REVIEW 4 cited by
Pade Theory applied to the vacuum polarization of a heavy quark
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The vacuum polarization of a quark, when considered in terms of the external momentum q^2, is a function of the Stieltjes type. Consequently, the mathematical theory of Pade Approximants assures that the full function, at any finite value of q^2 away from the physical cut, can be reconstructed from its low-energy power expansion around q^2=0. We illustrate this point by applying this theory to the vacuum polarization of a heavy quark and obtain the value of the constant K^(2) governing the threshold expansion at order O(alpha_s^2).
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Analytically Consistent Reconstruction of Finite Data Using Pad\'e Sequences
Tracking how spurious pole-zero pairs move across Padé approximation orders lets an iterative algorithm flag inconsistent data points and reconstruct the underlying function while preserving genuine analytic structures.
-
Reconstruction of Gravitational Form Factors using Generative Machine Learning
A diffusion model trained on synthetic physics-motivated curves reconstructs the proton's A(t), J(t), D(t) from sparse data, extracting c8=-4.6±0.8, c9=-0.61±0.19, and D(0)=-4.3±0.8.
-
Lepton anomalous magnetic moments: Theory
The paper provides an overview of theoretical calculations for lepton anomalous magnetic moments arising from quantum corrections in the Standard Model.
-
The role of Pad\'e and D-Log Pad\'e approximants in the context of the MUonE Experiment
Pade and D-Log approximants recover the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment from simulated MUonE data to within 0.06%.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.