Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Composite-State Localization Beyond the External Landscape in Non-Hermitian Quasicrystals

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An interacting non-Hermitian quasiperiodic ladder can keep same-rung composite pairs extended after single particles have localized, and a phase offset between the two legs reverses the ordering.

desk verdict A new mechanism—opposite leg potentials cancelling for same-rung pairs—gives a plausible localization inversion; the main caveat is that the right-vector IPR diagnostic needs a biorthogonal check before I'd fully trust the phase diagram. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08105 v1 pith:EIO4XLK3 submitted 2026-08-08 cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph

Tian Zhou , Xue-Bin Wang , Zhongmin Yang , Tao Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph MSC 81Q1282B44
keywords non-HermitianquasicrystallocalizationinversioncompositeexcitationsdoublonquasiperiodicladderextendedstateincontinuuminverseparticipationratioeffectivepairHamiltonian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that in an interacting non-Hermitian quasiperiodic ladder, a composite of two particles bound on the same rung can have a localization behavior opposite to that of the unpaired single-particle states in the same lattice. For antisymmetric complex leg potentials, the quasiperiodic potential cancels at first order for a same-rung pair, while it acts directly on separated particles; the pair instead moves through virtual unpaired configurations, so it experiences a much weaker emergent quasiperiodic landscape. As a result, paired states remain extended up to $h_3\approx 2.37$ (with $U_1/J=20$, $V/J=1$, $t/J=2$) even after the unpaired sector has localized above $h_2\approx 1.58$. A finite phase offset $\Delta\phi$ between the legs breaks the cancellation and reverses the hierarchy, localizing the pair while single-particle states stay extended, and an interaction-engineered pathway can embed an extended composite band inside a localized continuum. The message is that internal configuration is a reversible control parameter for localization, not just the external potential.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective paired-sector Hamiltonian obtained by projecting out unpaired configurations, written in Eqs. (B24), (6)-(8), and (11)-(14). Because hard-core bosons cannot hop a same-rung pair directly, the projector satisfies $PTP=0$, so pair propagation is a second-order virtual process. The effective hopping $J_j^{\mathrm{eff}}$ and renormalized onsite energy $\epsilon_j^{\mathrm{eff}}$ encode the emergent non-Hermitian quasicrystal experienced by the composite: for $\Delta\phi=0$ the first-order potential cancels and the residual modulation is $O(J^2/U_1)$, while for $\Delta\phi\neq 0$ a direct term $-2V\sin(2\pi\alpha j+ih)\sin(\Delta\phi/2)$ dominates the narrow composite band. The $U_2$ interaction in Eq. (15) plays the same role in configuration space by raising the energy of intermediate interleg configurations, stabilising the extended embedded band. The mechanism therefore turns internal pair configuration into the parameter that selects the effective landscape.

What would settle it

Diagonalise the same two-excitation ladder ($\Delta\phi=0$, $U_1/J=20$, $V/J=1$, $t/J=2$) and recompute the inverse participation ratio using the biorthogonal overlap $\langle L_m|R_m\rangle$ or the left-eigenvector density, and compare with a generalized Brillouin zone criterion; if the paired-sector extended phase no longer survives past $h\approx 1.58$ or the effective $h_3$ collapses toward $h_2$, the inversion is a diagnostic effect rather than a property of the spectrum.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that composite excitations do not inherit the localization of their constituents in this model. In the two-particle sector of the antisymmetric ladder ($\Delta\phi=0$), the first-order onsite potential for a same-rung pair vanishes because $V_{a,j}+V_{b,j}=0$, leaving the bare pair energy $U_1$. Pair motion is generated only by virtual excursions into the unpaired sector, and second-order quasi-degenerate perturbation theory yields a one-dimensional effective Hamiltonian for the paired manifold with modulated hopping $J_j^{\mathrm{eff}}$ and onsite energy $\epsilon_j^{\mathrm{eff}}$ (Eqs. 6-8). For $U_1\gg J,V$ this effective pair quasicrystal has modulations of order $J^2/U_1$, far weaker than the direct landscape seen by unpaired particles, so the pair band survives as extended while the unpaired band localizes. The hierarchy is controlled by $\Delta\phi$: a small phase offset restores a first-order pair potential $-2V\sin(2\pi\alpha j+ih)\sin(\Delta\phi/2)$, which, acting on the narrow pair band of width $J^2/U_1$, drives the pair localized while unpaired particles remain extended. The same logic, with a nearest-rung interaction $U_2$, suppresses certain virtual pathways and creates an extended composite band embedded inside a localized unpaired continuum, the inverse of a bound state in the continuum.

Load-bearing premise

The separation into paired and unpaired sectors assumes that the right-eigenvector density inverse participation ratio with self-overlap normalization correctly labels localized versus extended states; for non-Hermitian eigenstates with tiny self-overlap, that label can fail, and if it fails the claimed inversion could be an artifact of the diagnostic.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $\Delta\phi=0$ with $U_1/J=20$, $V/J=1$, $t/J=2$, the unpaired sector localizes for $h\gtrsim 1.58$ but same-rung pairs remain extended up to $h\approx 2.37$, so the composite band can be used for selective propagation through a localized environment.
  • Introducing a small phase offset $\Delta\phi\lesssim\pi/3$ localizes the composite band while the unpaired sector remains extended, demonstrating that the same microscopic lattice can support both ordering regimes.
  • Because the pair moves via weak $O(J^2/U_1)$ couplings, increasing $U_1$ widens the window in which extended pairs coexist with localized unpaired states; finite-size data for $L=34$ and $55$ show the hierarchy is stable.
  • Engineering a nearest-rung interleg interaction $U_2$ with $U_2/J=40$ produces a full extended-state-in-continuum phase for $1.56\lesssim h/J\lesssim 3.07$, with an extended composite band embedded within a localized unpaired continuum.
  • These results are all achieved within the same lattice Hamiltonian, so a single experimental setup could switch between composite-selective transport and pair confinement by tuning $\Delta\phi$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference beyond the paper: if the mechanism is the first-order cancellation rather than the complex phase $h$, a Hermitian ladder with opposite real potentials should show the same inversion as the potential amplitude is increased; this would separate the role of non-Hermiticity from the role of composite structure.
  • Inference beyond the paper: time-modulating $\Delta\phi$ between $0$ and $\pi/3$ should switch the same lattice between pair-extended and pair-localized regimes, providing a dynamical switch that the paper does not explicitly simulate.
  • Inference beyond the paper: the same configuration-space pathway suppression could be applied to composite excitations larger than pairs, such as rung trimers, where the virtual intermediate configurations are more numerous and the effective landscape may be even weaker or more tunable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a two-leg ladder of hard-core bosons with opposite complex quasiperiodic potentials, onsite same-rung repulsion U1, and a separate model with nearest-rung interaction U2. For antisymmetric leg potentials (Δϕ=0) the first-order potential on a same-rung pair cancels, so pair motion is generated by second-order virtual excursions into the unpaired sector; the resulting effective pair Hamiltonian is argued to be a much weaker non-Hermitian quasicrystal, allowing extended composite pairs to persist for h<h3 even when unpaired states have localized for h>h2. For finite Δϕ a direct first-order pair modulation is restored, which localizes the narrow pair band while the unpaired sector remains extended. In the U2 model, an engineered configuration-space barrier stabilizes an extended composite band embedded in a localized continuum (EIC). The main evidence is exact diagonalization of two-particle sectors for L=34 and L=55, the density inverse participation ratio (IPR) of right eigenvectors, and a second-order quasi-degenerate perturbation theory benchmarked against exact energies in Appendix B.

Significance. If the localization inversion is genuine, the paper makes a useful conceptual contribution: internal configuration is promoted from a passive label to a reversible control parameter for localization, and the EIC phase is an interesting inverse of the standard bound-state-in-the-continuum scenario. The analytic effective pair Hamiltonian of Eqs. (6)-(8) and Appendix B is a parameter-free, internally consistent derivation rather than a fit, and its energy spectra are benchmarked against exact diagonalization in Fig. 8. The paper also includes finite-size comparisons and a biorthogonal sector-weight check, although only for the U2/EIC model. The main weakness is that the central U1 phase diagram rests on a single localization diagnostic, the right-eigenvector density IPR, whose interpretation in a non-Hermitian system with non-orthogonal eigenvectors requires additional validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Eqs. (4)-(5) and Fig. 2] The paired/unpaired classification and the localization inversion in the U1 model are established entirely through the right-eigenvector density IPR defined in Eq. (4). Because H1 is non-Hermitian, the right eigenvectors can be nearly parallel near exceptional points, and the Hermitian density extracted from the right vector is not guaranteed to reflect the biorthogonal density ⟨L_m|n_j|R_m⟩/⟨L_m|R_m⟩; a state can appear extended in one diagnostic and localized in the other. The only biorthogonal check in the paper, Eq. (D1) in Appendix D, is applied to the U2/EIC model, not to the U1 model that carries the main inversion claim. Please repeat the IPR analysis with left-eigenvector or biorthogonal densities for the U1 model and show that the h2/h3 hierarchy and the phase diagrams in Figs. 2 and 3 are unchanged, or state explicitly why the right-vector density is the physically correct observable for this setup.
  2. [Appendix B, Fig. 8] The benchmark of the effective pair Hamiltonian compares only complex-energy spectra. The central claim, however, is about the spatial structure of paired eigenstates being extended while unpaired states are localized. Energy agreement does not validate that the effective model reproduces the eigenvectors or the IPRs of the paired manifold. Please benchmark the effective-model eigenstates against exact diagonalization for the pair-sector densities and IPRs, at least for the values of h used in Figs. 2 and 3 and near h3.
  3. [Appendix C and D, Figs. 9-10] The finite-size analysis is limited to L=34 and L=55, and the conclusion that the paired states are extended relies on the IPR decreasing with L over only two sizes. Since the two-particle Hilbert space has dimension ~L^2, L=89 or 144 is computationally accessible and would give a much stronger check of the L^{-1} scaling claimed in the text. The absence of such data weakens the identification of the extended composite phase, especially because finite-size effects can be severe near non-Hermitian transitions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References, ref. 39] The title of ref. 39 contains a typo: "Summetry" should be "Symmetry".
  2. [Appendix D, Eq. (D1)] The definition of |ϕ_j⟩ after Eq. (D1) is grammatically incomplete; add a period and complete the sentence before continuing with "Because this quantity can generally be complex".
  3. [Sec. III and IV, Eqs. (7) and (11)] The effective pair hopping J_eff_j is written in two apparently different forms in Eq. (7) and Eq. (11); they coincide for Δϕ=0, but the relation should be stated explicitly to avoid reader confusion.
  4. [Sec. V and Fig. 4] The vertical dashed lines in Fig. 4(a) are identified as h1 and h2 in the caption, but the text refers to "the onset of the full EIC phase" and "the crossover to the partial EIC regime"; please make the labeling consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the pair-sector effective Hamiltonian is derived from the microscopic model by a parameter-free second-order perturbative expansion and benchmarked against exact diagonalization; the central localization-inversion claims are diagnostics applied to the full model, not fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The effective pair Hamiltonian (Eqs. 6-8 for Delta phi = 0, Eqs. 11-14 for Delta phi != 0) is obtained by quasi-degenerate perturbation theory from the microscopic Hamiltonian H1 (Appendix B), with no free parameters fitted to the numerical IPR data. The first-order cancellation V a,j + V b,j = 0 for same-rung pairs is an algebraic identity from the antisymmetric potential definition (Eq. 2), not an assumed result. The subsequent comparison in Fig. 8 between exact diagonalization and the effective pair model is a validation of the perturbative approximation, not a de facto fit. The only external input is the single-chain critical point h_c = ln(2J/V) from Ref. [31] (Eq. A2), which is an independent published result and is used only as a reference point, not to define the claimed inversion. The paper does cite prior work by some of its own authors (e.g., Refs. [15, 23, 24, 28, 33]), but none of those citations carries the load-bearing argument; the mechanism is derived in this paper. The localization diagnostics (Eqs. 4-5) are observables evaluated on eigenstates of the full Hamiltonian; they are not constructed so that their output matches the paper's conclusions. Whether the right-eigenvector density IPR is the physically correct diagnostic in a non-Hermitian system is a correctness concern, not a circularity concern, and the paper does provide a biorthogonal sector-weight check for the EIC regime (Eq. D1). Therefore, no claim reduces to its inputs by construction, and no self-citation chain forces the result.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a perturbative effective Hamiltonian, a spectral separation assumption, and a specific non-Hermitian localization diagnostic. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The model parameters are control knobs rather than fitted values.

free parameters (1)
  • U1/J = 20 (and 50 in Appendix C) = 20, 50
    The strong-coupling interaction strength is chosen by hand to realize the regime U1 >> J, t, V under which the perturbation theory is derived. Appendix C shows the qualitative results persist and broaden with increasing U1, so the specific value is a regime choice rather than a fit to data.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Second-order quasi-degenerate perturbation theory with symmetrized energy denominators (Eq. B16) is valid for the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian H1.
    Used in Appendix B to derive the effective pair Hamiltonian. Non-Hermitian perturbation theory requires care near exceptional points, and the paper does not prove convergence or address the non-orthogonality of eigenstates in the expansion.
  • domain assumption The two-excitation Hilbert space splits into paired and unpaired sectors with negligible hybridization for U1 >> J, t, V.
    This spectral separation underlies the projection P and the derivation of the effective hopping and onsite energy in Eqs. 7-8 and B22-B23.
  • domain assumption Right-eigenvector density inverse participation ratio (Eq. 4) and biorthogonal pair weight (Eq. D1) reliably diagnose localization and pairing in non-Hermitian systems.
    The paper uses these diagnostics throughout. Non-orthogonality of eigenstates can make the norm in Eq. 4 small or unstable, and no alternative diagnostic is provided for comparison.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Composite-State Localization Beyond the External Landscape in Non-Hermitian Quasicrystals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EIO4XLK3

@misc{pith2026260808105,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Composite-State Localization Beyond the External Landscape in Non-Hermitian Quasicrystals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EIO4XLK3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08105}
}
read the original abstract

A composite excitation need not inherit the localization behavior of its constituents. We show that an interacting non-Hermitian quasiperiodic ladder realizes a controllable and reversible localization inversion between composite and unbound excitations, where internal configuration, rather than only the external potential, becomes a control parameter for localization. Opposite complex potentials on the two legs cancel at first order for a same-rung pair but act directly on separated particles, allowing extended composite states to persist while the unpaired sector becomes localized. A strong-coupling theory identifies the composite state as an emergent weakly modulated non-Hermitian quasicrystal generated by virtual unpaired configurations. Breaking the potential antisymmetry restores a direct modulation of the composite band and reverses the localization hierarchy. Engineering configuration-space pathways further stabilizes an extended composite band embedded within a localized continuum, the inverse of the conventional bound-state-in-the-continuum scenario. Our results establish internal configuration as a reversible control parameter for localization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08105 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Interacting non-Hermitian quasiperiodic ladder. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Evolution of the maximum (solid lines) and minimum (dashed lines) IPR of paired (light blue) and unpaired [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a,b) Localization-delocalization phase diagrams in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Localization and delocalization of single-chain non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Localization and delocalization of non-Hermitian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Localization and delocalization of non-Hermitian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Comparison between exact diagonalization (red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Finite-size robustness of the configuration-selective localization regime with extended composite pairs and localized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Finite-size characterization of the extended composite band embedded within a localized unpaired continuum. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author P. W. \ Anderson ,\ title title Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices , \ 10.1103/PhysRev.109.1492 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 109 ,\ pages 1492 ( year 1958 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrev.109.1492 1958

  2. [2]

    author author F. S. \ Pierce , author S. J. \ Poon , \ and\ author Q. Guo ,\ title title Electron localization in metallic quasicrystals , \ 10.1126/science.261.5122.737 journal journal Science \ volume 261 ,\ pages 737 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1126/science.261.5122.737

  3. [3]

    Lahini , author R

    author author Y. Lahini , author R. Pugatch , author F. Pozzi , author M. Sorel , author R. Morandotti , author N. Davidson , \ and\ author Y. Silberberg ,\ title title Observation of a localization transition in quasiperiodic photonic lattices , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.013901 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 103 ,\ pages 013901 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.013901

  4. [4]

    author author D. J. \ Thouless ,\ title title Electrons in disordered systems and the theory of localization , \ 10.1016/0370-1573(74)90029-5 journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 93 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(74)90029-5 1974

  5. [5]

    Winkler , author G

    author author K. Winkler , author G. Thalhammer , author F. Lang , author R. Grimm , author J. Hecker Denschlag , author A. J. \ Daley , author A. Kantian , author H. P. \ B\" u chler , \ and\ author P. Zoller ,\ title title Repulsively bound atom pairs in an optical lattice , \ 10.1038/nature04918 journal journal Nature \ volume 441 ,\ pages 853 ( year 2...

    doi:10.1038/nature04918

  6. [6]

    author author D. L. \ Shepelyansky ,\ title title Coherent propagation of two interacting particles in a random potential , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2607 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 73 ,\ pages 2607 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.73.2607 1994

  7. [7]

    Levine \ and\ author Paul J

    author author D. Levine \ and\ author Paul J. \ Steinhardt ,\ title title Quasicrystals: A new class of ordered structures , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2477 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 53 ,\ pages 2477 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.2477

  8. [8]

    Goblot , author A

    author author V. Goblot , author A. Štrkalj , author N. Pernet , author J. L. \ Lado , author C. Dorow , author A. Lemaître , author L. Le Gratiet , author A. Harouri , author I. Sagnes , author S. Ravets , author A. Amo , author J. Bloch , \ and\ author O. Zilberberg ,\ title title Emergence of criticality through a cascade of delocalization transitions ...

    doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0908-7

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Wang , author X

    author author Y. Wang , author X. Xia , author L. Zhang , author H. Yao , author S. Chen , author J. You , author Q. Zhou , \ and\ author X.-J. \ Liu ,\ title title One-dimensional quasiperiodic mosaic lattice with exact mobility edges , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.196604 journa...

    doi

  2. [10]

    Wang , author L

    author author Y. Wang , author L. Zhang , author W. Sun , author T.-F. J. \ Poon , \ and\ author X.-J. \ Liu ,\ title title Quantum phase with coexisting localized, extended, and critical zones , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.L140203 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 106 ,\ pages...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Wang , author Q

    author author P. Wang , author Q. Fu , author V. V. \ Konotop , author Y. V. \ Kartashov , \ and\ author F. Ye ,\ title title Observation of localization of light in linear photonic quasicrystals with diverse rotational symmetries , \ 10.1038/s41566-023-01350-6 journal journal...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Yao \ and\ author Z

    author author S. Yao \ and\ author Z. Wang ,\ title title Edge states and topological invariants of non- H ermitian systems , \ https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.086803 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 086803 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  5. [13]

    Yokomizo \ and\ author S

    author author K. Yokomizo \ and\ author S. Murakami ,\ title title Non- B loch band theory of non- H ermitian systems , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.066404 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 123 ,\ pages 066404 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  6. [14]

    Zhang , author Z

    author author K. Zhang , author Z. Yang , \ and\ author C. Fang ,\ title title Correspondence between winding numbers and skin modes in non- H ermitian systems , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.126402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 125 ,\ pages 126402 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  7. [15]

    Liu , author Y.-R

    author author T. Liu , author Y.-R. \ Zhang , author Q. Ai , author Z. Gong , author K. Kawabata , author M. Ueda , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Second-order topological phases in non- H ermitian systems , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.076801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Let...

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author F. K. \ Kunst , author E. Edvardsson , author J. C. \ Budich , \ and\ author E. J. \ Bergholtz ,\ title title Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence in non- H ermitian systems , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.026808 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 121 ,\ ...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Leefmans , author A

    author author C. Leefmans , author A. Dutt , author J. Williams , author L. Yuan , author M. Parto , author F. Nori , author S. Fan , \ and\ author A. Marandi ,\ title title Topological dissipation in a time-multiplexed photonic resonator network , \ 10.1038/s41567-021-01492-w...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Gong , author Y

    author author Z. Gong , author Y. Ashida , author K. Kawabata , author K. Takasan , author S. Higashikawa , \ and\ author M. Ueda ,\ title title Topological phases of non- H ermitian systems , \ https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031079 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ ...

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author C. H. \ Lee , author L. Li , \ and\ author J. Gong ,\ title title Hybrid higher-order skin-topological modes in nonreciprocal systems , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.016805 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 123 ,\ pages 016805 ( year 2019 a ) NoStop

    doi

  12. [20]

    author author J. Y. \ Lee , author J. Ahn , author H. Zhou , \ and\ author A. Vishwanath ,\ title title Topological correspondence between H ermitian and non- H ermitian systems: A nomalous dynamics , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.206404 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 1...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Kawabata , author K

    author author K. Kawabata , author K. Shiozaki , author M. Ueda , \ and\ author M. Sato ,\ title title Symmetry and topology in non- H ermitian physics , \ 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041015 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 9 ,\ pages 041015 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  14. [22]

    Okuma , author K

    author author N. Okuma , author K. Kawabata , author K. Shiozaki , \ and\ author M. Sato ,\ title title Topological origin of non- H ermitian skin effects , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.086801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 124 ,\ pages 086801 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [23]

    Liu , author J

    author author T. Liu , author J. J. \ He , author Z. Yang , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Higher-order W eyl-exceptional-ring semimetals , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.196801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 127 ,\ pages 196801 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  16. [24]

    \ Cai , author Y

    author author Z.-F. \ Cai , author Y. Li , author Y.-R. \ Zhang , author X. Wei , author Z. Yang , author T. Liu , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Arbitrary control of non- H ermitian skin modes via disorder and an electric field , \ 10.1103/zf4k-ytgt journal journal Phys...

    doi

  17. [25]

    Li \ and\ author Y

    author author K. Li \ and\ author Y. Xu ,\ title title Non- H ermitian absorption spectroscopy , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.093001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 129 ,\ pages 093001 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    Kawabata \ and\ author D

    author author K. Kawabata \ and\ author D. Nakamura ,\ title title Hopf bifurcation of nonlinear non- H ermitian skin effect , \ 10.1103/vxgf-59xt journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 135 ,\ pages 126610 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  19. [27]

    Wu , author Y

    author author J. Wu , author Y. Hu , author Z. He , author K. Deng , author X. Huang , author M. Ke , author W. Deng , author J. Lu , \ and\ author Z. Liu ,\ title title Hybrid-order skin effect from loss-induced nonreciprocity , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.176601 journal journa...

    doi

  20. [28]

    \ Jin , author J

    author author W.-W. \ Jin , author J. Liu , author X. Wang , author Y.-R. \ Zhang , author X. Huang , author X. Wei , author W. Ju , author Z. Yang , author T. Liu , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Anderson delocalization in strongly coupled disordered non- H ermitian cha...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Jiang , author L.-J

    author author H. Jiang , author L.-J. \ Lang , author C. Yang , author S.-L. \ Zhu , \ and\ author S. Chen ,\ title title Interplay of non- H ermitian skin effects and A nderson localization in nonreciprocal quasiperiodic lattices , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.054301 journal journa...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Liu , author X.-P

    author author Y. Liu , author X.-P. \ Jiang , author J. Cao , \ and\ author S. Chen ,\ title title Non- H ermitian mobility edges in one-dimensional quasicrystals with parity-time symmetry , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.174205 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 101 ,\ pages 17420...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Longhi ,\ title title Topological phase transition in non- H ermitian quasicrystals , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.237601 journal journal Phys

    author author S. Longhi ,\ title title Topological phase transition in non- H ermitian quasicrystals , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.237601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 122 ,\ pages 237601 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    \ Tang , author G.-Q

    author author L.-Z. \ Tang , author G.-Q. \ Zhang , author L.-F. \ Zhang , \ and\ author D.-W. \ Zhang ,\ title title Localization and topological transitions in non- H ermitian quasiperiodic lattices , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.033325 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 103 ,\...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Liu , author H

    author author T. Liu , author H. Guo , author Y. Pu , \ and\ author S. Longhi ,\ title title Generalized Aubry-Andr\'e self-duality and mobility edges in non- H ermitian quasiperiodic lattices , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.024205 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 102 ,\ pages 0...

    doi

  26. [34]

    Weidemann , author M

    author author S. Weidemann , author M. Kremer , author S. Longhi , \ and\ author A. Szameit ,\ title title Topological triple phase transition in non- H ermitian F loquet quasicrystals , \ 10.1038/s41586-021-04253-0 journal journal Nature \ volume 601 ,\ pages 354 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi

  27. [35]

    Lin , author T

    author author Q. Lin , author T. Li , author L. Xiao , author K. Wang , author W. Yi , \ and\ author P. Xue ,\ title title Observation of non- H ermitian topological A nderson insulator in quantum dynamics , \ 10.1038/s41467-022-30938-9 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 13...

    doi

  28. [36]

    Lin , author C

    author author Q. Lin , author C. Cedzich , author Q. Zhou , \ and\ author P. Xue ,\ title title Observation of metal-insulator and spectral phase transitions in Aubry-Andr\'e-Harper models , \ 10.1103/tz2n-lqxx journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 136 ,\ pages 206602 ( ye...

    doi

  29. [37]

    Liu \ and\ author S

    author author Y. Liu \ and\ author S. Chen ,\ title title Fate of two-particle bound states in the continuum in non- H ermitian systems , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.193001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 133 ,\ pages 193001 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  30. [38]

    Huang , author Y

    author author B. Huang , author Y. Ke , author H. Zhong , author Y. S. \ Kivshar , \ and\ author C. Lee ,\ title title Interaction-induced multiparticle bound states in the continuum , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.140202 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 133 ,\ pages 1402...

    doi

  31. [39]

    author author G. L. \ Bir \ and\ author G. Pikus ,\ @noop title Summetry and Strain-Induced Effects in Semiconductors \ ( publisher Keter, Jerusalem ,\ year 1974 ) NoStop

    1974

  32. [40]

    Cohen-Tannoudji , author J

    author author C. Cohen-Tannoudji , author J. Dupont-Roc , \ and\ author G. Grynberg ,\ @noop title Atom-Photon Interactions \ ( publisher John Wiley and Sons ,\ year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.