REVIEW 1 cited by
Dataset Geography: Mapping Language Data to Language Users
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Dataset Geography: Mapping Language Data to Language Users
read the original abstract
As language technologies become more ubiquitous, there are increasing efforts towards expanding the language diversity and coverage of natural language processing (NLP) systems. Arguably, the most important factor influencing the quality of modern NLP systems is data availability. In this work, we study the geographical representativeness of NLP datasets, aiming to quantify if and by how much do NLP datasets match the expected needs of the language speakers. In doing so, we use entity recognition and linking systems, also making important observations about their cross-lingual consistency and giving suggestions for more robust evaluation. Last, we explore some geographical and economic factors that may explain the observed dataset distributions. Code and data are available here: https://github.com/ffaisal93/dataset_geography. Additional visualizations are available here: https://nlp.cs.gmu.edu/project/datasetmaps/.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bridging Cultural Distance Between Models Default and Local Classroom Demands: How Global Teachers Adopt GenAI to Support Everyday Teaching Practices
Teachers' experiences with generative AI cluster into low, mid, and high cultural distance, defined by how much adaptation work teachers must do.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.