Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 9 minor 2 cited by

Inflation in non-local hybrid metric-Palatini gravity

T0 review · 5 major / 9 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Non-local hybrid gravity is ghost-ridden unless actions are degenerate.

desk verdict A solid extension of non-local ghost counting to hybrid metric-Palatini gravity, with a genuinely new ghost-free model, but the inflationary claims need stronger support and the localization step deserves scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15064 v2 pith:EI45LOMP submitted 2024-12-19 hep-th gr-qc

Flavio Bombacigno , Mariaveronica De Angelis , Carsten van de Bruck , William Giarè This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc PACS 04.50.Kd98.80.Cq
keywords non-localgravityhybridmetric-Palatinighostinstabilitiesscalar-tensorequivalenceinflationinversed'AlembertoperatorStarobinskymulti-fieldcosmology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that adding inverse-d'Alembert non-localities, of the form $\Box^{-k}R$ and $\Box^{-k}\mathcal{R}$, to hybrid metric-Palatini gravity generically introduces ghost instabilities, and that only a degenerate subclass of actions is dynamically stable. It shows that in the local scalar-tensor version of a general non-degenerate action $F(R,\mathcal{R},\ldots,\Box^{-m}R,\ldots,\Box^{-n}\mathcal{R})$, the number of ghost fields is set by the sum $m+n$ of the highest non-locality powers on the two curvatures. It then constructs two ghost-free hybrid models, a Palatini $f(\mathcal{R})$ action with metric non-localities and a metric $f(R)$ action with Palatini non-localities, and derives algebraic inequalities on the fields and the non-local coupling that guarantee positive-definite kinetic matrices. The paper's main cosmological result is that the metric-$f(R)$ plus Palatini-non-local case supports a finite slow-roll inflationary phase in the Einstein frame, reducing effectively to single-field inflation with a spectator field, while the Palatini-$f(\mathcal{R})$ plus metric-non-local case has a flat direction and cannot end inflation. This matters because it narrows the space of non-local hybrid gravity models that can describe the early universe and ties their viability to the linear-coupling, degenerate form of the action.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the scalar-tensor localization of the non-local action: each $\Box^{-1}$ is turned into an auxiliary scalar field constrained by a Lagrange multiplier, so the original action becomes a multi-field theory with kinetic matrices $K_1$ and $K_2$ in the Einstein frame. The decisive conditions are the Legendre inversion requirement $F_{\chi\chi}F_{\eta\eta}-F_{\chi\eta}^2\neq0$, which distinguishes the generic ghost-ridden case from degenerate models, and Sylvester's criterion, the standard determinant conditions for a symmetric matrix to be positive definite, applied to $K_1$ and $K_2$, which converts ghost freedom into inequalities on the scalar fields and on $G'$. For the inflationary analysis, the central object is the Einstein-frame potential $Y_2(\Phi,\Xi,\Psi)=\frac{V_0\chi_2^2(\Psi)+\frac{\left(e^{\sqrt{2/3}\Phi}+\Xi^2/6-a_2\right)^2}{4b_2}}{e^{2\sqrt{2/3}\Phi}}$, whose plateau and minimum govern the slow-roll phase, together with the no-ghost inequality that confines the field-space trajectory.

What would settle it

Take the simplest non-degenerate case $m=n=1$ in action (2.1) and perform a Hamiltonian or Ostrogradski constraint analysis directly on the non-local action, without localizing $\Box^{-1}$; if the ghost number is not $2$, or if it changes when boundary conditions of the inverse d'Alembert operator are varied, the stability claim fails. A second decisive test is to exhibit any non-degenerate hybrid action of the form (2.1) that is ghost-free, which would directly contradict the claimed unavoidability of $m+n$ ghosts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working from the action $F(R,\mathcal{R},\Box^{-1}R,\ldots,\Box^{-m}R,\Box^{-1}\mathcal{R},\ldots,\Box^{-n}\mathcal{R})$, the paper localizes each inverse d'Alembert operator with auxiliary scalars and Lagrange multipliers, and rewrites the theory in the Einstein frame. The central claim is that no matter the form of $F$, the kinetic sector of this scalar-tensor theory contains $N=m+n$ ghost fields whenever the Legendre inversion condition $F_{\chi\chi}F_{\eta\eta}-F_{\chi\eta}^{2}\neq0$ holds; a purely Palatini truncation does not avoid them, since the Palatini scalar loses dynamics but the non-local sectors still contribute ghosts. The ghost-free escape is degeneracy: actions in which local and non-local parts are carried by different curvatures, namely $\mathcal{L}_{1}=f(\mathcal{R})+\mathcal{R}G(\Box^{-1}\mathcal{R})-V(\Box^{-1}\mathcal{R})$ and $\mathcal{L}_{2}=f(R)+R G(\Box^{-1}R)-V(\Box^{-1}R)$, violate that inversion condition and leave exactly three propagating scalars. Sylvester's criterion on the kinetic matrices yields the no-ghost inequalities $\phi>0,\ \xi<0,\ G'(\alpha)>(\phi-\xi)/6$ for $\mathcal{L}_1$ and $\phi>0,\ \psi<0,\ G'(\beta)>-\psi/6$ for $\mathcal{L}_2$. For a flat FLRW background and quadratic $f(R)$, the $\mathcal{L}_2$ model produces a Starobinsky-like plateau potential deformed by the non-local coupling; numerical integration shows the field $\Phi$ drives inflation, $\Xi$ settles to zero, and $\Psi$ freezes as a light spectator, with the no-ghost condition $\frac{1}{6}\left(\frac{d\chi_2}{d\Psi}\right)^2\left(\sigma_2 e^{\sqrt{2/3}\Phi}+\frac{\Xi^2}{6}\right)<1$ satisfied along the trajectory.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that replacing $\Box^{-1}$ with auxiliary scalar fields gives an exact, boundary-condition-independent reformulation of the non-local action; if that localization is only formal, or if the choice of boundary conditions for the inverse d'Alembert operator changes the dynamics, the ghost count and no-ghost inequalities derived in the scalar-tensor picture do not apply to the original non-local theory.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every non-degenerate non-local hybrid action of the form (2.1) carries at least $m+n$ ghost fields, so this entire class is excluded as a stable gravitational theory unless extra mechanisms are introduced.
  • The degenerate Lagrangians $\mathcal{L}_1$ and $\mathcal{L}_2$ are ghost-free exactly when the Sylvester inequalities hold, giving a concrete recipe for building stable non-local hybrid models from known $f(R)$ actions.
  • Only the metric-$f(R)$ with Palatini non-localities (model $\mathcal{L}_2$) yields a finite slow-roll phase; the Palatini-$f(\mathcal{R})$ with metric non-localities (model $\mathcal{L}_1$) has a potential flat in $\Phi$, so it slow-rolls indefinitely and cannot reheat.
  • In $\mathcal{L}_2$ with quadratic $f(R)$ and either power-law or exponential kinetic couplings, inflation is effectively single-field, driven by $\Phi$, with $\Xi$ at its minimum and $\Psi$ acting as a light spectator damped by Hubble friction.
  • The non-local terms deform the Starobinsky-like potential and change the number of e-folds and the field trajectories, which in principle shifts the scalar spectral amplitude and other observables relative to Starobinsky inflation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the light spectator $\Psi$ in the $\mathcal{L}_2$ model should generate isocurvature and non-Gaussian perturbations whose amplitude the paper does not compute; computing the primordial power spectrum would provide a sharper observational test than the background-level e-fold count.
  • The degeneracy that makes $\mathcal{L}_1$ and $\mathcal{L}_2$ ghost-free means the scalar-tensor representation is non-invertible at the Legendre-transformation level, so a direct analysis of the original non-local action could reveal whether ghost freedom survives the localization step.
  • The paper's classification suggests a constructive pattern: among hybrid non-local actions, stability selects those whose non-local part is linearly coupled to the curvature of opposite type to the local $f$; testing higher-order or multi-copy versions of $G(\Box^{-1}R)$ would check whether this pattern persists.
  • Because the no-ghost window ties $\Xi$ and $\Psi$ together, the spectator could leave a measurable imprint on tensor-to-scalar ratio predictions; comparing the model's predictions with CMB bounds on $r$ and $n_s$ is a direct extension of the background analysis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 9 minor

Summary. This paper studies non-local extensions of hybrid metric-Palatini gravity in which inverse d'Alembert operators act on both the metric Ricci scalar R and the Palatini Ricci scalar R̄. Following Ref. [115], the authors replace the non-local action (2.1) by a local scalar-tensor action with auxiliary fields and Lagrange multipliers, Eqs. (2.4)-(2.6). For non-degenerate F they show that the Einstein-frame kinetic structure contains at least m + n ghosts, where m and n are the highest powers of the inverse d'Alembert operator acting on the two curvatures. They then study degenerate models in which the Hessian condition F_χχ F_ηη − F_χη² ≠ 0 is violated: L1 (Palatini f(R) with metric non-localities) and L2 (metric f(R) with Palatini non-localities). Applying Sylvester's criterion to the resulting 3×3 kinetic matrices, they derive algebraic no-ghost conditions, e.g. G'(β) > −ψ/6 for L2. The second half is a numerical study of slow-roll inflation in the Einstein frame for quadratic f, with power-law and exponential kinetic couplings and with and without a potential V(□^{-1}R). The main claims are that non-degenerate hybrid non-local actions are generically ghost-ridden, that the degenerate models restore stability, and that L2 supports slow-roll inflation, effectively reducing to single-field inflation with a spectator field.

Significance. If correct, the central ghost-counting result — that the number of ghosts equals the sum of the highest powers of □^{-1} acting on the metric and Palatini curvatures — cleanly extends the De Felice-Sasaki analysis of Ref. [115] to the hybrid metric-Palatini setting and rules out a broad class of non-local hybrid actions, isolating the degenerate models of Sec. 3 as the only stable candidates. The algebraic derivations in Secs. 2 and 3 are coherent and transparent, and the explicit no-ghost inequalities (the Sylvester conditions after Eqs. (3.3) and (3.8), and the field-space form (4.9)) are concrete and checkable. The identification of the L2 model as a Starobinsky-like plateau theory with an effectively frozen spectator field is a useful first step toward phenomenology, and the paper is honest about its background-only scope. Its main weaknesses are the undocumented numerical support for the inflationary claim (no e-fold counts, initial conditions, or sensitivity analysis) and the assumed rather than proven localization equivalence. No code is provided, but the results are in principle reproducible from the stated equations.

major comments (5)
  1. [Secs. 2-3, Eqs. (2.4)-(2.6), (2.7), (3.1)] The central ghost-counting and no-ghost results are derived in the localized scalar-tensor representation, and the paper explicitly adopts the 'perspective of considering the non-local theory as equivalent to a local scalar-tensor model' (Sec. 1). The dynamical equivalence is assumed, not demonstrated, and the degenerate models of Sec. 3 are precisely the cases in which the Legendre inversion condition F_χχ F_ηη − F_χη² ≠ 0 of Eq. (2.7) fails: the localization of L1 and L2 is a formal rewriting whose equivalence to the original non-local action is not established. The auxiliary fields α_1, β_1 obey □α_1 = R and □β_1 = R̄ and carry homogeneous solutions of the wave operator as free initial data, which are absent if □^{-1} is defined with a retarded Green's function. The ghost pairs exhibited after Eq. (2.21) and the Sylvester inequalities (e.g. G'(β) > −ψ/6 for L2, after Eq. (3.8)) are therefore, strictly speaking, statements about the localized field space. Since the inflationary analysis of Sec. 4 is built entirely on this representation, the paper should either justify the equivalence for the degenerate case (or cite a result covering it) or state explicitly in the abstract and in Sec. 3 that the ghost count refers to the localized definition of the theory.
  2. [Sec. 4.1-4.2, Figs. 1-4] The paper's central inflationary claim — that the L2 model can support slow-roll inflation with 'the adequate number of e-folds' and that the no-ghost and slow-roll conditions are checked 'a posteriori' along the evolution (abstract and Sec. 5) — is not quantitatively documented in the body. No e-fold number is reported for any of the cases in Figs. 1-4, the initial conditions of the integrations are not given, and the evolution of the diagnostic quantities (the no-ghost inequality (4.9) and ϵ0 = −Ḣ/H²) is not shown. As printed, the reader cannot verify that inflation lasts for, say, 50-60 e-folds, or that the trajectory stays inside the no-ghost region. I request a table reporting N_e, the initial field values, and the maximum of |(dχ2/dΨ)Ξ/6| along each trajectory for the cases displayed in Figs. 1-4.
  3. [Sec. 4, text after Eq. (4.11)] The text states that 'for σ1 = 1 the potential Y1 is independent of the field Φ', but substituting σ1 = 1 into Eq. (4.11) gives Y1 = (Ξ²/6 + a1)² / (4b1 e^{2√(2/3)Φ}), which depends on Φ through the exponential factor; the same Φ-dependence follows from Eqs. (3.5)-(3.6), where the potential appears as W1(Ψc, Ξc)/e^{2√(2/3)Φc}. The stated reason for excluding the L1 model from the inflationary analysis ('infinite slow-rolling stage along one scalar field direction', Sec. 5) therefore rests on an incorrect premise. The argument must be corrected; the conclusion may survive, since Y1 has no minimum in the Φ-direction, but the reasoning as printed is invalid.
  4. [Sec. 4.1-4.2, Eqs. (4.10)-(4.22)] The inflationary results are obtained with hand-picked parameters a2 = 2.3, b2 = 0.001, k = 0.1 and no sensitivity analysis. The text asserts that 'the shape of the potential is not tightly constrained by these chosen values' (Sec. 4.1) without reporting any scan over a2, b2, or k, although these parameters fix the location and height of the minimum; for the quoted values the plateau height is ~a2²/(4b2) ≈ 1.3×10³ in Planck units, and no statement is made about the implied scalar amplitude A_s (which the paper defers to future perturbation analysis). Given that the abstract advertises how the kinetic couplings 'influence the number of e-folds', a sensitivity scan over (a2, b2, k, V0) and over initial Φ is needed to substantiate the feasibility claim beyond a single point in parameter space.
  5. [Abstract and Sec. 5 vs. Sec. 4] The abstract and the conclusions claim that the paper 'assessed the well-posedness of the first-order slow-roll parameter, which ultimately resulted in additional constraints among the derivatives of the potential and the fields'. In the body, the only slow-roll criterion stated is the positivity of ϵ0 ≡ −Ḣ/H² after Eq. (4.8), and no constraints on potential derivatives are derived anywhere in Sec. 4. Either the promised derivation should be included, or the claim should be amended to match the content.
minor comments (9)
  1. [Eq. (3.1)] The two Lagrangians L1 and L2 are typeset identically in Eq. (3.1), since the overbars distinguishing the Palatini curvature from the metric curvature are not rendered; the distinction must be clearly visible in the published version, as the entire degeneracy argument relies on the two curvatures being different.
  2. [Sec. 3, second paragraph] The phrase 'condition FRRFRR − F²RR ≠ 0 is now evaded' should say that the non-degeneracy condition is violated (the models are degenerate), and the notation should carry the overbars; 'evaded' is misleading.
  3. [App. C, Eq. (C.1)] The power-law formula (C.1) is not valid at n = 0, which is one of the cases used in Figs. 1 and 3; the logarithmic limiting expression should be given explicitly.
  4. [Sec. 4, Figs. 1-4] The initial conditions, integration domains, and numerical tolerances for the integrations shown in Figs. 1-4 are not stated, and the meaning of 'normalised' in the figure captions (normalised to what quantity?) is not defined.
  5. [Sec. 4.1.1] The text describes k = 0.1 both as a small parameter making the non-local terms act 'as perturbations' and (for n = 1) as making the non-local coupling 'significant'; the intended hierarchy between these two statements should be clarified.
  6. [Sec. 4] The units of the numerical parameters (a2, b2, k, V0) are never stated; the paper should specify that they are in reduced Planck mass units (or equivalent).
  7. [Sec. 4.2.1] The light-field condition is phrased as 'H²/YΨΨ ≫ 1'; stating it as YΨΨ/H² ≪ 1 would make the connection with the standard m² ≪ H² criterion for light fields clearer.
  8. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.9)] The derivation of the field-space no-ghost inequality (4.9) from the Sylvester condition G'(β) > −ψ/6 of Sec. 3, which uses the field redefinitions (3.4) and the identification ψ = −Ξ²/6, should be displayed, since (4.9) is the form used in all the numerical checks.
  9. [Sec. 2, after Eq. (2.4)] There is a typo in the sentence 'Variation of Eq. (2.1) with respect to λ_i, ρ_j guarantees that the original formulation is consistently recovered, how it is showed by'; it should read 'as shown by'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found: the ghost-count and no-ghost inequalities are algebraic consequences of the explicitly stated localization, and the inflationary parameters are chosen and checked a posteriori rather than fitted.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain. In Sec. 2, the number of ghost fields is obtained by localizing the non-local action (2.1) with auxiliary fields and Lagrange multipliers (2.4)-(2.6), then applying linear field redefinitions (2.14)-(2.21). The result that the number of ghosts equals the number of inverse-d'Alembert pairs is a direct algebraic consequence of the stated localization scheme, not an independently fitted quantity passed off as a prediction. In Sec. 3, the degenerate models are treated by explicit Legendre/localization steps, and the no-ghost conditions are derived by applying Sylvester's criterion to the kinetic matrices K1 and K2 (Eqs. 3.3 and 3.8); these inequalities are conditions to be imposed, not quantities fitted to a target observable. The inflationary analysis in Sec. 4 chooses parameters a2, b2, k and V0 by hand to obtain a plateau potential with a minimum, integrates the background equations, and then checks the no-ghost and slow-roll conditions along the trajectories; this is consistency checking in a model-building exercise, not a prediction that reduces to its input. The self-citations in the paper, such as Ref. [101] for the degree-of-freedom content of generalized hybrid metric-Palatini gravity and Refs. [120]-[123] for the numerical algorithm, are supportive or methodological rather than load-bearing for the central no-ghost derivation. The paper itself acknowledges in Sec. 5 that the analysis is limited to background dynamics and does not treat perturbations; this is a scope limitation, not a circular step. No equation was found in which the claimed output is identical to the input by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The localization assumption for the inverse d'Alembert operator is an explicit working assumption rather than a hidden circularity, and the subsequent stability analysis is self-contained given that assumption.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central derivation relies on the localization assumption and the kinetic-matrix stability test. The numerical inflation analysis depends on hand-picked parameters a2, b2, k, V0, n, and integration constants, which are not derived from data or external constraints. The auxiliary fields are mathematical tools, not new physical entities.

free parameters (6)
  • a_2 = 2.3
    Coefficient in the quadratic f(R) model L2 = a2 R + b2 R^2; in Eq. (4.12) it sets the location of the potential minimum. Chosen by hand to give a positive Starobinsky-like plateau.
  • b_2 = 0.001
    Controls the height of the plateau in Eq. (4.12); hand-picked to allow slow-roll inflation.
  • k = 0.1
    Strength of the non-local kinetic coupling K(Psi) in Eq. (4.14); chosen small so non-local terms act as perturbations.
  • V_0 = not specified in text
    Coefficient of the quadratic potential V(chi2) = V0 chi2^2/2 in Eq. (4.22); values are used in the figures but not reported in the text.
  • n = -1, 0, 1, 2
    Exponent in the power-law and exponential kinetic couplings K(Psi); scanned by hand across cases, not derived from first principles.
  • Integration constants G0, chi2,0, Psi0 = constrained or set to simplifying values
    In Sec. 4.1 these constants are fixed, e.g. chi2,0 = k Psi0^(n+2)/(n+2), to keep the reconstructed non-local function G within the stable class; alternative choices can violate the assumptions of Sec. 3.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The non-local action with inverse d'Alembert operators is dynamically equivalent to a local scalar-tensor action with auxiliary fields.
    Used throughout Sec. 2 from Eq. (2.4) onward, following Ref. [115]; bypasses the boundary-condition ambiguity of the inverse d'Alembert operator.
  • standard math Sylvester's criterion on the kinetic matrix is a valid test for the absence of ghosts.
    Invoked in Sec. 3 for the matrices K1 and K2 to impose positive definiteness and derive the no-ghost inequalities.
  • standard math The Palatini connection can be solved algebraically, yielding the curvature relation in Eq. (2.12).
    Assumes torsionless and metric-compatible connection or the equivalent projective gauge; standard in Palatini gravity and stated in Sec. 2.
  • domain assumption The FLRW background with quadratic V and quadratic local f(R) is representative of the inflationary dynamics.
    The numerical analysis in Sec. 4 restricts to specific quadratic potentials and kinetic couplings; this is a model selection rather than a consequence of the ghost analysis.
invented entities (1)
  • Auxiliary scalar fields alpha_i, beta_j and Lagrange multipliers lambda_i, rho_j
    purpose: Localize the inverse d'Alembert operators in the action and convert the non-local theory into a scalar-tensor theory.
    Mathematical bookkeeping introduced in Eq. (2.4); not proposed as physical particles. The ghosts identified in the theory are instabilities of these auxiliary fields.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inflation in non-local hybrid metric-Palatini gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EI45LOMP

@misc{pith2026241215064,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inflation in non-local hybrid metric-Palatini gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EI45LOMP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15064}
}
read the original abstract

Within the framework of hybrid metric-Palatini gravity, we incorporate non-localities introduced via the inverse of the d'Alembert operators acting on the scalar curvature. We analyse the dynamical structure of the theory and, adopting a scalar-tensor perspective, assess the stability conditions to ensure the absence of ghost instabilities. Focusing on a special class of well-defined hybrid actions -- where local and non-local contributions are carried by distinct types of curvature -- we investigate the feasibility of inflation within the resulting Einstein-frame multi-field scenario. We examine how the non-minimal kinetic couplings between the fields, reflecting the non-local structure of the original frame, influence the number of e-folds and the field trajectories. To clarify the physical interpretation of our results, we draw analogies with benchmark single-field inflation scenarios that include spectator fields.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quasinormal modes of nonlocal gravity black holes

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Quasinormal frequencies of nonlocal gravity black holes deviate from Schwarzschild values by up to about 12%, and the derived bounds on the model parameters α and k depend on projected detector sensitivity.

  2. Constant-roll $\beta$-exponential inflation: Palatini formalism

    gr-qc 2026-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A parameter scan of constant-roll β-exponential inflation in Palatini R² gravity claims agreement with ACT/Planck contours, but the derivation is undermined by algebraic sign errors and an absent non-Gaussianity calculation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [115]

    Ghosts in classes of non-local gravity

    A. De Felice and M. Sasaki, Ghosts in classes of non-local gravity , Phys. Lett. B 743 (2015) 189 [1412.1575]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  2. [1]

    Walsh, R.F

    D. Walsh, R.F. Carswell and R.J. Weymann, 0957 + 561 A, B - Twin quasistellar objects or gravitational lens, Nature 279 (1979) 381

    1979

  3. [2]

    Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole , Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L1 [ 1906.11238]

    arXiv 2019

  4. [3]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102 [ 1602.03837]. – 21 –

    arXiv 2016

  5. [4]

    Sahni and A.A

    V. Sahni and A.A. Starobinsky, The Case for a positive cosmological Lambda term , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 9 (2000) 373 [ astro-ph/9904398]

    arXiv 2000

  6. [5]

    Carroll, The Cosmological constant, Living Rev

    S.M. Carroll, The Cosmological constant, Living Rev. Rel. 4 (2001) 1 [ astro-ph/0004075]

    arXiv 2001

  7. [6]

    Peebles and B

    P.J.E. Peebles and B. Ratra, The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy , Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 559 [ astro-ph/0207347]

    arXiv 2003

  8. [7]

    Padmanabhan, Cosmological constant: The Weight of the vacuum , Phys

    T. Padmanabhan, Cosmological constant: The Weight of the vacuum , Phys. Rept. 380 (2003) 235 [hep-th/0212290]

    arXiv 2003

Show all 123 references
  1. [8]

    Copeland, M

    E.J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of dark energy , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006) 1753 [ hep-th/0603057]

    2006 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Caldwell and M

    R.R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, The Physics of Cosmic Acceleration , Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 59 (2009) 397 [ 0903.0866]

    2009 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Li, X.-D

    M. Li, X.-D. Li, S. Wang and Y. Wang, Dark Energy, Commun. Theor. Phys. 56 (2011) 525 [1103.5870]

    2011 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Martin, Everything You Always Wanted To Know About The Cosmological Constant Problem (But Were Afraid To Ask) , Comptes Rendus Physique 13 (2012) 566 [ 1205.3365]

    J. Martin, Everything You Always Wanted To Know About The Cosmological Constant Problem (But Were Afraid To Ask) , Comptes Rendus Physique 13 (2012) 566 [ 1205.3365]

    2012 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem , Rev

    S. Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem , Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (1989) 1

    1989

  6. [13]

    Krauss and M.S

    L.M. Krauss and M.S. Turner, The Cosmological constant is back , Gen. Rel. Grav. 27 (1995) 1137 [astro-ph/9504003]

    1995 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Weinberg, The Cosmological constant problems , in 4th International Symposium on Sources and Detection of Dark Matter in the Universe (DM 2000) , pp

    S. Weinberg, The Cosmological constant problems , in 4th International Symposium on Sources and Detection of Dark Matter in the Universe (DM 2000) , pp. 18–26, 2, 2000, DOI [astro-ph/0005265]

    2000 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Sahni, The Cosmological constant problem and quintessence , Class

    V. Sahni, The Cosmological constant problem and quintessence , Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 3435 [ astro-ph/0202076]

    2002 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Yokoyama, Issues on the cosmological constant , in 12th Workshop on General Relativity and Gravitation, 5, 2003 [ gr-qc/0305068]

    J. Yokoyama, Issues on the cosmological constant , in 12th Workshop on General Relativity and Gravitation, 5, 2003 [ gr-qc/0305068]

    2003 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Nobbenhuis, Categorizing different approaches to the cosmological constant problem , Found

    S. Nobbenhuis, Categorizing different approaches to the cosmological constant problem , Found. Phys. 36 (2006) 613 [ gr-qc/0411093]

    2006 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Burgess, The Cosmological Constant Problem: Why it’s hard to get Dark Energy from Micro-physics, in 100e Ecole d’Ete de Physique: Post-Planck Cosmology , pp

    C.P. Burgess, The Cosmological Constant Problem: Why it’s hard to get Dark Energy from Micro-physics, in 100e Ecole d’Ete de Physique: Post-Planck Cosmology , pp. 149–197, 2015, DOI [1309.4133]

    2015 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Joyce, B

    A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury and M. Trodden, Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model , Phys. Rept. 568 (2015) 1 [ 1407.0059]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Bull et al., Beyond ΛCDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead , Phys

    P. Bull et al., Beyond ΛCDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead , Phys. Dark Univ. 12 (2016) 56 [ 1512.05356]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [21]

    B. Wang, E. Abdalla, F. Atrio-Barandela and D. Pavon, Dark Matter and Dark Energy Interactions: Theoretical Challenges, Cosmological Implications and Observational Signatures , Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 (2016) 096901 [ 1603.08299]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Brustein and P.J

    R. Brustein and P.J. Steinhardt, Challenges for superstring cosmology , Phys. Lett. B 302 (1993) 196 [ hep-th/9212049]

    1993 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Witten, The Cosmological constant from the viewpoint of string theory , in 4th International Symposium on Sources and Detection of Dark Matter in the Universe (DM 2000) , pp

    E. Witten, The Cosmological constant from the viewpoint of string theory , in 4th International Symposium on Sources and Detection of Dark Matter in the Universe (DM 2000) , pp. 27–36, 3, 2000 [ hep-ph/0002297]

    2000 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde and S.P. Trivedi, De Sitter vacua in string theory , Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 046005 [ hep-th/0301240]. – 22 –

    2003 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Polchinski, The Cosmological Constant and the String Landscape , in 23rd Solvay Conference in Physics: The Quantum Structure of Space and Time , pp

    J. Polchinski, The Cosmological Constant and the String Landscape , in 23rd Solvay Conference in Physics: The Quantum Structure of Space and Time , pp. 216–236, 3, 2006 [hep-th/0603249]

    2006 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Danielsson and T

    U.H. Danielsson and T. Van Riet, What if string theory has no de Sitter vacua? , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27 (2018) 1830007 [ 1804.01120]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Zlatev, L.-M

    I. Zlatev, L.-M. Wang and P.J. Steinhardt, Quintessence, cosmic coincidence, and the cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 896 [ astro-ph/9807002]

    1999 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Pavon and W

    D. Pavon and W. Zimdahl, Holographic dark energy and cosmic coincidence , Phys. Lett. B 628 (2005) 206 [ gr-qc/0505020]

    2005 arXiv

  22. [29]

    coincidence problem

    H.E.S. Velten, R.F. vom Marttens and W. Zimdahl, Aspects of the cosmological “coincidence problem”, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3160 [ 1410.2509]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [30]

    DESI collaboration, DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations , 2404.03002

    2024 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Giar` e, M

    W. Giar` e, M. Najafi, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino and J.T. Firouzjaee, Robust preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN measurements , JCAP 10 (2024) 035 [2407.16689]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Giar` e,Dynamical Dark Energy Beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO and Type-Ia Supernovae , 2409.17074

    W. Giar` e,Dynamical Dark Energy Beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO and Type-Ia Supernovae , 2409.17074

    arXiv

  26. [33]

    Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys

    A.H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347

    1981

  27. [34]

    Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems , Phys

    A.D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems , Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 389

    1982

  28. [35]

    Albrecht and P.J

    A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1220

    1982

  29. [36]

    Vilenkin, The Birth of Inflationary Universes , Phys

    A. Vilenkin, The Birth of Inflationary Universes , Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 2848

    1983

  30. [37]

    Verde, T

    L. Verde, T. Treu and A.G. Riess, Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe , Nature Astron. 3 (2019) 891 [ 1907.10625]

    2019 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Di Valentino et al., Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension, Astropart

    E. Di Valentino et al., Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension, Astropart. Phys. 131 (2021) 102605 [ 2008.11284]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri et al., In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions , Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 153001 [2103.01183]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Perivolaropoulos and F

    L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara, Challenges for ΛCDM: An update , New Astron. Rev. 95 (2022) 101659 [ 2105.05208]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Sch¨ oneberg, G

    N. Sch¨ oneberg, G. Franco Abell´ an, A. P´ erez S´ anchez, S.J. Witte, V. Poulin and J. Lesgourgues, The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models , Phys. Rept. 984 (2022) 1 [2107.10291]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [42]

    P. Shah, P. Lemos and O. Lahav, A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant , Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 29 (2021) 9 [ 2109.01161]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [43]

    E. Abdalla et al., Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies , JHEAp 34 (2022) 49 [2203.06142]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Di Valentino, Challenges of the Standard Cosmological Model , Universe 8 (2022) 399

    E. Di Valentino, Challenges of the Standard Cosmological Model , Universe 8 (2022) 399. – 23 –

    2022

  38. [45]

    Kamionkowski and A.G

    M. Kamionkowski and A.G. Riess, The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy , Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 73 (2023) 153 [ 2211.04492]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Giar` e,CMB Anomalies and the Hubble Tension , 2305.16919

    W. Giar` e,CMB Anomalies and the Hubble Tension , 2305.16919

    arXiv

  40. [47]

    Hu and F.-Y

    J.-P. Hu and F.-Y. Wang, Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics , Universe 9 (2023) 94 [2302.05709]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Verde, N

    L. Verde, N. Sch¨ oneberg and H. Gil-Mar ´ ın,A tale of many H0, 2311.13305

    arXiv

  42. [49]

    Di Valentino and D

    E. Di Valentino and D. Brout, eds., The Hubble Constant Tension , Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology, Springer (2024), 10.1007/978-981-99-0177-7

    2024 doi

  43. [50]

    DES collaboration, Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 023520 [ 2105.13549]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Di Valentino et al., Cosmology Intertwined III: f σ8 and S8, Astropart

    E. Di Valentino et al., Cosmology Intertwined III: f σ8 and S8, Astropart. Phys. 131 (2021) 102604 [2008.11285]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Di Valentino and S

    E. Di Valentino and S. Bridle, Exploring the Tension between Current Cosmic Microwave Background and Cosmic Shear Data , Symmetry 10 (2018) 585

    2018

  46. [53]

    Astrophys

    Kilo-Degree Survey, DEScollaboration, DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys , Open J. Astrophys. 6 (2023) 2305.17173 [ 2305.17173]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Tr¨ oster et al.,Cosmology from large-scale structure: Constraining ΛCDM with BOSS , Astron

    T. Tr¨ oster et al.,Cosmology from large-scale structure: Constraining ΛCDM with BOSS , Astron. Astrophys. 633 (2020) L10 [ 1909.11006]

    2020 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Heymans et al., KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints, Astron

    C. Heymans et al., KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints, Astron. Astrophys. 646 (2021) A140 [ 2007.15632]

    2021 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Dalal et al., Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra, Phys

    R. Dalal et al., Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 123519 [ 2304.00701]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Chen et al., Analysis of DESI ×DES using the Lagrangian effective theory of LSS , Phys

    S. Chen et al., Analysis of DESI ×DES using the Lagrangian effective theory of LSS , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 103518 [ 2407.04795]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [58]

    J. Kim et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope DR6 and DESI: structure formation over cosmic time with a measurement of the cross-correlation of CMB lensing and luminous red galaxies, JCAP 12 (2024) 022 [ 2407.04606]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [59]

    DES collaboration, Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing in harmonic space , 2406.12675

    arXiv

  53. [60]

    Harnois-Deraps et al., KiDS-1000 and DES-Y1 combined: cosmology from peak count statistics, Mon

    J. Harnois-Deraps et al., KiDS-1000 and DES-Y1 combined: cosmology from peak count statistics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 534 (2024) 3305 [ 2405.10312]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Dvornik et al., KiDS-1000: Combined halo-model cosmology constraints from galaxy abundance, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing , Astron

    A. Dvornik et al., KiDS-1000: Combined halo-model cosmology constraints from galaxy abundance, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing , Astron. Astrophys. 675 (2023) A189 [2210.03110]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Schiavone, G

    T. Schiavone, G. Montani and F. Bombacigno, f(R) gravity in the Jordan frame as a paradigm for the Hubble tension , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 522 (2023) L72 [ 2211.16737]

    2023 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Montani, M

    G. Montani, M. De Angelis, F. Bombacigno and N. Carlevaro, Metric f(R) gravity with dynamical dark energy as a scenario for the Hubble tension , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 527 (2023) L156 [ 2306.11101]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Escamilla, D

    L.A. Escamilla, D. Fiorucci, G. Montani and E. Di Valentino, Exploring the Hubble tension with a late time Modified Gravity scenario , Phys. Dark Univ. 46 (2024) 101652 [ 2408.04354]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Montani, N

    G. Montani, N. Carlevaro and M. De Angelis, Modified Gravity in the Presence of Matter Creation: Scenario for the Late Universe , Entropy 26 (2024) 662 [ 2407.12409]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Banerjee, M

    S. Banerjee, M. Petronikolou and E.N. Saridakis, Alleviating the H0 tension with new gravitational scalar tensor theories , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 024012 [ 2209.02426]. – 24 –

    2023 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Petronikolou and E.N

    M. Petronikolou and E.N. Saridakis, Alleviating the H 0 Tension in Scalar–Tensor and Bi-Scalar–Tensor Theories, Universe 9 (2023) 397 [ 2308.16044]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [68]

    E.N. Saridakis, Solving both H0 and σ8 tensions in f(T) gravity , in 16th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics and Relativistic Field Theories , 1, 2023, DOI [ 2301.06881]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Mandal, O

    S. Mandal, O. Sokoliuk, S.S. Mishra and P.K. Sahoo, H0 tension in torsion-based modified gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 993 (2023) 116285 [ 2301.06328]

    2023 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Bouch` e, S

    F. Bouch` e, S. Capozziello and V. Salzano, Addressing Cosmological Tensions by Non-Local Gravity, Universe 9 (2023) 27 [ 2301.01503]

    2023 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Adil, M.R

    S.A. Adil, M.R. Gangopadhyay, M. Sami and M.K. Sharma, Late-time acceleration due to a generic modification of gravity and the Hubble tension , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 103534 [2106.03093]

    2021 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Specogna, E

    E. Specogna, E. Di Valentino, J. Levi Said and N.-M. Nguyen, Exploring the growth index γL: Insights from different CMB dataset combinations and approaches , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 043528 [2305.16865]

    2024 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Specogna, W

    E. Specogna, W. Giar` e and E. Di Valentino, Planck-PR4 anisotropy spectra show (better) consistency with General Relativity , 2411.03896

    arXiv

  67. [74]

    Ishak et al., Modified Gravity Constraints from the Full Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements from DESI 2024 , 2411.12026

    M. Ishak et al., Modified Gravity Constraints from the Full Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements from DESI 2024 , 2411.12026

    2024

  68. [75]

    Carroll, V

    S.M. Carroll, V. Duvvuri, M. Trodden and M.S. Turner, Is cosmic speed - up due to new gravitational physics?, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 043528 [ astro-ph/0306438]

    2004 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Olmo, Post-Newtonian constraints on f(R) cosmologies in metric and Palatini formalism , Phys

    G.J. Olmo, Post-Newtonian constraints on f(R) cosmologies in metric and Palatini formalism , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 083505 [ gr-qc/0505135]

    2005 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Moretti, F

    F. Moretti, F. Bombacigno and G. Montani, Gauge invariant formulation of metric f (R) gravity for gravitational waves , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 084014 [ 1906.01899]

    2019 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Sotiriou and V

    T.P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, f(R) Theories Of Gravity , Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 451 [0805.1726]

    2010 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Nojiri, S.D

    S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou, Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution , Phys. Rept. 692 (2017) 1 [ 1705.11098]

    2017 arXiv

  73. [80]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, f(R) theories, Living Rev. Rel. 13 (2010) 3 [ 1002.4928]

    2010 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity , Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity , Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99

    1980

  75. [82]

    Gottlober, V

    S. Gottlober, V. Muller and A.A. Starobinsky, Analysis of inflation driven by a scalar field and a curvature squared term , Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 2510

    1991

  76. [83]

    Cognola, E

    G. Cognola, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, L. Sebastiani and S. Zerbini, A Class of viable modified f(R) gravities describing inflation and the onset of accelerated expansion , Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 046009 [ 0712.4017]

    2008 arXiv

  77. [84]

    Nojiri and S.D

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, Modified f(R) gravity unifying R**m inflation with Lambda CDM epoch, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 026007 [ 0710.1738]

    2008 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Artymowski and Z

    M. Artymowski and Z. Lalak, Inflation and dark energy from f(R) gravity , JCAP 09 (2014) 036 [1405.7818]

    2014 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Huang, A polynomial f(R) inflation model , JCAP 02 (2014) 035 [ 1309.3514]

    Q.-G. Huang, A polynomial f(R) inflation model , JCAP 02 (2014) 035 [ 1309.3514]

    2014 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Sebastiani and R

    L. Sebastiani and R. Myrzakulov, F(R) gravity and inflation , Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 12 (2015) 1530003 [ 1506.05330]. – 25 –

    2015 arXiv

  81. [88]

    van de Bruck and L.E

    C. van de Bruck and L.E. Paduraru, Simplest extension of Starobinsky inflation , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 083513 [ 1505.01727]

    2015 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Brooker, S.D

    D.J. Brooker, S.D. Odintsov and R.P. Woodard, Precision predictions for the primordial power spectra from f (R) models of inflation , Nucl. Phys. B 911 (2016) 318 [ 1606.05879]

    2016 arXiv

  83. [90]

    Brookfield, C

    A.W. Brookfield, C. van de Bruck and L.M.H. Hall, Viability of f(R) Theories with Additional Powers of Curvature , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 064028 [ hep-th/0608015]

    2006 arXiv

  84. [91]

    Faulkner, M

    T. Faulkner, M. Tegmark, E.F. Bunn and Y. Mao, Constraining f(R) Gravity as a Scalar Tensor Theory, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 063505 [ astro-ph/0612569]

    2007 arXiv

  85. [92]

    P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, A.-C. Davis and D.J. Shaw, f(R) Gravity and Chameleon Theories , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 104021 [ 0806.3415]

    2008 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Burrage and J

    C. Burrage and J. Sakstein, Tests of Chameleon Gravity , Living Rev. Rel. 21 (2018) 1 [1709.09071]

    2018 arXiv

  87. [94]

    P. Brax, S. Casas, H. Desmond and B. Elder, Testing Screened Modified Gravity, Universe 8 (2021) 11 [ 2201.10817]

    2021 arXiv

  88. [95]

    Baldazzi, O

    A. Baldazzi, O. Melichev and R. Percacci, Metric-Affine Gravity as an effective field theory , Annals Phys. 438 (2022) 168757 [ 2112.10193]

    2022 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Olmo, Palatini Approach to Modified Gravity: f(R) Theories and Beyond , Int

    G.J. Olmo, Palatini Approach to Modified Gravity: f(R) Theories and Beyond , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 20 (2011) 413 [ 1101.3864]

    2011 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Koivisto and H

    T. Koivisto and H. Kurki-Suonio, Cosmological perturbations in the palatini formulation of modified gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 2355 [ astro-ph/0509422]

    2006 arXiv

  91. [98]

    Harko, T.S

    T. Harko, T.S. Koivisto, F.S.N. Lobo and G.J. Olmo, Metric-Palatini gravity unifying local constraints and late-time cosmic acceleration , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 084016 [ 1110.1049]

    2012 arXiv

  92. [99]

    Tamanini and C.G

    N. Tamanini and C.G. Boehmer, Generalized hybrid metric-Palatini gravity , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 084031 [ 1302.2355]

    2013 arXiv

  93. [100]

    Karamitsos, Quasi-Palatini Formulation of Scalar-Tensor Gravity , 2503.06886

    S. Karamitsos, Quasi-Palatini Formulation of Scalar-Tensor Gravity , 2503.06886

    arXiv

  94. [101]

    Bombacigno, F

    F. Bombacigno, F. Moretti and G. Montani, Scalar modes in extended hybrid metric-Palatini gravity: weak field phenomenology , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 124036 [ 1907.11949]

    2019 arXiv

  95. [102]

    Capozziello, T

    S. Capozziello, T. Harko, T.S. Koivisto, F.S.N. Lobo and G.J. Olmo, Cosmology of hybrid metric-Palatini f(X)-gravity, JCAP 04 (2013) 011 [ 1209.2895]

    2013 arXiv

  96. [103]

    Capozziello, T

    S. Capozziello, T. Harko, T.S. Koivisto, F.S.N. Lobo and G.J. Olmo, Hybrid metric-Palatini gravity, Universe 1 (2015) 199 [ 1508.04641]

    2015 arXiv

  97. [104]

    J.a.L. Rosa, S. Carloni, J.P.d.S.e. Lemos and F.S.N. Lobo, Cosmological solutions in generalized hybrid metric-Palatini gravity , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 124035 [ 1703.03335]

    2017 arXiv

  98. [105]

    Capozziello and F

    S. Capozziello and F. Bajardi, Nonlocal gravity cosmology: An overview , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31 (2022) 2230009 [ 2201.04512]

    2022 arXiv

  99. [106]

    Briscese, L

    F. Briscese, L. Modesto and S. Tsujikawa, Super-renormalizable or finite completion of the Starobinsky theory, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 024029 [ 1308.1413]

    2014 arXiv

  100. [107]

    Koshelev, L

    A.S. Koshelev, L. Modesto, L. Rachwal and A.A. Starobinsky, Occurrence of exact R2 inflation in non-local UV-complete gravity , JHEP 11 (2016) 067 [ 1604.03127]

    2016 arXiv

  101. [108]

    Biswas, E

    T. Biswas, E. Gerwick, T. Koivisto and A. Mazumdar, Towards singularity and ghost free theories of gravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 031101 [ 1110.5249]

    2012 arXiv

  102. [109]

    Buoninfante, A.S

    L. Buoninfante, A.S. Koshelev, G. Lambiase and A. Mazumdar, Classical properties of non-local, ghost- and singularity-free gravity , JCAP 09 (2018) 034 [ 1802.00399]. – 26 –

    2018 arXiv

  103. [110]

    Deser and R.P

    S. Deser and R.P. Woodard, Nonlocal Cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 111301 [0706.2151]

    2007 arXiv

  104. [111]

    Deffayet and R.P

    C. Deffayet and R.P. Woodard, Reconstructing the Distortion Function for Nonlocal Cosmology, JCAP 08 (2009) 023 [ 0904.0961]

    2009 arXiv

  105. [112]

    Deser and R.P

    S. Deser and R.P. Woodard, Observational Viability and Stability of Nonlocal Cosmology , JCAP 11 (2013) 036 [ 1307.6639]

    2013 arXiv

  106. [113]

    Belgacem, A

    E. Belgacem, A. Finke, A. Frassino and M. Maggiore, Testing nonlocal gravity with Lunar Laser Ranging, JCAP 02 (2019) 035 [ 1812.11181]

    2019 arXiv

  107. [114]

    Deser and R.P

    S. Deser and R.P. Woodard, Nonlocal Cosmology II — Cosmic acceleration without fine tuning or dark energy , JCAP 06 (2019) 034 [ 1902.08075]

    2019 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Carleo, Constraints on non-local gravity from binary pulsars gravitational emission , Phys

    A. Carleo, Constraints on non-local gravity from binary pulsars gravitational emission , Phys. Lett. B 848 (2024) 138410 [ 2312.02862]

    2024 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Capozziello, M

    S. Capozziello, M. Capriolo, A. Carleo and G. Lambiase, Non-locality in quadrupolar gravitational radiation, JCAP 02 (2025) 049 [ 2412.13629]

    2025 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Delhom, Minimal coupling in presence of non-metricity and torsion , Eur

    A. Delhom, Minimal coupling in presence of non-metricity and torsion , Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 728 [ 2002.02404]

    2020 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Iosifidis, A.C

    D. Iosifidis, A.C. Petkou and C.G. Tsagas, Torsion/non-metricity duality in f(R) gravity , Gen. Rel. Grav. 51 (2019) 66 [ 1810.06602]

    2019 arXiv

  112. [120]

    De Angelis and C

    M. De Angelis and C. van de Bruck, Adiabatic and isocurvature perturbations in extended theories with kinetic couplings , JCAP 10 (2023) 023 [ 2304.12364]

    2023 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Giar` e, M

    W. Giar` e, M. De Angelis, C. van de Bruck and E. Di Valentino, Tracking the multifield dynamics with cosmological data: a Monte Carlo approach , JCAP 12 (2023) 014 [2306.12414]

    2023 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Cecchini, M

    C. Cecchini, M. De Angelis, W. Giar` e, M. Rinaldi and S. Vagnozzi, Testing scale-invariant inflation against cosmological data , JCAP 07 (2024) 058 [ 2403.04316]

    2024 arXiv

  115. [123]

    De Angelis, C

    M. De Angelis, C. Cecchini and M. Rinaldi, Tracing cosmic stretch marks: probing scale invariance in the early Universe , in 17th Marcel Grossmann Meeting: On Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Gravitation, and Relativistic Field Theories ,...

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.