REVIEW 2 cited by
Predictions for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay in the 3+1 Sterile Neutrino Scenario
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present accurate predictions of the effective Majorana mass $|m_{\beta\beta}|$ in neutrinoless double-$\beta$ decay in the standard case of $3\nu$ mixing and in the case of 3+1 neutrino mixing indicated by the reactor, Gallium and LSND anomalies. We have taken into account the uncertainties of the neutrino mixing parameters determined by oscillation experiments. It is shown that the predictions for $|m_{\beta\beta}|$ in the cases of $3\nu$ and 3+1 mixing are quite different, in agreement with previous discussions in the literature, and that future measurements of neutrinoless double-$\beta$ decay and of the effective light neutrino mass in $\beta$ decay or the total mass of the three lightest neutrinos in cosmological experiments may distinguish the $3\nu$ and 3+1 cases if the mass ordering is determined by oscillation experiments. We also present a relatively simple method to determine the minimum value of $|m_{\beta\beta}|$ in the general case of $N$-neutrino mixing.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Neutrinoless double beta decay with light sterile neutrinos: the contact terms
The short-range nuclear contact term in neutrinoless double beta decay depends on sterile neutrino mass more strongly than previously assumed, lengthening predicted half-lives by up to about a factor of six.
-
Effective Matter Flavor Conversion Mediated by Pseudo-Sterile States as the Possible Origin of Neutrino Oscillation Anomalies
A sterile neutrino with a novel density-dependent matter potential Vs resolves multiple oscillation anomalies when Vs is negative and mixing angles are small.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.