layer group, time-reversal, and particle-hole symmetry are written down, and each is solved self-consistently at the mean-field level to reproduce Tc ≈ 64 K. The decisive comparison is the BCS condensation energy of each candidate, which selects the Δ_sz2 + Δ_sx2+y2 two-gap state. The mechanism connecting structure to Tc is the hopping ratio |t⊥^z / t∥^x|, which tracks the relative s

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the monolayer subsystem cannot host Cooper pairs because it is Mott-insulating and incoherent; if its dx2-y2 orbital turns out to contribute coherent quasiparticles or pairing, the two-gap scenario is incomplete.

What would settle it

Measure the superconducting gap on the β pocket of La5Ni3O11 with high-resolution ARPES or STM: the theory predicts a nodeless gap along Γ-M but accidental nodes on the β pocket. Also, a pressure-dependent study that tracks the interlayer hopping ratio |t⊥^z / t∥^x| should show Tc rising with this ratio if the central claim is correct.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • If correct, La5Ni3O11 and pressurized La3Ni2O7 share a common two-gap mechanism, differing only in the relative strength of the interlayer channel.
  • The predicted fully gapped but sign-changing s±-wave gap with accidental nodes on the β pocket gives a concrete, testable spectral fingerprint.
  • The theory explains why thin-film La3Ni2O7 (Tc ≈ 40 K) favors the intralayer channel and why in-plane, not out-of-plane, strain raises Tc.
  • It implies that raising Tc requires simultaneously enhancing the interlayer exchange interaction and suppressing the intralayer exchange interaction.
  • The ratio |t⊥^z / t∥^x| becomes a control parameter for Tc across bilayer-containing nickelates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors do not explore, but the same symmetry-based logic would predict stacking-dependent Tc across other hybrid nickelates, controlled by the same interlayer-to-intralayer hopping ratio.
  • The strongest testable extension is materials engineering: selectively increasing interlayer dz2 hopping while leaving intralayer dx2-y2 hopping fixed should push Tc upward in La5Ni3O11, a prediction the paper implies but does not state.
  • If the monolayer dx2-y2 orbital ever gains coherence (e.g., under different pressure or doping), the two-gap scenario would need a third gap, so the paper's scope is tied to the Mott-insulating assignment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a DFT+DMFT study of the hybrid nickelate La5Ni3O11, arguing that the monolayer subsystem is Mott-insulating/incoherent and that superconductivity is confined to the bilayer subsystem. A renormalized two-orbital quasiparticle model is constructed, and a symmetry-based BCS mean-field framework with effective pairing interactions V_i in each symmetry channel is used. By fitting V_i to reproduce the experimental Tc≈64 K and imposing a feasibility bound J≈4|t|^2/U, the authors identify a leading interlayer dz2 pairing (Δ_sz2, A1g) and a subleading intralayer dx2-y2 pairing (Δ_sx2+y2), giving a fully gapped but s±-wave projected gap. They attribute the Tc reduction relative to La3Ni2O7 to the reduced hopping ratio |t_z⊥/t_x∥| and support the s± picture with RPA susceptibility calculations.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the paper offers a unified symmetry-based scenario for bilayer nickelates and a concrete explanation for the reduced Tc in La5Ni3O11. The two-gap structure with s±-wave projection is consistent with existing ARPES and STM observations, and the explicit parameter tables and equations in the main text allow partial checking of the calculations. The paper is also transparent that its approach is phenomenological: V_i are fitted to Tc, not derived from first principles. However, the central result is not parameter-free, and one of its load-bearing steps—the feasibility threshold used to select the leading pairing—is internally ambiguous as presented. The work is a useful contribution to the nickelate superconductivity discussion, but the main pairing assignment requires a consistency clarification before it can be fully accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table II and §'Symmetry-allowed superconducting pairings'] The feasibility threshold J≈4|t|^2/U is defined without specifying whether t and U are bare or renormalized. The BdG calculation and the V_i fit use the QP model with the hoppings in Table I (t_z⊥≈−0.230 eV, t_x∥≈−0.263 eV). Using these QP values with the cRPA U=4.0 eV gives J_z≈4×0.230²/4.0≈0.053 eV and J_x≈4×0.263²/4.0≈0.069 eV, which are far below the fitted V_z=0.212 eV and V_x=0.181 eV. The quoted J values in Table II (0.379 and 0.226 eV) match the bare TB hoppings, not the QP hoppings. If U is also renormalized by Z², the invariance J≈4t_bare²/U could justify the comparison, but the paper does not state this. Without clarification, the classification of Δ_sz2 as feasible, and hence the central two-gap assignment, is not yet demonstrated.
  2. [§'Symmetry-allowed superconducting pairings', Eq. (4)] The leading-pairing identification is conditional on the fitting procedure. V_i is determined by minimizing the BCS gap equation to reproduce Tc≈64 K, and then F_BdG,i is compared for the fitted V_i. This shows which channel is most favorable among the fitted interactions, not that Δ_sz2 is the leading instability of the microscopic model. The sentence 'we identify the leading one' overstates the predictive content. A robustness scan of V_i over the physically allowed range, or a pairing calculation with the RPA vertex instead of a Tc-fitted interaction, would substantially strengthen the claim. The paper should at minimum state this caveat explicitly.
  3. [§'Correlated electronic structure', after Fig. 2] The central scenario assumes that the ML subsystem does not participate in pairing. The authors argue that the ML d_x2-y2 orbital has Z≈0.35 but is incoherent, so it 'may not host well-defined quasiparticles near the Fermi level that can form Cooper pairs.' This is a reasonable assumption, but it is not a demonstrated conclusion. Because the ML orbital retains a nonzero quasiparticle weight, the possibility of at least partial pairing on the ML subsystem should be discussed or estimated. As written, the two-gap picture is limited to the BL subsystem, and the manuscript would be strengthened by an explicit statement of the associated uncertainty.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] Typos: 'an unified' should be 'a unified'; 'Base on' should be 'Based on'.
  2. [Section title 'Symmetry-allowed superconducting pairings'] The section title reads 'La5Ni3O10' but should be 'La5Ni3O11'.
  3. [Eq. (1)] The definition of Z as 'the diagonal QP spectral weight matrix' is clear for diagonal entries, but the treatment of off-diagonal/inter-orbital Z factors in H_QP is not specified. Please clarify whether Z is assumed diagonal or how off-diagonal terms are handled.
  4. [Table II] The Γ-matrix notation is very compact. A table or explicit formula listing all independent pairing channels, their matrix forms and the corresponding pairing harmonics would help readers verify the group-theoretical classification.
  5. [Figure 3(c)-(d), Figure 4] For the DOS and superconducting gap sizes, please state whether thermal broadening or a finite lifetime is included, and how the gap values are extracted. For the RPA calculation, specify the numerical value of U, the code used, and whether the Z² renormalization is applied to the interaction before the RPA susceptibility is computed.
  6. [References] Reference [67] contains a placeholder '[link to be inserted by publisher]' for the Supplemental Material; this should be completed before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: T_c enters transparently as a fitted input, and the leading two-gap assignment is selected by a separate condensation-energy comparison.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is not circular. The interaction strengths V_i are fitted to reproduce the experimental T_c (Section "Symmetry-allowed superconducting pairings": "The interaction strength V_i for each Δ̃_i is determined by minimizing the BCS gap equation to reproduce the experimental T_c"), but this is an explicitly phenomenological step, not a hidden prediction. The identification of the leading pairing is then made by comparing BCS condensation energies F_BdG,i for all feasible symmetry-allowed channels, which is an additional criterion independent of the T_c fit. The two-gap conclusion (Δ_sz2 leading plus Δ_sx2+y2 subleading) is consequently not equivalent to the input T_c by construction; other pairing symmetries are explicitly excluded by a feasibility threshold J ≈ 4|t|²/U that is derived from an exchange-scale argument. The discussion of reduced T_c is an interpretive consistency statement using V/J ratios and external hopping-parameter trends, rather than a derivation of T_c from the model. The self-citations to the authors' previous La3Ni2O7 study [61] are corroborative and are not the sole basis for the present calculation, which independently constructs the QP model, solves the BdG equations, and evaluates free energies. The noted mismatch between bare-J thresholds and Z-renormalized QP hoppings is a legitimate correctness/consistency concern, but it is not a definitional circularity: it does not make the output equal to an input. Overall, only minor non-load-bearing self-citations are present, warranting a low score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces. Its free parameters are the per-channel pairing interactions V_i fitted to T_c, the RPA U value, and the J feasibility threshold. The axioms are standard mean-field and nickelate modeling assumptions, with the ML-Mott premise being the most consequential.

free parameters (3)
  • Effective pairing interaction V_i per symmetry channel = e.g., V_{s_z2}=0.209 eV, V_{s_x2+y2}=0.177 eV; all channels 0.094–0.212 eV
    Determined by solving the BCS gap equation to reproduce experimental T_c≈64 K (Table II). This is a fit, not a microscopic calculation.
  • RPA Hubbard U = 0.5 eV
    Selected as a residual interaction renormalized by a factor Z^2; the paper does not derive this value from the DMFT interactions.
  • Feasibility threshold J≈4|t|^2/U = J=0.055–0.379 eV per channel
    Used to exclude pairing channels as physically unreasonable; depends on the choice of U and hoppings.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The monolayer subsystem is Mott-insulating and does not contribute Cooper pairs.
    Load-bearing simplification used to restrict the model to the BL subsystem; based on their DFT+DMFT self-energy divergence for Ni1-d_z2, but not proven experimentally.
  • domain assumption Slater-Kanamori form for the local Coulomb repulsion H_rep.
    Adopted to model strong correlations; standard in nickelate literature but still a model choice.
  • domain assumption Antiferromagnetic superexchange generates an effective short-range attractive interaction bounded by J≈4|t|^2/U.
    Underpins the feasibility criterion for singlet and triplet pairing channels; the extension to triplet is explicitly phenomenological.
  • standard math Mean-field BCS decoupling and condensation-energy comparison select the leading pairing channel.
    Standard approximation; used in Eq. (4) and the subsequent gap equation.
  • domain assumption The layer group p4/mmm symmetry constrains the allowed pairing matrices.
    Central to enumerating pairing types; assumes the experimental crystal structure remains in this symmetry at pressure.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 192 in / 7939 out tokens · 139576 ms · 2026-08-01T16:00:24.377048+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symmetry-Based Microscopic Theory of the Unconventional Pairing Mechanism in La$_5$Ni$_3$O$_{11}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EHLHKS5O

@misc{pith2026260718094,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symmetry-Based Microscopic Theory of the Unconventional Pairing Mechanism in La$_5$Ni$_3$O$_11$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EHLHKS5O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18094}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recent experiments report high-temperature superconductivity in the hybrid nickelate $\mathrm{La}_5\mathrm{Ni}_3\mathrm{O}_{11}$, which is composed of alternating stacks of bilayer $\mathrm{La}_3\mathrm{Ni}_2\mathrm{O}_7$ and monolayer $\mathrm{La}_2\mathrm{NiO}_4$. However, the superconducting transition temperature $T_c \approx 64~\mathrm{K}$ for $\mathrm{La}_5\mathrm{Ni}_3\mathrm{O}_{11}$ is remarkably lower than the $80~\mathrm{K}$ observed for pressurized $\mathrm{La}_3\mathrm{Ni}_2\mathrm{O}_7$. Thus, an unified microscopic theory is required to address the difference in the pairing mechanisms between these systems. Here, we develop a phenomenological symmetry-based approach to systematically analyze the low-energy physics in $\mathrm{La}_5\mathrm{Ni}_3\mathrm{O}_{11}$, which is obtained by a charge self-consistent density functional theory plus dynamical mean-field theory method. We show that the superconductivity in $\mathrm{La}_5\mathrm{Ni}_3\mathrm{O}_{11}$ exhibits a two-gap nature, consisting of a leading interlayer pairing between the $d_{z^2}$ orbitals and a subleading intralayer pairing between the $d_{x^2-y^2}$ orbitals. The reduction of $T_c$ can be attributed to the diminished contribution of the interlayer pairing, as reflected by the hopping parameter ratio $|t_{\perp}^z/t_{\parallel}^{x}|$. Base on this unified picture, we discuss the possible pairing mechanism and the role of $\gamma$ pocket for the superconductivity in the bilayer NiO$_2$ planes of nickelate superconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18094 by Guan-Hao Feng, Jun Quan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Crystal structure of La5Ni3O11 in the P4/mmm space group drawn using VESTA [64]. The crystal structure of La5Ni3O11 is adopted from Ref. [10], corresponding to a pressure of 21 GPa. (b)–(c) Layer-resolved BS and FS from DFT. alent Ni site can be treated as a single-site impurity problem, allowing us to apply a charge self-consistent DFT+DMFT approach to reveal the renormalized band structures (BSs). On… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Imaginary part of the Matsubara self-energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (b), substantially lower than FBdG ≈ −283 meV for the single-gap state shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: RPA results. (a) Total and orbital-projected bare [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature621, 493 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    Wang, H.-H

    M. Wang, H.-H. Wen, T. Wu, D.-X. Yao, and T. Xiang, Normal and Superconducting Properties ofLa 3Ni2O7, Chinese Physics Letters41, 077402 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    D. X. Yao and E. W. Carlson, Spin-wave dispersion in half-dopedLa 3/2Sr1/2NiO4, Phys. Rev. B75, 012414 (2007)

    2007

  4. [4]

    P. G. Freeman, M. Enderle, S. M. Hayden, C. D. Frost, D. X. Yao, E. W. Carlson, D. Prabhakaran, and A. T. Boothroyd, Inward dispersion of the spin excitation spec- trum of stripe-ordered La 2NiO4+δ, Phys. Rev. B80, 144523 (2009)

    2009

  5. [5]

    Li, Y.-J

    Q. Li, Y.-J. Zhang, Z.-N. Xiang, Y. Zhang, X. Zhu, and H.-H. Wen, Signature of superconductivity in pressurized La4Ni3O10, Chinese Physics Letters41, 017401 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Li, C.-Q

    J. Li, C.-Q. Chen, C. Huang, Y. Han, M. Huo, X. Huang, P. Ma, Z. Qiu, J. Chen, X. Hu, L. Chen, T. Xie, B. Shen, H. Sun, D.-X. Yao, and M. Wang, Structural transi- tion, electric transport, and electronic structures in the compressed trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy67, 117403 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Y. Zhu, D. Peng, E. Zhang, B. Pan, X. Chen, L. Chen, H. Ren, F. Liu, Y. Hao, N. Li, Z. Xing, F. Lan, J. Han, J. Wang, D. Jia, H. Wo, Y. Gu, Y. Gu, L. Ji, W. Wang, H. Gou, Y. Shen, T. Ying, X. Chen, W. Yang, H. Cao, C. Zheng, Q. Zeng, J.-g. Guo, and J. Zhao, Superconduc- tivity in pressurized trilayer La4Ni3O10−δ single crystals, Nature631, 531 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    F. Li, N. Guo, Q. Zheng, Y. Shen, S. Wang, Q. Cui, C. Liu, S. Wang, X. Tao, G.-M. Zhang, and J. Zhang, Design and synthesis of three-dimensional hy- brid ruddlesden-popper nickelate single crystals, Phys. Rev. Mater.8, 053401 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Z. Nie, Y. Li, W. Lv, L. Xu, Z. Jiang, P. Fu, G. Zhou, W. Song, Y. Chen, H. Wang, H. Huang, J. Lin, J.-F. Jia, D. Shen, P. Li, Q.-K. Xue, and Z. Chen, Supercon- ductivity and electronic structures of nickelate thin film superstructures, Nature652, 628 (2026)

    2026

  10. [10]

    M. Shi, D. Peng, K. Fan, Z. Xing, S. Yang, Y. Wang, H. Li, R. Wu, M. Du, B. Ge, Z. Zeng, Q. Zeng, J. Ying, T. Wu, and X. Chen, Pressure induced superconductivity in hybrid ruddlesden-popper La5Ni3O11 single crystals, Nature Physics21, 1781 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    C.-Q. Chen, M. Zhang, F. Yang, and D.-X. Yao, Pairing mechanism and superconductivity in 1313 phase la3ni2o7 (2026), arXiv:2604.21533 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    X. Chen, J. Zhang, A. S. Thind, S. Sharma, H. LaBol- lita, G. Peterson, H. Zheng, D. P. Phelan, A. S. Botana, R. F. Klie, and J. F. Mitchell, Polymorphism in the ruddlesden–popper nickelate La3Ni2O7: Discovery of a hidden phase with distinctive layer stacking, Journal of the American Chemical Society146, 3641 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Puphal, P

    P. Puphal, P. Reiss, N. Enderlein, Y.-M. Wu, G. Khal- iullin, V. Sundaramurthy, T. Priessnitz, M. Knauft, A. Suthar, L. Richter, M. Isobe, P. A. van Aken, H. Tak- agi, B. Keimer, Y. E. Suyolcu, B. Wehinger, P. Hans- mann, and M. Hepting, Unconventional crystal structure of the high-pressure superconductorLa 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 146002 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    LaBollita, S

    H. LaBollita, S. Bag, J. Kapeghian, and A. S. Botana, Electronic correlations, layer distinction, and electron doping in the alternating single-layer-trilayerLa3Ni2O7 polymorph, Phys. Rev. B110, 155145 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    J. Li, D. Peng, P. Ma, H. Zhang, Z. Xing, X. Huang, C. Huang, M. Huo, D. Hu, Z. Dong, X. Chen, T. Xie, H. Dong, H. Sun, Q. Zeng, H.-k. Mao, and M. Wang, Identification of superconductivity in bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7 under high pressure up to 100 GPa, National Science Review , nwaf220 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Hou, P.-T

    J. Hou, P.-T. Yang, Z.-Y. Liu, J.-Y. Li, P.-F. Shan, L. Ma, G. Wang, N.-N. Wang, H.-Z. Guo, J.-P. Sun, Y. Uwatoko, M. Wang, G.-M. Zhang, B.-S. Wang, and J.-G. Cheng, Emergence of high-temperature supercon- ducting phase in pressurized La3Ni2O7 crystals, Chinese Physics Letters40, 117302 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    Zhang, D

    Y. Zhang, D. Su, Y. Huang, Z. Shan, H. Sun, M. Huo, K. Ye, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y. Xu, Y. Su, R. Li, M. Smidman, M. Wang, L. Jiao, and H. Yuan, High- temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La3Ni2O7−δ, Nature Physics 20, 1269 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    G. Wang, N. N. Wang, X. L. Shen, J. Hou, L. Ma, L. F. Shi, Z. A. Ren, Y. D. Gu, H. M. Ma, P. T. Yang, Z. Y. Liu, H. Z. Guo, J. P. Sun, G. M. Zhang, S. Calder, J.-Q. Yan, B. S. Wang, Y. Uwatoko, and J.-G. Cheng, Pressure-induced superconductivity in polycrys- tallineLa 3Ni2O7−δ, Phys. Rev. X14, 011040 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Pei, Q. Wang, Y. Zhao, C. Li, W. Cao, S. Zhu, J. Wu, and Y. Qi, Effects of pressure and doping on Ruddlesden-Popper phases Lan+1NinO3n+1, Journal of Materials Science & Technology185, 147 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Z. Luo, X. Hu, M. Wang, W. Wú, and D.-X. Yao, Bilayer two-orbital model ofLa3Ni2O7 under pressure, Physical Review Letters131, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    D. A. Shilenko and I. V. Leonov, Correlated electronic structure, orbital-selective behavior, and magnetic corre- lations in double-layerLa 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B108, 125105 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    Y. Gu, C. Le, Z. Yang, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Effective model and pairing tendency in the bilayer Ni-based supercon- ductorLa 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B111, 174506 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Lechermann, J

    F. Lechermann, J. Gondolf, S. Bötzel, and I. M. Eremin, Electroniccorrelationsandsuperconductinginstabilityin La3Ni2O7 under high pressure, Physical Review B108, L201121 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Elec- tronic structure, dimer physics, orbital-selective behav- ior, and magnetic tendencies in the bilayer nickelate su- perconductorLa 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 108, L180510 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Cao and Y.-f

    Y. Cao and Y.-f. Yang, Flat bands promoted by hund’s rule coupling in the candidate double-layer high- temperature superconductorLa 3Ni2O7 under high pres- sure, Phys. Rev. B109, L081105 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Q.-G. Yang, D. Wang, and Q.-H. Wang, Possibles±-wave superconductivity inLa 3Ni2O7, Physical Review B108, L140505 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Sakakibara, N

    H. Sakakibara, N. Kitamine, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Possible highT c superconductivity inLa 3Ni2O7 under high pressure through manifestation of a nearly half-filled 7 bilayer hubbard model, Physical Review Letters132, 106002 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    Jiang, J

    R. Jiang, J. Hou, Z. Fan, Z.-J. , and W. Ku, Pressure driven fractionalization of ionic spins results in cuprate- like high-Tc superconductivity inLa 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 126503 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    L. C. Rhodes and P. Wahl, Structural routes to stabilize superconductingla 3ni2o7 atambientpressure,Phys.Rev. Mater.8, 044801 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Trends in electronic structures ands±-wave pairing for the rare-earth series in bilayer nickelate super- conductorR 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B108, 165141 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    B.Geisler, J.J.Hamlin, G.R.Stewart, R.G.Hennig,and P. J. Hirschfeld, Structural transitions, octahedral rota- tions, and electronic properties of A 3Ni2O7 rare-earth nickelates under high pressure, npj Quantum Materials 9, 38 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Sakakibara, M

    H. Sakakibara, M. Ochi, H. Nagata, Y. Ueki, H. Saku- rai, R. Matsumoto, K. Terashima, K. Hirose, H. Ohta, M. Kato, Y. Takano, and K. Kuroki, Theoretical anal- ysis on the possibility of superconductivity in the tri- layer ruddlesden-popper nickelateLa4Ni3O10 under pres- sure and its experimental examination: Comparison with La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B109, 1445...

    2024

  33. [33]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, S. Okamoto, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Electronic structure, and magnetic and superconducting pairing tendencies of the alternating single layer–bilayer stacking nickelateLa5Ni3O11 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B112, 094515 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    LaBollita and A

    H. LaBollita and A. S. Botana, Correlated electronic structure of the alternating monolayer-bilayer nickelate La5Ni3O11, Phys. Rev. B113, 115133 (2026)

    2026

  35. [35]

    I. V. Leonov, Electronic structure, quasiparticle renor- malizations, and magnetic correlations in the alter- nating single-layer bilayer nickelate La5Ni3O11 (2026), arXiv:2604.26627 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Ouyang, R.-Q

    Z. Ouyang, R.-Q. He, and Z.-Y. Lu, Phase diagrams and two key factors to superconductivity of ruddlesden- popper nickelates, Phys. Rev. B112, 045127 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Zhang, C.-Q

    M. Zhang, C.-Q. Chen, D.-X. Yao, and F. Yang, Pair- ing mechanism and superconductivity in pressurized La5Ni3O11, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astron- omy69, 257411 (2026)

    2026

  38. [38]

    Liu, J.-W

    Y.-B. Liu, J.-W. Mei, F. Ye, W.-Q. Chen, and F. Yang, s±-wave pairing and the destructive role of apical-oxygen deficiencies inLa3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 236002 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    S. Ryee, N. Witt, and T. O. Wehling, Quenched pair breaking by interlayer correlations as a key to super- conductivity inLa 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 096002 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Jiang, Y.-H

    K.-Y. Jiang, Y.-H. Cao, Q.-G. Yang, H.-Y. Lu, and Q.-H. Wang, Theory of pressure dependence of superconductiv- ity in bilayer nickelateLa3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 076001 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    Sakakibara, N

    H. Sakakibara, N. Kitamine, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Possible highT c superconductivity inLa 3Ni2O7 under high pressure through manifestation of a nearly half-filled bilayer hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 106002 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Structural phase transition,s ±-wave pair- ing, and magnetic stripe order in bilayered superconduc- torLa 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Nature Communications 15, 2470 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    W. Qiu, Z. Luo, X. Hu, and D.-X. Yao, Pairing symme- try and superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 thin films (2025), arXiv:2506.20727 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    C. Xia, H. Liu, S. Zhou, and H. Chen, Sensitive depen- dence of pairing symmetry on Ni-eg crystal field splitting in the nickelate superconductorLa3Ni2O7, Nature Com- munications16, 1054 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Oh and Y.-H

    H. Oh and Y.-H. Zhang, Type-iit−Jmodel and shared superexchange coupling from Hund’s rule in supercon- ductingLa 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B108, 174511 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    Z. Liao, L. Chen, G. Duan, Y. Wang, C. Liu, R. Yu, and Q. Si, Electron correlations and superconductivity inLa 3Ni2O7 under pressure tuning, Phys. Rev. B108, 214522 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    Qin and Y.-f

    Q. Qin and Y.-f. Yang, High-Tc superconductivity by mo- bilizing local spin singlets and possible route to higher Tc in pressurizedLa 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B108, L140504 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    C. Lu, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Interlayer-coupling- driven high-temperature superconductivity inLa3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 146002 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Y.-H. Tian, Y. Chen, J.-M. Wang, R.-Q. He, and Z.-Y. Lu, Correlation effects and concomitant two-orbitals±- wavesuperconductivityinLa 3Ni2O7 underhighpressure, Phys. Rev. B109, 165154 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    W. Wú, Z. Luo, D.-X. Yao, and M. Wang, Superex- change and charge transfer in the nickelate supercon- ductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy67, 117402 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavaz- zoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carn- imeo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawamura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Ko...

    2017

  52. [52]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. S...

    2009

  53. [53]

    D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B88, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  54. [54]

    M. E. Merkel, A. Carta, S. Beck, and A. Hampel, solid_dmft: gray-boxing DFT+DMFT materials simu- lations with TRIQS, Journal of Open Source Software7, 4623 (2022)

    2022

  55. [55]

    P. Seth, I. Krivenko, M. Ferrero, and O. Parcollet, TRIQS/CTHYB: A continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo hybridisation expansion solver for quantum impu- rity problems, Computer Physics Communications200, 8 274 (2016)

    2016

  56. [56]

    Werner, A

    P. Werner, A. Comanac, L. de’ Medici, M. Troyer, and A. J. Millis, Continuous-time solver for quantum impu- rity models, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 076405 (2006)

    2006

  57. [57]

    Werner and A

    P. Werner and A. J. Millis, Hybridization expansion im- purity solver: General formulation and application to Kondo lattice and two-orbital models, Phys. Rev. B74, 155107 (2006)

    2006

  58. [58]

    Boehnke, H

    L. Boehnke, H. Hafermann, M. Ferrero, F. Lechermann, and O. Parcollet, Orthogonal polynomial representation of imaginary-time green’s functions, Phys. Rev. B84, 075145 (2011)

    2011

  59. [59]

    L. V. Boehnke,Susceptibilities in materials with multi- ple strongly correlated orbitals, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Hamburg (2015)

    2015

  60. [60]

    Parcollet, M

    O. Parcollet, M. Ferrero, T. Ayral, H. Hafermann, I. Krivenko, L. Messio, and P. Seth, Triqs: A toolbox for research on interacting quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications196, 398 (2015)

    2015

  61. [61]

    G.-H. Feng, J. Quan, and Y. Hou, Unconventional super- conductivity inla 3ni2o7 from the perspective of symme- try, Phys. Rev. B113, 184505 (2026)

    2026

  62. [62]

    Kurita, T

    K. Kurita, T. Misawa, K. Yoshimi, K. Ido, and T. Koretsune, Interface tool from wannier90 to respack: wan2respack, Computer Physics Communications292, 108854 (2023)

    2023

  63. [63]

    Nakamura, Y

    K. Nakamura, Y. Yoshimoto, Y. Nomura, T. Tadano, M. Kawamura, T. Kosugi, K. Yoshimi, T. Misawa, and Y. Motoyama, Respack: An ab initio tool for deriva- tion of effective low-energy model of material, Computer Physics Communications261, 107781 (2021)

    2021

  64. [64]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi,VESTA3for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, Journal of Applied Crystallography44, 1272 (2011)

    2011

  65. [65]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised wannier functions, Computer Physics Communications 185, 2309 (2014)

    2014

  66. [66]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Blügel, F. Freimuth, G. Géranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune, J. Ibañez-Azpiroz, H. Lee, J.-M. Lihm, D. Marchand, A. Marrazzo, Y. Mokrousov, J. I. Mustafa, Y. Nohara, Y. Nomura, L. Paulatto, S. Poncé, T. Pon- weiser, J. Qiao, F. Thöle, S. S. Tsirkin, M. Wierzbowska, N. Marzari, D. Vanderbilt, I. Sou...

    2020

  67. [67]

    Feng, (2026), see the Supplemental Material [link to be inserted by publisher] for: 1

    G.-H. Feng, (2026), see the Supplemental Material [link to be inserted by publisher] for: 1. details of the DFT+DMFT approach; 2. the path integral formulation to derive Eq. (6) and (7); 3. the relation between the short-range attractive interaction and the antiferromag- netic exchange interaction int-Jmodel; 4. the generators of the normal-state Hamilton...

    2026

  68. [68]

    Yue, J.-J

    C. Yue, J.-J. Miao, H. Huang, Y. Hua, P. Li, Y. Li, G. Zhou, W. Lv, Q. Yang, F. Yang, H. Sun, Y.-J. Sun, J. Lin, Q.-K. Xue, Z. Chen, and W.-Q. Chen, Correlated electronic structures and unconventional superconductiv- ity in bilayer nickelate heterostructures, National Science Review 10.1093/nsr/nwaf253 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf253 2025

  69. [69]

    O. Can, T. Tummuru, R. P. Day, I. Elfimov, A. Damas- celli, and M. Franz, High-temperature topological super- conductivity in twisted double-layer copper oxides, Na- ture Physics17, 519 (2021)

    2021

  70. [70]

    J. Shen, G. Zhou, Y. Miao, P. Li, Z. Ou, Y. Chen, Z. Wang, R. Luan, H. Sun, Z. Feng, X. Yong, Y. Li, L. Xu, W. Lv, Z. Nie, H. Wang, H. Huang, Y.-J. Sun, Q.-K.Xue, J.He,andZ.Chen,Nodelesssuperconducting gap and electron-boson coupling in (La,Pr,Sm) 3Ni2O7 films, Science392, 1396 (2026)

    2026

  71. [71]

    S. Fan, M. Ou, M. Scholten, Q. Li, Z. Shang, Y. Wang, J. Xu, H. Yang, I. M. Eremin, and H.-H. Wen, Single-particle tunneling spectrum with a robust superconducting gap in La 2PrNi2O7 thin films at ambient pressure, Science Advances12, eaeg2429 (2026), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aeg2429

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeg2429 2026

  72. [72]

    H. U. R. Strand, N. Wentzell, and O. Parcollet,TPRF— Two-Particle Response Function Tools Based on the TRIQS Library(2019), available athttps://triqs. github.io/tprf/latest/

    2019

  73. [73]

    Käser and E.-N

    S. Käser and E.-N. U. F. G. N. Fakultät,Response func- tions of strongly correlated electron systems. From pertur- bative to many-body techniques, Ph.D. thesis, Friedrich- Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (2021)

    2021

  74. [74]

    Tang and L.-J

    S. Tang and L.-J. Zou, Correlation-renormalized spin-fluctuation pairing and the stabilization ofs ± superconductivity in pressurized la 3ni2o7 (2026), arXiv:2607.11786 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  75. [75]

    Z.-Y. Shao, C. Lu, M. Liu, Y.-B. Liu, Z. Pan, C. Wu, and F. Yang, Pairing withoutγ-pocket in the la3ni2o7 thin film (2025), arXiv:2507.20287 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    E. K. Ko, Y. Yu, Y. Liu, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V. Thampy, C.-T. Kuo, B. Y. Wang, Y. Lee, K. Lee, J.-S. Lee, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, and H. Y. Hwang, Signa- tures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7, Nature638, 935 (2025)

    2025

  77. [77]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  78. [78]

    Held, Electronic structure calculations using dynami- calmeanfieldtheory,AdvancesinPhysics56,829(2007), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730701619647

    K. Held, Electronic structure calculations using dynami- calmeanfieldtheory,AdvancesinPhysics56,829(2007), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730701619647

    doi:10.1080/00018730701619647 2007

  79. [79]

    Zhang, Z.-M

    Z. Zhang, Z.-M. Yu, G.-B. Liu, and Y. Yao, Magnetictb: A package for tight-binding model of magnetic and non- magnetic materials, Computer Physics Communications 270, 108153 (2022)

    2022

  80. [80]

    S. Ono, Y. Yanase, and H. Watanabe, Symmetry indi- cators for topological superconductors, Physical Review Research1, 013012 (2019)

    2019

Showing first 80 references.