REVIEW 2 cited by
The VECRO hypothesis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We consider three fundamental issues in quantum gravity: (a) the black hole information paradox (b) the unboundedness of entropy that can be stored inside a black hole horizon (c) the relation between the black hole horizon and the cosmological horizon. With help from the small corrections theorem, we convert each of these issues into a sharp conflict. We then argue that all three conflicts can be resolved by the following hypothesis: {\it the vacuum wavefunctional of quantum gravity contains a `vecro' component made of virtual fluctuations of configurations of the same type that arise in the fuzzball structure of black hole microstates}. Further, if we assume that causality holds to leading order in gently curved spacetime, then we {\it must} have such a vecro component in order to resolve the above conflicts. The term vecro stands for `Virtual Extended Compression-Resistant Objects', and characterizes the nature of the vacuum fluctuations that resolve the puzzles. It is interesting that puzzle (c) may relate the role of quantum gravity in black holes to observations in the sky.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Macroscopic Black-Hole Remnants in a Nonlocal Field Theory: Towards Hawking Radiation in SFT
In a smeared massless scalar on dynamical black hole, outgoing particle number drops to zero after scrambling time due to SFT nonlocality, implying macroscopic remnant.
-
Space cannot stretch too {\it fast}
The essay proposes that fast stretching of space releases energy stored in vacuum entanglements left by virtual black hole microstates, resolving the information paradox and yielding dark energy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.