REVIEW 12 cited by
Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We assess the tendency of state-of-the-art object recognition models to depend on signals from image backgrounds. We create a toolkit for disentangling foreground and background signal on ImageNet images, and find that (a) models can achieve non-trivial accuracy by relying on the background alone, (b) models often misclassify images even in the presence of correctly classified foregrounds--up to 87.5% of the time with adversarially chosen backgrounds, and (c) more accurate models tend to depend on backgrounds less. Our analysis of backgrounds brings us closer to understanding which correlations machine learning models use, and how they determine models' out of distribution performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 12 Pith papers
-
Detectors Learn the Wrong Thing: Shortcut-Resistant Adversarial Training Against Physically Realizable Attacks
InsCAT adds a contrastive loss that aligns adversarially clothed people with clean people and pushes away from texture-only images, reducing texture false positives from 46.9% to 7.3% while lifting average attack AP to 82.3%.
-
R3G: A Reasoning-Retrieval-Reranking Framework for Vision-Centric Answer Generation
R3G improves vision-centric VQA by generating a reasoning plan before retrieval and reranking candidate images with an MLLM judge on relevance, target match, and answerability.
-
AIM: Amending Inherent Interpretability via Self-Supervised Masking
AIM uses multi-stage feature guidance for self-supervised masking to improve both interpretability (EPG) and accuracy on vision benchmarks.
-
Shortcut Learning in Generalist Robot Policies: The Role of Dataset Diversity and Fragmentation
Low within-subdataset diversity and large between-subdataset differences cause shortcut learning in generalist robot policies, and targeted augmentation can mitigate it.
-
Decouple before Align: Visual Disentanglement Enhances Prompt Tuning
Decoupling images into foreground and background before aligning them with text improves CLIP prompt tuning on few-shot and generalization benchmarks.
-
Language-Unlocked ViT (LUViT): Empowering Self-Supervised Vision Transformers with LLMs
LUViT jointly pretrains a ViT with masked auto-encoding and LoRA adapters in a frozen LLM block, reporting +0.4% ImageNet-1K accuracy and up to +2.2% on ImageNet-A over its own MAE baseline.
-
Point Cloud Recombination: Systematic Real Data Augmentation Using Robotic Targets for LiDAR Perception Validation
A method to insert physically measured 3D point clouds of humanoid targets into real LiDAR scenes, using registered meshes to model occlusion, is shown to produce scenes geometrically close to real sensor scans.
-
Low-Biased General Annotated Dataset Generation
A CLIP-aligned, diffusion-generated 'low-biased' ImageNet improves backbone pre-training transfer accuracy and reduces shape, context, and background biases relative to real ImageNet and earlier synthetic datasets.
-
Bringing the Context Back into Object Recognition, Robustly
Localizing the foreground before classification and fusing its classifier output with the full-image prediction improves accuracy and robustness to background shifts in supervised and zero-shot VLM recognition.
-
SPARSE Data, Rich Results: Few-Shot Semi-Supervised Learning via Class-Conditioned Image Translation
A GAN framework that translates unlabeled medical images between classes and fuses ensemble, time-averaged pseudo-labels outperforms six prior GAN semi-supervised methods on MedMNIST at 5-50 labels per class.
-
Paint Outside the Box: Synthesizing and Selecting Training Data for Visual Grounding
POBF paints new backgrounds around preserved objects to synthesize visual-grounding training data and filters those samples with teacher-model scores, improving accuracy by 5.83% over real-only training.
-
Explainability for Vision Foundation Models: A Survey
A structured review of 122 papers on explainability for vision foundation models, with a taxonomy and the finding that quantitative evaluation is rare (36%).
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.