Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 86 references

Controlling Turbulent Flows in Compressible Active Nematics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Compressibility steers density and turbulence in active nematics, and can pin a one-dimensional vortex chain at activity interfaces.

desk verdict Solid compressible wet theory with a clean density-contrast law and real control of turbulence; the vortex-chain analytics are weaker than advertised but the numerics still carry that piece. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24927 v1 pith:EHZG23YX submitted 2026-07-27 cond-mat.soft physics.bio-phphysics.flu-dyn

Dimitrios Krommydas , Paarth Gulati , Aparna Baskaran , M. Cristina Marchetti This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.bio-phphysics.flu-dyn
keywords compressibleactivenematicsturbulencepatternedactivitydensitycontrastvortexchainsoftconfinementPécletnumberlyotropicliquidcrystals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Light-patterned active suspensions show large density variations that standard incompressible theories cannot capture. This paper builds a continuum theory of compressible active nematics in which density and flow evolve together. Under patterned activity, extensile isotropic pressure pushes material out of high-activity regions and into low-activity ones; a solvable one-dimensional reduction shows that the density contrast is set by a single dimensionless ratio linear in compressibility. Raising that ratio relocates active turbulence from high- to low-activity regions. At sharp activity interfaces the same mechanism confines flow to a one-dimensional chain of counter-rotating vortices held by soft, activity-induced confinement rather than solid walls. The result frames compressibility as an experimentally tunable knob for organizing both density and turbulent flow.

What carries the argument

The active compressibility ratio R ≃ α_B^0 κ (activity Péclet number comparing active transport to passive relaxation). In the exactly solvable scalar 1D reduction it alone sets the steady density profile ϕ(x) = C/(1+R f(x)) and the contrast Δϕ = R/√(1+R) for a sinusoid, thereby controlling where effective activity exceeds the turbulence threshold.

What would settle it

In a light-patterned quasi-2D active nematic, measure the steady density contrast versus compressibility (or activity strength) under a long-wavelength sinusoidal activity profile; the claim fails if the contrast does not track R/√(1+R) or if raising compressibility does not relocate turbulence into the low-activity region.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Compressibility is a control parameter for density variations and turbulent flow in active nematic suspensions. Under spatially patterned activity the density contrast is governed by the single dimensionless ratio R proportional to activity times compressibility, and raising R steers active turbulence from high- to low-activity regions and, at sharp interfaces, stabilizes an analytically tractable one-dimensional vortex chain held by activity-induced soft confinement.

Load-bearing premise

The model treats the suspension as an effective one-fluid system in which the solvent density stays uniform and only the active component can compress, while both species share the same in-plane velocity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Compressibility can be used experimentally to move active turbulence between illuminated and dark regions without changing the activity pattern itself.
  • Sharp activity interfaces can replace hard walls as reconfigurable boundaries that localize a one-vortex-thick chain.
  • The interfacial vortex chain is in principle mobile and controllable, offering a route to transport suspended objects.
  • Density organization and flow localization in light-responsive microtubule–kinesin suspensions become quantitatively predictable from the single parameter R.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If solvent density is not uniform, a full two-fluid treatment may shift the R threshold at which turbulence relocates, so experiments that independently vary solvent compressibility would test the reduction.
  • The same soft-confinement mechanism may generate controllable defect or vortex tracks in other light-addressable active systems beyond nematics.
  • Mapping R across activity wavelengths shorter than the vorticity correlation length would chart where the scalar density theory breaks and nematic mixing dominates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops an effective one-fluid hydrodynamic theory of a compressible active nematic, derived in the SI from a two-fluid quasi-2D suspension model in which only the active species compresses while the solvent absorbs out-of-plane flux. Three main results are presented. (1) Under spatially patterned activity, a scalar 1D reduction (Q=0) of the continuity plus Brinkman-Stokes equations yields a zero-flux steady state ϕ(x) ∝ 1/(1+Rf(x)) controlled by a single dimensionless ratio R ≃ α_B⁰κ; for a sinusoidal profile the density contrast is Δϕ = R/√(1+R), and this matches full 2D numerics with no fitting in the large-wavelength regime. (2) Tuning κ at fixed activity relocates active turbulence from high- to low-activity regions, rationalized by an effective activity |α(x)|ϕ(x) crossing the isotropic and nematic thresholds α_I^c, α_N^c from standard linear stability. (3) At sharp activity interfaces the system stabilizes a one-dimensional chain of counter-rotating vortices, for which Sec. S7 gives an approximate Green's-function solution of the Stokes equation with an assumed bend texture, and a Frank-energy argument estimating q ~ 2π/W. Linear stability, propagating density–nematic waves, and number-fluctuation crossovers (giant vs. normal) are worked out carefully in the SI.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes a substantial and timely contribution: it provides a parameter-free, closed-form prediction Δϕ = R/√(1+R) for the density contrast under patterned activity that agrees with full 2D numerics without fitting; it demonstrates a concrete control knob (compressibility) for relocating active turbulence, directly relevant to light-patterned microtubule–kinesin experiments; and it identifies a soft-confinement mechanism for one-dimensional vortex chains in a free-standing fluid. The work ships reproducible CUDA-based simulation code (Ref. [76]), the linear stability analyses are complete and consistent (transverse instability shown to preempt longitudinal ones), and the number-fluctuation crossover between dry and wet limits is cleanly derived. The falsifiable scaling m ~ L/W and the R-controlled density contrast give experimentalists direct tests.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. S7, Eqs. (S138)–(S157)] Sec. S7, Eqs. (S138)–(S157): the vortex-chain solution is a one-way kinematic construction. A texture is assumed (fixed S(x)=S0/2, bend ansatz θ(y)=θ₀ sin(qy), ϕ from the scalar model), and only the Stokes equation (S141) is solved. Stationarity of Q under the computed flow is never checked: inserting the ansatz into Eq. (3), the advection ∇·(vQ), co-rotation [ω,Q], and flow-alignment λ_N A terms generated by the computed v act on the assumed director field at O(θ₀), so ∂_tQ ≠ 0 unless a cancellation holds that is not demonstrated. Since the abstract advertises an 'analytically tractable dynamical steady state,' a consistency check is needed — e.g., evaluating the residual of Eq. (3) on the solution and showing it is higher order, or demonstrating numerically that the texture maintains the sinusoidal form and wavenumber over long times.
  2. [Eq. (S140); Fig. 3(c)] Eq. (S140) and main text: the wavenumber selection q ~ 2π/W (hence m ~ L/W vortices) rests on balancing Frank energies of longitudinal vs. transverse modulations with the additional assumption A_∥ ~ A_⊥, imported from hard-wall channel confinement [69]. This is not a stability or dispersion calculation, and the paper tests only a single width (W = L/64 = 8). Since the scaling m ~ L/W is a falsifiable prediction, the authors should test it by varying W in the numerics and measuring the vortex count, or explicitly qualify the selection rule as a heuristic estimate with an uncontrolled amplitude assumption.
  3. [Sec. S7; Fig. 3(c,d)] Sec. S7: the quantitative reach of the analytical vortex-chain solution is limited by two uncontrolled inputs that should be stated and, if possible, bounded. (i) The bend amplitude θ₀ is free, so the vorticity magnitude in Fig. 3(d) cannot be compared to Fig. 3(c) without a prescription for θ₀; the caption should state how θ₀ and q were chosen for the plotted analytic solution. (ii) The friction is linearized as ζϕ ≈ ζ across the interface (above Eq. (S141)), yet ϕ varies by O(1) there (Fig. S7); and the calculation assumes α_B(x) = α(x) (below Eq. (S146)) while the main-text numerics use α_B = (2/3)α₀. These approximations are reasonable for a first estimate, but their effect on μ_q and the vortex extent should be discussed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (S108), main-text Fig. 2 discussion] The dropped viscous term η∂²_xv in the scalar reduction (Eq. (S108)) introduces corrections of order κDηq² relative to the retained terms; at κ=20 with λ=L/2 this is a few percent, but it grows with κ toward the κ=100 end of Fig. 2(b). A brief error estimate or regime-of-validity statement in the main text would strengthen the parameter-free claim.
  2. [Main text, p. 4] Formatting: the sentence on the interfacial vortex chain reads '[66, 67][68] Although...' — the citations run into the text and should be reformatted.
  3. [Fig. 3(c,d)] Fig. 3(c) vs 3(d): the figure would benefit from a shared color scale or a line-cut comparison of ω(x,y) so the reader can judge the agreement beyond the qualitative vortex pattern.
  4. [Main text, activity patterning paragraph] Main text states α_B⁰ = (2/3)α₀ as a definition; a one-line motivation (e.g., from the microstructure or from matching to experiments) would help readers who wish to generalize the activity patterning.
  5. [Sec. S4; main text p. 3] The SI derives giant number fluctuations (∆N ~ N) only in the friction-dominated limit, while the pure-viscous simulations in Fig. S4 find approximately normal fluctuations after rescaling. The main-text summary of Sec. S4 correctly distinguishes the two regimes, but a pointer to Fig. S4's rescaled collapse would prevent confusion.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Central density-contrast and turbulence-steering results are non-circular first-principles reductions; only the vortex-chain wavenumber estimate lightly leans on a same-group channel heuristic.

  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Main text p.5 / SI Sec. S7 Eqs. (S139)–(S140)]
    "An estimate of elastic energies that treats the interfacial region as a confining channel [69] gives q∼1/W, corresponding to m∼L/W vortices in a chain of length L. ... Balancing these two costs yields m∼L/W A_⊥/A_∥, and therefore q=2πm/L∼2π/W A_⊥/A_∥. Assuming A_∥∼A_⊥, we find ... q∼2π/W."

    The vortex count/wavenumber is not obtained from a stability or fixed-point calculation of the present equations; it is taken from a same-group hard-channel energy-balance heuristic [69] plus the extra assumption A_∥∼A_⊥. This is a mild ansatz import, not a self-definition of the density or turbulence claims, and the flow solution given the texture remains a genuine Stokes calculation.

full rationale

The load-bearing claims walk cleanly. The scalar 1D reduction (continuity + overdamped Stokes, Q=0) yields ϕ=C/(1+Rf) and, for a sinusoid, Δϕ=R/√(1+R) with R≃α_B^0 κ by direct integration and number conservation—no fit, no self-defining loop. Agreement with full 2D numerics is parameter-free at large λ. Turbulence relocation follows because the effective drive |α|ϕ is compared to independently derived linear-stability thresholds α_I^c and α_N^c; raising κ reshapes ϕ and therefore which regions sit above threshold. The interfacial vortex-chain analytics are an approximate kinematic construction (assumed S and bend texture → Stokes Green’s function → exponentially localized ω), openly labeled approximate and backed by independent numerics; they do not redefine their inputs as predictions. The sole mild circularity-adjacent step is the estimate q∼1/W, which imports a Frank-energy channel-balancing heuristic from overlapping-author prior work [69] under A_∥∼A_⊥ rather than deriving selection from the present dispersion. That estimate is not required for the density law, the R-controlled relocation, or the qualitative soft-confinement picture, so overall circularity remains negligible.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on a standard active-nematic hydrodynamic skeleton plus a two-fluid-to-one-fluid reduction and constitutive choices (ideal-gas pressure, activity ∝ ϕ, lyotropic LdG). Free parameters are simulation/material coefficients held fixed while κ (or R) is scanned; they are not fitted to produce Δϕ(R). No new particles or forces are invented—only an effective compressible one-fluid description.

free parameters (4)
  • Compressibility κ (scanned control) = κ ∈ [1, 100] in scans; illustrative values 1.43 and 20
    Treated as the experimental tuning knob; not fitted to force the Δϕ formula, but its accessible range and the ideal-gas form P=ϕ/κ are modeling choices.
  • Activity magnitudes α, α_B and ratio α_B^0 = (2/3)α_0 = e.g. α=-5.0, α_B=-3.5 (dimensionless main-text units)
    Overall scale set by hand for numerics; isotropic/deviatoric ratio fixed rather than measured.
  • Friction ζ, viscosities η, γ, diffusivity D, LdG coefficients = ζ=10^{-4}, η=1, D=5, etc. as listed
    Standard continuum coefficients fixed to place the system in screened, turbulent regimes; change thresholds and ℓ_s but not the form of R at leading order when κζD ≪ 1.
  • Interfacial width W and modulation wavelength λ = λ=L/2; W=L/64 for vortex chain
    Geometry of the imposed light pattern; vortex number estimate m∼L/W depends on W.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Two-fluid quasi-2D reduction: shared in-plane velocity, active species has no z-flux, solvent density approximately uniform, total CoM flow incompressible → compressible one-fluid active equations (S1).
    Load-bearing for allowing large ϕ variations while retaining Stokes flow; stated in SI Sec. S1.
  • domain assumption Pressure is ideal-gas P=ϕ/κ; active stress σ^a = αϕQ + α_B ϕ 1 with α, α_B < 0 extensile and linear in ϕ.
    Closes the momentum equation and produces the active pressure that defines R; main text after Eq. (4).
  • domain assumption Lyotropic Landau–de Gennes free energy with r(ϕ), u(ϕ) so order appears only for ϕ>ϕ_IN; average density below transition.
    Needed for low-activity regions to order and lower the turbulence threshold at high κ.
  • domain assumption Passive elastic stresses negligible versus active and dissipative stresses in the Stokes balance.
    Stated in SI S1; standard in many active-nematic turbulence studies but affects quantitative flow structure.
  • ad hoc to paper Scalar (Q=0) 1D reduction captures steady density when activity wavelength ≫ vorticity correlation length.
    Used to obtain exact ϕ(x) and Δϕ; validated numerically only in that scale-separated regime (Fig. S5).
  • standard math Standard Fourier linear stability and continuum noise assumptions for structure factors and bend instability thresholds.
    SI Secs. S2–S4; underpins α_I^c, α_N^c and GNF crossover with ℓ_s.
invented entities (1)
  • Activity-induced soft confinement (effective channel of width W at high/low activity interface) independent evidence
    purpose: Explain localization of a free-standing 1D vortex chain without rigid walls.
    Not a new force law; a mechanistic reading of ∇·(αϕQ) peaking where αϕ jumps. Independent handle is the predicted exponential localization ∼e^{-μ_q|x|} and m∼L/W scaling, testable in light-patterned experiments.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Controlling Turbulent Flows in Compressible Active Nematics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EHZG23YX

@misc{pith2026260724927,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Controlling Turbulent Flows in Compressible Active Nematics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EHZG23YX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24927}
}
read the original abstract

Motivated by experiments on light-patterned, quasi-2D active suspensions that exhibit large density variations, we develop a continuum theory of compressible active nematics--suspensions of apolar rods whose orientation is invariant under pi rotations. Under spatially patterned activity, the extensile isotropic active pressure expels material from high-activity regions and accumulates it in low-activity ones; an exactly solvable 1D reduction shows that the resulting density contrast is governed by a single dimensionless parameter, linear in the compressibility. Using compressibility as a tuning knob, we then steer active turbulence from high- to low-activity regions and, at sharp activity interfaces, stabilize an analytically tractable dynamical steady state: a one-dimensional chain of vortices held by soft, activity-induced confinement. Our results establish compressibility as a control parameter for density variations and turbulent flow in active nematic suspensions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24927 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [76]

    D. Krommydas, Compressible active nematics with cuPSS, https://github.com/KrommydasDi/ compressible-active-nematics-cuPSS (2026), CUDA- based simulation code for compressible active nematics. Supplementary Material: Controlling Turbulent Flows in Compressible Active Nematics Dimitrios Krommydas, 1 Paarth Gulati, 2, 3 Aparna Baskaran,4 and M. Cristina Marc...

    2026

  2. [1]

    Saadaoui, D

    M. Saadaoui, D. Rocancourt, J. Roussel, F. Corson, and J. Gros, A tensile ring drives tissue flows to shape the gastrulating amniote embryo, Science367, 453 (2020)

    2020

  3. [2]

    A. C. Martin, M. Gelbart, R. Fernandez-Gonzalez, M. Kaschube, and E. F. Wieschaus, Integration of con- tractile forces during tissue invagination, J. Cell Biol. 188, 735 (2010)

    2010

  4. [3]

    Behrndt, G

    M. Behrndt, G. Salbreux, P. Campinho, R. Hauschild, F. Oswald, J. Roensch, S. W. Grill, and C.-P. Heisenberg, Forces driving epithelial spreading in zebrafish gastrula- tion, Science338, 257 (2012)

    2012

  5. [4]

    Etournay, M

    R. Etournay, M. Popovi´ c, M. Merkel, A. Nandi, C. Blasse, B. Aigouy, H. Brandl, G. Myers, G. Salbreux, F. J¨ ulicher, and S. Eaton, Interplay of cell dynamics and epithelial tension during morphogenesis of the Drosophila pupal wing, eLife4, e07090 (2015)

    2015

  6. [5]

    N. P. Mitchellet al., Visceral organ morphogenesis via calcium-patterned muscle constrictions, eLife11, e77355 6 (2022)

    2022

  7. [6]

    N. L. Nerurkar, C. Lee, L. Mahadevan, and C. J. Tabin, Molecular control of macroscopic forces drives formation of the vertebrate hindgut, Nature565, 480 (2019)

    2019

  8. [7]

    M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrody- namics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

Show all 86 references
  1. [8]

    Prost, F

    J. Prost, F. J¨ ulicher, and J.-F. Joanny, Active gel physics, Nat. Phys.11, 111 (2015)

    2015

  2. [9]

    Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu

    S. Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.1, 323 (2010)

    2010

  3. [10]

    Palacci, S

    J. Palacci, S. Sacanna, A. P. Steinberg, D. J. Pine, and P. M. Chaikin, Living crystals of light-activated colloidal surfers, Science339, 936 (2013)

    2013

  4. [11]

    Dell’Arciprete, M

    D. Dell’Arciprete, M. L. Blow, A. T. Brown, F. D. C. Farrell, J. S. Lintuvuori, A. F. McVey, D. Marenduzzo, and W. C. K. Poon, A growing bacterial colony in two dimensions as an active nematic, Nat. Commun.9, 4190 (2018)

    2018

  5. [12]

    Vizsnyiczai, G

    G. Vizsnyiczai, G. Frangipane, C. Maggi, F. Saglimbeni, S. Bianchi, and R. Di Leonardo, Light controlled 3D mi- cromotors powered by bacteria, Nat. Commun.8, 15974 (2017)

    2017

  6. [13]

    Frangipane, D

    G. Frangipane, D. Dell’Arciprete, S. Petracchini, C. Maggi, F. Saglimbeni, S. Bianchi, G. Vizsnyiczai, M. L. Bernardini, and R. Di Leonardo, Dynamic density shaping of photokinetic E. coli, eLife7, e36608 (2018)

    2018

  7. [14]

    J. Arlt, V. A. Martinez, A. Dawson, T. Pilizota, and W. C. K. Poon, Painting with light-powered bacteria, Nat. Commun.9, 768 (2018)

    2018

  8. [15]

    Aubret, J

    A. Aubret, J. Youssef, S. Sacanna, and J. Palacci, Tar- geted assembly and synchronization of self-spinning mi- crogears, Nat. Phys.14, 1114 (2018)

    2018

  9. [16]

    T. D. Ross, H. J. Lee, Z. Qu, R. A. Banks, R. Phillips, and M. Thomson, Controlling organization and forces in active matter through optically defined boundaries, Na- ture572, 224 (2019)

    2019

  10. [17]

    Zarei, J

    Z. Zarei, J. Berezney, A. Hensley, L. Lemma, N. Senbil, Z. Dogic, and S. Fraden, Light-activated microtubule- based two-dimensional active nematic, Soft Matter19, 6691 (2023)

    2023

  11. [18]

    L. M. Lemma, M. Varghese, T. D. Ross, M. Thomson, A. Baskaran, and Z. Dogic, Spatio-temporal patterning of extensile active stresses in microtubule-based active fluids, PNAS Nexus2, pgad130 (2023)

    2023

  12. [19]

    Zhang, A

    R. Zhang, A. Mozaffari, J. J. de Pablo,et al., Spatiotem- poral control of liquid crystal structure and dynamics through activity patterning, Nat. Mater.20, 875 (2021)

    2021

  13. [20]

    T. E. Bate, M. E. Varney, E. H. Taylor, J. H. Dickie, C.-C. Chueh, M. M. Norton, and K.-T. Wu, Self-mixing in microtubule–kinesin active fluid from nonuniform to uniform distribution of activity, Nat. Commun.13, 6573 (2022)

    2022

  14. [21]

    Nishiyama, J

    K. Nishiyama, J. Berezney, M. M. Norton, A. Aggarwal, S. Ghosh, Z. Zarei, M. F. Hagan, S. Fraden, and Z. Dogic, Closed-loop control of active nematic flows, Phys. Rev. X15, 041053 (2025)

    2025

  15. [22]

    Marenduzzo, E

    D. Marenduzzo, E. Orlandini, M. E. Cates, and J. M. Yeomans, Steady-state hydrodynamics of active liquid crystals, Phys. Rev. E76, 031921 (2007)

    2007

  16. [23]

    S. A. Edwards and J. M. Yeomans, Spontaneous flow states in active nematics, Europhys. Lett.85, 18008 (2009)

    2009

  17. [24]

    R. A. Simha and S. Ramaswamy, Hydrodynamic insta- bilities and spatiotemporal chaos in active particle sus- pensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 058101 (2002)

    2002

  18. [26]

    Sanchez, D

    T. Sanchez, D. T. N. Chen, S. J. DeCamp, M. Heymann, and Z. Dogic, Spontaneous motion in hierarchically as- sembled active matter, Nature491, 431 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    T. J. Pedley and J. O. Kessler, Hydrodynamic phenom- ena in suspensions of swimming microorganisms, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.24, 313 (1992)

    1992

  20. [28]

    Maryshev, A

    I. Maryshev, A. B. Goryachev, D. Marenduzzo, and A. Morozov, Dry active turbulence in a model for microtubule–motor mixtures, Soft Matter15, 6038 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Toner and Y

    J. Toner and Y. Tu, Long-range order in a two- dimensional dynamical XY model: How birds fly to- gether, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 4326 (1995)

    1995

  22. [30]

    M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase sepa- ration, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 219 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Geyer, A

    D. Geyer, A. Morin, and D. Bartolo, Sounds and quasi- particles of flowing active matter, Nat. Mater.17, 789 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Giomi, M

    L. Giomi, M. J. Bowick, P. Mishra, R. Sknepnek, and M. C. Marchetti, Defect dynamics in active nematics, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A372, 20130365 (2014)

    2014

  25. [34]

    Shankar, A

    S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, Topological active matter, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 380 (2022)

    2022

  26. [35]

    L. J. Ruske and J. M. Yeomans, Activity gradients in two- and three-dimensional active nematics, Soft Matter 18, 5654 (2022)

    2022

  27. [36]

    Cheng, D

    Y.-C. Cheng, D. Krommydas, R. L. Rosales-Hasek, S. Shin, P. Gulati, L. B. Frechette, M. F. Hagan, A. Baskaran, M. C. Marchetti, and Z. Dogic, Spatial con- trol of compressible active fluids (2026), in preparation

    2026

  28. [37]

    S. P. Thampi, R. Golestanian, and J. M. Yeomans, Ve- locity correlations in an active nematic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 118101 (2013)

    2013

  29. [38]

    E. J. Hemingway, P. Mishra, M. C. Marchetti, and S. M. Fielding, Correlation lengths in hydrodynamic models of active nematics, Soft Matter12, 7943 (2016)

    2016

  30. [39]

    Mukherjee, K

    S. Mukherjee, K. Kumar, and S. S. Ray, Turbulence- induced fluctuating interfaces in heterogeneously active suspensions, PNAS Nexus5, pgag125 (2026)

    2026

  31. [40]

    S. Dey, D. Das, and R. Rajesh, Spatial structures and gi- ant density fluctuations in models of active matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 238001 (2012)

    2012

  32. [41]

    Liebchen, D

    B. Liebchen, D. Marenduzzo, and M. E. Cates, Phoretic self-propulsion: The role of diffusiophoresis for stick- slip motion and phase separation, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 268001 (2017)

    2017

  33. [42]

    Mishra, A

    S. Mishra, A. Baskaran, and M. C. Marchetti, Fluctua- tions and instabilities in self-propelled particle systems, Phys. Rev. E81, 061916 (2010)

    2010

  34. [43]

    Guillamat, J

    P. Guillamat, J. Ign´ es-Mullol, and F. Sagu´ es, Control of active liquid crystals with a magnetic field, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.113, 5498 (2016)

    2016

  35. [44]

    S. J. DeCamp, G. S. Redner, A. Baskaran, M. F. Hagan, Z. Dogic, and M. C. Marchetti, Orientational order of motile defects in active nematics, Nat. Mater.14, 1110 7 (2015)

    2015

  36. [45]

    Doostmohammadi, M

    A. Doostmohammadi, M. F. Adamer, S. P. Thampi, and J. M. Yeomans, Stabilization of active matter by flow- vortex lattices and defect ordering, Nat. Commun.7, 10557 (2016)

    2016

  37. [46]

    Opathalage, M

    A. Opathalage, M. M. Norton, M. P. N. Juniper, B. Langeslay, S. Aghvami, S. Fraden, and Z. Dogic, Self- organized dynamics and the transition to turbulence of confined active nematics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 4788 (2019)

    2019

  38. [47]

    Chandrakar, M

    P. Chandrakar, M. Varghese, S. A. Aghvami, A. Baskaran, Z. Dogic, and G. Duclos, Confine- ment controls the bend instability of three-dimensional active liquid crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 257801 (2020)

    2020

  39. [49]

    Shankar and M

    S. Shankar and M. C. Marchetti, Hydrodynamics of ac- tive defects: From order to chaos to defect ordering, Phys. Rev. X9, 041047 (2019)

    2019

  40. [50]

    Alert, J

    R. Alert, J. Casademunt, and J.-F. Joanny, Active turbu- lence, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.13, 143 (2022)

    2022

  41. [53]

    S. Ngo, A. Peshkov, I. S. Aranson, E. Bertin, F. Ginelli, and H. Chat´ e, Large-scale chaos and fluctuations in ac- tive nematics, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 038302 (2014)

    2014

  42. [54]

    R. A. Simha, S. Ramaswamy, and J. Toner, Active ne- matics on a substrate: Giant number fluctuations and long-time tails, Europhys. Lett.62, 196 (2003)

    2003

  43. [55]

    Mishra and S

    S. Mishra and S. Ramaswamy, Active nematics are in- trinsically phase separated, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 090602 (2006)

    2006

  44. [57]

    Narayan, S

    V. Narayan, S. Ramaswamy, and N. Menon, Long-lived giant number fluctuations in a swarming granular ne- matic, Science317, 105 (2007)

    2007

  45. [58]

    Chat´ e, F

    H. Chat´ e, F. Ginelli, and R. Montagne, Simple model for active nematics: Quasi-long-range order and giant fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 180602 (2006)

    2006

  46. [59]

    Kozhukhov, B

    T. Kozhukhov, B. Loewe, and T. N. Shendruk, Mitigat- ing density fluctuations in particle-based active nematic simulations, Commun. Phys.7, 251 (2024)

    2024

  47. [60]

    H. P. Zhang, A. Be’er, E.-L. Florin, and H. L. Swinney, Collective motion and density fluctuations in bacterial colonies, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.107, 13626 (2010)

    2010

  48. [61]

    M. J. Schnitzer, Theory of continuum random walks and application to chemotaxis, Phys. Rev. E48, 2553 (1993)

    1993

  49. [62]

    A. P. Solon, J. Stenhammar, M. E. Cates, Y. Kafri, and J. Tailleur, Generalized thermodynamics of phase equi- libria in scalar active matter, Phys. Rev. E97, 020602 (2018)

    2018

  50. [63]

    Fily and M

    Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Athermal phase separation of self-propelled particles with no alignment, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 235702 (2012)

    2012

  51. [64]

    M. C. Marchetti, Y. Fily, S. Henkes, A. Patch, and D. Yl- lanes, Minimal model of active colloids highlights the role of mechanical interactions in controlling the emergent be- havior of active matter, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 21, 34 (2016)

    2016

  52. [65]

    (1-3), with all other numerical parameters unchanged

    Speed⟨˜v max⟩and ˜ωare normalized by the maximum speed and maximum vorticity obtained from the numer- ical solution of the incompressible version of Eqs. (1-3), with all other numerical parameters unchanged

  53. [66]

    Shankar, L

    S. Shankar, L. V. D. Scharrer, M. J. Bowick, and M. C. Marchetti, Design rules for controlling active topological defects, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.121, e2400933121 (2024)

    2024

  54. [67]

    Mozaffari, R

    A. Mozaffari, R. Zhang, N. Atzin, and J. J. de Pablo, Defect spirograph: Dynamical behavior of defects in spa- tially patterned active nematics, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 227801 (2021)

    2021

  55. [68]

    Here, by contrast, the chain forms for any activity-pattern wavelength larger than approximately twice the vortex correlation length

    These incompressible frameworks suggest that related vortex or defect confinement could, in principle, be used to generate vortex chains when the width of the ac- tive region is comparable to the intrinsic vortex correla- tion length. Here, by contrast, the chain forms for any...

  56. [70]

    Voituriez, J.-F

    R. Voituriez, J.-F. Joanny, and J. Prost, Spontaneous flow transition in active polar gels, Europhys. Lett.70, 404 (2005)

    2005

  57. [71]

    T. N. Shendruk, A. Doostmohammadi, K. Thijssen, and J. M. Yeomans, Dancing disclinations in confined active nematics, Soft Matter13, 3853 (2017)

    2017

  58. [72]

    Chapman and T

    S. Chapman and T. G. Cowling,The Mathematical The- ory of Non-Uniform Gases, 3rd ed. (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, 1970)

    1970

  59. [77]

    Nematic pattern at the active/passive interface We consider a system with a sharp activity profileα(x) centered atx= 0 that varies over a length scaleWbetween a passive region with zero activity and a region with a finite activity of magnitude|α 0|(see Fig. S6). Extensile acti...

  60. [78]

    Chapman and T

    S. Chapman and T. G. Cowling, The Mathematical Theory of Non-Uniform Gases, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1970). 24

    1970

  61. [79]

    L´ opez de Haro, E

    M. L´ opez de Haro, E. G. D. Cohen, and J. M. Kincaid, The enskog theory for multicomponent mixtures. I. linear transport theory, J. Chem. Phys.78, 2746 (1983)

    1983

  62. [80]

    Garz´ o, C

    V. Garz´ o, C. M. Hrenya, and J. W. Dufty, Enskog theory for polydisperse granular mixtures. II. sonine polynomial approximation, Phys. Rev. E76, 031304 (2007)

    2007

  63. [81]

    R. A. Simha and S. Ramaswamy, Hydrodynamic instabilities and spatiotemporal chaos in active particle suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 058101 (2002)

    2002

  64. [82]

    Giomi, Geometry and topology of turbulence in active nematics, Phys

    L. Giomi, Geometry and topology of turbulence in active nematics, Phys. Rev. X5, 031003 (2015)

    2015

  65. [83]

    Shankar and M

    S. Shankar and M. C. Marchetti, Hydrodynamics of active defects: From order to chaos to defect ordering, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041047 (2019)

    2019

  66. [84]

    Alert, J

    R. Alert, J. Casademunt, and J.-F. Joanny, Active turbulence, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.13, 143 (2022)

    2022

  67. [85]

    Srivastava, P

    P. Srivastava, P. Mishra, and M. C. Marchetti, Negative stiffness and modulated states in active nematics, Soft Matter12, 8214 (2016)

    2016

  68. [86]

    S. P. Thampi and J. M. Yeomans, Active turbulence in active nematics, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.225, 651 (2016)

    2016

  69. [87]

    S. Ngo, A. Peshkov, I. S. Aranson, E. Bertin, F. Ginelli, and H. Chat´ e, Large-scale chaos and fluctuations in active nematics, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 038302 (2014)

    2014

  70. [88]

    F. Vafa, M. J. Bowick, B. I. Shraiman, and M. C. Marchetti, Fluctuations can induce local nematic order and extensile stress in monolayers of motile cells, Soft Matter17, 3068 (2021)

    2021

  71. [89]

    Doostmohammadi, J

    A. Doostmohammadi, J. Ign´ es-Mullol, J. M. Yeomans, and F. Sagu´ es, Active nematics, Nat. Commun.9, 3246 (2018)

    2018

  72. [90]

    R. A. Simha, S. Ramaswamy, and J. Toner, Active nematics on a substrate: Giant number fluctuations and long-time tails, Europhys. Lett.62, 196 (2003)

    2003

  73. [91]

    Mishra and S

    S. Mishra and S. Ramaswamy, Active nematics are intrinsically phase separated, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 090602 (2006)

    2006

  74. [92]

    M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrodynamics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  75. [93]

    Baskaran and M

    A. Baskaran and M. C. Marchetti, Hydrodynamics of self-propelled hard rods, Phys. Rev. E77, 011920 (2008)

    2008

  76. [94]

    Caballero, cuPSS: A package for pseudo-spectral integration of stochastic PDEs (2024), arXiv:2405.02410 [physics.comp- ph]

    F. Caballero, cuPSS: A package for pseudo-spectral integration of stochastic PDEs (2024), arXiv:2405.02410 [physics.comp- ph]

    2024 arXiv

  77. [95]

    D. Krommydas, Compressible active nematics with cuPSS, https://github.com/KrommydasDi/ compressible-active-nematics-cuPSS (2026), CUDA-based simulation code for compressible active nematics

    2026

  78. [96]

    Gulati, S

    P. Gulati, S. Shankar, and M. C. Marchetti, Boundaries control active channel flows, Front. Phys.10, 948415 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.