REVIEW 1 cited by
Nonanalyticity of circuit complexity across topological phase transitions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The presence of nonanalyticity in observables is a manifestation of phase transitions. Through the study of two paradigmatic topological models in one and two dimensions, in this work we show that the circuit complexity based on our specific quantification can reveal the occurrence of topological phase transitions, both in and out of equilibrium, by the presence of nonanalyticity. By quenching the system out of equilibrium, we find that the circuit complexity grows linearly or quadratically in the short-time regime if the quench is finished instantaneously or in a finite time, respectively. Notably, we find that for both the sudden quench and the finite-time quench, a topological phase transition in the pre-quench Hamiltonian will be manifested by the presence of nonanalyticity in the first-order or second-order derivative of circuit complexity with respect to time in the short-time regime, and a topological phase transition in the post-quench Hamiltonian will be manifested by the presence of nonanalyticity in the steady value of circuit complexity in the long-time regime. We also show that the increase of dimension does not remove, but only weakens the nonanalyticity of circuit complexity. Our findings can be tested in quantum simulators and cold-atom systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Time dependence of complexity for Lovelock black holes
For Lovelock black holes, the Complexity=Action growth rate at late times is a coupling-independent multiple of the mass, and the Schwarzschild limit is recovered only up to a constant under the authors' boundary-term...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.