Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Copyleft for Alleviating AIGC Copyright Dilemma: What-if Analysis, Public Perception and Implications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.12216 v1 pith:EICQH3U6 submitted 2024-02-19 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords aigccopyleftdilemmacopyrightanalysisfeasibilitygovernancepublic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

As AIGC has impacted our society profoundly in the past years, ethical issues have received tremendous attention. The most urgent one is the AIGC copyright dilemma, which can immensely stifle the development of AIGC and greatly cost the entire society. Given the complexity of AIGC copyright governance and the fact that no perfect solution currently exists, previous work advocated copyleft on AI governance but without substantive analysis. In this paper, we take a step further to explore the feasibility of copyleft to alleviate the AIGC copyright dilemma. We conduct a mixed-methods study from two aspects: qualitatively, we use a formal what-if analysis to clarify the dilemma and provide case studies to show the feasibility of copyleft; quantitatively, we perform a carefully designed survey to find out how the public feels about copylefting AIGC. The key findings include: a) people generally perceive the dilemma, b) they prefer to use authorized AIGC under loose restriction, and c) they are positive to copyleft in AIGC and willing to use it in the future.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. One Size Does Not Fit All: Investigating Efficacy of Perplexity in Detecting LLM-Generated Code

    cs.SE 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Perplexity-based detectors are the most robust to unknown AI code generators, but they are less accurate and slower than supervised detectors, working best on C/C++ and large code snippets.

Pith tools