REVIEW 2 cited by
Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper is a study of fine-tuning of BERT contextual representations, with focus on commonly observed instabilities in few-sample scenarios. We identify several factors that cause this instability: the common use of a non-standard optimization method with biased gradient estimation; the limited applicability of significant parts of the BERT network for down-stream tasks; and the prevalent practice of using a pre-determined, and small number of training iterations. We empirically test the impact of these factors, and identify alternative practices that resolve the commonly observed instability of the process. In light of these observations, we re-visit recently proposed methods to improve few-sample fine-tuning with BERT and re-evaluate their effectiveness. Generally, we observe the impact of these methods diminishes significantly with our modified process.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
PARA: Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning with Prompt Aware Representation Adjustment
PARA generates prompt-conditioned scaling vectors for Q, V, and FFN activations, outperforming (IA)^3 and LoRA-style baselines on several benchmarks with similar parameter counts and lower multi-tenant inference latency.
-
Open Foundation Models in Healthcare: Challenges, Paradoxes, and Opportunities with GenAI Driven Personalized Prescription
Open LLMs (LLaMA-2, LLaMA-3, Mistral, Meditron) roughly match GPT-4 on a 25-patient prescription-suitability check when given SmPC context via RAG, though some interaction classes degrade with RAG.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.